logo
Reeves' ‘mansion tax' would stall home sales and fuel exodus of super-rich, experts warn

Reeves' ‘mansion tax' would stall home sales and fuel exodus of super-rich, experts warn

Independent12 hours ago
Property experts have warned that Rachel Reeves ' plans to levy a so-called 'mansion tax' on high-value properties would stall housing sales and add to the exodus of the super-rich from the UK.
Mortgage brokers and financial planners have rounded on the chancellor after reports she is considering hitting the owners of expensive properties when they sell to plug a £40bn hole in the public purse.
The mooted plans would see higher-rate taxpayers pay 24 per cent of any gain in the value of their home, while basic rate taxpayers would be hit with an 18 per cent levy. Currently, capital gains tax is not paid on the sale of primary residences.
Proposals being considered for the autumn budget, the private residence relief would end for properties above a certain threshold, sources told The Times.
The threshold is said to still be under consideration, but a £1.5 million starting point would hit around 120,000 homeowners who are higher-rate taxpayers with capital gains tax bills of £199,973.
Financial adviser Scott Gallacher, director at Rowley Turton, said a level of £1.5m would prevent most older homeowners, particularly those who bought properties in the 80s and 90s, from selling houses.
He added that the plans would 'kill off the upper end of the property market' and be difficult to implement. Mr Gallacher said: 'It would be insane if it creates a cliff edge in that properties over £1.5m are subject to Capital Gains Tax on the entire gain, as properties sold at £1.49m would incur no CGT whereas £1.5m might be a six-figure bill. If it's only on gains above £1.5m, then the CGT raised would be minimal, as potentially you'd be exempting six or even seven-figure gains.'
He added: 'Homeowners, especially older ones, who perhaps bought their houses in the 1970s or 1980s, would be daft to sell and incur a huge CGT liability. Instead they would be incentivised to hold on to the home until they die and pay no CGT.'
Meanwhile Simon Gerrard, chairman of Martyn Gerrard Estate Agents, warned the plans would leave families who bought homes in London more than a decade ago facing 'eye-watering' tax bills.
'Meanwhile, those who are actually wealthy know how to bypass these moves and won't pay it,' he said.
He told The Independent: 'After the deadline passes people will simply not sell their homes. The property market above the threshold will die until Labour are voted out and the policy is repealed under a more sensible government.'
Laith Khalaf, head of investment analysis at AJ Bell, said the tax-free nature of primary residences is 'deeply embedded in the psyche of homeowners'.
He warned: 'A mansion tax set at high level would naturally cause people to worry it was just the thin end of the wedge, and the next time the government needs a bit of money they could just lower the threshold.
'It would also be an impediment to mobility in the housing market, as those with properties which might fall foul of the tax would be inclined to sit on them for longer, leaving a log jam in the housing ladder below them.'
And critics warned the tax change would add to the reported exodus of super-rich individuals fleeing Britain. 'I can see a lot of families in London being caught with this higher tax bill, and it may push more wealthy tax contributors to exodus the UK, which is already a problem following the Chancellor 's last budget,' said Stephen Perkins, managing director of Yellow Brick Mortgages.
The Treasury was asked to comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hostage: 'Playing the Prime Minister 'changes your perception' of politics' says Suranne Jones
Hostage: 'Playing the Prime Minister 'changes your perception' of politics' says Suranne Jones

BBC News

time6 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Hostage: 'Playing the Prime Minister 'changes your perception' of politics' says Suranne Jones

