Experts Reveal 3 CommonTax Mistakes That Could Cost You Big
Frustrated shocked african man having problems, feel confused looking at laptop screen at office
As tax season comes to a close each year, many Americans rush to meet the April 15 deadline and celebrate when they received a big refund. But according to tax experts, these popular strategies might actually be costing you money.
Mark J. Kohler, M.PR.A., C.P.A., J.D.,Founding and Senior Partner at KKOS Lawyers, specializing in tax, legal, wealth, estate, and asset protection planning and Timothy Wingate Jr., an IRS-certified tax specialist and founder of G+F Business & Financial Consulting, say taxpayers often fall for three common traps — and correcting them can lead to smarter financial decisions all year long.
Here's what people get wrong about taxes and how you can take a more strategic approach.
While the April 15 deadline is real, filing your return on that day isn't always required — or even wise.
'Contrary to popular opinion, it's not the end of the world if you don't file your personal 1040 tax return by April 15,' Kohler said. 'In fact, it can be very strategic to not file and instead submit an extension. Getting an extension gives you time to get all your records in order.'
Timothy Wingate Jr., an IRS-certified tax specialist and founder of G+F Business & Financial Consulting, agrees—and offers practical advice for how to do it right.
Here's how to file an extension the smart way, according to Wingate:
Filing an extension gives you until October 15 to submit your return—but remember, it doesn't delay the deadline to pay any taxes owed. To avoid penalties or interest, it's smart to send a payment by April 15, even if your paperwork isn't ready.
Most people celebrate a large refund check — but Kohler says that mindset needs to change.
'Our number one cost in life is taxes,' he said. 'If we can minimize that, we can deploy that money in other areas that make us money. That's the concept of tax planning.'
Rather than aiming for a big refund, aim to owe nothing — and keep more of your paycheck throughout the year.
Talk to a tax advisor about adjusting your withholdings, contributing to retirement accounts, or making strategic investments to reduce your taxable income.
With nearly 40% of Americans working a side hustle, treating that income seriously is more important than ever.
'Side hustles aren't just income streams — they're tax planning opportunities,' Kohler said. 'But too many people miss out because they don't keep records or claim expenses.'
'Keep separate accounts, track all expenses, and consult a tax professional,' he said. 'That way, you can legally deduct business expenses and potentially lower your overall tax bill.'
Accurate record-keeping is essential to claim these deductions — and to protect yourself in case of an audit.
Don't wait until tax season to think about your tax strategy. Avoiding these common mistakes — filing blindly by April 15, celebrating big refunds, and ignoring your side hustle's business status — can help you keep more of your money.
Instead, work with a trusted tax advisor, file smarter (not faster), and take full advantage of deductions and planning strategies year-round. Your future finances will thank you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Pro Se Taxpayer Raises TurboTax Defense In IRS Form 3520 Penalty Case
IRS Form 3520 The IRS often challenges taxpayers who seek penalty abatements for late-filing penalties, particularly those related to international information returns. Generally, these cases focus on whether the taxpayer can demonstrate reasonable cause for non-compliance. Because the reasonable cause standard depends on the facts and circumstances, it is common for the government and taxpayers to disagree on whether the conduct at issue arises to a level of reasonable cause sufficient for penalty abatement. A recent federal district court order illustrates this point well. In Huang v. United States, No. 3:24-cv-062998-RS (N.D. Cal. 5/28/25), a pro se taxpayer challenged the IRS' assessment of roughly $40,000 of penalties related to two late-filed Forms 3520. When the government refused to concede the penalties, Huang filed a lawsuit, contending that she had reasonable cause for the late filings in that she relied on TurboTax to advise her of the forms. The government moved to dismiss her claims arguing, among other things, that Huang had failed to sufficiently allege reasonable cause. The court disagreed and concluded that her factual allegations, if true, could support a reasonable cause defense. Huang's case will now presumably move into discovery where she will have to support her allegations and where the government can attempt to introduce other evidence that may cut against her claim. Although Huang can move forward with her reasonable cause defense, the court did find in the government's favor on one issue. Specifically, in addition to the reasonable cause contentions, the government moved to dismiss certain procedural arguments Huang raised against the penalties on