Osborne Naval Shipyard: Incredible transformation of SA's subs hub
In the first major on-site work for the $368bn AUKUS submarine venture, a demonstration facility at Osborne Naval Shipyard will test steel cutting, welding and other key procedures.
In a further boost for the program, Defence Minister Richard Marles declared the complicated life extension to the Osborne-built Collins class submarines was 'a challenge that I think we can meet'.
Australian Submarine Agency director-general Jonathan Mead said he had chaired a May 29 meeting at Osborne involving UK officials, including Defence Procurement and Industry Minister Maria Eagle.
The meeting also included chiefs of all major players, including ASC, BAE Systems Australia, Australia Naval Infrastructure and AUKUS nuclear reactor supplier Rolls-Royce.
'We worked through some of the complex matters. This was not just an information gathering session. We made decisions on facilities down there. We intend to commence build on some of the production demonstration buildings by the end of this year,' Vice Admiral Mead said.
'Investing early into these demonstration facilities will give us confidence that when we commence the build proper, that when we're doing it for the first time, we'll be doing it correctly.'
Vice Admiral Mead said this was designed to prevent time being lost during construction if parts, or modules, of the submarines were not fit for purpose.
'We'll cut steel. We'll test out the steel. We'll make sure that the dimensions are exact. We'll build valves, pumps, and other systems, plus piping and welding,' he said.
'We want to make sure that when we when we do our welding proper, that our welds are correct. The demonstration facilities will test out a range of skills and a range of capabilities that we will need in order to commence build proper of the submarine.'
Vice Admiral Mead in March outlined plans for a $2bn Osborne transformation into the world's 'most advanced manufacturing centre' for the AUKUS program. Work started in March on a $500m Skills and Training Academy.
Mr Marles, who in February labelled the Collins class life extensions a 'technically challenging thing', said up to $5bn would be pumped into the program over the next decade.
He said this would 'ensure there is no capability gap until Australia's conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarines are in service'.
The Collins class sustainment program, conducted by ASC at Osborne Naval Shipyard, last December was listed by Defence as a Product of Concern 'to enable enhanced ministerial oversight of this critical capability'.
Mr Marles accused the Coalition of ripping money from the Collins class sustainment program run at Osborne by ASC, which he argued 'left Australia with the risk of a significant gap in respect of our submarine capability'.
This funding had been restored, he said, to ensure the ageing Collins class submarines remained 'a potent and credible platform for the Australian Defence Force'.
'As I've said previously, there is a challenge in relation to making sure that we are able to properly extend the life of the Collins class. But it is a challenge that I think we can meet,' he said.
Mr Marles said more than 150 ASC workers were already training at the United States Pearl Harbor navy base on maintenance of Virginia class nuclear-powered submarines, with this expected to grow to about 200 people by the end of the year.
The first ASC workers, from the firm's SA and WA operations, left for Pearl Harbor in mid-2024.
Key roles in leading the sustainment of US and UK nuclear-powered submarines at Garden Island naval base, near Perth, are expected to start from as early as 2027.
'The fact that we've got 150 tradespeople in Pearl Harbor right now working on US Virginia class submarines is a proof point that we are investing the resources we need to make sure that we get the skilled workforce required to build and maintain our submarines in the future,' Mr Marles said.
Originally published as Osborne again: Adelaide's defence precinct transformed from industrial wasteland to a hi-tech home of ships, subs and steel
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
a day ago
- ABC News
New Zealand's defence minister says Australia and NZ 'pretty slack' on defence spending
New Zealand's defence minister has sympathised with the Trump administration's push for partner countries to lift defence spending, saying Australia and New Zealand are among nations that have been "pretty slack" for decades. Judith Collins said for too long American taxpayers have had to "carry the burden", and while the United States has not directly asked New Zealand to boost its defence spending, Ms Collins said she understood the broader push from the Five Eyes partner and wanted to lift NZ's spend further. The White House has demanded Australia lift defence spending by almost $40 billion a year "as soon as possible", as it reviews the keystone AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine pact between the countries. Ms Collins said since the Berlin Wall fell in 1989, countries including Australia, New Zealand and some throughout Western Europe had "sat back". "People thought, 'well, there we go, peace is broken out, no one's going to be stupid' and then Putin came along and all of a sudden, things changed," she said in an interview with ABC News in Wellington. "Everyone's been pretty slack and the Americans have been carrying us. "While we've been going ahead and building our welfare states and making sure we have free health care and education and everything else, their people have actually had to fund a lot of the defence of the democratic world. "So, I have a certain sympathy to everyone doing a little bit more." New Zealand currently spends about 1 per cent of its GDP on defence, and earlier this year promised to lift that to 2 per cent within eight years. But Ms Collins — who is a conservative politician from New Zealand's National Party — insisted she was "looking to do more than that