logo
The internet's most famous people converged in 1 place and it all was captured on video: Inside my trip to VidCon

The internet's most famous people converged in 1 place and it all was captured on video: Inside my trip to VidCon

Yahoo11-07-2025
I spent a frenetic weekend at a convention center in Anaheim, California, in June, immersed among content creators and their rabid fans. VidCon, 15 years after its inception, is still a hotbed for influencers — and discussions about how they impact pop culture and turn social media into prosperous careers.
I kept a diary of my time mingling with online celebrities and the people who keep the creator economy afloat. It was sometimes glamorous, oftentimes scrappy and always fascinating, just like the internet itself. Let's talk about it.
A frenetic vibe from the start
Much of the vibe of VidCon is set by the palm tree-lined street outside the Anaheim Convention Center, where vendors line up to sell you food from a truck or guide you through the line for a photo opp.
Advertisement
This year, there were Minecraft topiaries in honor of the game's mainstream success through its movie adaptation, a box sponsored by horror production company Blumhouse which participants could enter to scream at the top of their lungs and a huge rainbow banner celebrating YouTube's 20th anniversary that was positioned over a small house at the intersection of 'Subscribe Street' and 'Like Lane.' It rivaled Disneyland, which was also visible from the window of my nearby hotel.
The cameras are always rolling
Everyone was filming all the time — including me and Yahoo video producer Sam Matthews.
A giant coloring page was set up in the expo hall, and Snapchat hosted a bodega-themed event at a nearby hotel. (Photo illustration: Yahoo News; illustrations: Jiaqi Wang for Yahoo News; photos: Kelsey Weekman/Yahoo News)
As we walked through the convention center, we saw a girl dressed as Wednesday Adams do an elaborately choreographed dance in the middle of the floor, declaring, 'I was just kidding' to the crowd that had formed by the time she finished. We saw another huge gathering of people formed around dozens of influencers holding their phones to their faces, lip-syncing to a song we couldn't hear with perfect synchronicity.
There was also a huge line of kids forming to take photos with a man dressed as The Lorax, who was giving instructions on how to pose and interact with him.
Advertisement
None of this was sanctioned, but it wasn't forbidden, either.
Toys 'R' Us
Vendors sold merchandise at VidCon's expo hall, and the brand Pop Store set up a "clinic" on another floor to help creators monetize. (Photo illustration: Yahoo News; illustrations: Jiaqi Wang for Yahoo News; photos: Kelsey Weekman/Yahoo News)
The sprawling expo hall in the convention center's grandest ballroom was extremely popular for attendees. There, amid lines of people waiting for meet and greets with their favorite creators or big events hosted on a mainstage, was a smorgasbord of all the finest collectibles. The little stuffed monsters known as Labubus were clipped to the purses and belt loops of every tenth person I saw. I formed a bond with a person in a Furby costume.
Another ultra-popular toy was the Easy Sqweezy Stretchy Banana which is literally just a big squishy banana toy that a dad told me kids like hitting each other with. There was a huge stand for mystery merch boxes, where fans could spend a few dozen dollars to get a random assortment of items related to titles like Stranger Things, Spider-Man and Star Trek. The cashier told me the most popular box is for The Goonies, but he didn't really understand why.
I met my actual heroes
I was part of the first generation to grow up with access to YouTube, so many of the creators honored in VidCon's Hall of Fame felt like the cool seniors who graduated when I was a freshman, though they're technically titans of media. Still, I was starstruck — more so interviewing Hank Green and Grace Helbig at the event than I was interviewing Josh Hartnett or Joseph Gordon-Levitt in the past.
Advertisement
I was also charmed by how kind and down-to-earth the Hall-of-Famers were. Ian Hecox of Smosh talked to me for more than half an hour, and I didn't even let it slip that I used to have a crush on him.
Rosanna Pansino somehow got me cake at a hotel bar when she heard it was my birthday. I've heard all these stories about how internet fame warps your sense of self and reality, but everyone I met was incredibly humble and sweet.
An immersive anthropological excursion
I expected a crowd of more people my own age at the Hall of Fame ceremony, given that the honored creators had been around since the 2000s, but I was wrong. I consider myself pretty well-versed in the online world, but I felt like an explorer in the depths of an uncharted jungle.
Sam and I were surrounded by children as young as 7, screaming at the top of their lungs to meme-inspired songs performed by YouTuber CG5. We were then subjected to a magic battle between two viral illusionists, Justin Flom and SeanDoesMagic. The kids behind me were screaming jokes laced with internet slang, accusing people of 'hacking' and directing questions like, 'Yo, who are these people?' to an imaginary 'chat.' They were rude to the Hall of Fame inductees, talking over their acceptance speeches, but loudly admitted that Rhett & Link are funny.