the basis that she had failed to raise them prior to the lawsuit. The court agreed with the government and dismissed these claims under the variance doctrine. Huang received significant monetary gifts from her foreign, non-resident parents in 2015 and 2016. These gifts were intended to help Huang relocate to the U.S. and to purchase a new home. Generally, gifts are not subject to income tax. However, section 6039F requires U.S. persons to file a Form 3520 if gifts from a foreign donor exceed certain reporting thresholds in a tax year (currently, more than $100,000 if the foreign donors are individuals). U.S. persons who miss the Form 3520 filing deadline may be subject to penalties of up to 25% of the amount of the foreign gifts received in a year. Huang used TurboTax to prepare and file her 2015- and 2016-income tax returns. According to her complaint, TurboTax never notified her of the Form 3520 filing obligations, resulting in her filing the information returns late. After she filed the returns, the IRS assessed over $90,000 of late-filing penalties against Huang under section 6039F. To contest the penalties, Huang hired a tax attorney. In response to the tax attorney's appeals protest, the agency agreed to abate all but approximately $35,000 of the penalties. Thereafter, Huang paid the remaining penalties plus interest and filed a lawsuit against the government. Huang's complaint raised reasonable cause and procedural defenses against the section 6039F penalties. The government moved to dismiss her complaint, contending that she failed to allege an appropriate reasonable defense and failed to properly raise her procedural contentions during the review of her refund claim. For decades, taxpayers and the IRS have fought over the scope and application of the reasonable cause defense to late-filing penalties. These disputes have resulted in rich and voluminous case law that categorize most of the reasonable cause defenses that are available to taxpayers. At its core, Huang's contentions fell into two of these well-known defenses: professional reliance and ignorance of the law. Although taxpayers may rely on professionals concerning substantive tax advice, the Supreme Court recognized many decades ago in U.S. v. Boyle, 469 U.S. 241 (1985) that taxpayers may not rely on professionals to file their return by a reporting deadline. A taxpayer may have reasonable cause for relying on a tax professional's advice regarding whether a specific return should be filed but does not have reasonable cause for the act of filing the return itself. With the rise in tax software, federal courts have also had the opportunity to review reasonable cause and whether it applies in these circumstances. In many cases, the courts have concluded that taxpayers cannot show reasonable cause reliance on tax software because the 'software . . . is only as good as the information the taxpayer puts into it.' See, e.g., Bunney v. Comm'r, 114 T.C. 259 (2000). In addition, courts have generally held that Boyle applies to late filings caused by tax software in that taxpayers may not rely on their software to file a timely return. See Spottiswood v. U.S., No. 17-cv-00209-MEJ (N.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2018) (no reasonable cause where taxpayer attempted to timely file return through TurboTax, but return was late due to error in dependent's Social Security number). In a recent decision, a California district court illustrated the distinction in Boyle between relying on a tax professional for reporting advice and relying on a professional to file the return. See Murphy v. U.S., No. 1:24-cv-00260 (E.D. Cal. 2025). Husband and wife taxpayers had created a revocable grantor trust which historically had reported the trust's income and tax items on the couple's joint individual tax returns. When the husband passed away, the wife, as trustee, was required to report the trust as a separate entity for federal income tax purposes. Although the wife advised her long-time tax advisor of her husband's death, the tax preparer continued to report the trust's income and other items on the wife's returns. The errors were eventually discovered, and late trust income tax returns were filed. When the IRS assessed late-filing penalties, the wife contended that she reasonably relied on her long-time tax advisor concerning the proper income tax reporting. The Murphy court agreed and found reasonable cause because the wife justifiably relied on her tax professional to provide reporting advice. The reasonable cause defense may apply where a taxpayer was ignorant of the tax laws, but it is often an uphill battle for taxpayers. Specifically, taxpayers must usually show ignorance of the law in combination with other factors (e.g., lack of education or business experience, complexity of the tax matter, etc.). The IRS also considers whether the taxpayer has been subject to the specific reporting requirement in prior years or subject to penalties. In Huang, the court concluded that the taxpayer pleaded sufficient facts to show reasonable