You Don't Have to Wear Sunscreen...As Long As You Don't Mind Dressing Like Me
But I also know that the sun is a killer. My Wirecutter colleagues have spent hundreds of hours testing sunscreens to protect your skin from the myriad risks it poses. Despite all of their work, and despite my trying all of those endless tubes and creams and aerosols, I've come to an unfortunate conclusion: I just don't like sunscreen.
I don't like the greasy look of it. I don't like the sticky feeling of it. And I don't even like how it smells. I also have sensitive, burn-prone skin and absolutely no desire to incur sun damage.
So what's a girl to do? Luckily, I've found a combination of clothing and other items that keep my skin safe, and they don't require me to smear globs of product I hate.
When I'm wearing this getup, my sister won't walk next to me, my friends laugh at me regularly, and sometimes children even point and stare. Perhaps I look strange. But I am free.
These opera-length UPF gloves provide coverage from your fingers to your upper arms. They're made from mesh, so they're extra breathable. And they have textured index-finger and thumb pads, so you can text on the move.
To avoid using sunscreen, my solution is to wear UPF clothing. I specifically love having a hat and gloves that I can add to any outfit.
UPF (ultraviolet protection factor) clothing is any type of clothing that offers protection from the sun. As Sarah Gannett wrote in our guide to UPF clothing, 'A garment isn't considered sun protective if it has a UPF rating lower than 15.' So any clothing you purchase for the sake of sun protection should have a UPF of at least 15 (my picks here both have a UPF rating of 50+).
Many garments do this without having a UPF rating. But the rating lets you know exactly how much sun can penetrate the fabric, similar to the way SPF indicates how much sun can penetrate sunscreen. Unlike sunscreen, UPF clothing does not require 'reapplication'; you just pull on the item, and whatever it covers is protected until you pull it off. And there's a ton of UPF clothing to choose from (some items are recommended elsewhere on our site, including hats, shirts, and sun sleeves for gardening).
My first line of defense is the Stevie Ultra Sun Hat. It may make me look like a beekeeper, but it's genius: On the underside of the hat, two snaps connect with the veil, so you can remove it or adjust its tightness, and it can be worn over the nose or under the chin. A flexible wire in the veil shapes around your nose (like a face mask) to create a snugger fit. Dorie Chevlen/NYT Wirecutter
It also has a removable chin strap, which can be tightened on windy days to keep the hat secure. And the hat's 22-inch circumference can be tightened, so it's suitable for more head shapes (though not all — a few buyers on Coolibar's site said the 22-inch circumference was too snug for their heads). The brim extends 4 inches on the front half of the hat (the back half has a gator), keeping my face fully shaded and my neck fully covered even on the sunniest days. I have worn my Coolibar sun hat for two years, and it's holding up beautifully.
From there, I add a pair of opera-length gloves. They allow me to skimp on sunscreen for the entire span of my arms, unless I'm wearing a sleeveless shirt, in which case I either rub sunscreen on my upper arms or tack a UPF umbrella onto my getup. Crucially, another thing that sets these gloves apart from winter pairs is their impressive breathability. Everyone asks me, 'Don't you get sweaty in there?' But I don't. The mesh is so breathable that I don't even feel it on my skin.
Also, the touch-screen-compatible pads on the index fingers and thumbs allow me to wear the gloves daily without going batty. Since I am usually lost and swiping around Google Maps on any walk that I take, this is a must-have feature. Another nice detail is the silicon texturing on the palms; this material makes the gloves just a bit grippier, so if you're holding, say, a water bottle, it won't slip through your fingers.
These gloves come in several colors and sizes, too (measured by the circumference of the biceps and the length of the fingers). In hindsight, I wish I'd bothered to measure; I lazily selected the medium-size gloves, but they're just a bit roomy; next time, I'd go with a small pair.