Who all the kids wanted to see
Tons of people have asked me who the most popular creator at VidCon was. It wasn't the one with the longest legacy or the biggest following. It was Jmancurly, a YouTuber who almost exclusively shares videos of himself playing the virtual reality game Gorilla Tag, in which people play as legless primates.
I missed his onstage appearance at the Hall of Fame ceremony, but I felt his presence everywhere. He had a giant — and I mean bigger than a house — statue of a buff torso set up in the expo hall. Kids everywhere wore his merch and lined up to play Gorilla Tag. To VidCon attendees, Jmancurly was like all four of the Beatles combined.
Advertisement
Another popular creator duo was AJ and Big Justice, the father-son pair who went viral for the loud New Jersey accents with which they assign things ratings on a 'boom or doom' scale. They had to enter the press room for our interview through a secret door because, as their manager explained, they kept getting 'swarmed.'
People begged them for photos and lined up to make videos with them, in which they would both scream and assess how many 'booms' a selfie-taker deserved. I was overjoyed when Yahoo received five big booms.
Someone who everyone missed
AJ and Big Justice often create content with The Rizzler, an 8-year-old child influencer best known for striking comically macho poses in viral interactions with celebrities. He sadly wasn't able to attend VidCon because he opted to go to Fanatics Fest in New York City instead, to the disappointment of at least a dozen people who asked about his whereabouts. I did see someone carrying around a seemingly life-size cardboard cutout of him, though.
The Rizzler poses in Times Square. (Michelle Farsi/FIFA/FIFA via Getty Images)
VidCon also felt more exclusive than ever, because, much to the chagrin of fans online, it didn't livestream its panels. You just had to be there.
Everyone wants to be an influencer
When I went to VidCon in 2022, everyone wanted to meet an influencer. People lined up around blocks and sat in full costume for hours for the chance to see a YouTuber they adored.
Advertisement
In 2025, everyone wanted to be an influencer. Even when lining up at panels for a chance to ask a creator a question, most wanted to know the secret to success or ask for advice on their careers. I'll never forget how many children I saw wearing T-shirts with their budding YouTube channel names printed on them.
At first, I thought the designated area that linking website Pop Store had set up that offered a hospital-themed 'monetization clinic' for fresh creators hoping to make money off their content was dystopian. 'Your vibe is billable' a neon sign beckoned.
After wandering through, I realized that for so many people, turning sharing what you love into a financially beneficial endeavour is an absolute dream. Who am I to judge, even if someone in a lab coat is prodding me to try my hand at a giant game of 'Operation' so they could lower my guard far down enough that I'd willingly open a website on my phone?
Luckily, content creators and other members of the creator economy were extremely eager to give advice. I gathered words of wisdom from a dozen of them.
Advertisement
I was particularly moved by the advice from video game streamer and true crime podcast host Ericka Bozeman, who could have tossed vague platitudes at the young YouTuber who approacher her, but instead gave him an on-the-spot overhaul by helping him identify what's distinct enough to embrace about his style and come up with a new channel introduction.
A new class of child stars emerges — and it's not all bad
LikeNastya, Avia Colette and Big Justice have massive followings and millions of people watching their every video. (Photo illustration: Yahoo News; photos: Instagram)
It feels like we only hear horror stories about children who grew up famous online, but the ones I talked to at VidCon love their lives. Big Justice, for instance, is living his dream. Avia Colette, the now-adult child of some of the first family vloggers, wouldn't have it any other way.
'Minecraft' still reigns supreme
After the success of A Minecraft Movie forced the mainstream entertainment industry to pay attention to the power of a sandbox video game, I became obsessed with untangling how it has managed to stick around for so many years. I spoke to Minecraft YouTubers with millions of subscribers about how they sustain a whole massive ecosystem of fans and content, though you've probably never heard of them.
The longest-running YouTube creators are still killing it
The comedy duo I was obsessed with in 2005 is still thriving, but not without their challenges. I profiled the people behind Smosh, a YouTube channel that has survived virality and brushes with career death over and over again for two decades.
Smosh's full cast, including Anthony Padilla and Ian Hecox in the middle. (Courtesy of Smosh)
Advertisement
They told me the secret to thriving as online creators from the early internet to modern times, which hasn't been easy or normal, but it has been an incredibly fun ride.
Going viral doesn't matter anymore, according to the guy who's the best at it
