Bangladeshi-origin writer Faria Basher is the Asia winner of the 2025 Commonwealth Short Story Prize
The regional winners are Joshua Lubwama from Uganda (Africa), Faria Basher from Bangladesh (Asia), Chanel Sutherland from Canada/Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (Canada and Europe), Subraj Singh from Guyana (Caribbean), and Kathleen Ridgwell from Australia (Pacific). The overall winner will be announced on June 25.
Basher is the first Bangladeshi-origin writer to win the regional Prize. She holds a bachelor's degree from the University of Edinburgh and a master's degree from New York University.
Taking the reader from a surf shack in Australia to a village in Guyana on the eve of independence, the stories tackle powerful themes head-on. The stories present the clash between generations as a boy's illiterate mother fears and resents the unconventional newcomer; the lost memories of enslaved Africans for whom storytelling is their final act of defiance; the legacy of colonialism reflected in a demon that threatens to prey on a young baby; the pressures on young women in their twenties to get married and rear children – or face dire consequences; and how two young people form an unlikely friendship in the face of racism and family pressure.
Chair of the Judges, Vilsoni Hereniko, said, 'These stories illuminate many aspects of human nature and demonstrate true mastery of the short story form. Each tale shows that geography matters in storytelling. They are works of fiction that are inseparable from the local culture and history from which they have sprung…'
The winning stories are:
Africa: 'Mothers Not Appearing in Search' by Joshua Lubwama (Uganda). Against his mother's wishes, a young boy befriends a woman who has recently moved into the neighbourhood.
Asia: 'An Eye and a Leg' by Faria Basher (Bangladesh). A darkly humorous and surreal take on the trope of the 'expiring' South Asian woman, with touches of the macabre.
Canada and Europe: 'Descend' by Chanel Sutherland (Canada/Saint Vincent and the Grenadines). As a slave ship sinks, enslaved Africans share their life stories. Their voices rise in defiance, illuminating memory, resilience and hope.
Caribbean: 'Margot's Run' by Subraj Singh (Guyana)/ A new mother ventures into the night to protect her child from a bloodthirsty creature.
Pacific: 'Crab Sticks and Lobster Rolls' by Kathleen Ridgwell (Australia). An Aboriginal boy sees himself as a crab stick – cheap, artificial, misrepresented. Through a forbidden relationship with a non-Indigenous girl, he comes to see his true value: a gilgie, authentic and deeply rooted in Country.
The Commonwealth Short Story Prize is awarded annually for the best piece of unpublished short fiction from any of the Commonwealth's 56 member countries. In addition to English, submissions are accepted in Bengali, Chinese, Creole, French, Greek, Malay, Maltese, Portuguese, Samoan, Swahili, Tamil, and Turkish.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
a day ago
- Scroll.in
‘A backdrop of geological time': Gurnaik Johal on why his novel has the river Saraswati in it
Gurnaik Johal is a writer from West London. His 2022 short story collection, We Move, won the Somerset Maugham Award and the Tata Literature Live! Prize. Its opening story won the Galley Beggar Short Story Prize. Saraswati, his debut novel, was published recently by Serpent's Tail in the UK and Hachette in the Indian subcontinent. It was shortlisted for the 2025 Waterstones Debut Fiction Prize. The novel follows the mythical river of Saraswati through what is now Northern India. But when Satnam arrives in his ancestral village for his grandmother's funeral, he is astonished to find water in the long-dry well behind her house. The discovery sets in motion a contentious scheme to unearth the lost river and build a gleaming new city on its banks, and Satnam – adrift from his job, girlfriend and flat back in London – soon finds himself swept up in this ferment of Hindu nationalist pride. As the river alters Satnam's course, so it reveals buried ties to six distant relatives scattered across the globe – from an ambitious writer with her eye on legacy to a Kenyan archaeologist to a Bollywood stunt double – who are brought together in a rapidly changing India. In a conversation with Scroll, Johal talked about how he found the novel's voice, created his characters, and addressed the tension between inherited memory and lived reality. Excerpts from the interview: Many congratulations on your excellent debut novel! Right off, I'm quite curious to know if you began this story with a central thread or if you first collected the voices, let them speak, and only later noticed how they echoed across continents and generations? Thank you! The main structure of the book was in place very early in the writing process – from the start, I knew I'd be following seven different characters who were each distantly related to one another. What came as a surprise in the writing was that we would also