An LA couple moved to Mexico to avoid deportation. They racked up $20K in debt, but are feeling more hopeful they can build a life together.
Alfredo Linares moved to Mexico with his wife Raegan Kline due to deportation fears in the U.S.
The couple left Los Angeles with $20,000 in debt after closing their Japanese barbecue pop-up restaurant.
After several months of instability, the two are finally finding some footing in Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco.
When Raegan Kline and Alfredo Linares married last summer, their dream felt straightforward and simple: start a Japanese barbecue pop-up restaurant in Los Angeles and live happily ever after.
But all of that changed in the fall when President Donald Trump, who had promised mass deportations on the campaign trail, won reelection.
Linares, who had worked his way up in fine dining to become a cook in a Michelin Star restaurant, arrived in the US as a teenager at 19 with his family and has lived here illegally ever since. Kline, a US citizen, was stricken with worry that at any moment, her husband could be arrested and deported.
"I really didn't feel safe," Kline said. "Every morning I would wake up saying, 'If we don't go and something happens to him, I'll never be able to forgive myself.' "
In March, the couple moved from Culver City to Linare's birth country of Mexico in hopes of improving their chances of building a future together.
"I lived in the shadows for 20 years," Linares said. "I'm 38 years old, so I don't think I have 10 more years of living in the shadows when I'm trying to build a business and grow as a family, as an entrepreneur."
Do you have a story to share about moving or immigration? Reach out to this reporter at jdeng@business.insider.com.
Going into debt to move to Mexico
The couple received around $10,000 in cash from their parents as a wedding gift. They had originally hoped to use the money to hire a lawyer to help Linares gain citizenship, but they wrestled with the best way to use the money to secure a future together.
"Do we really go ahead and gamble and trust this administration with this $10,000 that our parents gave us for our wedding gifts, or do we use that $10,000 to move to Mexico?" Kline said of their dilemma.
But even the wedding gift wasn't enough to help them break even and start fresh in Mexico. The pair took on debt to start their Japanese barbecue business last spring. While they tried to get it off the ground, their bills ballooned to over $20,000. They raised over $4,000 online through GoFundMe to help them with their relocation.
Since the move, they've attempted to find jobs in hospitality, but because Linares doesn't have an identification card and Kline doesn't have work authorization as a temporary resident, it's been difficult to pay the bills.
"We're not earning an income," Kline said. "We have all of that stress and try to keep our credit card in a reasonable place and keep ourselves on a budget."
Adjusting to life in a new country
The biggest hurdle for them has been navigating the deluge of paperwork and bureaucracy in a new country.
"I'm very Americanized," Linares said. "Yes, I'm Mexican, but I haven't been here for 20 years. It's totally different from the Mexico I left."
From needing a physical copy of a birth certificate to struggling to establish Linares' permanent residence, it's been hard for him to get an ID card when they were first living in Airbnbs in Mexico City.
"I need my ID, but I cannot have an ID because I don't have a home address. And I can't get a home address because I don't have a job, because I don't have an ID," Linares said of the frustrating situation.
Now they are renting an apartment in Puerto Vallarta in the state of Jalisco, where they've been finally settling in over the past three weeks.
"I feel like myself a little bit more," Kline said of the stability. "I'm realizing that this is where we live, this is our home. We're not on vacation."
Kline is now able to see past the trials of the past few months and look toward the future with more hope. They've since brought down their rescue dog Dolly Love from Los Angeles to live with them in Mexico.
"I do believe we made the right choice," Kline said. "I do believe that there's opportunity here. I do believe in my husband and his talents and his skills."
The move to Mexico has tested their relationship and challenged them in many different ways, but Linares said the core of their bond hasn't been shaken.
