11 hours ago
- Politics
- The Herald Scotland
Parents condemn vote to mothball 150 year-old school
This led the Scottish Borders Council to approve a recommendation to mothball, or temporarily close it, at Thursday's full council meeting. The mothballing will begin in August 2025.
Councils are required to review every mothballing decision at least once per year.
Evidence for the recommendation was presented by the council's solicitor, who explained that the council is not obligated to carry out a full statutory consultation on mothballing and that the council has some "flexibility" on the issue.
Mothballing is covered under the Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010.
Although the guidance only requires a full statutory consultation if a council is attempting to close a school permanently, the Scottish Government has recently reiterated to other councils that engagement with parents is necessary before any mothballing decision is made.
According to the official guidance, if that engagement results in the majority of affected families opposing the mothballing recommendation, then the council should begin the process for consulting on permanent closure "as soon as possible."
Previous reporting from The Herald has shown that Scottish Borders Council has so far failed to provide evidence that it carried out consultations with affected parents ahead of the mothballing vote.
Council papers included evidence that the low roll, along with the fact that the only additional placement request comes from outside the school catchment area, meant that children would not receive a full educational experience at Fountainhall and would be better served at a neighbouring school.
The school's stated capacity is 50 pupils.
During the half-hour discussion, many councillors expressed regret over the situation.
SNP councillor Fay Sinclair said that mothballing a village school is an "emotive subject" that can impact even families without children directly connected to the school, but the situation required a hard decision.
"I couldn't in good conscience vote to keep a school open for one pupil."
Conservative council leader Euan Jardine said that his experience at a small rural school encouraged him to support the difficult decision to mothball Fountainhall.
"I went to a small rural school from Primary One to Three. But from Primary Four, I moved to a different school, and I learned how to play football and different social things I had never experienced in my life before."
He also questioned how a setting with only one pupil might negatively impact the career development opportunities for staff at the school.
Prior to the vote, Scottish Liberal Democrat members issued a statement to The Herald questioning the process which led to the mothballing recommendation and calling for a review.
Councillor Euan Robson said:
'Liberal Democrat members of Scottish Borders Council will be posing questions as a result of the Officers' report on the proposed mothballing of Fountainhall Primary School.
"We want to know whether the consultation procedure about mothballing was fair and reasonable and complied with government guidance.
"We shall ask for a review.
"We also need to know just how many placement requests were made to the school and how many potential nursery children might have enrolled. There are conflicting suggestions in this regard that should be resolved."
"We will be scrutinising the savings that are estimated to occur. Savings can only be achieved by a reduction in the Council's teaching establishment. Loss of teachers is regrettable but the Council's establishment will still seemingly be above the minimum level set by the Scottish Government.
"The wider point about savings is that without staff reductions, there are little or no revenue savings to be achieved in closing or mothballing small rural schools, and staff reductions do nothing for pupil teacher ratios and children's education.'
There was no significant opposition to the recommendation during the meeting on Thursday.
Read more
Independent councillor James Anderson called the situation an "unfortunate" reflection of the suggestion that the Borders has become "more of a retirement village."
He called on council officers to make sure that next year's enrollment figures are not "misrepresented, considering they may reflect a loss of confidence rather than genuine lack of demand."
The decision has been met with frustration by local parents, who argued that the council did not provide affected families with fair notice of the decision.
They also argued that, according to Scottish Government and council policies, there was enough parent opposition to the mothballing recommendation that the council should instead have opted for the more rigorous process of opening a statutory consultation on permanently closing the school.
Councillors were greeted on Thursday morning with a letter from an affected parent asking for a delay in the mothballing decision and a fuller consideration of the implications of mothballing.
Many parents have raised concerns that the mothballing process is used as a way to keep enrollments and interest in rural schools to a minimum and make it easier to justify permanent closure eventually.
Fountainhall Primary School will be mothballed beginning in August 2025, a decision which councillors called regrettable, while parents have questioned the process which led to the decision. (Image: )
Scottish Borders Council has mothballed 13 schools and early learning centres (ELC) since 2015. One of those has reopened and five are now permanently closed.
According to Scottish Government guidance, councils are required to undertake a full statutory consultation before permanently closing a school. Guidance also states that mothballing "should not be a way of denying parents access to the statutory consultation process required" by law.
In a press release following the decision, a group of parent campaigners said the decision has left the community "reeling."
Fountainhall parent Laurie Cameron-Back said that she chose to live in Fountainhall in part because of the school at its heart.
"Being able to walk our child to school was always our dream. I'm concerned that losing the school may make it harder for young families to stay, settle, and feel part of something.
"It's more than just a building; it's part of the village's identity.'
Thursday's decision to mothball Fountainhall also follows a period of controversy for the council over the attempted mothballing and later restructuring of several rural nurseries.
Michael Napier, whose child has been attending Fountainhall Primary School, said that parents no longer have faith in the process and that the council needs to "try harder" to engage.
"We suggest SBC revises the Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010 set out by the Scottish Parliament. SBC's end-of-year report card for 2025 would read 'Does not pay
attention, does not listen, does not follow instructions'."
Scottish Borders Council has been asked to respond to parent concerns.