Actress Suranne Jones has taken on the role of many women under immense pressure. In Doctor Foster she suspects her husband of having an affair, in Vigil she investigates a death on board a submarine, and in Gentleman Jack she develops a dangerous lesbian romance. But none of the roles are quite as pressured as her latest - playing a British prime minister whose husband is kidnapped. Hostage, Netflix's new political thriller, sees Jones' character, Abigail Dalton, build an uneasy alliance with French President Vivienne Toussaint - played by Julie Delpy - who is being blackmailed during a London two leaders work together in order to rescue the PM's husband, unmask the kidnapper and blackmailer, and bring those responsible to justice. 'Political with a small p' Given its themes of immigration, the funding of the NHS and public trust, audiences may be tempted to connect Hostage to today's headlines. But, both stars insist the show is less about mirroring today's politics and more about creating a thrilling story set in the political world. "We're entertaining and we're in the political world, but it's in no way a reflection of the world we live in," Jones tells the BBC."It's political with a small p - there's enough that roots us in the real world but the world is too complicated to link it directly and I think it would be inappropriate." Delpy agrees and says: "Things change every day. It's impossible to be in the political moment because tomorrow is something else."The show's writer, Matt Charman, explains that there are some connections to the real world as it's "impossible to write a show that exists in the climate we live in that doesn't end up feeling that it's in dialogue with it". "If you wrote a show that isn't connected to our world it would feel weird," he says, "but I hope the show does have the ability to exist in its own oxygen." It is rare to see two female world leaders sharing the spotlight in a political thriller, but, for Charman, making sure Dalton and Toussaint were women was integral to the way the series was conceived and it was both a creative and political choice. "What was exciting was the idea of women in power and how we explore that," he says, explaining that he tried to explore how each situation the characters face would be different for a woman. "There's a double standard for women, so giving full dramatic freedom to that was very important." Charman and Jones have shared an agent for the past 10 years and Hostage came about because Charman really wanted to work with Jones and the pair settled on creating a political thriller. Jones says she particularly enjoyed exploring "how these two women have to dance around each other"."A female politician is used to dealing with men so it's interesting to see how it plays out when it's two women." While viewers quickly learn about Jones' character - a loving wife and mother who is idealistic about bettering the country - Delpy's character is more drawn out and our opinion of her changes throughout the show."We made sure not to play into the female politician stereotypes," Delpy say. "What I like is that these women actually have some things in common like they both want change and came into office hopeful." The Guardian describe Hostage as "quite unusual" in that it doesn't remind you of any other political thrillers. "It's a little biting but it's not House of Cards cynical, it has a breakneck pace but it's not 24, the dialogue is sharp but never played for laughs," Zoe Williams writes. 'Cost of being in power' To play Dalton convincingly, Jones, who also served as an executive producer on the show, says she really immersed herself in the reality of political life. She visited the House of Commons, spoke to the Speaker of the House and devoured books, podcasts and documentaries. "I'm a bit of a geek when it comes to research," she admits. "I was fascinated by not emulating anyone but by understanding a life I knew nothing about. And it's the cost of being in a powerful position in that way that really struck me."Charman also talks about the extraordinary amount of research that went into creating the show. I ask him whether Dalton or Toussaint were inspired by any real life politicians and he confesses that they are, but he won't say who. "We interviewed a lot of people and Suranne had incredible access to people who had been prime minister who talked about their time in office and the pressure on their family. But it was all agreed that they would speak about this as long as it could remain confidential," he says. Jones won't say which politicians inspired her character but says all of her previous characters are a part of her and she has "a boardroom of personalities" which feed into who she plays. She says all the research into what it's like to be a politician "changes your perception for sure" and makes you realise "the cost of being in a powerful position". One question the show raises is whether or not it's possible for a politician today to stick to their ideals once they come into office and while Jones is unsure, Charman is an optimist. "I wanted to explore how there can be decent people in politics who are fundamentally good but get pushed around," he says. He adds that it's not "inevitable" that people give up their ideals once in office, but "it's definitely tough to keep your morals". Above the thrills and drama of Hostage, Charman says the show explores "what it takes to be a good person in a system that doesn't always reward good people."Delpy is slightly more pessimistic and explains that given "politicians have to be heard, if you're too reasonable you won't be listened to as there's so much noise of both extremes"."If you have a moderate view you get lost in the noise as people are only listening to the loudest."

Raising her glass to a war on the middle classes? 'Woman of the people' Angela Rayner is snapped sipping rosé on the beach in £165 Dryrobe
Raising her glass to a war on the middle classes? 'Woman of the people' Angela Rayner is snapped sipping rosé on the beach in £165 Dryrobe

Daily Mail​

time6 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Raising her glass to a war on the middle classes? 'Woman of the people' Angela Rayner is snapped sipping rosé on the beach in £165 Dryrobe

