
Parents condemn vote to mothball 150 year-old school
Councils are required to review every mothballing decision at least once per year.
Evidence for the recommendation was presented by the council's solicitor, who explained that the council is not obligated to carry out a full statutory consultation on mothballing and that the council has some "flexibility" on the issue.
Mothballing is covered under the Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010.
Although the guidance only requires a full statutory consultation if a council is attempting to close a school permanently, the Scottish Government has recently reiterated to other councils that engagement with parents is necessary before any mothballing decision is made.
According to the official guidance, if that engagement results in the majority of affected families opposing the mothballing recommendation, then the council should begin the process for consulting on permanent closure "as soon as possible."
Previous reporting from The Herald has shown that Scottish Borders Council has so far failed to provide evidence that it carried out consultations with affected parents ahead of the mothballing vote.
Council papers included evidence that the low roll, along with the fact that the only additional placement request comes from outside the school catchment area, meant that children would not receive a full educational experience at Fountainhall and would be better served at a neighbouring school.
The school's stated capacity is 50 pupils.
During the half-hour discussion, many councillors expressed regret over the situation.
SNP councillor Fay Sinclair said that mothballing a village school is an "emotive subject" that can impact even families without children directly connected to the school, but the situation required a hard decision.
"I couldn't in good conscience vote to keep a school open for one pupil."
Conservative council leader Euan Jardine said that his experience at a small rural school encouraged him to support the difficult decision to mothball Fountainhall.
"I went to a small rural school from Primary One to Three. But from Primary Four, I moved to a different school, and I learned how to play football and different social things I had never experienced in my life before."
He also questioned how a setting with only one pupil might negatively impact the career development opportunities for staff at the school.
Prior to the vote, Scottish Liberal Democrat members issued a statement to The Herald questioning the process which led to the mothballing recommendation and calling for a review.
Councillor Euan Robson said:
'Liberal Democrat members of Scottish Borders Council will be posing questions as a result of the Officers' report on the proposed mothballing of Fountainhall Primary School.
"We want to know whether the consultation procedure about mothballing was fair and reasonable and complied with government guidance.
"We shall ask for a review.
"We also need to know just how many placement requests were made to the school and how many potential nursery children might have enrolled. There are conflicting suggestions in this regard that should be resolved."
"We will be scrutinising the savings that are estimated to occur. Savings can only be achieved by a reduction in the Council's teaching establishment. Loss of teachers is regrettable but the Council's establishment will still seemingly be above the minimum level set by the Scottish Government.
"The wider point about savings is that without staff reductions, there are little or no revenue savings to be achieved in closing or mothballing small rural schools, and staff reductions do nothing for pupil teacher ratios and children's education.'
There was no significant opposition to the recommendation during the meeting on Thursday.
Read more
Independent councillor James Anderson called the situation an "unfortunate" reflection of the suggestion that the Borders has become "more of a retirement village."
He called on council officers to make sure that next year's enrollment figures are not "misrepresented, considering they may reflect a loss of confidence rather than genuine lack of demand."
The decision has been met with frustration by local parents, who argued that the council did not provide affected families with fair notice of the decision.
They also argued that, according to Scottish Government and council policies, there was enough parent opposition to the mothballing recommendation that the council should instead have opted for the more rigorous process of opening a statutory consultation on permanently closing the school.
Councillors were greeted on Thursday morning with a letter from an affected parent asking for a delay in the mothballing decision and a fuller consideration of the implications of mothballing.
Many parents have raised concerns that the mothballing process is used as a way to keep enrollments and interest in rural schools to a minimum and make it easier to justify permanent closure eventually.
Fountainhall Primary School will be mothballed beginning in August 2025, a decision which councillors called regrettable, while parents have questioned the process which led to the decision. (Image: )
Scottish Borders Council has mothballed 13 schools and early learning centres (ELC) since 2015. One of those has reopened and five are now permanently closed.