There are many advantages to my sun-protective accessories, including that they're machine-washable. Every couple of weeks (or whenever I remember), I throw the hat and gloves into the washer on the delicate cycle, and then I air-dry them. (I put the gloves in a mesh bag so they don't tangle.)
This getup is also a lot quicker to throw on than your classic rub-in sunscreen. On the few days that I use sunscreen instead of my UPF ensemble, I fume over how long it takes. Pulling on gloves and throwing on a hat takes maybe 15 seconds. But carefully rubbing in sunscreen, making sure it's evenly distributed across your neck and face and on your ears, and then repeating that process every two hours? I've never measured, but I know it's a lot longer than a quarter of a minute.
But even with this getup at my disposal, there will always be some occasions where sunscreen proves necessary — when I'm swimming, for example, or on really windy days (the veil can flap up in strong gusts, making its protection less dependable). And though my various UPF accessories are by no means cheap, the cost-per-wear is ultimately worth it.
If anything, the biggest downside to this getup is the attention it brings.
Even my friends laugh at me or call me a 'whack-ass beekeeper,' and while I have a very high threshold for embarrassment, it can still feel uncomfortable to walk around in public looking different from most people. And though wearing a face covering and gloves against the sun is common practice in many parts of the world, in the US and Canada, where I have worn my getup, people stare. That's usually fine by me, but sometimes I do choose the physical discomfort of sunscreen over the social discomfort of judgmental looks.
More often than not, however, I throw caution to the wind and don my hat and gloves without a second thought. On a recent walk through Vancouver's Stanley Park with my boyfriend, he marveled at the response to my attire. 'People are giving you such nasty looks!' They were. They will again. But I'm holding my ground. No matter what others think, I have the smug satisfaction of taking care of my skin — my body — in my own way. I didn't invent this practice, and I won't be the last to employ it.
So to all of my fellow sunscreen-averse, UPF-hat-wearing friends (past, present, and future), I will say it's an honor to be in your club.
This article was edited by Hannah Rimm and Maxine Builder.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Processed Food May Raise Lung Cancer Chances—Scientists
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A new large-scale study has found that people who consume higher amounts of ultra-processed foods (UPF) face a significantly increased risk of developing lung cancer. Published in the medical journal Thorax, researchers from Chongqing University in China analyzed the dietary patterns of over 100,000 adults and found that those with the highest intake of UPF had a 41 percent greater chance of being diagnosed with the disease. Newsweek contacted the American Lung Association for comment via email on Sunday. Why It Matters Processed food has already been linked to numerous chronic health conditions, including obesity, heart disease, and diabetes. This new research adds lung cancer to the growing list of serious health concerns associated with the modern industrial diet. With UPF making up a substantial portion of many people's daily intake, the findings raise urgent public health questions about food quality, regulation, and long-term health outcomes. Stock image of a selection of ultra-processed-foods. Stock image of a selection of To Know The study drew on data from the U.S. Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial, following more than 100,000 adults aged between 55 and 74 over a period of 12 years. Among participants, those in the highest quartile of UPF intake faced a markedly higher risk of developing lung cancer, even after researchers adjusted for smoking, socioeconomic status, and other lifestyle factors. UPF in the study included packaged snacks, instant noodles, sweetened beverages, processed meats, frozen meals, and industrial baked goods. Notably, the increased risk applied to both major forms of the disease, non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer (NSCLC and SCLC). The researchers found that even after accounting for smoking, which remains the leading cause of lung cancer, diet remained an independent risk factor. The study concluded that higher consumption of UPF is associated with an increased risk of lung cancer, NSCLC, and SCLC. Although additional research in other populations and settings is warranted, these findings suggest the health benefits of limiting intake. Public health experts have long warned that UPF, while convenient and inexpensive, carry long-term health risks that are often