get access to the story of these characters' two common ancestors. Following the historical love story of that one couple, which I think in a sense is now the heart of the book, was a lot of fun. In the online space, I noticed many people (including reviews) have drawn parallels between your writing and that of David Mitchell, Zadie Smith, and the like. But your writing also has this quiet wit and humour in surprising places and restraint in other parts that feel very much your own. On that, could you share more on what shaped the tone of Saraswati for you? Are there any writers or books in particular you found yourself returning to while writing it, and drew inspiration? I drew influences from far and wide, and one that comes to mind now is the films of Werner Herzog. Aguirre, the Wrath of God and Fitzcarraldo are stories of rivers, colonialism and madness, and resonated very strongly with what I was trying to achieve. I remember returning to some sequences in Aguirre several times in the writing process, and the opening music of the film was part of a roster of songs I'd often play to get into the mood to write. More often than not, professions like eco-activists, entomologists, and archaeologists are written with more symbolic weight than emotional intimacy. How did you resist that tendency and ensure these characters remained complex and breathing individuals rather than devices for moving the narrative forward? Also, what kind of research went into it to bring these characters to life aptly? My starting place for characters is always seeing them as real people. I'm interested in character-led fiction and so it would probably go against the impulses from where my imagination comes from to see them as devices for advancing plot. Often, the process of trying to ensure I make them well-rounded people begins with trying to think of what an average day looks like in their life, outside of the confines of my plot – what music do they listen to, how do they commute to work, what do they pack for lunch… The main character, Satnam and his journey, from disaffection to reluctant involvement, reflect a generational drift many readers may recognise if not relate deeply. What interested you most in exploring that tension between inherited memory and lived reality? And how consciously did you weave it into the novel's architecture? Like many characters in the novel, Satnam manages to find a stable identity by looking backwards rather than forwards. You're right to pull out that he's adrift in life, and he derives meaning from his family history and from a connection to their ancestral land. I hope there's space in the novel for this to be seen as both a good and a bad thing – we need origin stories to help tell us who we are, but they needn't wholly define us. The book layers modern India with future speculations and ancient myths. How do you see fiction's role in imagining timelines that don't sit comfortably within linear history, especially in a country like India, where the past is often politicised in the service of the present by everyone around? Sometimes I wonder if the reason we make art, whether that's fiction, music or film, is that these forms allow us to play with time in a way we can't in real life. In reality, time is a constant, but in a book, in a song, in a film, it's something we can speed up or slow down. I wanted to layer different timelines on top of one another in the novel, we get a present story that pushes forward into the future, we get a colonial-era story, and an ancient one, too. I was also interested in showing human stories against a backdrop of geological time – the timeline of a river is vastly different to that of a human life. Staying on the topic from before, your story weaves modern India with future speculation and ancient myth. What can fiction do with timelines that don't sit comfortably in linear history, especially in a country like ours where the past is constantly being repurposed for present-day politics? Linear history is a concept I found becoming more complicated as I worked on the book. For example, the characters in the late 19th century feel the effects of water scarcity, which is something that then returns on a larger scale in the imagined present. If you removed the dates from those historical chapters, one might be able to read them as set in a future after the events in the present day. And finally, what is your view on the idea of 'diaspora fiction' in the current literary landscape? Is it a label that still has any generative potential, or is it something a book like Saraswati ultimately tries to move beyond and break free? The diasporic element in the novel is one among many, and if readers find the book through it being part of that tradition, then I welcome it, but I can't say it was something I had in mind while writing. I do think there will long be generative potential in writing about migration – our common story, all the way back to the first people, is one of movement and change.
