Populist Nawrocki's triumph threatens Poland's place at Europe's top table
The victory margin of the nationalist Karol Nawrocki in Poland's presidential elections may have been wafer-thin, but it marks a huge upheaval in the country's political landscape whose impact will be felt not just in Warsaw but across the EU.
Backed by the previous ruling conservative Law & Justice (PiS) party and, openly, by Donald Trump's Maga movement, Nawrocki, a radical-right historian, defeated his liberal rival, the capital's mayor, Rafał Trzaskowski, by 50.89% to 49.11%.
His win means PiS retains a size-11 boot in the door of Poland's politics that could seriously destabilise the coalition government of the centre-right prime minister, Donald Tusk, and threaten the country's newfound place at Europe's top table.
Tusk's election in 2023 brought to an end eight years of PiS rule and signalled Poland's return to the European fold. Over the past two years, the bloc's sixth-biggest economy has become a key player at the heart of mainstream European policymaking.
Nawrocki's victory hands him a presidential veto that will make it difficult for Tusk's government to pass promised legislation rolling back the judicial and other changes implemented by PiS that led to repeated clashes with Brussels.
default
But it heralds more than just a delicate period of cohabitation between a pro-EU prime minister and a nationalist, Eurosceptic president. The 42-year-old, who has never held elected office, will seek to actively undermine Tusk wherever he can.
Poland's outgoing PiS-aligned president, Andrzej Duda, deployed his veto, but sparingly. Nawrocki will do so more aggressively and systematically, analysts say, aiming to weaken the prime minister before 2027 parliamentary elections.
PiS and its allies will portray Sunday's presidential vote as a full-scale rejection of Tusk's progressive and reformist agenda – and may even be tempted to try to bring down his already fractured coalition government before the end of its term.
Snap elections could be triggered, for example, if Nawrocki, whose campaign focused on conservative Catholic values, attacks on EU migration and climate policy and opposition to Ukraine's accession to the bloc, decides to stall the budget, which he could do by sending it to the PiS-dominated constitutional tribunal.
Polls suggest that PiS and the far-right, libertarian Confederation party of Sławomir Mentzen, who won nearly 15% of the vote in the first round of the presidential ballot, could control a majority of seats in parliament if they were to unite.
So far, Mentzen has ruled that out, even refusing to endorse Nawrocki. But an analysis of Sunday's vote showed that almost 90% of Mentzen's first-round voters backed Nawrocki in the presidential runoff, and the potential affinity is clear.
Amid growing speculation about the government's future, Tusk on Monday called for a confidence vote to force junior partners to commit to his coalition and head off any defections towards a possible PiS-Confederation majority.
In Europe, while Tusk will continue to represent Poland at EU summits, he will inevitably be weakened by the challenge to his domestic legitimacy. Nawrocki, as commander-in-chief, may also seek to sway Poland's strongly pro-Ukraine stance.
He has not shied away from tapping into Polish anti-Ukrainian sentiment over refugees, has criticised Kyiv and its EU and Nato accession plans, and his attendance at Nato summits could significantly complicate Europe's united pro-Ukraine front.
Nawrocki will have somewhat less influence over other EU issues to which he is also opposed, such as deeper integration, joint borrowing and Europe's green deal, but the overall effect of his election on Poland's pro-EU ambitions will be chilling.
The European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, said on Monday the EU would continue its 'very good cooperation' with Poland. But analysts note Polish conservatives cast Sunday's vote as a refendum on Tusk's whole pro-EU agenda.
The nationalist's win is also a boost for Europe's populist EU-critical parties, led by Italy's prime minister, Giorgia Meloni, and to Viktor Orbán, Hungary's prime minister and the bloc's disrupter-in-chief, whose illiberal rule-of-law playbook PiS follows.
Nawrocki's triumph was a 'fresh victory for patriots', Hungary's foreign minister, Péter Szijjártó, said on his Facebook page on Monday.