According to Scottish Government guidance, councils are required to undertake a full statutory consultation before permanently closing a school. Guidance also states that mothballing "should not be a way of denying parents access to the statutory consultation process required" by law.
In a press release following the decision, a group of parent campaigners said the decision has left the community "reeling."
Fountainhall parent Laurie Cameron-Back said that she chose to live in Fountainhall in part because of the school at its heart.
"Being able to walk our child to school was always our dream. I'm concerned that losing the school may make it harder for young families to stay, settle, and feel part of something.
"It's more than just a building; it's part of the village's identity.'
Thursday's decision to mothball Fountainhall also follows a period of controversy for the council over the attempted mothballing and later restructuring of several rural nurseries.
Michael Napier, whose child has been attending Fountainhall Primary School, said that parents no longer have faith in the process and that the council needs to "try harder" to engage.
"We suggest SBC revises the Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010 set out by the Scottish Parliament. SBC's end-of-year report card for 2025 would read 'Does not pay
attention, does not listen, does not follow instructions'."
Scottish Borders Council has been asked to respond to parent concerns.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BreakingNews.ie
6 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
JK Rowling compares Nicola Sturgeon to Donald Trump in scathing book review
JK Rowling has compared Nicola Sturgeon to US president Donald Trump and the Twilight character Bella Swan in a scathing review of the former Scottish first minister's memoir. The Harry Potter author accused Ms Sturgeon of being 'flat out Trumpian in her shameless denial of reality and hard facts' on issues relating to trans and women's rights. Advertisement The writer is a long-time critic of the former SNP leader and her views on gender self-ID. The Twilight of Nicola Sturgeon My review of Frankly — J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) August 14, 2025 In her near-3000-word review, published on her own website, she accuses Ms Sturgeon, who passed gender reform legislation at Holyrood, of holding 'luxury beliefs' that have caused 'real, lasting harm' to women. Rowling published her review on X alongside what appears to be an AI-generated image of Ms Sturgeon in the woods in front of a wolf and a vampire. She said of the politician's memoir, Frankly: 'She remains stubbornly wedded to her belief that it is possible to let some men into women's spaces on the men's say so, without letting any man who fancies it come inside. Advertisement 'She denies there are any risks to a policy of gender self-identification. 'She can't imagine any male predator capitalising on such policies, in spite of the fact that it has, demonstrably, happened many times. 'She is flat out Trumpian in her shameless denial of reality and facts.' Former first minister Nicola Sturgeon at the launch of her memoir 'Frankly', at Edinburgh International Book Festival (Jane Barlow/PA) Rowling, who lives in Edinburgh, said the Glasgow Southside MSP had not been 'remotely humbled' by the Supreme Court ruling that sex in the UK Equality Act referred to biological sex. Advertisement The Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Act, which was passed by MSPs, was ultimately scrapped by Westminster, with the then Tory government saying it contravened equalities law. In her book, Ms Sturgeon said she had never received as much abuse than when Rowling posted a picture of herself on social media with a T-shirt saying 'Nicola Sturgeon, destroyer of women's rights'. The former first minister said the post made her feel 'more at risk of possible physical harm'. Rowling defended the decision, writing in her review her intention was to encourage journalists to question Ms Sturgeon on the impacts her gender reforms may have. Advertisement She compares the MSP to Twilight character Bella Swan, saying both were 'monomaniacs', with Mr Sturgeon being 'consumed' by independence. Nicola Sturgeon was compared to Donald Trump in a book review by author JK Rowling (Jane Barlow/PA) She says of them: 'Both shy, insecure teenagers have dates with destiny. 'Nicola Sturgeon will one day become first minister of Scotland. Bella Swan will join the ranks of the undead.' The author said Sturgeon made significant omissions in her memoir, including WhatsApp messages from the Covid pandemic, education standards and the row over delayed and over-budget ferries. Advertisement 'Perhaps the most disgraceful omission — and I'll admit to a personal interest here, because I'm married to a doctor who used to run a methadone clinic, so saw the national scandal up close — is the fact that Scotland continues to lead the whole of Europe in drug deaths,' she said. Ms Sturgeon has said she stands by the principle of gender self-ID but has expressed regret at not pausing her gender reforms in order to find common ground with opponents. Speaking at the Edinburgh International Book Festival on Thursday, Ms Sturgeon said the debate was 'toxic on both sides'. She accepted that 'in all of the tone and tenor of this I am not saying I was blameless at all', saying she 'desperately' wished she had been able to 'find a more collegiate way forward' on the controversial issue. Ms Sturgeon has been approached for comment.


Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Kate Forbes ban venue forced into a humiliating U-turn after public funds threat
The Edinburgh Festival Fringe venue at the centre of the Kate Forbes cancel culture row has performed a dramatic U-turn after threats to its public funding. Summerhall Arts, which was recently awarded £608,000 in grants, climbed down over an apparent ban on deputy First Minister because of her gender critical views. Bosses had claimed her appearance last week in a political talk was an 'oversight' and gave a 'guarantee' it wouldn't happen again. But after their statement was condemned by senior SNP figures, including ex First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, the charity chiefs said no politician would be banned after all. Chief executive Sam Gough told the Mail: 'No one is banned from appearing on the stages. Summerhall is a collection of things in this building, including stages and venues. We have not banned anyone.' Mr Gough's uncaveated comments went further than a statement issued earlier in the day by the organisation, which put a pre-condition on future appearances. It said there would be no ban on anyone 'assuming they adhere to our zero tolerance regarding discrimination'. The damage limitation exercise followed an outcry over censorship with both the Government and arts quango Creative Scotland appearing to wash their hands of it. Ministers said they had no role in 'individual funding decisions', while Creative Scotland, which gave Summerhall £608,302 in January, claimed it had no part in 'programming decisions'. The Scottish Conservatives said both were missing the point - that taxpayers' cash was supporting an organisation that appeared to be breaking the law by stifling free speech. A condition of Summerhall's state funding that it must 'comply with all applicable laws'. Ms Forbes, a devout Christian who opposed the SNP's botched gender self-ID reforms, spoke at the venue last week. Summerhall apologised to performers just hours ahead of her appearance as it was concerned about 'the safety and wellbeing of LGBTQ+ artists, staff and audiences by attracting those who share her 'views' and said 'we have work to do to repair the damage'. They even provided a 'designated relaxed space' or 'safe room' said to be 'terrified' of the 5ft 2in Skye MSP. The row coincided with controversies over gender critical authors being excluded from the state-backed Edinburgh Book Festival and a best-selling book of gender critical essays, The Women Who Wouldn't Wheest, being pulled from a National Library of Scotland exhibition. Finance Secretary Shona Robison called Summerhall's reaction 'unwise and unnecessary', while Ms Sturgeon said she didn't agree with cancel culture or the venue's actions. The Scottish Tories demanded Summerhall's public funding be cut for potentially discriminating against people because of their beliefs. In 2023, the Stand comedy club had to back down after trying to cancel a Fringe show by then SNP MP Joanna Cherry KC because of her gender critical views, admitting its original decision was 'unfair and constituted unlawful discrimination'. Last year Creative Scotland axed £84,555 of public funding from the live arts project Rein after a plan to include real sex acts was deemed a breach of contract. Bowing to pressure yesterday, the venue said 'no-one is banned from the Summerhall building or by Summerhall Arts' and it would 'not be banning politicians or anyone else'. It was a marked departure from its message to artists eight days earlier, which an insider downplayed as merely an 'email to performers', not an official statement. Scottish Tory equalities spokeswoman Tess White said there had been too much 'craven buck-passing' by the Government and Creative Scotland. She said: 'This latest clear-as-mud statement from Summerhall just underlines the need for SNP ministers to step in and order the venue to get its act together. 'Summerhall's shameful decision to suppress free speech didn't occur in a vacuum. 'For years the SNP have been pushing their reckless and unlawful self-ID policy on Scotland's public bodies and pandering to gender extremists. 'As a result, organisations funded by taxpayers think it's okay to silence those who have the moral courage and legal vindication to stand up for women's rights. It's totally unacceptable. 