cause for the late-filed Forms 3520. In finding in favor of the taxpayer, the court found significant that: (i) Huang provided evidence that TurboTax may have suggested to her that she was not required to file an information return; (ii) the IRS has historically abated many of these penalties; and (iii) she suggested that she lacked experience or knowledge of the Form 3520 filing obligations. Huang also raised procedural challenges to the Forms 3520 penalties which included arguments under the Administrative Procedure Act and section 6751(b). However, the court agreed with the government that these claims were barred under the variance doctrine. Applicable to refund claims, the variance doctrine provides that taxpayers must fully apprise the IRS of each ground for refund prior to filing a lawsuit. The doctrine is intended to inform the agency of the claims to potentially avoid costly and time-consuming litigation. If a taxpayer fails to properly raise an argument prior to filing a lawsuit, courts will refuse to entertain the new arguments in litigation. Many tax professionals are aware of the variance doctrine and its risks—unfortunately, few pro se taxpayers know of its existence and application, resulting in many good arguments never making it before the court. The Huang case shows that the government often takes a hard stance on penalties in international information return cases. The court order also demonstrates the dangers taxpayers may face in failing to properly raise all of their arguments under the variance doctrine pre-litigation.
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Doug Ford says it's up to Donald Trump to de-escalate tensions with Canada
You first. That's the message Premier Doug Ford has for U.S. President Donald Trump in the war of words over U.S. tariffs and his musings about Canada becoming his country's 51st state. 'Sure, you want me to tone it down. That's fine. The president has to tone it down,' Ford said Tuesday after a meeting with U.S. Ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra. 'We need to bring the temperature down. We both agree on that,' the premier told reporters. While Hoekstra — a former Republican congressman from Michigan — did not appear with Ford following the tete-a-tete, sources told the Star that the premier's frequent hard-hitting remarks about Trump have been an irritant. 'My job is to protect the people of Ontario,' Ford replied when asked about that, noting the ambassador did not raise 'this time' the sore spot of the LCBO removing Kentucky bourbon and other American products from store shelves. 'It's very simple: Drop your tariffs, we'll bring back the booze,' added the premier, who noted he nevertheless feels the two countries are 'getting closer' to working out their differences. Ontario Premier Doug Ford says he is disappointed U.S. President Donald Trump is doubling steel and aluminum tariffs. The last time Trump threatened to raise that set of tariffs to 50 per cent it was in response to Ford placing a surcharge on electricity Ontario sends to three U.S. states. Ford agreed to remove it and Trump backed off that threat, but now with the 50 per cent tariff rate taking effect Wednesday, Ford says the Americans broke a promise. (June 3, 2025 / The Canadian Press) Hoekstra said much the same to a luncheon audience of the Empire Club in a conversation with former federal Conservative cabinet minister Lisa Raitt, now vice-chair of global investment banking at CIBC. 'We are very positive about where the future of America, Canada, individually where we can go but also what we can achieve together,' the ambassador said. 'The relationship with Canada is so important.' On the auto industry that Michigan and Ontario share, Hoekstra spoke of the need for co-operation — despite the disruption caused by tariffs and Trump's recent threat to raise steel and aluminum tariffs to 50 per cent on Wednesday. 'Our chief competitor here is China,' Hoekstra said. 'How do we use the strengths of the U.S. auto industry? How do we use the strengths and capabilities of Canada, and how do we bring those together in such a way that we're beating China and not each other?' Ford, who has also pointed the finger of blame at China regarding auto parts and pledged to co-operate with the U.S. on that front, said the revived tariff threat on steel and aluminum left him 'disappointed.' That's because the premier pulled back Ontario's threat of a 25 per cent surcharge on electricity exports to three U.S. states on March 11 after the move alarmed Trump, who then agreed to reduce the steel and aluminum tariffs to 25 per cent as Ford secured an 'olive branch' meeting with U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. 'We take off the surcharge that we put on electricity and that promise was broken,' Ford lamented Tuesday. 'One person is controlling the message, their decisions, and that's the president.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Dem who wanted Elon Musk 'taken down' launches bid for House Oversight leadership position
