logo
Woman turned away from pub for wearing Union Flag dress says: 'I'm a grandma'

Woman turned away from pub for wearing Union Flag dress says: 'I'm a grandma'

A woman who was wearing a Union Jack dress and refused entry to a pub said she 'won't be going back' - despite being a regular for nearly 30 years.
Tanya Ostolski, 54, claims she was turned away from the Wetherspoon's boozer due to her outfit.
The events followed an anti-illegal immigration protest that took place in Nottingham town centre on Friday, July 25 which Tanya attended.
READ MORE: Americans baffled by Ireland's beloved chicken fillet roll and Cork's flag during visit
READ MORE: Galway Races dress code, bag policy and 'banned' items
The protest was sparked after Reform MP Lee Anderson made an unverified claim that a local man who was charged with rape was an asylum seeker.
After marching in the protest, Tanya made her way to the local Wetherspoon - The Picture House - but was denied entry due to her dress, despite putting away the flag she was carrying, she says.
The decision caused anger amongst some protesters who clashed with bouncers on Friday evening as they were also denied entry, they said. Tanya Ostolski in her patriotic dress with son Leon (Image: Tanya Ostolski / SWNS)
According to Nottinghamshire Live, a spokesperson for Wetherspoon confirmed the pub asked customers with flags and placards not to enter so as not to 'increase tension'.
Tanya said: 'I'm disgusted. I won't be going back there. I go in there all the time, and I wasn't causing any trouble. The whole day was a peaceful protest.
'I'm a grandma and I've never caused any bother. I just can't believe this was all over a flag - it was really upsetting. I didn't do anything wrong."
According to Tanya, she was first refused entry because she was carrying a St George's cross flag. But after putting the flag away, Tanya said she was still turned away from the pub.
She claimed witnesses had defended her – calling the bouncers actions 'unfair' as she wasn't 'causing any trouble'.
Tanya said: 'I had the flag tied around my waist. He said I couldn't come in and asked me to put the flag away. But I had flags all over my dress and then I was told I can't come in at all.
'I was really confused – it's just a flag. I asked for a valid reason. They just kept saying, 'you're not coming in'. I'm not aggressive and didn't want to cause trouble, so I just walked away. People came up to me and said it was really unfair. I've heard I won't be welcome back or I might be barred."
JD Wetherspoons has a 'no flag' policy which was prohibits the pubs from hanging the England flag – which had backlash from pubgoers during the 2018 football world cup.
But during the men's Euro 2024, the popular chain overturned it's policy and allowed the pubs to hang the England flag during the summer tournament.
According to Nottinghamshire Live, Wetherspoon spokesman Eddie Gershon commented in response to the incident in Sutton-in-Ashfield.
He said: "Pub managers have a duty under the licensing laws, and as a matter of common sense, to judge every situation on its particular circumstances.
'In this case, the pub manager felt that it was important not to increase tensions. Therefore, on this occasion the manager asked customers not to enter with flags or any placards."
For the latest breaking news and top stories from at home and abroad, visit our homepage
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cops accused of ‘cover-up' after failing to reveal men charged with raping girl, 12, are Afghan asylum seekers
Cops accused of ‘cover-up' after failing to reveal men charged with raping girl, 12, are Afghan asylum seekers

The Irish Sun

time7 hours ago

  • The Irish Sun

Cops accused of ‘cover-up' after failing to reveal men charged with raping girl, 12, are Afghan asylum seekers