may be planning to soak the middle classes with her new council tax reforms, but judging from these exclusive photos, she clearly intends to stay warm and dry herself. The Deputy PM's plan to hit Middle England with a hefty hike in council tax has already met a wave of opposition, but she seemed unconcerned as she sipped a glass of rosé on the beach, snuggled up in a £165 Dryrobe. The scene might not have fitted with the Deputy Prime Minister's 'woman of the people' image, but she was clearly enjoying herself with a small group of friends on Hove beachfront on Monday evening. The impromptu party came just before news broke of Ms Rayner's (appropriately named) 'Plan For Change' assault on middle class homeowners by reforming the council tax system and forcing householders in the countryside to subsidise residents of cities. The move was branded 'spiteful' by Tory leader Kemi Badenoch. An onlooker said he wouldn't have even noticed the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government if it hadn't been for her companions constantly scanning the beach for cameras. 'I guess she must have been in for a dip, but I only noticed her when the wine came out when she was already in her Dryrobe, and her friends started looking furtively around the beach,' said the eyewitness. The image with glass of rose in one hand, wrapped in the garishly coloured robe, may not have met with the approval of Ms Rayner's aides, but it's not quite in the same league as John Prescott playing croquet. And it's not the first time fun-loving Angela has been photographed letting her hair down – last October she was snapped raving behind a DJ deck in Ibiza, belting out the lyrics to a remix of Gotye's hit Somebody That I Used to Know. At the time she said: 'I won't apologise for taking a day off'. Ms Rayner doesn't apologise for very much – it took her about a month to say sorry for famously calling Tories 'scum' in 2021. According to reports, the new planned Rayner tax raid will mean that middle-class families in rural areas will face an extra average £376 in council tax. The County Councils Network (CCN) has warned that leafy towns and villages will 'foot the bill' for a planned overhaul of local finances, hitting households in wealthier places such as the Home Counties. According to the CCN, which representing local authorities outside of big cities, a family in a band D countryside property will see their annual council tax bills rise to £2,756 by 2029, up from £2,380 at current rates. Ms Rayner, wants residents of middle class rural areas to pay more in council tax to help fund services in poorer neighbourhoods. The CCN forecast that local authorities in rural areas would have to increase council tax by the maximum rate of 5pc over the next three years. While money would flow to the cities, the CCN said this would lead to less money for local authorities in the country – despite their households facing higher council tax bills. As part of its research, it found that £1.6bn in council tax income from dozens of rural authorities would be effectively redistributed to other parts of the country, including major towns and cities in the North. Surrey County Council stands to be the biggest loser from the overhaul, according to the CCN. A spokesman for Ms Rayner's department said: 'We do not recognise this analysis. The current, outdated way in which local authorities are funded has left communities behind and damaged local services. 'This must change and is why we are taking decisive action as part of our Plan for Change to reform the funding system so we can improve public services, while maintaining the previous government's referendum threshold on council tax rises so taxpayers have the final say and are protected from excessive increases.'

HUGO DUNCAN: The genie has burst out of the bottle - and it's all too clear who is to blame
HUGO DUNCAN: The genie has burst out of the bottle - and it's all too clear who is to blame

Daily Mail​

time6 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

HUGO DUNCAN: The genie has burst out of the bottle - and it's all too clear who is to blame

The chickens are coming home to roost. When Rachel Reeves broke the Labour election pledge not to raise national insurance, she was warned the £25 billion tax raid on business would push up prices and cost jobs. She did it anyway. Official figures last week showed that 206,000 jobs have been lost since the election. Now we have inflation roaring back as companies push up prices to deal with the extra costs they face as a result of the Chancellor's growth-sapping, job-destroying policies. Ms Reeves used to boast that Britain was the fastest-growing economy in the G7. Not any more. But at 3.8 per cent, we do have the highest inflation rate of the seven major developed economies. In September last year, ahead of the Budget, it was 1.7 per cent. The Left-leaning Resolution Foundation says that UK inflation 'looks increasingly like an international outlier'. The bond markets are watching – and don't like what they see. Not only is the inflation genie bursting back out of the bottle, and the economy floundering, but our national debt is soaring and, in abandoning welfare cuts, Labour has shown it has no plan to bring the public finances back under control. As a result, Britain faces the steepest borrowing costs in the G7, with the 30-year bond yield at its highest level since 1998. That means the United Kingdom Government pays more to borrow on the international money markets than the United States, Germany, France, Italy, Japan and Canada. In other words, lending to Britain is seen as a riskier bet than lending to any of these other countries. The spike in inflation will not help as a large portion of UK Government debt is index-linked – meaning payments rise as inflation goes up. There are very real consequences for families across the country. Inflation is a menace that eats into the income of workers and pensioners alike, devastating living standards along the way. Yes, average prices may have been pushed a little higher by the 'Oasis effect' as fans paid through the nose for hotel rooms around concert venues. But this is also about parents struggling to pay for school uniforms, families putting the weekly supermarket shop on the credit card to make sure they have enough money to pay household bills, and then worrying about how they'll pay for Christmas after pushing the boat out on even a modest summer holiday. Rail fares – which are linked to inflation – now look set to rise by 5.8 per cent next year. There is also the prospect of energy bills rising again at the start of October – little over a month away – just in time for winter. It might seem a long way off, but it will come round soon enough for those feeling the pinch. Another Reeves boast is that interest rates have come down five times since Labour came to office, from an annual rate of 5.25 per cent to four per cent. But while she seeks to take credit for this, how much lower might interest rates now be had the Chancellor not driven up prices with her inflationary rises in national insurance and the minimum wage? With inflation nearly double the Bank of England's two per cent target, hopes of a further interest rate cut this year are fading fast. Instead, families and businesses are braced for another punishing round of tax rises in the autumn. The squeeze has only just begun.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store