Scroll.in
2 days ago
- Scroll.in
In FTII memory project A Room Of Our Own, a reminder that women were there too
An act of demolition served as one of the building blocks of a digital memory project on the Film and Television Institute of India's female graduates. A separate act of erasure spurred the project, titled A Room Of Our Own and initiated by FTII alum Reena Mohan, Bina Paul and Surabhi Sharma. A few year ago, the girls' hostel at the Pune institute was torn down and replaced by another structure. The hostel's residents swapped old photographs and reminiscences about their time there. In 2021, the institute commissioned Being FTII, a commemorative volume comprising essays by some of the institute's best-known alumni – nearly all of them men. The following year, FTII alum Gargi D Chakraborty put together the anthology Balancing The Wisdom Tree. The book comprises information on all the women who had studied at the institute until 2022 as well as essays and interviews with some of the graduates. She was there too – this basic and yet overlooked truth is one of the ideas driving A Room Of Our Own. How did the women react to living away from home, hostel life and the FTII campus itself? How were their creative journeys shaped by male-dominated classrooms and faculties? These are some of the questions that A Room Of Our Own seeks to answer. According to the project's mission statement, 'By excavating personal memories, documenting oral histories and re-presenting photographs from private collections that capture our time as students, we foreground a collective gendered experience that seeks to overturn conventional histories of cinema.' The work-in-progress project includes clips from online interviews with over 50 women, photographs and short videos made by some of the alumni. The subjects include Payal Kapadia, Jabeen Merchant, Batul Mukhtiar, Putul Mahmood and Hemant Sarkar. The founders will be recording more interviews. The project's title is a reference to the writer Virginia Woolf's famous observation, 'A woman must have money and a room of her own if she is to write fiction.' The objective isn't nostalgia, said Bina Paul, editor, filmmaker and festival programmer from the 1983 batch. Out of the 6,000-odd graduates from FTII since its inception in 1960, approximately 600 are women. A Room Of Our Own explores 'the history that belongs to that physical space, which transcended the space and became a space for all of us in terms of discovery and growth', Paul pointed out. 'There were these great institutions set up in the 1960s,' she added. 'But there has been no examination of how these institutions have contributed to the women graduates. We were keen to see how women are placed in not only in Indian cinema history but also in institutional history.' The project is funded by New York University's Abu Dhabi campus. 'Many of us had a room that was not monitored by anybody for the first time in our lives,' observed Sharma, who is Program Head, Film and New Media and Associate Professor of Practice of Film and New Media at NYU Abu Dhabi. 'What did the space mean in our trajectory of learning filmmaking, becoming artists and imagining the industry?' In her film for the archival project, editor and filmmaker Batul Mukhtiar says, 'When someone says what community do you belong to, can I say FTII? But when all the markers of the landscapes we once knew change, how do we still feel belonging?' Parvati Menon, the earliest female student to be enrolled in 1965, calls herself 'the first of my species'. In the short film Menon contributed to the project, she talks about pursuing her training exercises while dressed in a sari. Menon also interviews Lakshmi Murari, the wife of FTII's principal Jagat Murari, who speaks of the wonderment caused by Menon's presence. Among the subjects is the hostel's long-serving matron Gloria Koshy, who is described by her interviewer Sameera Jain as 'part friend, part warden, part mother figure'. Koshy was initially 'shocked and upset' by the female students, but was then reminded by her husband that 'you are not teaching Sunday school'. Surabhi Sharma says about Koshy, who was the matron from 1982 to 2012, 'Gloria treated us as adults with agency. There was this tacit understanding that you are adults, I am available whenever you need me but I am not here for surveillance or scrutiny. So in a sense that conceptual idea of a room of our own where we have complete control was really the critical starting point for this exploration.' Although committed to encouraging female enrolment, FTII hasn't always been hospitable to women, the founders told Scroll. As various ex-students began talking to Mohan, Paul and Sharma, repressed memories of sexist behaviour and unfair treatment emerged. Editor and filmmaker Reena Mohan, who graduated in 1982, was one of two female students in her batch. 'There were a total of seven girls in the hostel and around hundred boys on the campus,' Mohan recalled. 'Initially, it was fun. It was about being on my own. It was about exploring a new medium.' The film school's women-unfriendly culture soon caught up with Mohan, she says. 'The faculty and my classmates and the boys in generally may not have been actively hostile, but it was ultimately a boys club,' she observed. 