'John Swinney and Creative Scotland, which has form for financing dodgy projects, should remove funding from any group or venue that blocks legitimate free speech.' It emerged yesterday that Summerhall Arts had known since April that Ms Forbes would appear in an event run by the Herald newspaper but did not object. Just 48 hours before the event, managers raised fears about 'hate speech'. SNP Culture Secretary Angus Roberson yesterday told the Herald he was 'a strong supporter of the freedom of speech and of expression at our festivals'. He said: 'It will not be easy all of the time to please everybody. 'But I think keeping an eye on the principle of freedom of expression and the expression of different views is an established and important part of our national life.' Mr Robertson is the MSP for Edinburgh Central, which is home to many cultural organisations, and he said he does not make decisions about their funding to avoid conflicts of interest. He has specifically 'recused himself from decisions in relation to Summerhall', which are taken by employment minister Richard Lochhead instead. A Creative Scotland spokesman said: 'Creative Scotland does not play a role in the programming decisions of funded organisations.' A Scottish Government spokesman said: 'Creative Scotland is an arms-length funding body and Ministers have no role in individual funding decisions.'


Telegraph
8 hours ago
- Telegraph
Perverted liberalism has led to neo-Marxism, perverted patriotism may yet lead to neo-fascism
It is, on balance, helpful, that the current American president and vice-president are both interested in Britain. We are one of the few allies not deliberately antagonised by the Trump administration. This is a Brexit benefit. Yesterday, Donald Trump had things to do in Anchorage, Alaska, but last month he was in Aberdeenshire, and next month he will be over here for his second state visit. JD Vance, the vice-president, ended the week staying on an estate in Ayrshire, after spending a few days near Adlestrop in the Cotswolds, scene of Edward Thomas's much anthologised pastoral poem about a summer railway station where nothing happens. What draws these two powerful men here? Mr Trump likes – and owns – golf courses, and his mother came from the Hebrides. He seems to prefer her Scottish roots to his father's German ones, and he is in love with the British monarchy. Mr Vance has Scottish roots, too, but his quest seems more cultural, intellectual and political. He was mixing a family holiday (accompanied by a few non-political old mates) with discussions about ideas with his English friend, Dr James Orr, a Cambridge theologian, and Danny Kruger, the Conservative MP who recently made a powerful parliamentary speech in favour of Christianity in Britain. He saw the billionaire businessman Sir Paul Marshall, owner of The Spectator and patron of several conservative and Christian causes. The vice-president entertained and was entertained by Tom Skinner – patriotic Essex man, former market trader and star of The Apprentice, whose catchword is 'Bosh' – and a much more famous public entertainer, currently from Clacton, called Nigel Farage. Through the good offices of George Osborne, a surprising ally, given Mr Osborne's Remainer, globalist views, Mr Vance also met assorted Conservatives – Robert Jenrick, Chris Philp, Laura Trott and the rising star of the party's new intake, Katie Lam. It was a mark of how even Tory centrists feel the need to trim to the Atlantic wind that the journalist Daniel Finkelstein was among the guests. Lord Finkelstein's column this week was a fine read for Kremlinologists, as it sidled cautiously closer to Mr Farage. There is something attractive about Mr Vance's quest for ideas. Although it can be tactless (and may be intended to be), his readiness to propagate them is refreshing too. Since the days of Theodore Roosevelt, who invented it, the 'bully pulpit' has been the property of the US president. Mr Trump, however, is more bully than pulpit, and Mr Vance, a Catholic convert, is a most articulate preacher. He is searching, like so many, for a conservatism which goes deeper than economics and pays greater heed to those left behind by social change and discriminated against by modern public doctrine. He is influenced in this by the National Conservatism movement in the United States. In developing these views, Mr Vance and Maga allies identify 'woke' as their main internal opponent. They see woke doctrines, advancing under the camouflage of liberal tolerance, as neo-Marxist attempts to set different groups, tribes and classes against one another and to dissolve the proud historical