Trump wants director of jobs data fired after dismal employment report
Trump, in a post on his social media platform, alleged that the figures were manipulated for political reasons and said that Erika McEntarfer, the director of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, who was appointed by former President Joe Biden, should be fired. He provided no evidence for the charge.
"I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY," Trump said on Truth Social. "She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified."
Trump later posted, "In my opinion, today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad".
The charge that the data was faked is an explosive one that threatens to undercut the political legitimacy of the US government's economic data, which has long been seen as the "gold standard" of economic measurement globally. Economists and Wall Street investors have for decades generally accepted the data as free from political bias.
Trump's move to fire McEntarfer represented another extraordinary assertion of presidential power. He has wielded the authority of the White House to try to control the world's international trade system, media companies, America's top universities and Congress' constitutional power of the purse, among other institutions.
McEntarfer's firing was roundly condemned by a group that included two former BLS commissioners, including William Beach, who was appointed by Trump to the position. They particularly objected to the charge that the data was altered for political reasons.
"This rationale for firing Dr McEntarfer is without merit and undermines the credibility of federal economic statistics that are a cornerstone of intelligent economic decision-making by businesses, families, and policymakers," the statement from the group, the Friends of BLS, said.
In addition to Beach, the statement was signed by Erica Groshen, BLS commissioner under former President Barack Obama.
"Firing the Commissioner ... when the BLS revises jobs numbers down (as it routinely does) threatens to destroy trust in core American institutions, and all government statistics," Arin Dube, an economist at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst, said on X. "I can't stress how damaging this is."
After Trump's initial post, Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer said on X that McEntarfer was no longer leading the bureau and that William Wiatrowski, the deputy commissioner, would serve as the acting director.
"I support the President's decision to replace Biden's Commissioner and ensure the American People can trust the important and influential data coming from BLS," Chavez-DeRemer said.
Friday's jobs report showed that just 73,000 jobs were added last month and that 258,000 fewer jobs were created in May and June than previously estimated.
The report suggested that the economy has sharply weakened during Trump's tenure, a pattern consistent with a slowdown in economic growth during the first half of the year and an increase in inflation during June that appeared to reflect the price pressures created by the president's tariffs.
"What does a bad leader do when they get bad news? Shoot the messenger," Democratic Senate Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said in a speech.
McEntarfer was nominated by Biden in 2023 and became the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics in January 2024. Commissioners typically serve four-year terms but since they are political appointees can be fired. The commissioner is the only political appointee of the agency, which has hundreds of career civil servants.
The Senate confirmed McEntarfer to her post 86-8, with now Vice President JD Vance among the yea votes.
Trump focused much of his ire on the revisions the agency made to previous hiring data. Job gains in May were revised down to just 19,000 from a previously revised 125,000, and for June they were cut to 14,000 from 147,000. In July, only 73,000 positions were added. The unemployment rate ticked up to a still-low 4.2% from 4.1%.
"No one can be that wrong? We need accurate Jobs Numbers," Trump wrote. "She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes."
Trump has not always been so suspicious of the monthly jobs report and responded enthusiastically after the initial May figures came out on June 6, when it was initially reported that the economy added 139,000 jobs.
"GREAT JOB NUMBERS, STOCK MARKET UP BIG!' Trump posted at the time.
That estimate was later revised down to 125,000 jobs, prior to the most recent revision down to just 19,000.
During the 2016 campaign, Trump was more critical. He often attacked the jobs figures as they showed the unemployment rate steadily declining while Obama was still president, only to immediately switch to praising the data once he was in office, as steady job gains continued.
The monthly employment report is one of the most closely-watched pieces of government economic data and can cause sharp swings in financial markets. The disappointing figure sent US market indexes about 1.5% lower on Friday.
The revisions to the May and June numbers were quite large and surprising to many economists. At the same time, every monthly jobs report includes revisions to the prior two months' figures. Those revisions occur as the government receives more responses from businesses to its survey, which helps provide a more complete picture of employment trends each month.
In the past decade, companies have taken longer to respond, which may have contributed to larger monthly revisions.
The proportion of companies responding to the surveys has also fallen steadily over the past 10 years, but the survey still gets responses from roughly 200,000 business locations, which can be independent companies or franchises of larger chains.
The monthly jobs report has long been closely guarded within the BLS, with early copies held in safes under lock and key to prevent any leaks or early dissemination.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Spinoff
3 hours ago
- The Spinoff
Gone By Lunchtime: Three Gen Xers assess the expulsion of NCEA
Plus: Everything is fine for Luxon apart from the butter, Trump, unemployment, netball, etc. Twenty-three years after its introduction, the National Certificate of Educational Achievement is headed for the shredder, with an overhaul of the qualification system laid out by Erica Stanford, the minister for education, on Monday. The changes include a greater emphasis on external assessment and core subjects of maths and English, a pair of new certificate programmes for years 12 and 13, and the resurgence of an A-E letter grade system. In a new episode of the Spinoff politics podcast Gone By Lunchtime, Annabelle Lee-Mather, Ben Thomas and Toby Manhire discuss what looks like a return to something more like the system they experienced back in the olden times. Does this look like the right balance between loosey-goosey and rigid one-size-fits-all-ness? Is six weeks really sufficient time to get feedback from the sector, students and parents? And why not bring back third to seventh form, while we're at it? Also on the podcast this week: is the removal of voting rights for those who enrol in the fortnight before an election a necessary measure to limit the 'strain on the system', a welcome kick up the backside for the dropkicks, dipshits and deadbeats of New Zealand (eg Ben Thomas) or a troubling disenfranchisement of a particular group of people. Plus: Christopher Luxon took a short and sharp mindset into the National Party conference on the weekend. He arrived in Christchurch amid a blur of bleak headlines, focused mostly on an economic mood epitomised by butter, netball crowds, abrupt Trump tariffs, unemployment numbers, and all that. On the cost of living and the economy more broadly, just how is the getting back on track going? Follow Gone By Lunchtime on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you listen to podcasts.
Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
On New Zealand's Role In The New ANZUS Remake
Want Donald Trump to lower the tariffs on your exports to US markets? Easy. Offer him money. Lots of it. As the New York Times explained yesterday (in a story headlined 'Trump's Demand to Trading Partners: Pledge Money or Get Higher Tariffs) South Korea bought its way to a 10% reduction in its tariff rate by offering to spend $350 billion on US investments, and to purchase $100 billion of liquified natural gas. South Korea is not the only country to make such pledges. Japan said it would establish a $550 billion fund for investments in the United States. The European Union indicated that its companies were poised to invest at least $600 billion. To trade experts, the commitments raise the question of whether Mr. Trump is negotiating with trading partners or trade hostages. One can only hope that the New Zealand diplomats and corporate leaders heading to Washington to beg for leniency on our 15% tariff rate do realise that paying Trump off with large amounts of protection money is the only way to grease the tariff wheel. Think of those billions we recently set aside for new defence spending. Perhaps a few billions committed to Lockheed Martin or Raytheon or General Dynamics might knock a few points off the tariff rate? Keep this scam in mind if, by some miracle, our tariff rate does get reduced. It won't be because of Winston Peters' diplomatic wizardry, or Christopher Luxon's innate will be because we succumbed to a shakedown by the Mafioso-in-Chief, and paid him off. Makes one high would be we willing to bid for a tariff cut? New Movie, Same Actors Previously on AUKUS, Death From Below... back in 2021, Joe Biden, Boris Johnson and Scott Morrison hatched a secret defence pact. The core narrative involved the deployment of a fleet of nuclear submarines to negate the threat he inscrutable Chinese allegedly pose to everything that Australia holds dear: everything from shrimps on the barbie to the rightful dominance of Euro-American civilisation over the heathen hordes of Asia, a threat that's as old as Fu Manchu himself. In this week's episode... in a surprising story twist, it looks as if the fabled Second Pillar of AUKUS (consisting of quantum technology, hypersonics, underwater drones and other James Bond stuff) might have more chance of becoming a reality than the Pillar One that begat it. Basically, AUKUS is/was a reward to the nation of little Aussie battlers for faithful services rendered to Washington. In return, the US agreed to equip Australia with a fleet of super silent Virginia-class nuclear subs to update Canberra's ageing submarine fleet. Keen as mustard, Scott Morrison cancelled an existing submarine contract with France, at great expense. Alas, the story hasn't worked out the way the US had promised in the trailer. Due to the low annual rates of productivity in American shipyards, the US Navy and Australia can't both get these new submarines in a timely fashion. The key risk to AUKUS is that the Americans fail to manufacture enough new Virginia-class boats to enable them to transfer up to five vessels to Australia. The required production rate for that to happen is 2.3 Virginia-class subs per year. Last year, the production rate was below 1.2, and it has never exceeded 2 at any stage in the life of the programme. How come? There are many things to blame: Admiral Jonathan Rucker, the programme executive for the Virginia-class boats, [has] told Congress that workforce was the main issue. 'Our 2024 annual production rate of Virginia-class submarines per year was 1.13 compared to our need of 2.0. The main causes for this are workforce challenges, material and supplier delays, and shipbuilder facilities and infrastructure issues, all of which are driving cost increases and schedule delays.' Under Donald Trump, America's needs always come first. Therefore, it will now be many years (at best) beyond the initial 2034 delivery dates before Australia finally gets its hot new mega-expensive submarine deterrent, long after any Chinese threat to Taiwan has been done and dusted. Oh, and Taiwan is a key reason why Elbridge Colby, Trump's defence policy mastermind has been stalling on AUKUS: After taking the post [at the Pentagon] Colby told his British counterparts that the Royal Navy should focus on threats from Russia and leave the U.S. Navy to lead in the western also helped trigger a review of former President Joe Biden's multibillion-dollar U.S.-U.K.-Australia submarine pact, out of concern that the Australians might not deploy U.S.-provided submarines during a U.S.