when we can", although she did not indicate how much more. For comparison, Australia's current defence spending is about 2 per cent of GDP and is forecast to hit 2.3 per cent in the same timeframe. But the actual dollar figure Australia is set to spend will equal tens of billions of dollars more than New Zealand because it has a larger economy. Regardless, both figures are much lower than the 3.5 per cent the Trump administration has been loudly calling on Australia to reach. The government has defended against repeated calls to lift defence spending, including from the Dutch defence chief last month, with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese repeating again over the weekend that the government would not pursue an arbitrary target. Speaking with ABC News, Ms Collins was also critical of China's recent behaviour in the Indo-Pacific region, including its live firing drills in the Tasman Sea in February, which caused commercial flights to change course. She said it was an "absolute reminder" to Australia and New Zealand of how close China is and the rising strategic competition in the region, warning that competition was already leading to an increase in foreign interference and "influence" of Pacific policing forces. Ms Collins was also particularly critical of China's recent deal with the Cook Islands on trade and the "seabed minerals sector", which Wellington felt it should have been aware of ahead of time. "We think was it was certainly unusual, it wasn't expected, and it is a wake-up call again, for New Zealand," she said. She explained the region's rich resources made it an area for great competition, but was mindful Australia and New Zealand had relatively small populations with which to defend it. "We have the ninth largest exclusive economic zone in the world with massive resources, particularly on our seabed," she said. "We are countries with enormous resources and actually not that much in terms of defence compared to what other nations might have." On top of that, she acknowledged her defence force had been struggling to attract and retain enough personnel, although those numbers have recently improved. While the Trans-Tasman allies have put a big focus on increasing the interoperability of their defence forces in recent months, it is still not clear if New Zealand will join the second stage of the AUKUS security pact. While Ms Collins talked up the benefits of AUKUS as an opportunity for peace, she said New Zealand had still not been invited to join Pillar Two, which largely involves the sharing of technology. "Obviously a lot of work's going on behind the scenes, but none of it has got to cabinet yet, so there's no decision yet." The US administration is currently reviewing the AUKUS commitment to provide Australia with nuclear-powered submarines in partnership with Britain.
Sky News AU
a day ago
- Sky News AU
Concerns Australia cannot ‘afford' to pay for AUKUS Pillar One
The Australian's Washington Correspondent Joe Kelly discusses the 'huge concern' around Australia's defence spending and the AUKUS deal. The US Defence Department is increasingly concerned that Australia isn't pulling its weight when it comes to defence. 'This concern has been relayed to me, in a number of ways, most recently the concern that we can't even afford to pay for Pillar One,' Mr Kelly told Sky News host Sky News host Sharri Markson. 'That comment suggests that one of the things we might expect out of the AUKUS review is a request for Australia to pay more.'
Sydney Morning Herald
a day ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Don't jump the gun. Paddington's Victoria Barracks must not be converted for housing
'It's just utter stupidity, I mean it really belongs to the people … the nation as a whole.' These words were spoken in the mid-'90s by the late, great Labor politician Tom Uren, whom Prime Minister Anthony Albanese calls his 'father figure'. Back then, Defence wanted to sell its priceless historic harbour military sites, partly for new housing. Thanks to John Howard, Bob Carr, the federal parliament, and the community, all the sites were saved. They were never sold nor transferred to the NSW government. A new federal Sydney Harbour Federation Trust took over. But 30 years later, it's eerily deja vu. Defence is pondering vacating its exceedingly historic Victoria Barracks, although no decision has been made. Located in Paddington, surrounded by a high convict sandstone wall, the vast 15-hectare 1840s heritage site is so large that it has vistas inside. As big as Hyde Park, it comprises many convict-built sandstone Edwardian buildings. It is a rare intact military village. The largest building, 740 metres long, is 'reputed to be the longest stone building in the Southern Hemisphere', according to Defence. The Barracks is Commonwealth Heritage Listed, being 'the finest complex of colonial barracks … in Australia', 'survives as the only substantial barracks … from the early Victorian period', is 'valuable for future archaeological investigation', and 'is one of the most architecturally imposing 19th century military establishments in Australia'. It is in excellent condition. But because it's an active military base, few members of the public have been inside, apparently including some City of Sydney councillors. Regrettably, City of Sydney council, in a unanimous resolution late last year, and in case Defence moves out, decided that one key priority for the Barracks should be 'affordable housing' and that it needed to develop 'guiding principles'. Intriguingly, the two-page resolution contains a significant error, stating, 'about 30-50 per cent of the site is heritage-protected, but the remaining area could potentially be redeveloped'. This is erroneous – the entire site is heritage-protected. Three councillors spoke to the resolution. The first – Labor's Zann Maxwell – strongly in favour, said the site 'could unlock transformative opportunities', and would help 'to address the ongoing demand for homes'.
