281 bills fall victim to deadline at Nevada Legislature. Here are the highlights
One bill known as 'Reba's Law' got a quick reprieve on Monday as lawmakers scrambled to bring it back. That followed a public outcry that is rare at this stage. Other bills aren't likely to get the same rescue, although they can be brought back from the heap in a number of ways.
We've told you about some of the bills that died: the Hotel Safety Act, the medical aid in dying bill and the Nevada lottery. But here's a look at some others that missed the deadline:
Senate Bill 415 would have allowed law enforcement to install automated traffic enforcement cameras. The bill was supported by the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, but opposed by the ACLU of Nevada. The ACLU issued a statement from executive director Athar Haseebullah regarding the bill:
'This bill was bad policy from the start. The deployment of red-light cameras is often framed as a matter of public safety, but in reality, most civil liberties abuses happen under the guise of public safety. Automated traffic enforcement systems, which raise significant constitutional concerns, are problematic tools used to generate revenue for the government on the backs of ordinary Nevadans, and other communities have paid out tens of millions of dollars in settlements based on faulty systems. From a practical perspective, the Legislature couldn't exercise oversight of the data collected through these programs because it is not privy to every surveillance tool law enforcement has in its possession and how that data is used. We commend the Nevada Senate for not advancing this bill and encourage the Legislature to be mindful of the harms of automated traffic enforcement systems.'
The Culinary Union ripped Democratic leaders for killing the state lottery.
'When politicians talk about democracy being at risk, but block Nevadans from voting on something as straightforward as a state lottery, their words ring hollow. Actions speak louder than rhetoric,' according to a statement issued by the union.
'With federal cuts looming, uncertainty around the state budget, and lack of funding for education and mental health, Nevadans need real solutions and we need it now. Politicians cannot complain about budget shortfalls while refusing to even consider a bill that would bring in new revenue,' according to the union.
Nevada Republicans also criticized the Democrat-controlled Legislature for refusing to bring constitutional amendments to increase transparency to a vote. The amendments were authored by Republican Assem. Heidi Kasama.
'After years of scandals that have cost them the public's trust, Democrats in our State Legislature are covering up their ethical failures and denying Nevadans the right to know what they are doing,' according to a news release from Better Nevada PAC.
Also left behind:
AB195 would have required the Clark County School District to give nonvoting members the same duties, rights and responsibilities as the members of the board of trustees who are elected to the office.
AB240 would have required certain schools and institutions of higher education to designate by sex the athletic teams and sports sponsored by the schools, along with a prohibition on male or female athletes from competing on teams designated for the other sex.
AB293 would have created the state Office of Aerospace.
AB311 would have prohibited an insurance company from refusing to provide coverage to a driver who works for a transportation network company. The bill would also require network companies to provide medical payments coverage and coverage involving uninsured/underinsured motorists.
AB317 would have authorized cities and counties to establish a program to provide housing to help people experiencing homelessness.
SB94 would have taken Nevada off Daylight Saving Time. But … AB81, sponsored by Democrat Selena La Rue Hatch passed, and it does the same thing.
SB103 would have required mail ballots to be received on or before Election Day.
SB184 would have banned the use of latex gloves in food establishments and health care settings.
SB219 would have increased the penalties for organized retail theft. Rather than a 2-15 year sentence, the bill would have required a 3-30 year prison term, and a tripling of the fine, up to $30,000.
SB223 would have increased the penalties for sex trafficking a child or helping someone sex trafficking a child.
SB365 would have limited attorneys from collecting a contingency fee in excess of 20% of the amount recovered, except in state cases involving negligence in health care matters.
SB392 would have imposed a state sales tax on digital products electronically transferred to a buyer. The tax would have required the facilitator to collect and remit the tax if sales were over $100,000.
SB394 would have prohibited the sale of fireworks to anyone under the age of 18.
Next up: An April 22 deadline for bills to advance to the next house.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
27 minutes ago
- NBC News
The CEO in chief: How Trump is getting what he wants from big business
For years, conservative groups and corporate leaders argued that the U.S. government would be better if it were run like a business. For President Donald Trump, who has controlled his own businesses for decades, that looks like taking an increasingly active role in individual corporations' affairs, from manufacturing to media to tech firms. And corporations are meeting the demands of a president who is more freely exerting his powers than he did the last time he was in office. At Trump's urging, Coca-Cola said it would produce a version of its namesake soda with U.S.-grown cane sugar. Paramount paid millions to settle allegations Trump levied against CBS' venerated '60 Minutes.' Two major semiconductor makers agreed to give the government a cut of their sales in China. The CEO of Intel met with Trump soon after the president called on him to resign. 'It's so much different than the first term,' said a Republican lobbyist whose firm represents several Fortune 500 companies, who spoke on condition of anonymity to speak candidly. 'He's just acting like a businessman. In his first term, I think he was trying to cosplay as a politician. He's more comfortable in his own skin, too. He can explain deals better.' Trump's role represents a break with past administrations that may have been unwilling or unable, politically, to bring similar pressure to bear on businesses. In the past, small-government conservatives once accused previous Democratic administrations of attempting to 'pick winners and losers' by trying to regulate industries. Trump today stands downstream of a bolder right-wing movement that calls for enhanced state intervention in corporate affairs. Trump has said the corporate concessions are intended to boost the U.S. economy. And the White House, in a statement, reinforced the idea that Trump's involved approach to private-sector dealings is a key part of his economic agenda. 'Cooled inflation, trillions in new investments, historic trade deals, and hundreds of billions in tariff revenue prove how President Trump's hands-on leadership is paving the way towards a new Golden Age for America,' White House spokesperson Kush Desai said.


Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Focus groups: Trump redistricting push could backfire with swing voters
The reaction of Georgia swing voters in our latest Engagious / Sago focus groups shows how President Trump's sudden push for redistricting could backfire on the GOP in the midterms — if Democrats can hold voters' attention. The big picture: Just four of the 11 Biden-to-Trump swing voters in Tuesday night's sessions said they could explain why more than 50 Democratic Texas legislators have left that state. But when provided with neutral facts describing the situation, none of the 11 said they support the GOP redistricting effort. All 11 oppose an effort from the state attorney general to remove some of the Democrats from office. 10 of the 11 said Texas Democrats did the right thing by leaving the state. "Once Georgia swing voters understand what Texas Republicans are attempting, they reject it," said Rich Thau, president of Engagious, who moderated the focus groups. "That said, Democrats have done a lousy job of educating swing voters about mid-decade redistricting." Zoom in: Of the 11 focus group participants, all of whom backed President Trump in November, just three now say they approve of the administration's overall actions. All 11 said they're more anxious about the economy now than when Trump took office. Seven said they disapprove of the tariffs. How it works: Axios observed two online focus groups Tuesday night that included 11 Georgia residents who voted for Joe Biden in 2020 and Donald Trump in 2024. Five are Democrats, four are independents and two are Republicans. While a focus group is not a statistically significant sample like a poll, the responses show how some voters are thinking and talking about current events. What they're saying: " The cost of living is ridiculous and it's not slowing down; it shows no signs of getting better," said Todd L., 42, of Atlanta. "It seems like every other day there's a new tariff or he's pissed off some other country, and just every single day there's more news about inflation and job losses," said Gavin E., 52, of Decatur. "It just keeps getting worse and worse. We're hemorrhaging. It's crazy." When it comes to the Texas redistricting dispute, Kevin J., 57, of Woodstock, said: "Doing this now and redrawing their districts, that's just they want to please Donald Trump." Said Chris Z., 36, of Norcross: "He wants it now. He wants it his way. There's a proper way to do things and he doesn't follow. ... There's no balance of power. That's just not how things operate, and it'll be a domino effect with other states doing the same thing." "Once it's done every five years, then some state will push it to two years and some state will push it to a year," said Sherrecia J., 34, of Atlanta. "It's going to become more and more ridiculous. It has to have a boundary." "What's the purpose of having laws and constitutions and protocols if they're not going to be followed?" said Olanrewaju A., 44, of Decatur. Meanwhile, Thau also spent a portion of the sessions asking these swing voters how they are using and thinking about AI. The panels followed the launch of OpenAI's GPT-5. Some communities, including in Georgia, are raising concerns about the growth of data centers and their potential strains on the power grid and the environment. 10 of the 11 said they've used some form of AI; five use ChatGPT at least weekly; eight consider themselves supporters of AI. Nine worried AI will weaken privacy protections, especially related to financial data; nine also feared AI will be used to undermine America's political system; and eight said they fear AI will figure out how to launch weapons on its own, without human commands.


Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Crypto cash threatens Sherrod Brown's comeback campaign
Fairshake — which is funded primarily by the crypto firms Coinbase and Ripple and the venture capital group Andreessen Horowitz — spent more money on his Ohio race than any other contest it targeted. The PAC plastered ads across the state boosting Republican Bernie Moreno, a crypto enthusiast and car dealer who successfully defeated Brown and now sits on the Banking panel himself. It is unclear if Brown would return as the Banking Committee's Democratic leader if he won, replacing Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren. Senate Democrats' rules state that 'the seniority of a Member with interrupted service or service in another Party does not date from that Member's initial entrance into the Senate' — meaning he would not be entitled to count his prior service. But Democratic leaders could seek to change those rules or grant an exception to Brown, their top recruit for the Ohio race. Regardless, crypto lobbyists worry that Brown could pose problems for them if he returns — especially given the brute-force tactics the industry used to try to take him out. And his opponent, Republican incumbent Jon Husted, has been a reliably industry-friendly vote. Husted, who was tapped to fill the vacancy created when JD Vance became vice president, hasn't been vocal about crypto issues during his short time in the Senate, but he has voted in favor of industry-backed bills on the floor and supported its goals when he served as Ohio's lieutenant governor. Husted campaign spokesperson Tyson Shepard said in a statement that if Brown enters the race, 'he will be starting in the biggest hole of his political career,' dubbing him Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer's 'handpicked candidate.' 'He has never faced a candidate like Jon Husted,' he said. 'Brown's slogans will ring hollow as his coalition walks away, tired of the radical policies he's forced to support to appease his coastal bosses in California and New York.' Despite losing by more than three percentage points to Moreno, Brown is seen as Democrats' best chance to win back the Ohio seat in 2026. He outran former Vice President Kamala Harris by more than seven points in the state, even as the crypto money contributed to a barrage of outside money that helped Republicans outspend Democrats in the race. Ohio Democrats hope a more favorable national environment will help propel Brown next year. 'Crypto can come in again and do whatever they're going to do,' said Jerry Austin, a longtime Democratic strategist in the state. 'I think they've shot their wad. And if they want to come back and do it again, I think a lot of things have happened between the last election and now, and that is what Trump's been doing in Ohio and the rest of the country.'