Nawrocki, who was invited to Washington by Trump and has shared a selfie with the US president, is opposed to Europe's recent security shift away from the US and favours closer transatlantic ties – another source of tension with Tusk, and Brussels.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
EU eyes 'leadership' role on oceans ahead of UN summit
The European Union will Thursday unveil a new roadmap on marine conservation -- addressing climate and pollution threats to biodiversity as well as challenges for coastal livelihoods -- ahead of a UN summit on preserving the world's seas. The 27-nation bloc wants to position itself as a leader in the field and will formally launch the "European Ocean Pact" at next week's conference in the French city of Nice. But a draft leaked last month was given short shrift by a coalition of environmental groups including Surfrider, WWF, ClientEarth and Oceana -- who saw it as largely rehashing old measures. "While the document outlines steps towards better enforcement of existing laws," they said in a joint statement, "concrete actions to address the most pressing threats to marine life and biodiversity are currently lacking." The draft pact acknowledges the need to boost funding to safeguard the oceans, but is light on hard commitments. Topping the list of measures environmentalists would like to see is an immediate ban on bottom trawling in protected areas -- the subject of a string of court cases -- as well as broader steps to align fishing practices with marine protection. On the European Commission front, officials have pushed back at the criticism -- indicating the leaked document was an interim draft and suggested stronger measures to come. - 'Blue economy' to 'blue carbon' - Forty percent of Europeans live within 50 kilometres (30 miles) of the coast -- though paradoxically the bloc is dependent on imports for 70 of the aquatic food it consumes, according to EU data cited in the draft. Nevertheless, the so-called "blue economy" linked to the sea supports more than five million jobs and contributes more than 250 billion euros ($285 billion) to the bloc's gross domestic product. As leaked, the draft pact: -- vows to update the bloc's 2008 directive on marine environmental policy and promises a new "Blue Carbon" action plan by 2026 to monitor and extend habitats capable of storing carbon dioxide. -- promises "dedicated attention" to small-scale fisheries and coastal communities that are economically and environmentally vulnerable when marine habitats are degraded. -- pledges to improve use of the European Satellite Oil Monitoring Service (CleanSeaNet), which serves to alert member states to the presence of pollutants. Between 2022 and 2023, the CleanSeaNet system identified more than 7,700 possible oil spills -- mostly in Spain, Greece and Italy -- but states acted on fewer than half of all alerts, according to the European Court of Auditors. When they did act, states confirmed pollution in only seven percent of cases -- often because too much time had elapsed by the time inspection teams arrived on site. - 'Clear signal' - After unveiling its roadmap in Brussels, the EU will formally present it at the June 9-13 UN Ocean Conference (UNOC), which is set to draw some 70 heads of state and government to southern France. The third of its kind, the UN summit seeks to build unity -- and raise 100 billion dollars in new funds -- for marine conservation, in spite of deep divergences over deep-sea mining, plastic trash and overfishing. One of its aims is to secure the 60 ratifications needed to enact a landmark treaty to protect marine habitats outside national jurisdiction -- with 28 countries on board so far, along with the EU. The oceans covering 70.8 percent of the globe have absorbed the vast majority of the warming caused by burning fossil fuels and shielded societies from the full impact of greenhouse gas emissions. But there are alarming symptoms of stress: heatwaves, loss of marine life, rising sea levels, falling oxygen levels and acidification caused by the uptake of excess carbon dioxide. The EU Commissioner for Fisheries and Oceans Costas Kadis said earlier this month the bloc wanted to send "a clear signal of Europe's leadership, commitment and vision" to its partners in Nice. "The ocean is warming. It is rising. It is acidifying. Pollution from plastics, chemicals, and noise is altering marine ecosystems," Kadis warned. "The pressures are growing and the need for action is immediate." adc/ec/rlp/cms
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NATO ministers to discuss defence spending hike ahead of key summit