'You were constantly having to prove yourself or fight for space to say what you wanted to say.' Sexism could present itself at the entry level itself. Bina Paul gives the example of the filmmaker and educationist Chandita Mukherjee, who died in 2023. 'In her interview, Chandita talks about the fact that when she applied to the institute, she was discouraged by the panel interviewing her,' Paul said. 'This is the case even until a few years ago. Women are told, why do you want to study cinematography, let the boys study it. You will anyway get married and go away. This kind of misogyny is often not acknowledged at all.' To compound matters, students in previous years were rarely presented with female role models, Paul added. 'The whole parallel cinema movement was about men making films about women,' Paul said. 'There were no women teachers, very little female presence. So the conversations we tried to have were about how the women tried to find their voices, what was their relationship to cinema and technology, what were the collaborations that the institute afforded.' By the time Surabhi Sharma enrolled in 1996, the situation had improved – on the surface. 'My cohort was quite unique because ours was the first batch and perhaps the last batch to have so many women, especially in direction,' Sharma said. Seven out of the 10 Indian students were women. There were women in the sound, cinematography and editing departments too. 'It was extraordinary – so much so that two senior male students actually got drunk one night and stood outside the girls' hostel wailing that Indian cinema was dead,' Sharma recalled. 'The chaos that our presence was creating pumped all of us with a lot of confidence and bravado.' Among the biggest realisations for Sharma was how women blindly absorb the notion that filmmaking is free of gender considerations. 'What was interesting to me then and became even more apparent through this project was the ways in which one refused to identify oneself in terms of gender,' Sharma said. 'While the idea was not to be one of the boys, as a filmmaker one wanted to be genderless, without taking into account that one's experience of the world itself is gendered.' The FTII faculty and administration were 'not interested in this search or quest', Sharma added. 'But between us women, we were having these conversations and making the connections, thanks to people like Gloria Koshy and alumni like Reena Mohan, Vasudha Joshi and Deepa Dhanraj.' The proposal for A Room of Our Own was initiated in 2019. The initial idea was to conduct in-person conversations. When the coronavirus pandemic hit in 2020, the interviews moved online. 'The pandemic opened up another opportunity – by 2022, we completed almost 55 interviews, sometimes with individuals, sometimes with groups, and almost entirely with the three of us together,' Sharma said. While the interviewers followed a list of specific questions, they also kept the conversations free-flowing. 'The less structured the process was, the freer it became,' Reena Mohan said. 'Some of the women were acknowledging or voicing their thoughts even to themselves for the first time.' The conversations reveal commonalities but divergences too. There are testimonials about casual sexism as well as a sense of liberation, Sharma said. 'The idea is to bring out a collective experience that is not necessarily following one thread, but allows for conflicting threads to come together,' she added. 'An experience in 1972 might be reflected in the experience of somebody in 2015. Or two people in 1998 have the exact opposite experience at the same time.' The women who weather FTII often find that the world beyond the institute's gates is equally unwelcoming. In this sense, A Room Of Our Own isn't just about the campus experience, but also about how film industries treat female professionals. 'For the women, another battle begins to prove yourself,' Paul said. 'Being from FTII is hardly a qualification.' The FTII prototype was male by design, Sharma pointed out. 'When it was established, FTII was an incredible institution for such a young country to want to imagine, but you also realise that its imagination was centred on a male student,' she said. 'It was a progressive idea to train women, but the bottom line of the people within the institution was that women are outsiders. The institution itself was telling you that it was going to be tough for you out there.' Exclusion is more commonplace than rare, Paul added. 'It appears only when women start talking to each together and reflect on what they have gone through,' she said. 'There's a lot of memory that you push away. You never realise how much you normalise it for yourself. That is why it is important that these histories are recorded.' The founders have made presentations based on the existing material at a few places, such as Harkat in Mumbai and the Asian Women's Film Festival in Delhi. Upcoming events include the Seoul International Women's Film Festival and the International Documentary & Short Film Festival of Kerala in Thiruvananthapuram. 'The project is an incredible resource for anyone working on Indian film history, women artists, institutional histories, a feminist understanding of women's experiences in institutions,' Sharma said. 'The project might also interest young students interested in filmmaking, women interested in women in filmmaking, anyone doing an analysis of the way film histories are written.'