Anthony Po is the king of going viral. He thinks it's easy. You probably don't know him by name, but chances are you've seen the Timothée Chalamet lookalike competition, or videos of him eating a jar of cheese balls in front of 3,000 people in a mask.
At 23, he's been a creator for about 10 years, and he said on a panel called 'From Viral Moments to Sustainable Business Models' that 'going viral is kind of easy … it's a science, almost.'
He worked for YouTube's most popular creator MrBeast in 2023, where he said their goal was to have every video reach at least 300 people.
Advertisement
'There's a way to engineer that … you look at what exists and study culture,' he said.
Po isn't into that anymore — he wants to find the authentic human element in everything he does. But it still makes him go viral.
It was fascinating because I think a lot of brands might have been foaming at the mouth just to get a dash of his ability to get their products seen by so many people. Maybe he's onto something, or maybe he's just got the magic touch.
What it means to be a creator
I asked a lot of creators the same question: What do people get wrong about your job that you wish you could correct them on? I got a lot of the same answer: Basically, it's harder than anyone thinks.
Advertisement
I loved VidCon cocreator Hank Green's answer, because he took things in a different direction. He never said content creation was easy, but called attention to the fact that lots of people are creators in the same way that lots of people are musicians. Not everyone's Beyoncé, but that's OK, there can only be one.
Mainstream entertainment isn't the goal anymore
Given the success of creator MrBeast's Prime Video reality series Beast Games, I thought the possibility of breaking out into the mainstream might be the talk of the town at VidCon. I was wrong.
It's notoriously difficult for even the most famous online celebrities to become traditional ones, and after many years, people seem to understand that. At a panel called 'Blurred Lines: Rethinking the Relationship Between Traditional & Digitally Native Entertainment,' I was struck by something that Paul Telner, Viral Nation's head of programming, said. A former YouTuber himself, he now works with creators to develop their own original IP.
'We have an incredible roaster of talent that I really think — they are their own networks. They are their own Nickelodeon. They are their own CNN, they are their own MTV,' he said. 'I love to pair them with traditional [entertainment], because traditional, for the first time in my career, is starting to wake up to creators.'
In other words, old school media like TV and movies need internet celebrities. As Telner explained, there was a time when creators would prefer to produce their own shows, maintain creative control and do so without network feedback. Now, they have more power than ever in the business. Hollywood needs access to the massive audiences of creators, and creators benefit from the budgets and production of traditional entertainment.
Meet and greet philosophy
I'm always struck by how many fans are willing to pay and line up for long periods of time for a chance to briefly meet and take a photo with their favorite creators. It solidifies, to me, that YouTubers and TikTokers are truly the next class of A-list celebrities for younger generations.
Dream, the most popular Minecraft YouTuber in an already extremely popular online subculture, told me he doesn't like doing meet and greets because it's not enough time to truly make a connection with someone. On the other hand, SoupTimmy, a YouTuber who also has millions of subscribers but a more niche specialty, doesn't mind them. He posts videos of himself solving Rubik's cubes.
'I just treat them like people,' SoupTimmy told me, his fingers clutching a tiny Rubik's cube he wore on a chain around his neck. He didn't expand on that, and honestly, he didn't have to.
Get friendly with AI
I admit I spent most of VidCon avoiding the panels and sessions about AI like the plague, hoping to prioritize talking to creators about what actually aids their careers on a daily basis instead. I underestimated how much AI was a practical answer and not just something that big creators like MrBeast are trying to harness and share as another way to diversify their revenue.
Stephanie Segev, head of creative and content at the link sharing website Hopp by Wix, tells me after VidCon that she highly recommends that creators 'embrace AI beyond ChatGPT prompts.'
'The creators who want to get a head start in 2025 are the ones truly embracing AI at a more technical level,' she says. 'A side-hustler who leans into AI can operate like a full-timer; a full-timer can run like a small agency.'
If this career is really all about consistency, which I keep hearing, maybe leaning into the efficiency of AI isn't such a bad idea. Just don't get into producing AI slop — YouTube just announced it's cracking down on monetizing that.
YouTube is still king
After I got back from VidCon, I joined Slate's internet culture podcast ICYMI to talk about my experience. Cohosts Candice Lim, Kate Lindsay and I declared YouTube king of the social media sites and daydreamed about how we'd change the convention. Listen here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

