
Delay of law proposal adds to uncertainty around redress for clerical abuse survivors
abuse
by their members will not be considered by the Government until 2027 at the earliest.
Many religious organisations are unincorporated bodies. This means they as entities cannot be sued and their assets may be beyond the reach of the courts if and when one of their members are found liable for damages against child sex abuse survivors.
Individual members of such religious bodies can face legal action, but case law shows it can be difficult to legally pursue the organisation itself for redress.
There are concerns about how the State will recoup redress funds from religious bodies for a scheme being considered for survivors of sexual abuse in schools.
READ MORE
If set up, it would likely be the largest and most expensive redress scheme in the history of the State.
Since 2022, the
Law Reform Commission
(LRC) has been considering whether the Government should legislate to give unincorporated associations, such as voluntary religious orders, their own legal personality or set out another way by which they may be held liable.
Minister for Education
Helen McEntee
has said: 'The Government will review any recommendations made by the commission in its final report, with a view to introducing any necessary legislative or administrative changes in due course.'
However, a spokesman for the LRC said its report on changing the legal status of bodies such as religious organisations will not be ready before the end of next year.
'The report about the liability of unincorporated associations is being scoped at present. We do not yet have a completion date but we do not expect it to be published before the end of 2026,' the spokesman said.
Labour Party
leader
Ivana Bacik
has expressed concern about whether a delay in progressing such a law would stymie the ability of the Government to access religious organisations' assets, or the lay-run trusts that their assets may have been transferred to.
Ms Bacik said her party is trying to bring forward a Bill that would allow civil proceedings to be taken against unincorporated bodies like religious orders. It would allow any damages awarded in such cases to be recovered from a religious organisation or from 'associated' trusts.
The same law, if passed, would also add a one-year extension to the normal limitation period provided for in the statutes of limitations.
The Labour Party leader said this was to allow any proceedings that the Bill would cover to be brought within 12 months of it being enacted. She recently personally handed a copy of the Bill to the Attorney General.
Given the upcoming Commission of Investigation into historic abuse in schools, the Government cannot afford to 'sit back and wait' for the LRC report to finish, she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Daily Mirror
21 minutes ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Woman turned away from pub for wearing Union Flag dress says: 'I'm a grandma'
A woman who was wearing a Union Jack dress and refused entry to a pub said she 'won't be going back' - despite being a regular for nearly 30 years. Tanya Ostolski, 54, claims she was turned away from the Wetherspoon's boozer due to her outfit. The events followed an anti-illegal immigration protest that took place in Nottingham town centre on Friday, July 25 which Tanya attended. READ MORE: Americans baffled by Ireland's beloved chicken fillet roll and Cork's flag during visit READ MORE: Galway Races dress code, bag policy and 'banned' items The protest was sparked after Reform MP Lee Anderson made an unverified claim that a local man who was charged with rape was an asylum seeker. After marching in the protest, Tanya made her way to the local Wetherspoon - The Picture House - but was denied entry due to her dress, despite putting away the flag she was carrying, she says. The decision caused anger amongst some protesters who clashed with bouncers on Friday evening as they were also denied entry, they said. Tanya Ostolski in her patriotic dress with son Leon (Image: Tanya Ostolski / SWNS) According to Nottinghamshire Live, a spokesperson for Wetherspoon confirmed the pub asked customers with flags and placards not to enter so as not to 'increase tension'. Tanya said: 'I'm disgusted. I won't be going back there. I go in there all the time, and I wasn't causing any trouble. The whole day was a peaceful protest. 'I'm a grandma and I've never caused any bother. I just can't believe this was all over a flag - it was really upsetting. I didn't do anything wrong." According to Tanya, she was first refused entry because she was carrying a St George's cross flag. But after putting the flag away, Tanya said she was still turned away from the pub. She claimed witnesses had defended her – calling the bouncers actions 'unfair' as she wasn't 'causing any trouble'. Tanya said: 'I had the flag tied around my waist. He said I couldn't come in and asked me to put the flag away. But I had flags all over my dress and then I was told I can't come in at all. 