underestimated. Critics point out that these foods are not only nutrient-poor, but often high in sugar, sodium, and additives that may interfere with normal metabolic and immune functions. BMJ Group, publisher of the British Medical Journal, noted that as this is an observational study, "no firm conclusions can be drawn about cause and effect," with researchers unable to factor in smoking intensity, which may have been influential. "In addition, dietary information was collected only once, so couldn't account for changes over time, and the number of cancer diagnoses was small." Although the study was observational and cannot confirm a direct cause-and-effect relationship, researchers said the strength of the association warrants serious attention. Some experts, however, cautioned against drawing firm conclusions from observational data alone, urging further research to explore underlying mechanisms. What People Are Saying Kevin McConway, emeritus professor of applied statistics at The Open University, per Science Media Center: "It's yet another of a class of studies about ultra-processed foods that, in my view, are doing nothing much to advance what is known about associations between the consumption of UPFs and human health. "I'm well aware that studies with other kinds of methodology are going on—I just wish that researchers would concentrate more on those other types of research, instead of repeatedly cranking the handle of doing studies like this one." What Happens Next The study may intensify calls for clearer food labeling, public education campaigns, and stronger policy action to reduce the dominance of UPF in the global food supply. Future studies could examine specific ingredients and production processes to determine what aspects of UPF may contribute most to cancer risk. In the meantime, health authorities are likely to renew efforts to promote diets based on minimally processed, whole foods—such as fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and lean proteins—as a way to reduce cancer and other chronic disease risks.
New York Times
2 days ago
- New York Times
This Portable Travel Essential Could Save Your Life. And It Costs Less Than $35.
Focusing too heavily on the symptoms of carbon monoxide poisoning may give people a false sense that they'll know if they're suffering from CO poisoning. That's because common symptoms of CO poisoning — such as headache, dizziness, fatigue, and nausea — resemble the signs of other illnesses, especially those that are easy to come down with while you're traveling. You might think you have food poisoning, the flu, COVID-19, or a migraine, or that you simply had too much to drink. 'If you have a headache, you're not going to call the fire department,' Hauschildt noted. On top of that, if you've ever gotten sick on vacation, you've probably done exactly what I've done: You've stayed in your room. If you have carbon monoxide poisoning however, this will only make you sicker, and the sicker you get, the less likely you are to get out, since another effect of CO poisoning is disorientation or confusion. And many carbon-monoxide related deaths happen while a person is sleeping, so some people might experience no symptoms at all. All of that is to say: A detector may be the only way for you to know if you have CO poisoning. Left: Our portable detector pick (left) is slightly smaller than a standard plug-in detector (right). Right: If you use plug-in detectors (pictured at top) at home, you can also bring them with you on vacation, an especially appealing option if you need to cover an entire rental. Maria Adelmann/NYT Wirecutter Luckily, CO devices are compact, readily available to buy, and relatively inexpensive. Unlike smoke alarms, carbon monoxide alarms don't need to be mounted because CO is about the same weight as air; as a result, many residential detectors for sale today are plug-in devices that also have a battery backup. These are totally suitable for travel as long as they conform to the UL 2034 standard, which reflects the latest safety regulations for such devices. Packing your home's plug-in alarms to take on vacation can be especially useful if you'd like to have several for coverage of a larger rental. But it may be worthwhile to get a dedicated, portable, battery-operated CO alarm that you can store with your travel supplies and that you won't have to remember to pack or return to its original location. Doug Mahoney, who writes Wirecutter's guide to smoke alarms, suggests the First Alert CO710 Carbon Monoxide Detector, a battery-operated detector that is about the width of two iPhones and weighs less than half a pound. It can slip into the front pocket of a carry-on. Although we haven't extensively tested CO detectors as their own category, we have tested combination fire alarms and CO detectors, and Doug is confident in this recommendation. Currently, only two well-established manufacturers of residential smoke alarms, First Alert and Kidde, undergo rigorous third-party testing to confirm that their products comply with UL standards, as indicated by a UL or Intertek mark on the back of the device. 