When Blond Meets Ambition
When Blond Meets Ambition

New York Times

time2 minutes ago

  • New York Times

When Blond Meets Ambition

Loni Anderson's TV persona — the bombshell with a brain — was a brilliant amalgam of old Hollywood and 1970s feminism, pitched perfectly for a pop-culture audience. As Jennifer Marlowe, the clever receptionist on 'WKRP in Cincinnati,' she solved everyone's problems while bringing the slightly doofy men in the office to their knees with just a glance. Ms. Anderson, who died on Sunday, developed a signature look on this show: clinging jersey dresses or sweaters, nearly always in solid colors (to minimize any visual interruption of her famous curves); false eyelashes; wide lipsticked smile; and that famous blond mane: shoulder-length, bouffant on top, with low-hanging scalloped bangs undulating around her face — all immovable, firmly sprayed into place. That hair was key. At first glance, it looked much like the So-Cal glamour styles worn by her TV contemporaries, such as Farrah Fawcett or Suzanne Somers. But those women looked tousled and touchable, their bangs feathering out as if blown by ocean breezes, while Ms. Anderson's hair had a teased and lacquered look. Its shape said 'come hither,' but its sculptural stiffness said 'keep a respectful distance.' And while those other women's variegated blond tones mimicked sun-kissed highlights, Ms. Anderson's hair was bleached to a monochromatic platinum more doll-like than human, a color reminiscent of 'blond bombshells' of earlier decades. This makes sense, because Loni Anderson was not aiming for '70s and '80s 'lighthearted naturalness.' (In fact, she was turned down for the role of 'Chrissy' on 'Three's Company,' which went to Ms. Somers.) She was fashioning herself into a kind of exaggerated, ironic version of the classic Hollywood sex kitten, the voluptuous blonde no man can resist. Numerous stars have occupied this category (including Jean Harlow, Mae West, Lana Turner, Jayne Mansfield, Brigitte Bardot), but it was Marilyn Monroe whom Ms. Anderson conjured most clearly. Critics often noted Ms. Anderson's Marilyn-like qualities — particularly the combination of mature sexual allure and disarming sweetness. (Vincent Canby pointed out her 'sweet, Marilyn Monroe-like turn' in his review of her 1983 film, 'Stroker Ace,' for example.) But there was more to Ms. Monroe's onscreen persona. Through all her breathy bounce and giggle, she always seemed to be winking at her audience, acknowledging that this creature she'd dreamed up was purely fictional — a kind of useful, even slightly funny, alter-ego, a masquerade. Ms. Anderson picked up where Ms. Monroe left off, borrowing elements of the Marilyn persona — the showcased bosom, the Kewpie-doll prettiness, the white-blond hair — while adding a new ingredient: obvious, self-assured intelligence. When first offered the role of 'Jennifer,' Ms. Anderson had rejected it, disliking its stereotypical 'dumb blonde' portrayal. But seeing her star potential, the producer Hugh Wilson offered to rewrite the role so that Jennifer could be 'the smartest person in the room,' as Mr. Wilson recalled to The Hollywood Reporter. It worked. Ms. Anderson had figured out a way to don a Marilyn-esque persona and then infuse it with a new intelligence that did not need suppressing, the recognition that a woman could look like a pinup but think like a C.E.O. This self-awareness was in keeping with the second-wave feminist sensibilities of the late 1970s. 'Jennifer,' in all her high-gloss artificiality, was like a theatrical prop, even a marionette operated by Ms. Anderson, the canny puppeteer. Audiences could sense both halves of the act, and loved them equally. (It's not surprising that Ms. Anderson was married for a time to Burt Reynolds, himself the epitome of a winkingly ironic sex symbol.) While Ms. Anderson's career continued past 'WKRP in Cincinnati,' her look remained largely the same throughout her life. Later, she savvily capitalized on her association with 1950s Hollywood sirens, playing Jayne Mansfield in a 1980 television movie, and even channeling Marilyn Monroe at a 2010 event at the Hollywood Museum, where she appeared in one of Ms. Monroe's evening gowns. 'Bombshell' style never fully fades away, of course. We see it in celebrities such as Sydney Sweeney, Sabrina Carpenter and the Kardashian-Jenner clan, especially Kim, who bleached her hair and wore Marilyn's sequin-covered 'naked dress' for the 2022 Met Gala. We see it in the 'Real Housewives' franchise, with its bosom-centric fashions and big blond hair. Recently, we saw it dissected thoughtfully by Mariska Hargitay in 'My Mom, Jayne,' her excellent documentary about her mother, Jayne Mansfield. And we even see it among some government officials and their spouses. Big hair, tight curve-displaying clothes, big lashes and high heels are not uncommon among women in the current administration. Few of these bombshells-come-lately evince Ms. Anderson's degree of witty self-awareness. Perhaps we're too far away now from the Hollywood golden age that invented all this outré glamour, and even further from the feminist wave that inspired its reassessment. Whatever the reason, even decades later, Loni Anderson is still uniquely watchable, seeming to peer out at us conspiratorially from beneath the persona she invented. She remains the platinum standard.

Millennials went wild for Outdoor Voices. Can it become cool again?
Millennials went wild for Outdoor Voices. Can it become cool again?

Washington Post

time2 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Millennials went wild for Outdoor Voices. Can it become cool again?

