Have sections of the US Constitution gone missing from government website?
Reddit users pointed out on Wednesday that the website omitted text from some sections of Article 1, which include provisions about the right of habeas corpus as well as limits on congressional and state power. Using the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine, people found that the full text appeared on the Library of Congress website on July 17 but was missing in snapshots after that date.
Some people mistakenly said President Donald Trump's administration removed these provisions from the constitution entirely without Congress's input.
'BREAKING: The official US government website has quietly removed Sections 9 and 10 of Article I from the Constitution,' one Threads post said on Wednesday. 'Let me say that again: They didn't amend the Constitution. They didn't debate it in Congress. They just erased two of the most protective sections; the ones that deal with habeas corpus, limits on federal power, and Congress's sole authority to set tariffs.'
Altering the text on a website would not remove or erase sections of the constitution. It can be changed only through a formal amendment process, which begins in the US Congress, which can modify or replace existing provisions. The constitution's full text is also available on the websites for the National Archives and the nonprofit National Constitution Center.
The amendment process outlined in Article 5 is the only way to alter the constitution. Any proposed amendment must first be approved by a two-thirds vote in both the US House of Representatives and the US Senate. Then it must be ratified by three-quarters of the state legislatures or via state ratifying conventions.
Government website omits constitution sections
On Wednesday about 11am in Washington, DC (15:00 GMT), the Library of Congress posted on X that the missing sections were 'due to a coding error'.
'We have been working to correct this and expect it to be resolved soon,' the post read. The website on Wednesday also displayed a banner that said: 'The Constitution Annotated website is currently experiencing data issues. We are working to resolve this issue and regret the inconvenience.'
The institution issued an update on X a few hours later that the website was fixed.
'Missing sections of the Constitution Annotated website have been restored,' it said. 'Upkeep of Constitution Annotated and other digital resources is a critical part of the Library's mission, and we appreciate the feedback that alerted us to the error and allowed us to fix it.'
Article 1 establishes the federal government's legislative branch. Its missing sections included portions of Section 8 and all of Sections 9 and 10, which largely focus on limits on congressional and state power.
Before being restored, the text of Article 1 ended in Section 8, just before a line that lists Congress's ability to provide and maintain a navy.
Section 9, which was temporarily deleted, details limits on congressional power. It addresses habeas corpus, the legal procedure that grants people in government custody the right to challenge their detention in court. The section says Congress may not suspend habeas corpus 'unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it'.
Habeas corpus has been in the headlines during the second Trump administration. White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller told reporters in May that the administration was looking into suspending habeas corpus. Later that month, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem wrongly said habeas corpus is a right the president has to remove people from the US.
Section 10, which was also temporarily removed, covers restrictions on US states, including regulating tariffs without Congress's consent.
Our ruling
A Threads post said an official US government website 'quietly removed Sections 9 and 10 of Article I from the Constitution' without input from Congress.
On Wednesday, the Library of Congress's annotated website of the US Constitution was missing sections of Article 1.
The library said the issue was related to a coding error, and it was corrected shortly afterwards.
Website alterations do not affect US law or the constitution. The document can be changed only through a formal amendment process initiated by Congress.
We rate this post false.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Qatar Tribune
21 minutes ago
- Qatar Tribune
Trump and Putin to meet in Alaska for Ukraine talks next week
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin will meet in Alaska next Friday to discuss the future of the war in Ukraine. Trump announced the 15 August meeting on social media and it was later confirmed by a Kremlin spokesperson, who said the location was "quite logical" given Alaska's relative proximity to Russia. There was no immediate reaction from Ukraine. The announcement of the meeting came just hours after Trump had signalled that Ukraine might have to cede territory in order to end the war, which began with Russia's full-scale invasion of its neighbour in February 2022. "You're looking at territory that's been fought over for three and a half years, a lot of Russians have died. A lot of Ukrainians have died," Trump said at the White House on Friday. "It's very complicated. We're going to get some back, we're going to get some switched. There will be some swapping of territories, to the betterment of both." The US president did not provide further details of what that proposal would look like.
