Scale of Commission of Investigation reflects 'deep impact on families'
This afternoon, the Government announced that is to establish a Commission of Investigation into allegations of historical sexual abuse in schools across the country.
One in Four which works with people who have been subjected to abuse has welcomed "the commitment to a broad and inclusive approach, covering all schools and with a definition of concerns of sexual abuse that includes formal allegations, information and witnessed behaviours".
It expressed hope that by investigating how concerns and allegations of child sexual abuse were handled by schools, religious bodies and state agencies, the Commission will uncover the failures to prevent sexual abuse, identify lessons for the future, whilst ensuring that the voices of those affected lead to meaningful change.
Given the scale of the issue, One in Four has said it recognises that not every individual case can be investigated.
"We urge the Commission to ensure its sampling methods are transparent so that all survivors and the wider public can understand how cases are selected and trust that the process is fair, open, and accountable," it said.
It has expressed concern that the issue of redress will be further delayed.
"While we appreciate this is complex, survivors have shown immense resilience and patience; therefore, we are concerned about any further delay.
"Delays disadvantage survivors and may allow institutions to avoid accountability."
It added that the Commission of Investigation is not an alternative route to justice for survivors, its focus is on examining how concerns were handled and learn from past failures.
It has pointed out that the Survivor Engagement Programme, while not a legal process, offers survivors a confidential and supportive space to share the impact of their experiences, ensuring their voices inform the Commission's recommendations.
CEO Deirdre Kenny said that examining how concerns were managed is vital for understanding past failures and building a safer, more accountable future for all children.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
White House confirms 15% tariff rate will include pharma and semiconductors
The White House has confirmed the tariff rate of 15 per cent in the trade deal struck with the European Union on Sunday will include pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. The two sectors are key to Irish exports, accounting for the bulk of the €72 billion of goods shipped to the US last year. The Government and the European Commission both said on Monday it was their 'clear understanding' there would be a tariff ceiling of 15 per cent in those sectors. Senior figures in the commission said its negotiating team had been given commitments by US president Donald Trump's administration on this point, but there remained some lingering concern owing to the unpredictable nature of Mr Trump. READ MORE However, a 'fact sheet' published by the White House contains a line stating the tariff rate of 15 per cent will apply to pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, albeit couched in terms that suggest the tariffs will be paid by the EU when in fact they will be borne by US companies or consumers. [ How the EU's 'lopsided' US trade deal was done Opens in new window ] 'As part of president Trump's strategy to establish balanced trade, the European Union will pay the United States a tariff rate of 15 per cent, including on autos and auto parts, pharmaceuticals, and semiconductors,' the White House said. EU Commission trade spokesman Olof Gill noted that the framework agreement was in effect a 'political commitment' rather than a legally binding document. He said Europe and the White House were now working on a joint statement, which will be treated as 'an agreement in principle' that will give the bloc a 'political road map to where we take it from here'. 'Both sides are working very hard now to get the details of that signed up,' he said on RTÉ Radio One. 'We're hoping to do that before the deadline of August 1st set by the US.' At that stage, he said, the EU would be in a position to say 'very clearly' what the next stages are, and will use the joint statement as 'a platform to look at other areas where we can reduce tariffs'. 'This is how it's going to work,' he said. 'Fifteen per cent is across the board. That's going to cover all sectors. It's going to cover pharma. It is going to cover digital. 'What we're talking about here are political commitments. This joint statement I mentioned isn't a legally binding document. These are commitments.' Separately, it has emerged Irish butter entering the US will return to the tariff level in place before Mr Trump came to office, which was around 16 per cent. In a briefing to members this week, business lobby Ibec pointed out that butter had been subject to a tariff based on the weight of the product, rather than a percentage figure which is more common. This worked out at about 16 per cent of the value of the product. Under the finer details of the deal, products which had been tariffed on this basis are to return to their original level rather than the 15 per cent which will apply more generally. This returns Kerrygold, sold by Ornua, to a tariff level at which it has managed to grow its market share in recent years. Since Mr Trump imposed his additional 10 per cent tariff in April, Irish butter imported to the US has faced a punitive tariff of around 26 per cent. Meanwhile, the trade deal has been described by an academic from University College Cork as 'a capitulation' by Europe that will cause 'long-term negative results'. Dr John O'Brien, an academic on financial markets and investments, who was previously an investment manager in London, said the EU had projected 'weakness'. 'The EU commission, and Ursula von der Leyen in particular, has capitulated in the US trade deal with the US,' he said. 'The deal will negatively affect growth. In the short term, this is a better outcome than a trade war. 'However, the projection of weakness by the EU, surrendering to economic threats and accepting a one-sided deal will be noted globally with long-term negative results. China and Russia will be particularly interested in this weakness. 'The financial markets reacted by selling the euro, signalling an expectation of lower growth across the EU. This view was repeated as stock exchanges across the EU also fell.' Dr O'Brien said the 'supposed benefit' of certainty was 'overstated', and, echoing the comments of Mr Gill, noted that the current deal was just a 'political agreement'. 'There are many failure points before a deal is signed,' he said. 'Having conceded once to Trump there is no guarantee that he will not come back for more having sensed weakness. Business planning on the basis of 15 per cent and done may be surprised before the end of the year.' Matthew Ryan, head of market strategy at global financial services firm Ebury, said estimates of about a 0.3-0.5 per cent hit to the bloc's GDP in the next three to five years was 'moderate, but not enough to fuel recession concerns'.