In the 2010s, millions of millennials made the lurch into adulthood, bringing with us our famed earnestness and idealism as well as our gently tasteful Millennial Aesthetic. Declared immortal in 2020, pronounced dead 2021, said Aesthetic washed out our homes and gathering spaces in dusty pink and sage green, with soft arch-shaped accents and big, groovy plants. It wiped away maximalist commercial culture to replace it with pleasing, Instagram-friendly sans serif fonts and ad campaigns starring models with freckles. A totem of this particular time: the undyed canvas Outdoor Voices tote, bearing its 'Technical Apparel for Recreation' tagline in a bubbly blue font. It bobbed around city blocks on the shoulders of women who sometimes also wore the brand's distinctive, pale-pastel-color-dipped leggings, or its tennis-adjacent Exercise Dress, or the baseball cap that bore its tail-waggingly cheery slogan, 'Doing Things.' By the end of the decade, you could route yourself to almost any major metro area's liveliest postgrad neighborhood just by Googling directions to the local Outdoor Voices. Parsons School of Design graduate Ty Haney founded Outdoor Voices in 2013 at the age of 23. The former track athlete quickly rose to fame alongside it, a trajectory common to a whole class of young, stylish female founders of the then-burgeoning direct-to-consumer movement. Haney was pushed out of the role in 2020, but the company came under new ownership last year and announced last week that Haney had returned to the helm. (Also, as it happens, a common development lately for said class of female founders.) In the week since the announcement, a flurry of TikTok videos have materialized celebrating the return of 'Ty,' with whom fans seem to be on a parasocial first-name basis. The first collection of her second stint dropped Tuesday. Outdoor Voices 1.0 was earnest, it was friendly, it made the pursuit of health feel fun. It was, in many ways, an ur-millennial brand, free of irony and determinedly welcoming. But it worked the first time because it was — to borrow a then-buzzword — disruptive. Now Haney faces the tricky assignment of once again standing out in an athleisure market over which Outdoor Voices has undeniably exerted an influence. Back in 2013, workout gear was 'like, shiny black Spandex and superhuman-looking,' Haney told me this week. 'I wanted to go the other way, with neutrals and texture, things that would integrate nicely into your daily wardrobe.' So in the early years, Outdoor Voices' matte color palette largely consisted of light, creamy hues called 'oatmeal' and 'ash' and 'beach' and 'white sand.' Even the more saturated tones had names such as 'dandelion' and 'evergreen,' and the high neck- and waistlines of most OV garments gave even their body-hugging high-compression workout sets a sweetly modest affect. Today, if something gets described, or derided, as 'millennial-coded,' chances are it looks like Outdoor Voices: 'It definitely set the tone in a lot of ways for that era, in terms of, like, 'clean and simple,'' Haney said, then added, laughing, 'and sans serif.' At the time, its conviction that exercise didn't have to be punishing — Haney fondly remembers an ad campaign built entirely around dog-walking — won over legions of shoppers. More came into the fold when the brand began offering