Questions mounting over why details were kept a secret 'RAPE' PROBE Cops accused of 'cover-up' after failing to reveal men charged with raping girl, 12, are Afghan asylum seekers COPS have been accused of a "cover-up" after allegedly failing to reveal that men charged with raping a 12-year-old girl are asylum seekers. Two men were charged after a girl was allegedly kidnapped, raped and strangled. 3 Warwickshire County Council leader George Finch with Reform leader Nigel Farage Credit: Facebook / Cllr George Finch 3 Two men were charged after a 12-year-old girl was allegedly kidnapped, raped and strangled in Nuneaton, Warwickshire Credit: Alamy Ahmad Mulakhil, 23, is accused of raping of the underage girl in Nuneaton, Warwickshire, on July 22. A second man, Mohammad Kabir, also 23, has been charged with aiding and abetting rape, as well as strangulation and kidnap of the girl. The leader of Warwickshire county council and Reform party politician George Finch claimed there has been a "cover up". He alleged the two men were asylum seekers, and accused the police of hiding this from the public. Mr Finch claimed that the chief executive of the council, Monica Fogarty, told him Kabir was an asylum seeker living in a house of multiple occupancy. He said locals were able to "join the dots together" and came to the same assumption. While police are under no obligation to reveal a suspect's nationality, cops allegedly told local politicians and officials not to reveal it in this case over fears of 'inflaming community tensions', The Times reported. The roads where suspects live are usually named, but in this case were kept secret. An official claimed police feared the area would become a hotbed for protests like those outside a migrant hotel in Epping, Essex, last month. Mr Finch called for the Home Office to remove all asylum seekers living in HMOs in the county. According to The Times, he wrote: "Our local community has had enough of the Home Office breaking planning regulations to turn sections of local communities into unrecognisable, ghetto-like zones. "I am disgusted that one year from the social unrest that we saw in parts of the UK in 2024, the Home Office and police have clearly not learned the lessons from the handling of similar incidents last year." After the tragic killing of three children in Southport, false stories spread online that the culprit Axel Rudakubana was an ­illegal asylum-seeker. Rudakubana targeted children at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class - stabbing Bebe King, six, Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, and Alice Dasilva Aguiar, nine, to death and injuring 10 others. It unfolded on July 29 as children enjoyed the workshop at a community centre. And the horror did not stop there, with riots tearing through communities due to misinformation online. Migrant hotels became targets as an information vacuum 'allowed disinformation to flourish', with investigators struggling to set the record straight. In the aftermath, The Home Affairs Select Committee called for a review of what police can put into the public domain. Last month, Epping made the headlines after becoming a hotspot for protests outside of asylum seeker hotels. The protest, outside the Bell Hotel in Epping, began peacefully but escalated into what officers described as "scattered incidents of violence" targeting police and property. Eight officers were injured and a number of police vehicles were damaged as missiles were thrown. The Warwickshire assault allegedly unfolded between 8.30pm and 9.45pm on Tuesday, July 22. CCTV footage from a nearby doorbell camera appeared to show a man walking with the girl at around 8pm. Cops detained the suspect on Saturday 26, and he was charged the following day. He appeared at Coventry Magistrates' Court on Monday and was remanded in custody. Both defendants will next appear at Warwick Crown Court on August 26. Warwickshire Police said in a statement: 'When something significant happens, we brief these partners and local elected officials on the circumstances of the crime, the investigation, the work being undertaken to arrest those responsible and how local people and partners can help a concerned community. 'Where relevant, sensitive information around locations, details of the crime and policing activity to catch offenders can be shared, with a warning that this is sensitive or confidential information and disclosure by those being briefed could affect future court hearings. 'Once someone is charged with an offence, we follow national guidance. "This guidance does not include sharing ethnicity or immigration status.'

Hong Kong imposes new measures on overseas-based activists
Hong Kong imposes new measures on overseas-based activists

Irish Examiner

time12 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

Hong Kong imposes new measures on overseas-based activists

Hong Kong authorities strengthened a crackdown on 16 overseas-based activists who were previously targeted by bounties on suspicion of endangering national security, implementing measures that include banning financial support to them and cancelling passports for most of them. The activists were among 19 people who were targeted with arrest warrants in July for alleged roles in Hong Kong Parliament, a group the police called a subversive organisation abroad. The organisation is not the city's official legislature and its influence is limited. Three of the original 19 activists were already targeted by similar measures last year. Secretary for Security Chris Tang banned providing funds or economic resources to the 16 activists, including Victor Ho, Keung Ka-wai, Australian academic Chongyi Feng and US citizen Gong Sasha, the Hong Kong government said in a statement. Travel documents were cancelled for 12 of the 16 who hold Hong Kong passports. The government also prohibited properties from being leased to the people on the list or forming joint ventures with them. The extraterritorial targeting of Hong Kongers who are exercising their fundamental freedoms is a form of transnational repression Anyone violating the orders risks a penalty of up to seven years in prison. The 16 activists are hiding in the UK, the US, Canada, Germany, Australia, Thailand and Taiwan, among other regions, the government said, accusing them of continuing to engage in activities endangering national security. The notice also accused them of intending to incite hatred against Beijing and Hong Kong through smear and slander. 'We therefore have taken such measures to make a significant impact,' the statement said. Beijing imposed a national security law on the territory in 2020 that has effectively wiped out most public dissent following huge anti-government protests in 2019. Many activists were arrested, silenced or forced into self-exile. The measures announced Monday were issued under the powers granted by Hong Kong's homegrown national security law enacted last year. The arrest warrants issued in July have drawn criticism from foreign governments, including the US, the UK and the European Union. Police offered rewards of 200,000 Hong Kong dollars (25,480 US dollars) to one million Hong Kong dollars (127,400 US dollars) for information leading to their arrests. In a July statement, US secretary of state Marco Rubio condemned the moves. 'The extraterritorial targeting of Hong Kongers who are exercising their fundamental freedoms is a form of transnational repression,' he said. 'We will not tolerate the Hong Kong government's attempts to apply its national security laws to silence or intimidate Americans or anyone on US soil.' The Hong Kong office of the Chinese Foreign Ministry responded by opposing criticism from foreign politicians, insisting the actions were legitimate. The governements in Beijing and Hong Kong said the security laws were necessary for the city's stability.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store