Economic Times
2 days ago
- Economic Times
Video shows Barron Trump's childhood confession: US President's son was just 18-month old when he predicted his future
Barron Trump is a first-year student at New York University's Stern School of Business. Barron Trump, the youngest son of President Donald Trump and Melania Trump, is dominating the headlines once again after an old scene from his father's show, The Celebrity Apprentice revealed what he said about his future plans. In the old clip, Barron said he wanted to be when he was 18 months re-surfaced clip, aired in 2008, shows a then 18-month old Barron Trump being introduced to contestants on his father's reality competition show. The clip shows Barron, now 19, cradled in his mother's arms, alongside two of Trump's other children, Ivanka and Eric, reports The Irish other children, Donald Trump Jr. and Tiffany, were not present in the clip. After introducing his son on the show, Trump expressed his hopes that Barron would follow in his footsteps and become an entrepreneur. ALSO READ: US citizens to receive stimulus check of $2,000 in August? What has Trump said about economic relief Barron's mother Melania followed up and asked baby Barron what he wanted to do growing up. "Business," he replied, triggering an eruption of laughter from everyone in the room. "Like your daddy," Melania fawningly replied, while Trump remarked, "That is pretty amazing." Melania then asked Barron, "Daddy is a businessman, and what is he building?" To which he replied, "House." — Catherine_986 (@Catherine_986) At present, Barron is a student at New York University's Stern School of Business. The resurfaced clip comes after another resurfaced video showed the youngest member of the Trump clan in 2009 being held by his mother and requesting a particular present for his READ: Are you eligible for the AT&T settlement? Here's how to claim your share of $7,500 "I like to play drums," baby Barron told the interviewer, to which his mother, then 39, replied, "You want to have drums. What will you have for your birthday?" — MilaLovesJoe (@MilaLovesJoe) An excited Barron replied while gesturing in the distance, "I want to play the drums like on the television." The future First Lady then revealed that Barron adores playing the drums and that perhaps her precious boy will receive a set of "big drums." Earlier this year, Trump suggested that his son's future might be in technology instead of in following his footsteps in the politics and business fields. Trump was asked by Fox News host Laura Ingraham about his youngest son, Barron Trump, and what the commander in chief sees him pursuing in the future. ALSO READ: 'My thigh was burning': Deadly shark attacks pregnant wife of ex- NBA player while swimming with her two kids Trump was asked by Fox News host Laura Ingraham about his youngest son, Barron Trump, and what the commander in chief sees him pursuing in the future during a wide-ranging interview that aired Wednesday, a day ahead of Barron Trump's birthday.'Maybe technology,' the president responded, arguing the younger Trump knows how to operate a computer better than his dad. 'I turn off his laptop … I go back five minutes later, he's got his laptop. I say, 'How did you do that?' 'None of your business, dad,'' the commander in chief said. 'He's got an unbelievable aptitude in technology,' he told during the interview. ALSO READ: 'Social Security will be gone if...': Trump celebrates Social Security's 90th anniversary, makes big claim Barron Trump is a first-year student at New York University's Stern School of Business. During the 2024 presidential campaign, he was praised by his dad and others for helping connect the then-Republican nominee to younger voters through appearances on popular podcasts. 'I'm very proud of him about his knowledge, even about politics and giving an advice to his father — he brought in so many young people. He knows his generation, because nowadays the young generation, they don't sit in front of TV anymore,' first lady Melania Trump said in early December. 'He was very vocal, and he gave an advice to his father, and was incredible how he brought in a success because he knew exactly who his father needs to contact and to talk to,' she added. ALSO READ: US fitness star, bodybuilder Hayley McNeff shared awe-inspiring message before her 'unexpected' death at 37 The Trump campaign also credited the president's youngest son with boosting his father's appeal among young voters—especially young men. According to a new book, Barron Trump was a behind-the-scenes force in shaping outreach strategy, with Donald Trump allegedly refusing to appear on certain podcasts unless 'Barron said it was smart.' The 19-year-old reportedly urged his father to sit down with Adin Ross, the controversial streamer banned from Twitch for offensive 2024, Barron Trump was named one of 41 Florida GOP delegates ahead of the Republican National Convention. He also made an appearance at his father's July 2024 rally in Doral, Fla.