community events such as group hikes and fun runs. And still others, myself (25 at the time, married only to my gym membership, regularly washing sweaty yoga clothes to the point of disintegration) included, got converted just by the shocking durability of the clothes. Technical apparel for recreation, indeed. In some ways, 2025 America might seem like a perfect climate for the return of OG OV. Gen Z women are carrying their Owala FreeSip water bottles (gentle colors, sans serif font) to the Pilates studio after work instead of meeting up for happy hour. Now, though, the athleisure market is flooded with Exercise Dress copycats and candy-colored two-piece compression sets. (And the latter feel 'a little tired,' Haney quipped.) Not to mention brand-sponsored run clubs and yoga events. After the announcement of Haney's return, Outdoor Voices released the first preview image of her new collection: a black zip-up hoodie with a cursive, bedazzled 'Doing Things,' a notion that would have sounded like parody — or blasphemy — in 2015, given Outdoor Voices' famously understated look at the time. But a decade later, as Gen Z gleefully revives the gaudy, goofy styles of the early 2000s, the concept feels on-trend, if not on-brand. ('What in the Juicy Couture Y2K is going on right now,' replied a chorus of TikTok reaction videos.) Among the other new offerings are looser-fitting variations on the Exercise Dress in black and white, shorts and workout bras in vibrant canary yellow, and grass-green and pastel cardigans made of a cotton-cashmere blend. The collection's single style of leggings is a similarly Y2K-invoking black capri. This new Outdoor Voices has 'more details' and is 'more fashion-driven,' Haney said. 'I think the whole ecosystem of activewear brands has gotten a little bit boring and plain and bland.' In Haney's absence, Outdoor Voices was displaced from dominance by brands such as Alo and Vuori, whose workoutwear is frequently photographed in settings that suggest $300-a-month fitness club memberships and luxe beach getaways ('I am somewhat shocked that the '[fitness as] recreation' path is still so wide open for us to own,' Haney mused) and tend to offer a surfeit of earth tones alongside one or two bolder accent colors. Their muted 2020s color palettes, arguably, are a downstream effect of Outdoor Voices' muted 2010s color palette, though 2010s OV looks Lisa Frank-esque in comparison. Haney wants the brand to once again lead athleisure in a new direction. So rhinestones and capri pants and loud fabrics may be what's required for Outdoor Voices 2.0 to stand out in a post-Outdoor Voices 1.0 world. Still, a certain subset of women might be content to order those 1.0 staples from Haney forever if she were to keep making them, buying back pieces of their youth. 'Outdoor Voices is making a comeback. And it feels like 2019 again,' one New Yorker rejoiced on TikTok. In Los Angeles, another user mimed blowing cobwebs off a blue 'Doing Things' cap. And one woman who had posted in jubilation in response to 'Ty' 'rising from the ashes' posted again a few days later: 'Just dusted off this vintage, archival, authentic Outdoor Voices exercise dress,' read the caption. In a polka-dot version, she posed whimsically for a moment before slurping her iced coffee and pushing a bassinet stroller out of frame.

