
In the tariff war, is Canada forgetting about Indigenous nations?
In the fear and fury generated by the US administration's thuggish treatment of Canada and other allies and trade partners, Canadian political elites have donned the Captain Canada mantle. Virtually all political parties and think tanks are asserting Canadian sovereignty and making commitments to jobs and incomes by proposing new mechanisms to ensure expedited approvals of priority infrastructure and industrial projects.
In this melee, Indigenous nations, and our rights and interests, are not discussed — we remain marginalized. Our rights attract attention only when political elites and indeed, most Canadians, think the political agenda is relaxed enough to tolerate it, or there is something to gain through our inclusion.
Indigenous Peoples' rights have a legal basis and some Constitutional recognition domestically, and more robust recognition in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act, the gold standard for these rights. Any national policy that ignores these realities will be expensive and vulnerable to litigation and civil society opposition, as evidenced by the pipeline fights in BC and the fishing wars in Mi'kmaw territory. Further, Ontario's 'Ring of Fire' region, invoked by some politicians as an immediate source of state-approved projects for its untapped mineral wealth, is on unceded Treaty 9 Indigenous territory.
Ignoring Indigenous nations and rights, as Canada enters a new economic chapter, would shred Canada's reputation, much as ignoring the Canada-USA-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) shreds America's. Ignoring us is contrary to the last decade of Canada's Truth and Reconciliation work and is a serious risk to both the legitimacy of political elites and the profitability of Canadian industries.
Regulatory streamlining anticipated for pre-approved or quickly approved projects benefiting corporate stakeholders with government approvals for pipelines, mines and such, runs right through Indigenous lands, waters and rights. This is true despite the involvement in some projects of a few Indigenous communities or capitalists.
Cutting 'red tape' and eliminating regulatory barriers, proposed by a number of politicians and corporate actors, facilitates the fast-forward, consequence-free kinds of approaches beloved by investment capitalists and the governments that service them. However, one critic's 'red tape' is another's regulatory regime ensuring transparency, accountability and compliance with safety codes, environmental standards, and fundamental human rights. Indigenous rights require state recognition and regulatory support.
Moreover, Canadians face another existential crisis unrelated to US President Donald Trump's reckless trade war: the breakdown of our climate and natural environment collapse as a direct result of political, corporate and consumer activity. That catastrophe looms at least as large as present economic threats. Indigenous rights and priorities are linked to climate and environmental matters in profoundly important ways. Most of us come from cultures that privilege relationships with everything in our territorial environments. Maintaining these relationships is a primary obligation.
Ignoring Indigenous Peoples' rights is contrary to Canada's Truth and Reconciliation work and is a serious risk to the legitimacy of political elites and the profitability of Canadian industries, write Joyce Green and Christine Sy
While sharing our fellow citizens' fears about the Trump-induced economic perils, we have fears too, about the trampling of Indigenous rights and interests, seen as impediments to the prime directive of protecting economic growth and the jobs it sustains. We are not entirely hostile to these priorities, but surely, we can expect the elite political class to walk and chew gum at the same time.
Canadian governments and citizens must focus on the very serious threats to the state's sovereignty and economic order, while still advancing its ethical relations with Indigenous nations, protecting Indigenous rights and enacting legislation to meet the challenges of the imminent and evident threat of more catastrophic climate change and environmental collapse.
Given the erasure of Indigenous nations in public discourse about Canada's future, we wonder if a next iteration of the Idle No More movement is needed to bring these matters into the public eye and get them on the political agenda?
Canada wishes to defend its sovereignty in the face of threatening rhetoric from the Trump administration, but it cannot simultaneously ignore the sovereignty of the many Indigenous nations with whom it is in relationship. The colonial rampage has never stopped for us, even if the language framing it has changed. We are still trying to recover from colonialism in a context where it is still unfolding. Some of us are still seeking either negotiation or implementation of treaties. Many treaties that exist are coerced agreements created in contexts manipulated to cause duress, somewhat like the mystifying, ever-changing shifts in trade relationships instigated by the US that Canada faces now.
Indeed, Canadians are about to empathize much more personally with the politics of imperialism, the disparity of power relations, and the implications of being subjected to external dominance and exploitation. Might this lend itself to an appreciation of what Indigenous Peoples have and continue to endure?
With American imperialism at the door, will Canada reflect on its relationships with Indigenous nations, and recognize that its honour is only as good as its commitment to reconciling its relationship with the Indigenous nations upon whose lands it calls home?