'This certification is a pass/fail test for us,' Doug told me. 'If a company has it, we consider their products. If a company does not have it, we will not consider their products.' Unfortunately, Kidde's track record with its products is 'disturbing,' according to Doug, owing to a perpetual history of large-scale recalls. That makes First Alert the last one standing. Our portable pick is not much bigger than an iPhone and fits even in the smallest pockets of my travel bags, such as the side pocket of my Fjällräven Kånken and a pocket on my suitcase specifically designed for a phone and a power bank. Maria Adelmann/NYT Wirecutter We also think First Alert devices are nicely built and easy to use. For travel, the battery-operated CO detector has an advantage over a plug-in model: Not only is it smaller and able to work without occupying a precious outlet, but also, if you're vacationing internationally, you won't have to deal with a travel adapter for it. You can also place it at eye level so that you don't forget to pack it when you leave. Plus, the lithium ion battery should last about 10 years. Just note that because of that battery, you may want to slip the detector into your carry-on or personal item instead of your checked bag. The First Alert detector is blissfully simple (though we always recommend reading the manual). When the air is safe, the display shows the room temperature (left). Running a quick test demonstrates what the alarm sounds like and looks like when activated (right). Maria Adelmann/NYT Wirecutter Unless the detector is issuing an alert (or you're running a test), the display simply shows the temperature, a pleasant feature I like. It lets you forget about the risk of carbon monoxide poisoning while keeping you protected. If you're in a hotel room, you can just place the detector on a nightstand. If you're renting an entire house, the Environmental Protection Agency advises putting a detector on every floor. (Some sources go further, recommending detectors on every floor and in every bedroom.) Doug also suggests placing one in the basement, though not directly next to a furnace or any fuel-burning appliance, such as a hot water heater, which could cause a false alarm. If you have only one detector, the EPA suggests placing it near sleeping areas and confirming that it's loud enough to wake you. If your carbon monoxide detector merely chirps, it may be malfunctioning or in need of a new battery. But if it goes off continuously, get outside to fresh air as quickly as possible (or open windows if not) and then call 911.
New York Times
4 days ago
- New York Times
You Don't Have to Wear Sunscreen...As Long As You Don't Mind Dressing Like Me
Before you come for me in the comments: Yes, I do know what I look like. But I also know that the sun is a killer. My Wirecutter colleagues have spent hundreds of hours testing sunscreens to protect your skin from the myriad risks it poses. Despite all of their work, and despite my trying all of those endless tubes and creams and aerosols, I've come to an unfortunate conclusion: I just don't like sunscreen. I don't like the greasy look of it. I don't like the sticky feeling of it. And I don't even like how it smells. I also have sensitive, burn-prone skin and absolutely no desire to incur sun damage. So what's a girl to do? Luckily, I've found a combination of clothing and other items that keep my skin safe, and they don't require me to smear globs of product I hate. When I'm wearing this getup, my sister won't walk next to me, my friends laugh at me regularly, and sometimes children even point and stare. Perhaps I look strange. But I am free. These opera-length UPF gloves provide coverage from your fingers to your upper arms. They're made from mesh, so they're extra breathable. And they have textured index-finger and thumb pads, so you can text on the move. To avoid using sunscreen, my solution is to wear UPF clothing. I specifically love having a hat and gloves that I can add to any outfit. UPF (ultraviolet protection factor) clothing is any type of clothing that offers protection from the sun. As Sarah Gannett wrote in our guide to UPF clothing, 'A garment isn't considered sun protective if it has a UPF rating lower than 15.' So any clothing you purchase for the sake of sun protection should have a UPF of at least 15 (my picks here both have a UPF rating of 50+). Many garments do this without having a UPF rating. But the rating lets you know exactly how much sun can penetrate the fabric, similar to the way SPF indicates how much sun can penetrate