Does More Freedom Equal Less Screen Time? Experts Think So
Does More Freedom Equal Less Screen Time? Experts Think So

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Does More Freedom Equal Less Screen Time? Experts Think So

In a screen time battle, there are no winners. Either you give in and let your kids have way too much screen time, leading to increased mental health problems and other issues, or you strictly control their screens so much that they end up feeling ignored, misunderstood, and babied. It's a lose-lose situation. My oldest child is only 7, and it's already a struggle for my family. But what are we supposed to do? A new study asked experts how to actually lower screen time in kids, and the answer is something that feels completely counter-intuitive: give your kids more freedom. The Anxious Generation author Jonathan Haidt, along with Lenore Skenazy and Zach Rausch, recently partnered with Harris Poll to survey 500 U.S. kids ages 8 to 12 about their phone habits and wrote about the results in The Atlantic. They found that the majority of kids already owned smartphones, with about half of 10-to-12-year-olds reporting that 'most' or 'all' of their friends use social media, despite the minimum age being 13. (Haidt advocates that kids don't have phones until high school and social media until they are 16.) More from SheKnows Gen Z Is Bragging About 'Getting Cracked' on TikTok - & It May Not Mean What You Think Additionally, about 75 percent of kids ages 9 to 12 play the online game Roblox, where they can interact with friends and internet strangers. However, most of the children said they aren't allowed to be in public at all without an adult. Fewer than half of the 8- and 9-year-olds have gone down a grocery-store aisle alone and more than a quarter aren't allowed to play unsupervised in their front yard. When asked how they would prefer spending time with friends, the majority said unstructured play in real life. 'Children want to meet up in person, no screens or supervision,' the authors wrote. 'But because so many parents restrict their ability to socialize in the real world on their own, kids resort to the one thing that allows them to hang out with no adults hovering: their phones.' In fact, nearly three-quarters of kids in the study said they would spend less time online if there were more friends in their neighborhood to play with in person. Kids Want More Freedom Too Members of our SheKnows Teen Council shared how they enjoy stepping away from their phones for hands-on 'adventuring,' such as building a tiki hut, shooting hoops, and connecting with their friends. 'You're going out with your friends, you're finding activities to do, you're exploring, you're building something — it can really be anything,' 16-year-old Clive told us. And as a result? 'You feel double satisfaction. You had fun, and you're proud of yourself for not scrolling on your phone all day.' 'If there's a way that a kid can walk a few blocks to a store and buy something, at age 8, they should be doing that,' Haidt previously told SheKnows. 'And the kids who go out and do something, they come back and they're jumping up and down. They are so excited. It has a huge impact on the kids, but the really important thing is that it has an impact on the parents, because we don't know what the right age is to let them out. We're afraid.' Over-policing of Parents Short of getting in a time-machine and raising kids in the '80s, it's hard to let your kids roam the neighborhood when no other kids are doing it — or parents are watching out the windows and calling the police if they see unsupervised kids out and about. Take this tragedy from a family in North Carolina. Jessica and Sameule Jenkins let their 7-year-old son Legend and 10-year-old son Brandon walk to the neighborhood Food Lion supermarket and Subway sandwich shop, which was less than 10 minutes away from their apartment. In an interview with The New York Times, the parents revealed they were hesitant. 