Joyce Green is professor emerita of political science at the University of Regina. Her research interests focus on Aboriginal-settler relations and the possibility of decolonization in Canada.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Calgary Herald
an hour ago
- Calgary Herald
Opinion: G7 confronts a new world order as Leaders Summit returns to Kananaskis
Article content As the G7 celebrates its 50th anniversary in 2025, its members face a volatile new world that threatens the global economic, military and social order of the past half-century, as current events challenge long-standing relationships at the heart of the group. Article content In a world dealing with devastating wars, pandemic recovery and broader health, ecological, climate and other challenges, the attacks by U.S. President Donald Trump on the rules-based foundations of global stability and prosperity — from trade to national sovereignty — cast a long shadow over the summit. Article content Article content Article content The leaders of the Group of Seven major industrialized countries will meet in Kananaskis in their first return to Alberta since the 2002 Kananaskis summit in the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the United States. Article content Article content Now, as then, global stability and security are core issues for the G7, with wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, and escalating military tensions in many other parts of the world. For Canada, resolving deadly and destructive conflicts is an immediate summit priority, but the issue of 'security' must go beyond militarism. Article content Canada is a trading nation. Trade accounts for two-thirds of our national GDP and exports are critical. In Alberta, exports — led by energy and agriculture — accounted for 38 per cent of provincial GDP in 2023. The province contributes about 25 per cent of Canada's merchandise exports and a full 15 per cent of Canada's overall GDP. Article content Article content With Canada holding the G7 presidency in 2025 under new Prime Minister Mark Carney, military, economic and energy security are all prominent on the summit agenda. Article content For Albertans, this summit is an opportunity to discuss how Alberta and Canada can contribute to continental and global energy and food security. Many also see an opportunity to build on our history of military contributions in the First and Second World War, more recent conflicts and peacekeeping missions. We could encourage a new global energy security alliance among like-minded free-trade-supporting countries to co-ordinate energy and critical mineral needs and supply. Article content The agenda for Kananaskis marks, in some ways, a return to the G7's early days in the 1970s, when the Middle East oil crisis first brought the major industrialized countries together to address an unprecedented energy-based global economic challenge.


Vancouver Sun
an hour ago
- Vancouver Sun
Ontario drops American banks from U.S.-dollar bond sale in first since 2011
Ontario left American banks out of a US-dollar bond sale for the first time in almost 14 years, choosing Barclays Plc as its foreign bank to help manage a $2 billion debt issue. Canada's largest province sold 10-year bonds last week in a deal led by Barclays and three Canadian banks — BMO Capital Markets, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and Bank of Nova Scotia. It's the first greenback bond issue for Ontario since early January, shortly before Donald Trump's inauguration. The last time U.S. banks were not involved in a US-dollar bond sale by Ontario was July 2011, Bloomberg records show. Since then, the province has done about 40 such deals. Bank of America Corp. was involved in the January sale; Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co. were the U.S. banks on the one before that, in September. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. The deal 'was part of regular bond rotation and U.S. banks were in no way deliberately excluded,' Colin Blachar, a spokesperson for Ontario's ministry of finance, said in an email. 'Bond issuance is run through the Ontario Financing Authority, which is an arms-length organization to government.' Questions to the OFA were referred back to the finance ministry. Ontario Premier Doug Ford has expressed anger over U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs, which have hit key sectors of the province's economy. In March, after the White House unleashed its first wave of tariffs against Canada, Ford's government released a policy that restricts public-sector entities in procuring from US businesses. The government ordered US-made wine and liquor pulled from the shelves of alcohol stores and said provincial building projects would focus on using Canadian-made materials, as much as possible. But the policy doesn't specifically state that the Ontario Financing Authority can't give new business to US financial institutions. Ontario is the center of Canada's automotive industry, the home to assembly plants owned by General Motors Co., Honda Motor Co. and other manufacturers, and has large steel mills — sectors that have been specifically targeted by Trump in his tariff policy. The province's unemployment rate rose to 7.9% in May, up more than a percentage point from a year earlier. The province expects to borrow nearly $60 billion in this fiscal year to fund a growing budget deficit, and has said that as much as 30%, or nearly $13 billion, may come from foreign markets. Other Canadian provinces are also expected to borrow more this year as an economic slowdown leads to wider budget deficits. JPMorgan has already lost 'a couple' of bond deals tied to the tariff uncertainty, with issuers opting for local banks instead, JPMorgan Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon said in April, without giving specifics. Ontario isn't the only province to break with American banks for foreign-currency bonds since the US began placing tariffs on imports from Canada earlier this year. In April, Alberta sold a €1.25 billion ($1.4 billion) bond without using Bank of America, a first in six years. That exclusion, which Alberta said at the time wasn't the result of a blanket ban, aligned with the broader provincial move to reject US goods and services. British Columbia, on the other hand, sold a $2.5 billion US-dollar bond on Wednesday using a syndicate group that included Bank of America and Citigroup. The western province also sold a euro bond with the help of JPMorgan late last month. 'Being an issuer in the US-dollar global bond market can include U.S. banks among the lead managers and support competitive and efficient access to international US dollar investors, as well as strong secondary market performance,' a spokesperson for BC's finance ministry said via email. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .


Edmonton Journal
an hour ago
- Edmonton Journal
Ontario drops American banks from U.S.-dollar bond sale in first since 2011
Article content Ontario left American banks out of a US-dollar bond sale for the first time in almost 14 years, choosing Barclays Plc as its foreign bank to help manage a $2 billion debt issue. Canada's largest province sold 10-year bonds last week in a deal led by Barclays and three Canadian banks — BMO Capital Markets, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and Bank of Nova Scotia. It's the first greenback bond issue for Ontario since early January, shortly before Donald Trump's inauguration.