By Lili Bayer, Sabine Siebold and Andrew Gray BRUSSELS (Reuters) -NATO defence ministers will gather in Brussels on Thursday to discuss how to meet Donald Trump's demand for significant increases in spending, less than three weeks ahead of a key summit of the alliance in The Hague. The U.S. president has said NATO allies should boost investment in defence to 5% of gross domestic product, up from the current target of 2%. Diplomats say the European allies understand that hiking defence expenditure is the price of ensuring a continued U.S. commitment to the continent's security and that keeping America on board means allowing Trump to be able to declare a win on his 5% demand during the summit, scheduled for June 24-25. "We have to go further and we have to go faster," NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte told reporters on Wednesday. "A new defence investment plan will be at the heart of the NATO summit in The Hague," he added. In a bid to meet Trump's 5% goal, Rutte has proposed alliance members boost defence spending to 3.5% of GDP and commit a further 1.5% to broader security-related spending, Reuters has reported. But details of the new investment plan will likely continue to be negotiated until the very eve of the NATO summit. "We have to find a realistic compromise between what is necessary and what is possible really to spend," German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius said on Wednesday. Countries remain divided over the timeline for a new pledge. "There's not unlimited time," U.S. ambassador to NATO Matthew Whitaker told reporters on Wednesday. Rutte has proposed reaching the 5% by 2032 – a date that some eastern European states consider too distant but which some others see as too early and unrealistic given current spending and industrial production levels. A 2032 target is "definitely too late", Lithuanian Defence Minister Dovile Sakaliene said on Wednesday, arguing for a target of 2030 at the latest. There is also an ongoing debate over how to define "defence-related" spending, which might include spending on cybersecurity and certain types of infrastructure. "The aim is to find a definition that is precise enough to cover only real security-related investments, and at the same time broad enough to allow for national specifics," said one NATO diplomat.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump Hits Columbia With Big New Threat Even After It Caved
Surrender wasn't enough to spare Columbia University from Donald Trump's wrath. The Department of Education issued a new threat against Columbia Wednesday, this time targeting its accreditation. The department alleged that the elite New York City school was 'in violation of federal anti-discrimination laws' for failing to stamp out antisemitism on campus. The DOE's press release revealed that it had notified the organization responsible for ensuring that Columbia is in compliance with accreditation standards of the alleged violation. 'After Hamas' October 7, 2023, terror attack on Israel, Columbia University's leadership acted with deliberate indifference towards the harassment of Jewish students on its campus,' said Linda McMahon, Trump's education secretary. 'This is not only immoral, but also unlawful. Accreditors have an enormous public responsibility as gatekeepers of federal student aid.' The move is an escalation in Trump's war on top universities. Since March, the president's administration has frozen $400 million in federal funding to Columbia. The university acquiesced to Trump's list of demands that month—including a ban on face masks and a vow to harshly protest pro-Palestinian student protesters. Losing accreditation would strip the university of state and federal financial funding, such as Pell Grants for low-income students. It could also inflict damage to Columbia's reputation and make its undergraduates ineligible for many graduate programs. Columbia's accreditor, Middle States Commission on Higher Education (MSCHE), requires that it follow relevant laws. The Education Department is alleging that the university has violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by failing to 'meaningfully protect Jewish students against severe and pervasive harassment on Columbia's campus.' While the Department of Education plays a role in setting accreditation standards, the organizations that determine whether a university is following them, like the MSCHE, operate independently. The MSCHE told the Daily Beast in a statement that it had received the letter from the Education Department but declined to comment further. Columbia did not immediately return a request for comment. Last week, Trump praised Columbia's deference and said that the school had earned a reprieve from his attacks. 'You know, Columbia has been really—they were very, very bad, what they've done. They're very antisemitic and lots of other things,' he said. 'But they're working with us on finding a solution, and, you know, they're taken off that hot seat.' In the months since Columbia gave into Trump's demands, one of its peers, Harvard University, has fought a fierce legal battle to avoid following suit. Harvard's defiance has earned it an escalating series of punishments—$2.5 billion in frozen funds, a threat against its tax-exempt status, and a push to strip its ability enroll international students. Despite suffering losses in court, Trump has declared that he is winning the war. 'But Harvard wants to fight. They want to show how smart they are, and they're getting their a-- kicked,' the president said. Harvard's president, Alan Garber, has urged other colleges and universities to fight back against Trump. 'I would say that we need to be firm in our commitments to what we stand for,' he told NPR.