identity of the nation state. This is an even more incendiary subject in America than in Britain but, goodness knows, it is hotting up here, chiefly because of this century's huge increase in immigration encouraged under both main parties. Mr Vance has expressed this vividly: 'I think the people whose ancestors fought in the Civil War have a hell of a lot more claim over America than the people who say they don't belong today.' He seeks allies for a comparable message here and, in more directly political terms, for the best political vehicle. He is contemplating a different party configuration on the Right. At present, he sees Reform, if allied with 'sound' Tories, as the likelier means than the present Conservative Party. I have my doubts about the practicality of that, and the wisdom of foreign politicians, Anglophile though they may be, getting involved. But what I want to discuss today is not party-political manoeuvring. It is the philosophical and moral ways in which the Vance Anglosphere crusade – given the militant Christian roots involved, the word 'crusade' may be apposite – could all go wrong. I write as someone who wants it to go right. The first danger – though I agree that Christianity is the most important single root of our institutions, our civil society and our shared culture – arises because there is usually something unscrupulous about using Christianity as a political weapon. Look at how politics in the Muslim world is corrupted by Islamist ideology and you will see the analogy. The second danger is that the anti-wokeists may replicate on their side what they so dislike about their opponents. Just as woke people try to smear all conservatives as racists, so some conservatives smear all wokeists as unpatriotic traitors. Many Maga supporters are doing this already, especially online. They lament how the 'mutual loyalty' of American society has been gashed by political correctness, but they are not doing much to bind up the wounds. Like that of woke, their rhetoric attracts people who enjoy hating other people. If perverted liberalism leads to neo-Marxism, could not perverted patriotism lead to neo-fascism? Take, for example, Dr Orr's recent advocacy of the slogan 'Faith, Flag and Family'. All three are indeed good things, but he, an intelligent and well-educated man, must know how similar are these words to the propaganda of Vichy France (' Famille. Travail. Patrie '). One well-known Vichy poster contrasted an attractive, well-built house founded on these principles with a crumbling one built on 'capital', 'Jewishness', 'democracies' and other supposed evils. Does that not worry him? It should. In the United States, sometimes assisted by people as prominent as Tucker Carlson, anti-Semitism, which in the past 30 years has become increasingly the property of the Left, is being reclaimed by elements on the Right. A good index of bad trends of thought is what some on the Right say about Ukraine. There are, of course, reasonable arguments to make for peace talks, but note the omissions. Neither President Trump nor his vice-president ever says that Putin's invasion struck against the 80-year peace of all Europe, which depends on inviolable borders. Neither draws attention to Putin's more minor but significant provocations and infiltrations in most other eastern European nations. Note, too, the shifting of blame – most strikingly on to President Zelensky himself, whose crime seems to have been to refuse to run away as the Russian tanks rolled towards Kyiv – and also on to the West in general (a persistent claim made by Nigel Farage). Finally, note how the wilder attacks on wokeism in the West invoke Putin almost as the goodie. On the BBC in May, Dr Orr appeared with the Liberal Democrat MP, Max Wilkinson. Complaining (rightly) about growing free speech restrictions in this country, Dr Orr said, 'A lot more people have got into trouble in the UK for free speech offences than in Putin's Russia.' When challenged for this astonishing statement, he 'gladly' promised to send Mr Wilkinson the evidence to back it up. He has never done so. If Maga people are sincere, as I believe they are, in wishing to reassert the self-determination of independent nation states and disapproving of imperial 'forever wars', why do they excuse Putin's Russia and disparage Ukraine's battle to maintain the rights of nationhood? How did the national conservatism of Edmund Burke get muddled up with the Putinist opportunism of Viktor Orban's government in Hungary?