Al Jazeera
7 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
How RFK Jr's vaccine funding cuts fit with Trump's vision
United States Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr has announced that the US is to cut funding for mRNA vaccine development – a move that health experts say is 'dangerous' and could make the US much more vulnerable to future outbreaks of respiratory viruses like COVID-19. Kennedy is known for his vaccine scepticism and recently ousted all 17 members of a scientific advisory panel on vaccines at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to be replaced with his own selections. However, this latest announcement is just part of a series of moves by President Donald Trump himself that appear to target the vaccine industry and give increasing weight to the arguments of vaccine sceptics in the US. Trump has previously undermined the efficacy of vaccines and sought to cut funding to vaccine programmes. Public health experts sounded the alarm after his election win in November, warning there would likely be a 'war on vaccines' under Trump. 'My main concern is that this is part of an increasingly ideological rather than evidence-based approach to healthcare and vaccination in particular that is being adopted in the US,' David Elliman, associate professor at University College London, told Al Jazeera. 'This is likely to increase vaccine hesitancy … [and] will result in more suffering and death, particularly for children. This would be a tragedy, even more so because it is avoidable.' What new cuts to vaccine funding have been made? In a statement posted on Tuesday on X, Kennedy said 22 projects on mRNA vaccine development worth nearly $500m will be cancelled. The main reason, he said, was that the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) in his Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) had reviewed mRNA vaccines and found them to be 'ineffective' in fighting mutating viruses. 'A single mutation can make mRNA vaccines ineffective,' Kennedy said in a video statement. 'After reviewing the science and consulting top experts, … HHS has determined that mRNA technology poses more risk than benefits for these respiratory viruses.' Instead, Kennedy said, the US will shift mRNA funding to other vaccine development technologies that are 'safer' and 'remain effective'. Some notable institutions and companies that will be affected by the latest decision, as listed on the HHS website, include: Emory University and Tiba Biotech (terminated contracts) Pfizer, Sanofi Pasteur, CSL Seqirus (rejected or cancelled proposals) Luminary Labs, ModeX ('descoped' or weakened contracts) AstraZeneca and Moderna ('restructured' contracts) What are mRNA vaccines, and are they really ineffective against virus mutations? Messenger ribonucleic acid vaccines prompt the body to produce proteins that help it build immunity against certain microbes. They differ from traditional vaccines that introduce weakened or dead microbes into the body to stimulate immunity. Both types of vaccines have their strengths and weaknesses, but mRNA vaccines are notably faster to manufacture although they don't provide the lifelong coverage that traditional vaccines might. However, Elliman said virus mutations are a general problem for any vaccines and present a challenge scientists are still contending with. 'As yet, there are no vaccines in use that have solved this problem, so this is not a good reason for abandoning mRNA vaccines,' Elliman said. 'The technology has great promise for vaccines and therapeutics, so ceasing research in the field without good evidence is unjustified.' The move, he added, could discourage investors and scientists, both inside and outside the US, from keeping up research. Dorit R Reiss, a law professor at the University of California, San Francisco, who focuses on vaccine law, told Al Jazeera that the decision is 'troubling and shortsighted'. 'Procedurally, the decision was done in a very flawed manner. At the least, there should be notice and an opportunity for hearing and explanation under our administrative law, and there was instead a short and cursory X video with no references, no real data,' she said. The move will not only hurt innovation, she said, but will also leave the country less prepared for emergencies. What are RFK's views on vaccines? The health secretary has long been considered a vaccine sceptic. Kennedy formerly chaired Children's Health Defense – an anti-vaccine advocacy group formed in 2007 – until 2023 when he announced his run for the presidency. The organisation has also campaigned against the fortification of drinking water with fluoride, which prevents tooth decay. During a 2013 autism conference, Kennedy compared the CDC's childhood vaccine programme to Nazi-era crimes. 'To me, this is like Nazi death camps, what happened to these kids,' he said, referring to an increasing number of children diagnosed with autism. 