Indian student arrivals nearly halve in the US on Trump visa policy
Total arrivals on student visas fell for the fourth straight month in July 2025, declining 28% to just under 79,000, according to data from the International Trade Administration compiled by Bloomberg. That was also the biggest monthly drop so far this year.
Student arrivals from India fell 46% while China posted a 26% decline.
The twin drops from the two largest sources of foreign students provides a grim snapshot that threatens to disrupt the financial models of US colleges and universities.
To be sure, US universities have already warned that first-time foreign student enrollment on campuses are projected to fall by 30% this autumn, potentially costing the education sector $2.6 billion in tuition revenue.
The sharp downturn follows a series of policy changes and administrative hurdles from the White House around tightening immigration and foreign student scrutiny.
The measures have created a climate of uncertainty and resulted in significant backlogs and delays at US embassies and consulates in key Asian markets.
'There are real reasons for concern,' Zuzana Cepla Wootson, deputy director of federal policy at Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, told Bloomberg. 'It's part of a broader pattern under this administration. The travel ban, expanded screening processes, appointment backlogs—all these create uncertainty for students from China, India and beyond.'
The Trump administration announced a pause in interviews for student visas in late May. In mid June, the US State Department said that it would resume interviews, while also ordering reviews of applicants' social-media profiles. The timing of these policies, during the peak summer visa application season, has been particularly damaging and doesn't bode well for student arrivals in August—historically the peak month for new students entering the US.
The visitor arrival figures don't break down whether those coming in are new or returning students. Many already on student visas may have chosen to stay in the US and not travel this summer due to the administration's scrutiny of international scholars, Wootson said.
Officials at schools with large Asian student populations, such as the University of Southern California, have said that that a continued decline could result in tens of millions of dollars in lost revenue. USC already faces a deficit of $200 million. Arizona State University President Michael Crow meanwhile said visa delays have been more disruptive than the pandemic.
A record 1.1 million international students enrolled in US higher education institutions in the 2023-24 school year, according to Open Doors, which collects data on foreign scholars. India was the top country, with nearly 332,000 students, followed by China with about 277,000 that academic year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
28 minutes ago
- India.com
‘Dramatic Reset': Expert Shares Inside Story Of What Forced Modi To Turn Towards China After 5-Year Chill
India and China have been working to mend their ties. All of a sudden, ministers and officials from each country are visiting each other and Prime Minister Narendra Modi is making a visit to Beijing after seven years. Ahead of PM Modi's visit, China lifted curbs on the export of rare earth minerals, fertilisers and other commodities, signalling a willingness to boost trade ties. Amid this unprecedented rebuilding exercise, a foreign policy expert has shared key insights on what led to the dramatic change in India's diplomatic approach. Dramatic Shift In India-China Ties Speaking to Bloomberg, Rockefeller International Chairman Ruchir Sharma claimed that only a few months ago, PM Modi was categorically saying that he wanted nothing to do with China and all of a sudden, India is now engaging with China at the highest level. 'India is seeing a dramatic reset with China. Till about three or four months ago, Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi was very categorical when he would meet people, in saying how let down he felt by China and Xi Jinping. PM Modi was privately telling people he wanted nothing to do with China,' said Sharma. Sharma further claimed that Prime Minister Modi tried his best to form a relationship with China when Xi Jinping visited India in 2019. 'Modi felt very let down personally about what China did in terms of the border dispute and other issues. The same was reinforced by the Indo-Pak conflict, which took place during Operation Sindoor, where Pakistan used extensively weapons supplied by China. That was a really low point in the ties,' Sharma told Bloomberg Insights, adding that the reset has been a 'complete pivot' in terms of what 'Modi has been forced to do'. Why Modi Turned To China? Sharing details about the dramatic policy shift, Sharma credited it to PM Modi's deteriorating ties with US President Donald Trump. 'Modi is doing this because of the fact that the way he's fallen out with Trump that the two of them were extremely close during the first term of Trump,' said Sharma. He further claimed that during the US presidential polls in 2024, PM Modi was set to meet Kamala Harris and Donald Trump in September. However, since the meeting with Harris was cancelled, the meeting with Trump was also terminated so as not to appear close to any one candidate. Sharma claimed that this irked Trump and recently, when India did not endorse Trump's ceasefire claim, the personal ties between Modi and Trump went downhill. Time For China To Rebuild Trust The expert further said that many countries still do not trust China, and since many nations are under pressure by the United States, it could be the right time for Beijing to step-in in the right direction. 'A lot of countries in Asia do not trust China. It is up to China to rise to the occasion with India and other nations. It has to build ties at a time when many countries are feeling pressured by America,' said Sharma.
