
Federal Reserve chair defends holding interest rates after fresh Trump attacks
The Federal Reserve is well placed to wait and see how tariffs impact US prices before cutting interest rates, its chair, Jerome Powell, insisted, defying renewed demands from Donald Trump.
The US president has disregarded the central bank's longstanding independence to repeatedly call for rate cuts to spur economic growth and launch a series of personal attacks on Powell.
In an overnight social media post, Trump branded the Fed chair as 'very dumb' and claimed the central bank's refusal to lower rates since December – in part, the result of uncertainty sparked by his own administration's erratic economic strategy – was damaging the US.
'We will be paying for his incompetence for many years to come,' the president wrote on his Truth Social platform.
On Capitol Hill on Tuesday, Powell reiterated that Trump's tariffs are 'likely' to increase prices – potentially challenging the Fed's years-long bid to bring down US inflation. He noted, however, that the administration's policies frequently shift.
'Policy changes continue to evolve, and their effects on the economy remain uncertain,' Powell told the US House of Representatives financial services committee. 'The effects of tariffs will depend, among other things, on their ultimate level. Expectations of that level, and thus of the related economic effects, reached a peak in April and have since declined.
'Even so, increases in tariffs this year are likely to push up prices and weigh on economic activity.'
At its latest two-day policy meeting last week, the Fed kept rates on hold, but its officials signaled thy might make two cuts this year. They lifted their projections for inflation and downgraded their estimates for growth.
The 'obligation' of the central bank's policymakers is to 'keep longer-term inflation expectations well anchored and to prevent a one-time increase in the price level from becoming an ongoing inflation problem', Powell told Congress on Tuesday.
He added: 'For the time being, we are well positioned to wait to learn more about the likely course of the economy before considering any adjustments to our policy stance.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
10 minutes ago
- The Guardian
US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites only set back program months, Pentagon report says
An initial classified US assessment of Donald Trump's strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities over the weekend says they did not destroy two of the sites and likely only set back the nuclear program by a few months, according to two people familiar with the report. The report produced by the Defense Intelligence Agency – the intelligence arm of the Pentagon – concluded key components of the nuclear program including centrifuges were capable of being restarted within months. The report also found that much of Iran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium that could be put to use for a possible nuclear weapon was moved before the strikes and may have been moved to other secret nuclear sites maintained by Iran. The findings by the DIA, which were based on a preliminary battle damage assessment conducted by US Central Command, which oversees US military operations in the Middle East, suggests Trump's declaration about the sites being 'obliterated' may have been overstated. Trump said in his televised address on Saturday night immediately after the operation that the US had completely destroyed Iran's enrichment sites at Natanz and Fordow, the facility buried deep underground, and at Isfahan, where enrichment was being stored. 'The strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated. Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace,' Trump said in his address from the White House. While the DIA report was only an initial assessment, one of the people said if the intelligence on the ground was already finding within days that Fordow in particular was not destroyed, later assessments could suggest even less damage might have been inflicted. Long regarded as the most well-protected of Iran's nuclear sites, the uranium-enrichment facilities at Fordow are buried beneath the Zagros mountains. Reports have suggested that the site was constructed beneath 45-90 metres (145-300ft) of bedrock, largely limestone and dolomite. The White House disputed the intelligence assessment, which was first reported by CNN. 'The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran's nuclear program,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement. The Guardian revealed last Wednesday that top political appointees at the Pentagon had been briefed at the start of Trump's second term that the 30,000lb 'bunker buster' GBU-57 bombs meant to be used on Fordow would not completely destroy the facility. In that briefing, in January, officials were told by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency at the Pentagon that developed the GBU-57 that the bombs would not penetrate deep enough underground and only a tactical nuclear weapon would wipe out Fordow. The US strikes against Iran's nuclear facilities involved B2 bombers dropping 12 GBU-57s on Fordow and two GBU-57s on Natanz. A US navy submarine then launched roughly 30 Tomahawk missiles on Isfahan, US defense officials said at a news conference Sunday. Defense secretary Pete Hegseth repeated Trump's claim at the news conference that the sites had been 'obliterated', but the chair of the joint chiefs of staff, Gen Dan Caine, who helped oversee the operation, was more measured in his remarks. Caine said that all three of the nuclear sites had 'sustained severe damage and destruction' but cautioned that the final battle-damage assessment for the military operation was still to come.


Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump's very telling social media move after being nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize
President Donald Trump is basking in the glow of his nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize. He shared a letter written by a Republican lawmaker that nominated him for brokering a delicate end to the war between Iran and Israel. Trump also reposted a tweet made by Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk Monday evening in which Kirk declared that "President Trump should get the Nobel Peace Prize.' Georgia Republican Congressman Buddy Carter nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize on Tuesday after the president mediated a delicate ceasefire between Israel and Iran, which he announced Monday. Carter sent to a letter to the Nobel Peace Prize committee, hailing Trump's 'instrumental influence' in forging a swift agreement 'that many believed to be impossible.' 'President Trump also took bold, decisive actions to halt Iran's nuclear ambitions and ensure that the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism remains incapable of acquiring a nuclear weapon,' Carter wrote to the five-member committee. Posting on Truth Social Monday night, Trump touted the end of the '12 Day War' between Israel and Iran. The two nations had been exchanging blows for over a week, prior to U.S. involvement. There are currently 338 candidates for the 2025 Peace Prize, according to the official Nobel website. Rep. Buddy Carter R-Ga., walks from a closed-door meeting with the GOP Conference during the opening day of the 118th Congress at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Tuesday, Jan 3, 2023. The Georgia congressman, who is also presently running for U.S. Senate in the battleground state, is likely using the nomination to curry favor with Trump, who is expected to bestow a formal endorsement in that GOP primary campaign. Cater wrote, that 'President Trump took bold action to ultimately champion peace through strength and facilitate a ceasefire framework that brought hostilities to a halt.' He isn't the only lawmaker to have recommended Trump for the award. I just nominated @realDonaldTrump for the Nobel Peace Prize in recognition of his historic role in brokering a ceasefire between Israel and Iran and preventing the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism from obtaining the most lethal weapon on the planet.… — Buddy Carter (@RepBuddyCarter) June 24, 2025 A member of the Ukrainian parliament who nominated Trump for the prestigious diplomacy award back in November decided Monday to withdraw his nomination. Oleksandr Merezhko, who is the head of the foreign affairs committee in Ukraine's parliament said that he had "lost any sort of faith and belief" in Trump's ability to be a dealmaker in the war between Russia and Ukraine as he switched his focus to brokering peace in the Middle East, per Newsweek. Trump has long been obsessed with gaining the Nobel Peace Prize musing as early as 2018 that he deserved it. 'I think I'm gonna get a Nobel Prize … if they gave it out fairly,' he told reporters in 2019. Part of Trump fixation is based on the fact that his predecessor, Barack Obama earned the prize in 2009, after just nine months in office, for his work on nuclear non-proliferation. Donald Trump Jr. wrote that 'affirmative action is when Barack Obama gets the Nobel Peace Prize instead of Donald Trump.' Affirmative action is when Barack Obama gets the Nobel Peace Prize instead of Donald Trump. — Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) June 24, 2025 Earlier this year, Rep. Darrell Issa nominated Trump for the prestigious California lawmaker wrote in March that Trump that tangibly kickstarted the cause of peace in numerous regions of the world with his re-election to a second term. Issa pointed to Trump's first Middle East peace deal, the 2019 Abraham Accords, as evidence he should be given the award, adding that Trump 'has in no way received fair recognition for his efforts and accomplishments'


Reuters
14 minutes ago
- Reuters
TSX climbs to record high, helped by Middle East ceasefire optimism
June 24 (Reuters) - Canada's main stock index rose to a record high on Tuesday, led by financial and technology shares, as investors cheered a cooling of Middle East tensions and found reassurance in domestic inflation data. The S&P/TSX Composite Index (.GSPTSE), opens new tab ended up 109.26 points, or 0.4%, at 26,718.62, eclipsing the record closing high it posted on June 12. "It's riding on the coattails of what's come out recently in the Middle East," said Allan Small, senior investment advisor of the Allan Small Financial Group with iA Private Wealth. "All of a sudden we went from everything around us was negative, to positive once again. That's how fast things can turn and a good example to why investors can't run and hide, (can't) try and time markets." Wall Street also rallied as investors welcomed a fragile truce with Israel and Iran while parsing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell's congressional testimony for clues regarding the U.S. central bank's path forward. Canada's annual inflation rate in May was unchanged from the previous month, at 1.7%, as a drop in gasoline costs continued to keep the overall index stable while prices of shelter, food and transportation also cooled. "The CPI numbers they weren't anything that I thought anyway to be nervous about," Small said. The heavily weighted financials sector rose 1%, while technology ended 2.5% higher, helped by a gain of 4% for e-commerce company Shopify ( opens new tab. Commodity-linked stocks were a drag. The energy sector (.SPTTEN), opens new tab lost 1.5% as the price of oil settled 6% lower at $64.37 a barrel on expectations that the ceasefire will reduce the risk of oil supply disruptions in the Middle East. Energy producers in Alberta, Canada's top oil-producing province, blew past the province's self-imposed limit on annual natural gas flaring in 2024 for a second year in a row, Reuters calculations show. Safe-haven gold also declined, falling 2.5%. The materials sector, which includes metal mining shares, was down 1.7%.