'I really thought against it,' said Mr. Jenkins. He added that he and his wife are 'very protective of our kids.' But they compromised: the boys could walk their if they stayed on the phone with their parents the whole time. 'They made it there safe,' Mrs. Jenkins said. But on the way back, Legend stepped off a grass median and was tragically hit and killed by an SUV driver. Although the driver faced no charges for the incident, the parents were charged with involuntary manslaughter with bail set at $1.5 million each. 'As many parents now control their children's every move, transgressions by parents who take a freer approach — one that used to be normal — can result in criminal charges,' stated the outlet. 'Just because parents don't have their eyes on their kids every single second doesn't mean they are bad parents,' Lenore Skenazy, who chronicles such cases as president of Let Grow, which advocates for more childhood freedom, along with Jonathan Haidt, told the outlet. 'We're blaming these parents, but they've done everything as good as they can for 10 years, and then something terrible happens.' When parents do let kids have more freedom, everyone benefits. How Parents Can Help Screen Addiction A March 2025 Common Sense Media report found that by the time kids are 2 years old, 40 percent have their own tablet. By age 8, nearly 1 in 4 kids have their own cell phone. Overall, 51 percent of children age 8 and younger have some sort of mobile device. And kids ages 5-8 spend about three and a half hours daily on screens. Other studies have shown that kids are addicted to their screens, which interferes with schoolwork, relationships, and life because they only want to be on their devices. Psychologist and author Dr. Becky Kennedy (known as 'Dr. Becky') previously talked to SheKnows about kids and screen time. She reminded us that we have to think about both short- and long-term needs for our kids. 'Sometimes short-term needs are, 'I need my kid to be fully occupied for an amount of time, so I can fill-in-the-blank: decompress, cook, answer emails, work out, have time to myself,' whatever it is. I totally understand this!' she told us. Long term needs might be: ''I want my kid to be able to access their own creativity and turn that creativity into action. I want my kid to learn to be bored, and to wait, and to know that that's part of human existence. I want my kid to learn that hard work and effort is what leads to good feelings, as opposed to only mindlessness and low effort leading to good, exciting feelings.'' '[I]t's not a way of saying long term needs should always trump short term needs,' Dr. Becky clarified. 'It's a way of saying we just need to think about them both.' No one is saying kids can never watch cartoons or play iPad games on a long car trip. But what experts are suggesting is that we also think about how we want to raise our kids to prepare them for the future. Teaching them how to explore and entertain themselves when they're bored. Help them gain skills to be independent and work hard at what they want. And it starts with loosening the leash and giving them a little more freedom. It's like what Clive previously told us. 'I don't know if being on my phone makes me unhappy,' the teen shared. 'But I'm 100 percent sure that when I'm really happy — like during the summer when I have things to do and I'm in my best place — I don't want to be on my phone.' Let's work together to start giving our kids more freedomsBest of SheKnows These Raw & Beautiful Breastfeeding Photos Show There's No 'Right' Way to Nurse 'But I Hate School': What To Do When Your Teen Dreads Going Back Rugged Meets Romantic in These 'Quiet Western' Names: All the Charm, None of the Grit Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store