-led campaign on Chinese forces in the event of an assault on Taiwan. In effect, Colby was saying that Australia (with New Zealand tagging along behind) can't be relied on to go to war with China over Taiwan when expected to do so by Washington. Plainly, if New Zealand is to be allowed into AUKUS, we will similarly need to demonstrate our willingness to take orders from further up the operational chain of command.. and ultimately, that means from Generalissimo Donald Trump, the AUKUS commander in chief. Are we really going to spend billions of taxpayer dollars on defence, in order to be marched into WW3 by Donald Trump? Looks that way. Footnote: Reportedly, we are still very, very annoyed at the Cook Islands for not telling us about the deals with China they announced in February. So much so that we skipped attending their 60th birthday celebrations this week. Talk about a double standard. AUKUS is/was a secret deal struck with the US ,whereby nuclear submarines would pass through Pacific waters en route to intimidating China – but we never told Pacific leaders beforehand, let alone sought their feedback. They only found out about AUKUS on the news. You get the picture. The Cook Islands and Vanuatu are supposed to notify us ahead of time and get our stamp of approval before signing up to any deals with China. Yet at the same time, the neo-colonial powers can do whatever secret military deals they like with the US that affect the region, and tell Pacific nations about it only after the fact. Footnote Two: There is a further story twist in the AUKUS saga. The original band of brothers (Biden, Johnson, Morrison) have all left the political scene. Vladimir Putin though, has changed things for Britain. In the UK's Integrated Defence Review back in 2021, Boris Johnson had happily embraced Biden's 'Indo-Pacific tilt' as being the UK's strategic priority as well. Not any more. As Keir Starmer recently stressed, the UK's defence spending priority is now a 'NATO first' strategy aimed at countering the threat posed by Russia to Ukraine, and to the rest of Europe. Meaning: the 'UK' part of AUKUS has virtually left the building. What is left behind? An old story line is being revived. The former team of the US, Australia and New Zealand are back in combat fatigues, and preparing to kick China's ass. To all intents, AUKUS is an ANZUS reboot, but one that's been shorn of New Zealand's old anti-nuclear misgivings. Luxon, Peters, and Defence Minister Judith Collins now seem more than happy for New Zealand to be actively engaged with a nuclear deterrent that projects its force far beyond our shores. Oh, we'll say we're in it only for the high-tech spin-offs. But you can bet that our access to those good things will be conditional on us agreeing to the rest of it. No doubt, some woke generals will want Japan on board for diversity reasons, to give the pact more credibility in the capitals of Asia. But to repeat: there should be no doubt about would be the boss. In the new JANZUS War Room, there will be no room for 'independent' foreign policy. All of the key operational decisions will be made in Washington. USA, USA! We've all seen that movie. Luther Reborn ( again and again) Talking of the early to mid 1970s, the sweet and soulful lover man Luther Vandross (1951-2005) was an inescapable presence. The recent mega-hit 'Luther' tribute track by Kendrick Lamar and SZA drew creatively on the classic 1973'If This World Were Mine' duet by Vandross and Cheryl Lynn, a song that Marvin Gaye had originally written for the doomed love of his life, Tammi Terrell. OK. So we have the Gaye/Terrell duet as radically re-interpreted by Lynn and Vandross, a version that in turn was sampled and lovingly re-imagined by Kendrick Lamar and SZA. Here's the Vandross/Lynn version : And here's the long version of the Kendrick Lamar/SZA revamp, which ends with a lengthy Vandross/Lynn sample : It doesn't end there. Last week, the alt-folk musicians Sam Beam (aka Iron & Wine) and Ben Bidwell of Band of Horses released an Americana version of 'Luther.' At the very least, they deserve some points for trying:
NZ Autocar
5 hours ago
- NZ Autocar
Tesla awards CEO Musk millions of shares worth billions
Tesla has given Elon Musk a stock grant of $NZ49bn as a reward for years of 'transformative and unprecedented' growth. That's despite a recent switch into right-wing politics that hurt sales, profits and Tesla's stock price. In gifting almost 100m restricted shares, the electric car company board noted that Musk hasn't been paid in years. That's because his 2018 compensation package was rejected by a Delaware court. The share gift comes eight months after a judge revoked the 2018 pay package for a second time. Tesla has appealed the ruling. The Tesla board said the grant was a 'first step, good faith' way of retaining Musk and keeping him focused. Musk said recently that he needed more shares and control so shareholder activists couldn't oust him. 'Rewarding Elon for what he has done and continues to do for Tesla is the right thing to do,' the company said in a recent filing. It noted an increase of $NZ1.242tn in Tesla's value on the stock exchange since 2018. However, Tesla shares have dropped by 25 per cent this year following Musk's brief affiliation with President Donald Trump. Moreover, Tesla faces intensifying competition from the big American automakers, and from China. Read our review of the current Model 3. In its most recent quarter, Tesla reported that quarterly profits plunged from NZ2.35bn to $NZ691m. Investors have grown worried about the trajectory of the company after Musk spent much of his time in Washington, trying to slash government expenditure. The electric vehicle maker said in the regulatory filing that Musk must initially pay Tesla $NZ39.45 per share which is equal to the exercise price per share of the 2018 pay package. A US analyst commenting on the payment said: 'We believe this grant will now keep Musk as chief executive of Tesla at least until 2030 and removes an overhang on the stock.' Tesla's stock rose nearly two per cent in trading after the announcement.