'I can't tell you why somebody would do something like that. I can't tell you why ordinary Germans participated in the Holocaust.' In a 2023 interview with Fox News, Kennedy claimed vaccines cause autism. He cited a widely debunked study by Andrew Wakefield, a discredited British doctor and antivaccine activist whose study on the matter has since been retracted from journals. In another 2023 podcast, Kennedy said, 'No vaccine is safe or effective.' Aside from his vaccine scepticism, Kennedy, also known as RFK Jr, has also made several controversial remarks about other health issues, such as COVID-19. He criticised vaccine mandates and lockdown restrictions during the pandemic under former President Joe Biden. He also claimed in a leaked video in 2022 that COVID-19 'attacked certain races disproportionately' because of their genetic makeup and Ashkenazi Jews were most immune to the virus. Several research studies, however, found that social inequalities were major influences on how COVID-19 affected different ethno-social groups because certain people had reduced access to care. During a congressional hearing in the lead-up to his appointment in Trump's administration, Kennedy denied making several of the controversial statements attributed to him in the past. He also promised to maintain existing vaccine standards. What are Trump's views on vaccines? Trump has flip-flopped on this issue. He has previously downplayed the usefulness of vaccines and, in particular, criticised the schedules under which children receive several vaccine doses within their first two years. In his election campaign last year, Trump promised to dismantle vaccine mandates in schools. In a 2007 interview with the South Florida Sun-Sentinel, Trump claimed that an autism 'epidemic' had arisen as a result of vaccines, a theory which has since been debunked. 'My theory – and I study it because I have young children – my theory is the shots [vaccines]. We're giving these massive injections at one time, and I really think it does something to the children.' In subsequent interviews, Trump called childhood vaccines a 'monster shot' and in 2015 during a debate among Republican presidential candidates said vaccines were 'meant for a horse, not a child'. In 2015, he told a reporter he had never received a flu shot. But Trump has also spoken in favour of vaccines at times. During his first term as president, Trump said at a news briefing that children 'have to get their shots' after outbreaks of measles emerged across the country. 'The vaccinations are so important. This is really going around now,' he said. Additionally, in his first term during the COVID-19 pandemic, his administration initially downplayed the virus, but it ultimately oversaw the rapid production of COVID-19 vaccines in a project it called Operation Warp Speed. After Biden became president in 2021, Trump's camp criticised his vaccine and face mask mandates, which critics said contributed to rising levels of antivaccine sentiment among conservative voters. Trump also avoided using Operation Warp Speed's success as a selling point in last year's presidential campaign. He also did not publicly announce that he had received initial and booster COVID-19 vaccine shots before leaving the White House. Has the Trump administration targeted vaccines more broadly? During Trump's second term, the US introduced vaccine regulations that some critics said undermine the country's vaccine system. Furthermore, the Trump administration has cut funding to the US Agency for International Development, which supported hundreds of vaccine development programmes across the world. In February, Trump halted federal funding for schools that required students to have what his administration called 'coercive' COVID-19 vaccines. In May, Kennedy announced that the federal government would no longer recommend COVID-19 vaccines for healthy children and pregnant women without giving details about the reasons behind the change in policy. That went against the advice of US health officials who had previously urged boosters for young children. In June, Kennedy fired all 17 members of a CDC panel of vaccine experts, claiming that the board was 'rife with conflicts'. The panel, which had been appointed by Biden, was responsible for recommending how vaccines are used and for whom. Kennedy said the move would raise public confidence, stating that the US was 'prioritising the restoration of public trust above any specific pro- or antivaccine agenda. However, the move drew condemnation from scientists and health bodies. At the same time, the Food and Drug Administration, which also comes under the remit of the HHS, has approved at least one COVID-19 vaccine. In May, the FDA approved Novavax's non-mRNA, protein-based COVID-19 vaccine although only for older adults and those over the age of 12 who also have underlying health conditions that put them at higher risk from the virus. That was unusual for the US, where vaccines are usually approved without such limitations. The 2026 budget proposal to Congress does not include funding for the Global Vaccine Alliance (GAVI), a public-private entity formed in 2002 to support vaccine distribution to low and middle-income countries. GAVI was instrumental in securing vaccines for several countries in Africa and other regions during the COVID-19 pandemic when it was feared that richer countries could stockpile the available doses. The US currently provides more than 10 percent of GAVI's funding. In 2024, that amounted to $300m. Did Trump seek to undermine vaccine research and development during his first term as well? Yes. Trump's health budget proposals in 2018 and subsequently proposed budget cuts to the National Institute of Health and the CDC would have impacted immunisation programmes and a wide range of life-saving research on vaccines. However, the proposals were rejected by Congress. In May 2018, the Trump administration disbanded the Global Health and Biodefense Unit of the National Security Council. The team, which was set up to help prepare the US for pandemics and vaccine deployments, was formed in 2015 under President Barack Obama's administration during an Ebola epidemic. Later, when the COVID-19 pandemic reached the US, scientists blamed the country's vulnerability on Trump's decision.