sunscreen. Unlike sunscreen, UPF clothing does not require 'reapplication'; you just pull on the item, and whatever it covers is protected until you pull it off. And there's a ton of UPF clothing to choose from (some items are recommended elsewhere on our site, including hats, shirts, and sun sleeves for gardening). My first line of defense is the Stevie Ultra Sun Hat. It may make me look like a beekeeper, but it's genius: On the underside of the hat, two snaps connect with the veil, so you can remove it or adjust its tightness, and it can be worn over the nose or under the chin. A flexible wire in the veil shapes around your nose (like a face mask) to create a snugger fit. Dorie Chevlen/NYT Wirecutter It also has a removable chin strap, which can be tightened on windy days to keep the hat secure. And the hat's 22-inch circumference can be tightened, so it's suitable for more head shapes (though not all — a few buyers on Coolibar's site said the 22-inch circumference was too snug for their heads). The brim extends 4 inches on the front half of the hat (the back half has a gator), keeping my face fully shaded and my neck fully covered even on the sunniest days. I have worn my Coolibar sun hat for two years, and it's holding up beautifully. From there, I add a pair of opera-length gloves. They allow me to skimp on sunscreen for the entire span of my arms, unless I'm wearing a sleeveless shirt, in which case I either rub sunscreen on my upper arms or tack a UPF umbrella onto my getup. Crucially, another thing that sets these gloves apart from winter pairs is their impressive breathability. Everyone asks me, 'Don't you get sweaty in there?' But I don't. The mesh is so breathable that I don't even feel it on my skin. Also, the touch-screen-compatible pads on the index fingers and thumbs allow me to wear the gloves daily without going batty. Since I am usually lost and swiping around Google Maps on any walk that I take, this is a must-have feature. Another nice detail is the silicon texturing on the palms; this material makes the gloves just a bit grippier, so if you're holding, say, a water bottle, it won't slip through your fingers. These gloves come in several colors and sizes, too (measured by the circumference of the biceps and the length of the fingers). In hindsight, I wish I'd bothered to measure; I lazily selected the medium-size gloves, but they're just a bit roomy; next time, I'd go with a small pair. There are many advantages to my sun-protective accessories, including that they're machine-washable. Every couple of weeks (or whenever I remember), I throw the hat and gloves into the washer on the delicate cycle, and then I air-dry them. (I put the gloves in a mesh bag so they don't tangle.) This getup is also a lot quicker to throw on than your classic rub-in sunscreen. On the few days that I use sunscreen instead of my UPF ensemble, I fume over how long it takes. Pulling on gloves and throwing on a hat takes maybe 15 seconds. But carefully rubbing in sunscreen, making sure it's evenly distributed across your neck and face and on your ears, and then repeating that process every two hours? I've never measured, but I know it's a lot longer than a quarter of a minute. But even with this getup at my disposal, there will always be some occasions where sunscreen proves necessary — when I'm swimming, for example, or on really windy days (the veil can flap up in strong gusts, making its protection less dependable). And though my various UPF accessories are by no means cheap, the cost-per-wear is ultimately worth it. If anything, the biggest downside to this getup is the attention it brings. Even my friends laugh at me or call me a 'whack-ass beekeeper,' and while I have a very high threshold for embarrassment, it can still feel uncomfortable to walk around in public looking different from most people. And though wearing a face covering and gloves against the sun is common practice in many parts of the world, in the US and Canada, where I have worn my getup, people stare. That's usually fine by me, but sometimes I do choose the physical discomfort of sunscreen over the social discomfort of judgmental looks. More often than not, however, I throw caution to the wind and don my hat and gloves without a second thought. On a recent walk through Vancouver's Stanley Park with my boyfriend, he marveled at the response to my attire. 'People are giving you such nasty looks!' They were. They will again. But I'm holding my ground. No matter what others think, I have the smug satisfaction of taking care of my skin — my body — in my own way. I didn't invent this practice, and I won't be the last to employ it. So to all of my fellow sunscreen-averse, UPF-hat-wearing friends (past, present, and future), I will say it's an honor to be in your club. This article was edited by Hannah Rimm and Maxine Builder.