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Delay of law proposal adds to uncertainty around redress for clerical abuse survivors
A proposal for a law that would allow religious organisations to be held liable for abuse by their members will not be considered by the Government until 2027 at the earliest. Many religious organisations are unincorporated bodies. This means they as entities cannot be sued and their assets may be beyond the reach of the courts if and when one of their members are found liable for damages against child sex abuse survivors. Individual members of such religious bodies can face legal action, but case law shows it can be difficult to legally pursue the organisation itself for redress. There are concerns about how the State will recoup redress funds from religious bodies for a scheme being considered for survivors of sexual abuse in schools. READ MORE If set up, it would likely be the largest and most expensive redress scheme in the history of the State. Since 2022, the Law Reform Commission (LRC) has been considering whether the Government should legislate to give unincorporated associations, such as voluntary religious orders, their own legal personality or set out another way by which they may be held liable. Minister for Education Helen McEntee has said: 'The Government will review any recommendations made by the commission in its final report, with a view to introducing any necessary legislative or administrative changes in due course.' However, a spokesman for the LRC said its report on changing the legal status of bodies such as religious organisations will not be ready before the end of next year. 'The report about the liability of unincorporated associations is being scoped at present. We do not yet have a completion date but we do not expect it to be published before the end of 2026,' the spokesman said. Labour Party leader Ivana Bacik has expressed concern about whether a delay in progressing such a law would stymie the ability of the Government to access religious organisations' assets, or the lay-run trusts that their assets may have been transferred to. Ms Bacik said her party is trying to bring forward a Bill that would allow civil proceedings to be taken against unincorporated bodies like religious orders. It would allow any damages awarded in such cases to be recovered from a religious organisation or from 'associated' trusts. The same law, if passed, would also add a one-year extension to the normal limitation period provided for in the statutes of limitations. The Labour Party leader said this was to allow any proceedings that the Bill would cover to be brought within 12 months of it being enacted. She recently personally handed a copy of the Bill to the Attorney General. Given the upcoming Commission of Investigation into historic abuse in schools, the Government cannot afford to 'sit back and wait' for the LRC report to finish, she said.
Irish Times
6 days ago
- Irish Times
EU backs potential counter-tariffs on €93bn of US goods if no deal
The European Union's member countries voted on Thursday to approve counter- tariffs on €93 billion of US goods, which could be imposed should the bloc fail to reach a trade deal with Washington, EU diplomats said. The 27-nation bloc's executive European Commission had said on Wednesday its primary focus was to achieve a negotiated outcome with Washington to avert 30 per cent US tariffs that president Donald Trump has said he will apply on August 1. The commission said it would press on in parallel with plans for potential countermeasures, merging two packages of proposed tariffs of €21 billion and €72 billion into a single list and submitting this to EU members for approval. No countermeasures would enter force until August 7. So far the EU has held back from imposing any countermeasures, despite Trump's repeated announcements of tariffs, the broadest of which have been postponed. EU member states authorised the first package of countermeasures in April, but these were immediately suspended to allow time for negotiations. [ EU moves towards accepting 15% tariff as price of deal Opens in new window ] The EU and United States appear to be heading towards a possible trade deal, according to EU diplomats, which would result in a broad 15 per cent tariff on EU goods imported into the US, mirroring a framework agreement Washington struck with Japan. Trump would still need to take any final decision. Under the outlines of the potential deal, the 15 per cent rate could apply to sectors including cars and pharmaceuticals and would not be added to long-standing US duties, which average just under 5 per cent. There could also be concessions for sectors such as aircraft, lumber as well as some medicines and agricultural products, which would not face tariffs, diplomats said. Washington does not, however, appear willing to lower its 50 per cent tariff on steel. – Reuters