Rising Democratic Party star Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, who sparked controversy earlier this year with remarks about Elon Musk and Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, formally launched her bid for ranking member of the House Oversight Committee Tuesday. "These are not normal times — and this cannot be a business-as-usual moment," Crockett said in a post on X. The House Oversight Committee is responsible for holding the executive branch of the federal government and President Donald Trump accountable in Congress. The committee's last ranking member, Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va., died May 21 after battling cancer. He was elected to the position in 2023. "Since the start of the 119th Congress, the late ranking member, Gerry Connolly, led Oversight Democrats in the fight to hold the Trump Administration accountable and it was my distinct privilege and absolute honor to serve alongside him as the Vice Ranking Member," Crockett said in a letter to her Democratic colleagues. Jasmine Crockett Agrees During Town Hall That 'Republicans Want Poor People To Die' Republican Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin announced Tuesday a special election to replace Connolly in the House. His death May 21 also left a leadership gap on the House Oversight Committee, and House Democrats are now tasked with electing a new leader to challenge Trump. Read On The Fox News App Connolly designated Rep. Stephen Lynch, D-Mass., as interim ranking member, and the race is on among House Democrats for the open leadership position. Democratic representatives Robert Garcia of California and Kweisi Mfume of Maryland have announced their own bids to lead the committee. Crockett had signaled her intention to run for ranking member, and the Texas congresswoman's letter to Democrats Tuesday made her bid official. Jasmine Crockett Shares Bizarre Song Clip Calling Herself 'Leader Of The Future' "In this moment, Americans are demanding a more strategic, aggressive, and energetic fight," Crockett said. "Understanding that fierce urgency, I formally announce my candidacy for Ranking Member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform — with a focus on standing up for American families, defending the Constitution and the rule of law, and ensuring the government serves the people, not the privileged few." Crockett has risen to the national stage for her viral moments in the House, building name recognition among Democrats and a reputation among Republicans. Earlier this year, Attorney General Pam Bondi accused Crockett of "threatening lives" and said she should apologize for her rhetoric against Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) for saying, "All I want to see happen on my birthday is for Elon to be taken down." Crockett said she was referring to "nonviolent" resistance. Crockett was also criticized this year for calling Gov. Greg Abbott, R-Texas, who is in a wheelchair, "Governor Hot Wheels." She walked back the comments after her remarks went viral, calling the outrage a "distraction." And the Texas congresswoman dominated headlines last year when her campaign trademarked the phrase "bleach blonde, bad built, butch body" after a verbal dispute with Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga. Her viral moments have even caught the attention of Trump, who called Crockett a "low I.Q. person." "Our country is in an existential crisis driven by an out-of-control Executive with a flagrant disregard for our Constitution, our way of governance, and our very way of life as citizens of a democratic republic," Crockett said in her letter to House Democrats. "The Administration has refused to respect congressional authority, abide by lawful judicial orders, or respond to public outrage." "The magnitude of these unprecedented times warrants a resistance and tactics never before seen. We must pull back the curtain on the unmitigated chaos under Trump 2.0 and translate our findings to the American people in a way they can digest," Crockett added. In the letter, Crockett praised President Joe Biden, touted her own achievements during her first two terms in the House and asked for her colleagues' support. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., another rising Democratic Party star, said earlier this year she would not seek the top Democratic position on the House Oversight Committee. "It's actually clear to me that the underlying dynamics in the caucus have not shifted with respect to seniority as much as I think would be necessary, and so I believe I'll be staying put at Energy and Commerce," Ocasio-Cortez's spokesperson confirmed to Fox News Digital in a statement first reported by NBC. Ocasio-Cortez lost her House Oversight bid to Connolly late last year. Connolly had announced his plan to step back as ranking member of the Oversight Committee after just four months on the job due to the resurgence of his esophageal article source: Dem who wanted Elon Musk 'taken down' launches bid for House Oversight leadership position