The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
India can't fight Trump tariffs with emotion. Smart talks, sector relief, reforms are key
These sectors not only anchor the merchandise exports to the US but also directly affect employment generation and the livelihoods of millions of workers and farmers. The T&A sector, faces a tariff disadvantage of over 30 percentage points compared with competitors like Bangladesh, Pakistan and Vietnam, threatening its competitive position in a key export market. Gems and jewellery exports, worth USD 11.9 billion, face similar challenge against suppliers such as Turkey, Vietnam, and Thailand. Auto parts, which constitute 3% of India's exports to the US, are also vulnerable. While this represents just 1.56% of GDP and 7.38% of total exports, far from a catastrophe for a USD 3.9 trillion economy, the impact is heavily concentrated in labour-intensive and high-value sectors such as textiles and apparel, gems and jewellery, auto parts and agricultural products, notably shrimp. The recent escalation of tariffs by the United States against Indian exports has significantly altered the landscape of India-US trade relations. Announced by US President Donald Trump on July 31st and August 6th, 2025, the measures impose a 25% tariff plus a 25% penalty tariff respectively on exports from countries importing Russian oil (in the form of secondary sanctions). India's purchase of Russian oil remains fully compliant with international norms and is guided by cost competitiveness and energy security imperatives. Our analysis shows that USD 60.85 billion around 70% of India's goods exports to the US are now exposed to the 50% tariff. In agriculture, shrimp exports will be worst hit with 50% tariffs higher than those applied to competitors like Ecuador, Indonesia, and Vietnam, in addition to the existing anti-dumping (1.8- 3.0%) and countervailing duties (5.7%) India faces. These are sectors where buyers can switch sourcing relatively quickly, which gives US importers bargaining power and weakens India's negotiating position. The policy brief recommends a three-pronged strategic response. Smart negotiations with strategy, not emotion The US remains too large and too important to write off, especially as India advances trade deals with the UK and EU (DGFT, 2025). Instead, India must work to re-engage US with smart, tactical negotiation, next rounds of which are scheduled this month end. The key sticking point has always been agriculture. US demands on GM products should be addressed on the basis of science rather than ideology. The Vajpayee government had allowed GM cotton, and emphasised the power of science in transforming agriculture, as he quoted 'Jai Jawan, Jai Kisan, Jai Vigyan'. India imposes restrictions on import of soybean and corn from US giving the GM context. However, it is ironic that cotton seed and its oil is already in our food chain, as 95% of our cotton is now GM (Gulati and Juneja, 2022). India can ensure that imported GM corn can be used for ethanol blending or as poultry feed. Similar is the case of soya, where India restricts imports of GM soya but imports it in the form of soya oil. India must also question its own tariff structure. In 2024, India's average agricultural tariff stood at 36.7%, nearly seven times higher than the US average of 5%; while the trade-weighted average was an even steeper 64.3%, compared to just 4.2% for the US (WTO Tariff Profiles, 2025). Yet, in certain cases, these high barriers are selectively relaxed; For example, India imported USD 17.09 billion worth of edible oils covering about 57% of its consumption at tariffs below 30% (DFPD, 2025). The argument is simple- if edible oils and pulses can enter at less than 30% duty, there is no logic in maintaining tariffs of 120% on walnuts, 100% on chicken legs, 70% on rice (despite India being the world's largest exporter), 60% on SMP, 45% on soyabean, 50% on corn, apples and 30% on cranberries. Edible oil tariffs are reduced during global price spikes, effectively shielding one sector while leaving others exposed. For non-sensitive goods without strong domestic production capacity such as walnuts (120%), berries like cranberries and blueberries (30%), and breakfast cereals (30%) tariffs could be rationalised. On dairy, India could explore a certification system-similar to halal-that assures buyers the cattle are non-meat fed or pasture-grazed. In dairy, protecting smallholder farmers is the concern, India could adopt a tariff rate quota (TRQ), keeping prohibitive