They keep a routine of checking in with each other over coffee every morning. "She makes things easier, and it's because of the communication that we have," Linares said of his wife.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US Steel Sale to Nippon Steel Poised to Close After Trump Deal
(Bloomberg) -- Nippon Steel Corp. won conditional US approval for its $14.1 billion purchase of United States Steel Corp., capping a lengthy saga in a tie-up that will create one of the world's largest steel companies. Shuttered NY College Has Alumni Fighting Over Its Future Trump's Military Parade Has Washington Bracing for Tanks and Weaponry NYC Renters Brace for Price Hikes After Broker-Fee Ban Do World's Fairs Still Matter? As Part of a $45 Billion Push, ICE Prepares for a Vast Expansion of Detention Space In a release Friday, the companies said they've committed to a national security agreement proposed by the Trump administration, which earlier cleared the deal subject to those terms. As part of the $55-per-share deal, the Japanese company will invest an additional $11 billion by 2028, including an initial commitment in a greenfield project that would be completed after 2028. Nippon had previously raised its pledged additional investment in an effort to win President Donald Trump's approval. Nippon Steel will also spend an extra $3 billion after 2028 for a new steel mill, according to people familiar with the matter. That would push the total additional investment — on top of the purchase price — to $14 billion. Earlier Friday, Trump formally opened the door to approving the sale of US Steel by submitting the agreement to the companies and amending former President Joe Biden's move to block the agreement in an executive order. The president's action cleared the sale so long as the companies comply with the government's terms. 'President Trump promised to protect American Steel and American Jobs — and he has delivered on that promise,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said in a written statement. 'Today's executive order ensures US Steel will remain in the great Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and be safeguarded as a critical element of America's national and economic security.' Nippon Steel and US Steel in the release said they had received regulatory approvals and that 'the partnership is expected to be finalized promptly.' The deal is expected to close by June 18, the merger agreement deadline, Japan's Nikkei reported on Saturday, without saying where it got the information. Trump earlier this week said the US would receive a so-called golden share in the post-transaction company, though it's not clear what that would entail. The companies confirmed that the US would get a golden share but didn't elaborate. The terms of the security agreement include significant and unprecedented US control measures, as well as certain control over some board seats and requirements that some leadership roles go to American citizens, according to a person familiar with the pact, speaking on condition of anonymity. The golden share does not include an equity stake in the company, the person said. Earlier: Nippon Steel Plans $6 Billion Investment in Its Japanese Mills 'The Japanese government believes that this investment will strengthen the ability of the Japanese and US steel industries to generate new innovation and lead to the strengthening of the close partnership between Japan and the US,' Japan's Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, Yoji Muto, said in a written statement. 'We welcome the decision of the US government.' Trump and Biden as well as former Vice President Kamala Harris campaigned against the deal, before the former president blocked it in January. Trump has since reversed his position, insisting that the agreement would preserve steel jobs in the US. The text of the security agreement hasn't been released. Trump and others have previously announced other elements of the deal, including bonuses to steelworkers, a requirement to keep existing blast furnaces running for a decade, and government veto power to retain control over the board of the US Steel subsidiary. Trump has also hailed the accord as vindication of his trade policies, which have seen the administration levy tariffs in a bid to pressure companies to shift more manufacturing to the US. Japan has been engaging in negotiations with the US over trade in a bid to avoid higher levies Trump has threatened. Trump's decision to champion Nippon Steel's bid offers to provide fresh momentum for those talks. Trump held a rally in Pennsylvania two weeks ago, at US Steel's iconic Mon Valley facility, celebrating the deal with a crowd of steelworkers, even though it had not yet been finalized. Earlier: US, Mexico Near Deal to Cut Steel Duties and Cap Imports Trump also used that event to announce he was doubling his tariffs on steel and aluminum, raising them to 50% from 25%. Since that rally, government officials, company executives and deal advisers worked to hammer out the finer details and get the final signatures. The deal creates a combined company that will be the world's second-largest steelmaker. It will become a formidable domestic