logo
Prescribing reform: Alabama pharmacists walk out, what they say lawmakers can do to keep them in business

Prescribing reform: Alabama pharmacists walk out, what they say lawmakers can do to keep them in business

Yahoo26-02-2025
ELBERTA, Ala. (WKRG) — Pharmacists across Alabama locked their doors and turned out the lights Tuesday afternoon to mourn the loss of what it would look like to lose local pharmacies forever.
Pharmacists across the state staged walkouts in support of legislation aimed at keeping pharmacy doors open. Over 100 pharmacies participated.
Mobile City Council discusses renaming Crichton Fire Station after late deputy chief
'We are closing our doors for two hours today,' Tonja Lowery at Elberta Pharmacy said. 'But what if it was forever? That's what's happening in our state and across the nation.'
For Tonja Lowery at Elberta Pharmacy and many others like her, it all comes down to the pharmacy's revenue.
'It's a sad time when we're making more money off selling a Coca-Cola versus a prescription,' she said.
The walkouts support legislation to reform pharmacy benefit managers also known as a PBM. PBMs decide which medications are covered by insurance and set prices such as co-pays and how much money pharmacies are reimbursed for medications they provide.
Pharmacist Clint Howard at Midtown Pharmacy in Mobile said current reimbursements often don't even cover the cost of filling the prescription.
'Yesterday I filled a prescription, the insurance company, the PBM, they paid me 15 cents. I mean, my bottle costs more than that. The lid to my bottle costs more than that,' Howard said. 'I've got a 90-day supply of a patient's life-saving heart medication, and they're going to give me 15 cents. You can't continue and do business when someone is only paying you a dime for prescriptions that they fill.'
Semmes Pharmacy in Mobile County also showed their support Tuesday by wearing all black resembling the pharmaceutical funeral that supporters say may happen if the proposed legislation doesn't pass.
'All we're asking for is just a fair shake, you know,' Willie Dunnam at Semmes Pharmacy said. 'That's what Senate Bills 93 and 99 are aimed to do. Fair reimbursement, fair prices for the customer, instead of those rebates going to the billion dollar companies.'
Meanwhile, opponents of the bills point to fees that would be tacked onto each prescription and how those fees could add up to hundreds of millions of dollars in extra drugs costs statewide each year.
Mobile County Health Department reports receiving anonymous threat
'A lot of people are reporting that it's going to be a fee or a tax on the patient. That's not true,' Lowery said. 'This has nothing to do with the patient paying more. It's definitely just about the insurance companies being forced to pay us more.'
Pharmacists across the state want to encourage everyone to reach out to their elected officials and let them know that the small pharmacies need their help.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Make your own electrolyte drink at home using this simple 4-ingredient recipe from a sports nutritionist
Make your own electrolyte drink at home using this simple 4-ingredient recipe from a sports nutritionist

Business Insider

time2 days ago

  • Business Insider

Make your own electrolyte drink at home using this simple 4-ingredient recipe from a sports nutritionist

Hydration is having a moment. As wellness becomes a priority for consumers, electrolyte drinks are booming. Demand for sodas is dwindling. Instead, people are flocking to products designed to quench thirst and replenish nutrients. Gatorade, PepsiCo's OG sports drink, is now vying for cooler space alongside BodyArmor (from Coca-Cola) and Electrolit (owned by Keurig Dr. Pepper). A host of electrolyte powder packets are also competing for consumer attention. They all promise an extra dose of electrolytes, key minerals like sodium and magnesium that maintain the body's fluid balance and help the nerves function. We lose these nutrients when we sweat, and depleting them too much can risk symptoms of electrolyte imbalance ranging from mild headache to serious, even life-threatening seizures. The problem is, many electrolyte drinks contain a surprising amount of sugar, sometimes as much as soda. Leading brands have as much as 36 grams of added sugar per bottle — the upper daily limit recommended for adults. That can be helpful if you're a pro athlete or practicing an endurance sport, since sugar is a quick way to top up your body's glycogen stores, the key fuel source. But most of us aren't working out for hours at a time, and our typical diets are already loaded with added sugar, which can increase our risks of heart disease and cancer. Here's an alternative: How to make a healthy electrolyte drink at home For a healthier option that also saves you some cash, you can make your own sports drink at home using sea salt to provide electrolytes. . To make it, combine: ½ cup orange juice ½ cup coconut water juice from ½ a lemon a pinch of sea salt The fruit juice contributes added nutrients like vitamin C and potassium (another electrolyte) along with carbs for energy, at a fraction of the sugar in a typical sports drink. Coconut water provides other electrolytes like magnesium and calcium. Depending on where you shop and if you buy in bulk, the ingredients cost just over a dollar per serving. Asche recommends sticking to a hydration ratio of about three servings of water for every one serving of electrolyte drinks, depending on your activity level and how much you sweat.