tariffs (similar to what Japan or Korea does) only beyond a certain volume threshold, such as 2 MMT. Annex 4 lists commodities on which India currently levies tariffs exceeding 50% on US imports (WTO, 2025). This inconsistency weakens India's credibility in trade talks. The reality is that high protectionist tariffs breed inefficiency. India should take this as an opportunity to reform like the 1991 moment. The fact is that India needs major reforms in rationalizing its import duties, irrespective of Trump's pressures. Rather than shielding agriculture with blanket protections, India should invest in R&D, improve supply chain efficiency and modernise infrastructure reforms on the scale of the 1991 liberalisation. This adversity should be converted to an opportunity through domestic reforms and India must focus on innovations, high productivity and R&D to enhance our export competitive strength, globally. Above all, India must cool the temperature in negotiations and engage with the US with logic, not emotion. India should not protect one sector risking huge loss to other sectors. Warn you, if service sector is hit, it would be huge impact on India's skilled youth and the economy as a whole. To help balance the trade deficit, India could consider sourcing 15-20% of its crude oil imports from the US. India must set its tariffs rationally. Smart negotiation, combined with flexibility and internal reforms, will be the key to sustaining India's export competitiveness in an increasingly volatile global trade order. Immediate sector specific targeted relief structure A second urgent measure is targeted relief to highly affected sectors, through temporary subsidies, rebates or incentives, should be rolled out within weeks for sectors such as T&A, gems & jewellery, and shrimp. T&A sector which face a 50% tariff compared to 19-20% for competitors like Pakistan and Vietnam, this price gap is too wide to absorb without major job losses in an industry that employs over 45 million people (Gulati et al., 2025). A temporary subsidy or support scheme, to the tune of 25-30% of export value, could neutralise the tariff differential. Preserving the sector's viability is critical not only for export earnings but for preventing mass layoffs in labour-intensive clusters across India. Likewise, the gems & jewellery sector, anchored by Surat's globally renowned diamond-cutting and polishing hubs, employing lakhs of people, needs immediate fiscal cushioning to prevent erosion of its market share to competitors in Turkey, Vietnam, Thailand etc. Similarly, shrimp exports require urgent support. The states of Andhra, West Bengal and Odisha depend heavily on aquaculture for rural employment and livelihoods (MPEDA, 2025). The new tariffs threaten both livelihoods and political stability, as key state and national leaders will face mounting pressure from affected communities (Reuters, 2025b). Finally, a nationalist consumption drive could help 9 absorb some of the excess supply domestically (especially with the upcoming festival seasons), with campaigns to promote Brand Bharat as part of a broader movement of nationalist fervour, especially from the ramparts of the Red Fort by PM Narendra Modi in his Independence Day speech. Also read: Indian foreign policy is in free fall. Can we balance national pride with new power reality? High-priority diversification of export markets Overdependence on the US must be reduced by actively cultivating alternative markets. India must conclude the FTA with the EU, advance the UK deal, and seriously explore joining the CPTPP, an open, rules-based trade bloc that includes Japan, Korea and Australia (Ahluwalia, 2025). Beyond these, the most promising avenues for expansion lie in Africa, ASEAN, the Middle East and Brazil. In Brazil, where India's agricultural exports stood at USD 130.5 million in CY2024 compared with imports of USD 2.91 billion, there is clear scope to bridge the USD 2.78 billion trade gap by targeting high-demand imports such as malt extracts, milk products (including SMP), basmati rice, frozen French fries, fresh apples, and garlic (ITC Trade Map, CY 2024). Africa, with an USD 80 billion agri-import market where India's share is only 8%, offers significant potential under AfCFTA, COMESA, and SACU frameworks to redirect surplus capacity from the US into staples and value-added products ranging from rice (USD 4.2 billion), sugar (USD 1.5 billion), and meat (USD 800 million) to pulses, oilseeds, spices etc (Rath et al., 2025). In ASEAN, India's 2024 exports included meat (USD 1.5 billion), marine products (USD 285.4 million), sugar (USD 167.4 million), groundnuts (USD 620 million), and rice (USD 500 million), with further potential in spices, fresh and processed produce, tea, coffee, oilseeds, dairy, and animal feed. India has a spectacular diplomatic relation with middle east, and the region has annual agri-import demand exceeding USD 100 billion and several GCC members reliant on imports for over 80% of their food needs. This is another key destination already taking rice (USD 5.05 billion), sugar (USD 242.04 million), meat (USD 1.7 billion), and tea (USD 345 million) from India, while also offering strong opportunities in dairy, pulses, oilseeds, fruits, vegetables, packaged foods, etc supported by cold-chain investments and long-term supply contracts (Rath et al., 2025). Conclusion In navigating the Trump's Tariff Blow, India must hold firm to the principle that sovereignty cannot be compromised, especially when external pressures seek to dictate its fair economic choices. India is a rising power and no one can halt its momentum. The path forward lies in smart negotiations that defend national interests which unlock opportunities for growth. This is not a personal battle between leaders, but a matter of national interest especially protecting jobs, securing market access and safeguarding strategic autonomy. India's response must blend tactical flexibility with structural reforms that enhance competitiveness across sectors. India needs to negotiate smartly, provide immediate, targeted relief to highly-hit sectors, and diversify export markets on high priority to navigate the tariff blow. The success of our leaders will be ensuring that short-term disruptions give way to long-term gains, reinforcing India's position as a trusted and indispensable player in the global economy. This is an abstract from a policy brief by the Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER). Ashok Gulati is a Distinguished Professor at ICRIER. Sulakshana Rao is a Senior fellow at ICRIER. Tanay Suntwal is a Research Assistant with the Agriculture Policy, Sustainability, and Innovation Team at ICRIER.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Trump's 50% tariffs to affect Indian exports worth $48 billion, says Centre
The Centre on Tuesday said almost $50 billion worth of Indian goods will be affected once the 50 per cent US tariff comes into effect on August 27. In a written reply to the Lok Sabha regarding a question on the effect of the Donald Trump tariffs, Minister of State of Commerce and Industry Jitin Prasada said that around $48.2 billion of merchandise exports of India will be subject to the additional tariffs. 'It is estimated that around $48.2 billion of India's merchandise export (based on 2024 trade value) to the US will be subject to the above additional tariffs,' he said in the reply. Trump has imposed 25 per cent reciprocal tariffs on India, along with an additional 25 per cent levy on its purchases of Russian oil, resulting in a total of 50 per cent duties. 'Reciprocal tariff at the rate of 25% has been imposed on certain goods exported from India to the USA starting from August 07th, 2025. Further, additional ad valorem rate of duty of 25% with effect from 27th August, 2025 has been imposed on certain goods exported from India,' Prasada explained in his answer. The minister in his reply said that the Centre is 'committed to secure' India's national interest and protect its farmers, workers and more in light of the recent US tariffs. 'Government is committed to secure and advance country's national interest and protect the welfare of our farmers, workers, entrepreneurs, exporters, MSMEs and all sections of industry and take all necessary steps to help mitigate impact on trade including through appropriate export promotion and trade diversification measures,' he said in the reply. 'The Government has taken note of tariff imposition by the US,' he added. India and the USA are negotiating a multi-sector Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA), with five rounds of talks already being completed. The US team has recently postponed their visit for the sixth round of US tariff negotiations, which was scheduled from August 25. In a separate reply regarding the matter, Jitin Prasada said, 'As a part of negotiations, among other things, both sides are engaged in discussions on liberalization of trade in goods, including non-sensitive agricultural products, with the aim to expand trade and deepen the India-US trade relationship.'