'I was really confused – it's just a flag. I asked for a valid reason. They just kept saying, 'you're not coming in'. I'm not aggressive and didn't want to cause trouble, so I just walked away. People came up to me and said it was really unfair. I've heard I won't be welcome back or I might be barred." JD Wetherspoons has a 'no flag' policy which was prohibits the pubs from hanging the England flag – which had backlash from pubgoers during the 2018 football world cup. But during the men's Euro 2024, the popular chain overturned it's policy and allowed the pubs to hang the England flag during the summer tournament. According to Nottinghamshire Live, Wetherspoon spokesman Eddie Gershon commented in response to the incident in Sutton-in-Ashfield. He said: "Pub managers have a duty under the licensing laws, and as a matter of common sense, to judge every situation on its particular circumstances. 'In this case, the pub manager felt that it was important not to increase tensions. Therefore, on this occasion the manager asked customers not to enter with flags or any placards." For the latest breaking news and top stories from at home and abroad, visit our homepage


Irish Times
21 minutes ago
- Irish Times
‘Why are there no pro-Israel voices in the Dáil?' - your questions about politics answered
It's summer holiday season and that means it's time to open the floor to questions from the Inside Politics podcast audience. Hugh Linehan, Pat Leahy, Jack Horgan-Jones, Ellen Coyne and Cormac McQuinn sift through questions submitted to the politicspodcast@ inbox and pick out questions on the presidency, Gaza, the State's struggle to solve complex problems and more.

Irish Times
21 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Housing Agency raised salary for incoming CEO by over €23,000
A pay increase of more than €23,000 was approved for the new chief executive of the Housing Agency after negotiations between two government departments. The post was meant to be filled with a starting package of €161,593 a year, the first point on the Assistant Secretary salary scale of the Civil Service. However, the Housing Agency said their preferred candidate had been paid a higher salary than that in his previous role in the National Treasury Management Agency (NTMA). They argued that their new CEO, Martin Whelan, should start at €184,852 a year, the fourth and final point on the agreed salary scale. The Department of Public Expenditure said that, based on his 'substantial knowledge and experience' and his previous salary, they would have 'no objection' to the higher package. Internal records detail how the Housing Agency was left without a CEO when their previous boss, Bob Jordan, resigned in September last year after a three month notice period. An email from the Department of Housing said: 'Given the short lead in time to Mr Jordan's resignation, there is an urgency in commencing the recruitment process. 'It may be a case that an interim CEO will be required for a number of months as it is imperative that the work and consequential outputs of the Housing Agency is uninterrupted while the substantive CEO process is ongoing.' The Department of Public Expenditure said in response that it had no objection to a person being appointed on an acting basis if the need arose. Department officials said at the time that the full-time appointment should be made on the Assistant Secretary level which begins at €161,593 per year and with no perks permitted under Government policy. In November, the Housing Agency said they had found a candidate for the role but submitted a business case to seek a higher starting pay rate. It said that while Mr Whelan was 'enthusiastic about the role', he had 'requested a review of the remuneration package'. 'To address this and to reflect the level of experience and expertise Mr Whelan will bring, the agency proposes appointing him at the top of the Assistant Secretary scale, €186,701.' It said a committee led by the chairperson of the Housing Agency fully supported it and believed it was a 'prudent and necessary investment'. As part of the business case, the Department of Housing said they agreed that Mr Whelan should start on the higher rate of pay. There were further discussions with details sought on how many people had applied and how many were considered suitable for the role. In mid-November, the Department of Housing said it was hoping for a final decision as the matter was now 'very urgent and impacting the business of the agency'. On November 29, an email from the Department of Public Expenditure said they had closely considered the case and the candidate's previous experience. 'Taking into account his current salary in the NTMA, [we] would have no objection to the Housing Agency negotiating a salary up to the fourth point of the Assistant Secretary scale,' said the message.