Food companies make promises while MAHA looks for more
Food companies make promises while MAHA looks for more

Axios

time07-08-2025

  • Axios

Food companies make promises while MAHA looks for more

Coca-Cola, Steak 'n Shake, Mars and other food companies earned valuable exposure for pledging to remove certain ingredients and align themselves with Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s bid to clean up what America eats. But some of Kennedy's "Make America Healthy Again" base question if the companies deserve a celebration. Why it matters: The commitments aren't enforceable. And nutritionists and influencers say they largely don't address the primary drivers of chronic diseases that Kennedy has made his cause. State of play: Companies including General Mills, PepsiCo, Conagra, Nestle, Hershey and Kraft Heinz have said they'll remove artificial dyes from their products within the next two years. Coca-Cola pledged to roll out a product that uses cane sugar instead of high-fructose corn syrup. Starbucks is looking to remove canola oil from products on its menu. Steak 'n Shake was among the earliest to get on board, agreeing to cook its fries in beef tallow instead of seed oils. "Secretary Kennedy has consistently emphasized that the Department's top priority is ensuring the health and transparency that American families deserve," a Health and Human Services spokesperson said in an email to Axios. "Recent food industry commitments to remove artificial dyes, seed oils, and high fructose corn syrup are a positive step." Some MAHA faithful question whether the resulting fanfare amounts to a free pass, akin to a dubious healthy food claim. "They are not big MAHA wins," said Rob Houton, founder of the MAHA Coalition, an advocacy group that builds support for the MAHA agenda. "Those companies want to trumpet that, right? [It's] very clever of them to say, 'Oh, we're in agreement.' But what they are trumpeting as a big deal is not transformative." "The analogy I would make is it's like you have a dilapidated house, the foundation is crumbling and you think that you can correct everything by just putting a new coat of paint on it all," said Arden Anderson, a physician, agriculture consultant and MAHA supporter. As for the two-year window some companies have to make good on their commitments, "what I want to see is that they are doing it," said Ana-Maria Temple, a holistic pediatrician and an influencer aligned with MAHA. Between the lines: Some activists say the most substantive changes would be in regulating agriculture — a touchy proposition for an administration eager not to alienate farm interests. MAHA discontent is building around the House Interior spending bill, which includes language that would offer liability protections for the makers of pesticides. There's also frustration with agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency, which removed regulations against pesticides and "forever chemicals." "We are extremely disappointed with some of the actions taken by this administration to protect the polluters and the pesticide companies," Zen Honeycutt, the founder of Moms Across America, told Vox. What to watch: Kennedy is set to release a blueprint within days for how the administration intends to address issues raised in a MAHA Commission report that was released in May. Supporters say it will be a test of the administration's willingness to impose new standards on food ingredients, as well as transparency requirements about what's in their products. "Under the MAHA agenda, HHS supports real accountability and science-based standards to ensure that any promised changes are both transparent and truly meaningful for consumers," the HHS spokesperson said in the emailed statement. The bottom line: These moves are creating awareness and pressure that the food industry has never had to respond to before, and that's important, Temple said. "Is it the final answer? Of course not," Temple said of the commitments the administration has extracted from industry. "More people are going to be asking questions. That's a huge win." "The small changes that have been made ... you might think, 'Well, that's not making that big of a difference,'" said Hilda Labrada Gore, a health coach, podcast host and MAHA supporter. "But it's a start."

Florida bans soda and candy for SNAP users in 2026
Florida bans soda and candy for SNAP users in 2026

Axios

time06-08-2025

  • Axios

Florida bans soda and candy for SNAP users in 2026

Florida is among a few states that have narrowed their list of food eligible for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Programs (SNAP) this week to exclude sugary snacks and drinks. Why it matters: Starting next year, more than a million families in the state will no longer be able to use their benefits to buy a box of Little Debbie's, a liter of Coca-Cola or a Hershey bar at the checkout. The big picture: Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. outlined his "Make America Healthy Again" campaign in April, encouraging states to restrict SNAP purchases to ensure taxpayer dollars go toward "wholesome foods." One study found little difference between purchases made by households with SNAP and those without benefits, with 20 cents of every dollar spent on sweetened beverages, desserts, candy and sugar. How it works: SNAP, often called food stamps, helps low-income families, seniors and people with disabilities buy groceries. Five other states — Colorado, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas and West Virginia — were approved to restrict eligible food on Monday. Before these changes, SNAP recipients were already prohibited from using their benefits to purchase alcohol, tobacco, hot and prepared foods and personal care items, according to a press release. Zoom in: Florida amended its statutory definition of food to exclude: Candy, which the state defined as sugar or artificial sweeteners combined with chocolate, fruits, nuts, caramels and gummies. Prepared desserts, which the state defined as processed, pre-packaged sweet foods intended for immediate consumption. Soda, which the state defined as a beverage that is made with carbonated water and flavored with sugar or artificial sweeteners. Energy drinks, which the state defined as a beverage with at least 65 milligrams of caffeine per 8 fluid ounces that are marketed as increasing the consumer's mental and physical energy. Yes, but: Drinks like sparkling water and coffee are still eligible. What they're saying: "In Florida, we are ensuring SNAP supports nutritious options that help families thrive, not unhealthy products that lead to long-term health problems," Gov. Ron DeSantis said in a statement. "Thank you to President Trump for approving our waiver request." The other side: "Because these products are inexpensive, banning SNAP use on them won't have the desired effect," Christopher Bosso, a political science professor at Northeastern University, wrote in an op-ed for The Hill. "SNAP enrollees simply will use other funds on them," Bosso went on. "After all, SNAP is 'supplemental,' and most enrolled households have cash on hand to spend $3 on that 2-liter bottle of Pepsi if they want one."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store