Al Jazeera
8 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Before Trump-Putin talks, Ukraine rules out ‘gifting land to occupier'
President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has ruled out Ukraine ceding land to Russia and demanded his country take part in negotiations in comments made before planned talks between the leaders of Russia and the United States. In a video shared on social media on Saturday, Zelenskyy said Ukraine was ready for 'real decisions' that could bring a 'dignified peace' but stressed there could be no violation of the constitution on territorial issues. 'Ukrainians will not gift their land to the occupier,' he said, warning that 'decisions without Ukraine' would not bring peace. 'They will not achieve anything. These are stillborn decisions. They are unworkable decisions. And we all need real and genuine peace. Peace that people will respect,' added Zelenskyy, whose country has been fighting off a full-scale Russian invasion since February 2022. His comments came hours after US President Donald Trump said a peace deal would involve 'some swapping of territories' as he announced a meeting on Friday with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, in the US state of Alaska to discuss the war in Ukraine. Tens of thousands of people have been killed since Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine, which also forced millions of people to flee their homes. Three rounds of negotiations between Russia and Ukraine this year have failed to bear fruit, and it remains unclear whether a summit would bring peace any closer. On Thursday, Putin said he considers a meeting with Zelenskyy possible but the conditions for such negotiations must be right and the prerequisites for this are still far from being met. The Russian president did not outline his conditions, but previously, the Kremlin has insisted that Ukraine give up the territories Russia occupies, Western nations stop supplying Ukraine with weapons and they exclude Ukraine from membership in the NATO military alliance. 'There has been a lot of speculation over what a ceasefire agreement could look like in which the lines of contact between Russia and Ukraine could be frozen for a number of years,' Al Jazeera's Osama Bin Javad, reporting from Moscow, said. 'It is also not clear whether the Russian demand that NATO's ambitions in Ukraine should be forever quashed is actually going to be met.' 'A challenging process' Ukraine and its European allies have long opposed any agreement that involves ceding occupied territory, but Putin has repeatedly said any deal must require Ukraine to relinquish some of the territories Russia has seized. Russia declared four Ukrainian regions that it does not fully control – Kherson, Donetsk, Zaporizhia and Luhansk – its territory in 2022 and also claims the Black Sea peninsula of Crimea, which it annexed in 2014. Putin aide Yuri Ushakov said the talks between the presidents of Russia and the US next week will 'focus on discussing options for achieving a long-term peaceful resolution to the Ukrainian crisis'. 'This will evidently be a challenging process, but we will engage in it actively and energetically,' Ushakov said. Prime Minister Donald Tusk of Poland, a close ally of Ukraine, said on Friday that a pause in the conflict could be close. 'There are certain signals, and we also have an intuition that perhaps a freeze in the conflict – I don't want to say the end, but a freeze in the conflict – is closer than it is further away,' Tusk said at a news conference after talks with Zelenskyy. 'There are hopes for this.' The Alaska summit would be the first between sitting US and Russian presidents since Joe Biden met Putin in Geneva in June 2021. Trump and Putin last sat together in 2019 at a Group of 20 summit in Japan during Trump's first term. They have spoken by telephone several times since Trump returned to the White House in January.