competitor to Nucor Corp., which for a generation has dominated the American steel industry. The acquisition also clears the way for enhanced steelmaking in areas the US has lagged in recent years, including the type of steel critical to bolster ailing electric grids across the country. The Japanese steelmaker's takeover became a political lightning rod after the leadership of the United Steelworkers – based, like US Steel itself, in Pittsburgh – staunchly opposed the tie-up. Biden sided with them, as did Trump. The deal has taken a winding path with extensions, a Biden block, a legal fight, and then Trump's decision to reexamine it before ultimately clearing it. Nippon Steel and US Steel have steadily tried to address worries, with Vice Chairman Takahiro Mori making repeated visits to the US to clinch the deal. Divisions within the union were laid bare through the process, with local union leaders expressing support for the deal and breaking with their national leadership. Trump's reversal was a few months in the making. In February, he surprised the parties by blessing some kind of a minority stake — an announcement they hadn't been privy to and didn't understand. The deal, then and now, was built on Nippon Steel buying US Steel entirely. The question was mitigation measures. The president said he supported a 'planned partnership' between the companies on May 23, without providing details of an announcement that appeared to bless the original deal with additional mitigation measures. --With assistance from Jennifer A. Dlouhy, Meghashyam Mali and Yoshiaki Nohara. (Updates with potential closing timeframe in eighth paragraph.) American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years As Companies Abandon Climate Pledges, Is There a Silver Lining? US Tariffs Threaten to Derail Vietnam's Historic Industrial Boom ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Mexico's flag features prominently in protests. What does it symbolize?
Mexico's flag features prominently in protests. What does it symbolize? Since the start of the protests against the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency's crackdowns in Los Angeles, one common sight in images circulated widely on social media is that of the red, white and green Mexican flag. Protesters have embraced the flag as a symbol of cultural pride and a repudiation of anti-immigrant policies against the backdrop of National Guard and Marines deployed to the city by President Donald Trump. On June 13, hundreds of Marines arrived in Los Angeles after an appeals court allowed Trump to maintain control of the National Guard troops ordered into the city. A federal judge had ruled the deployment unlawful and ordered control of the National Guard troops back to California Gov. Gavin Newsom. What does the Mexican flag mean? Adopted in its current form in September 1968, the Mexican flag blends its indigenous roots with its modern identity. The coat of arms of Mexico − a golden eagle perched atop a prickly pear cactus, devouring a fanged serpent − contrasts sharply on a white field flanked by green and red stripes. But what do these symbols mean? Here's a brief tour of the Mexican flag. Reactions to the flag's use Protesters have embraced the flag to reassert Mexican American identity, while some conservatives have used protest images featuring the Mexican flag to frame the demonstration with anti-American messaging. "Look at all the foreign flags," White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller posted on X, formerly Twitter. "Los Angeles is occupied territory." Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum condemned any violence stemming from the protests during at a news conference June 9 in Mexico City. "It must be clear: We condemn violence wherever it comes from," Sheinbaum said. "We call on the Mexican community to act peacefully and not fall for provocations." Contributing: Reuters Ongoing coverage: LA protests live: Marines in LA; cities prepare for 'No Kings' demonstrations Impacts of raids: How will Trump's immigration crackdown in California impact the economy?
Chicago Tribune
2 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
‘I am a product of this system': Pedro Martinez reflects on his tenure as CPS chief
At an eighth grade graduation last week at his alma mater, John A. Walsh Elementary School in Pilsen, outgoing schools chief Pedro Martinez recounted to parents and students how one teacher — Mr. Asher — turned the trajectory of his life around. 'I was below grade level. I was struggling, frankly. You know, I grew up in poverty,' Martinez said. 'And (he) just saw something in me.' Martinez is leaving the district on Wednesday. In an interview with the Tribune on Thursday, he emotionally recounted his passion for Chicago Public Schools and for the city where he found a home as the child of Mexican immigrants. He urged the next leader of the district to practice empathy in order to set an example for the more than 320,000 kids they will oversee. The top district official drew national attention this school year amid a showdown between CPS and Mayor Brandon Johnson, who was backed by the mayor's close ally, the Chicago Teachers Union. That conflict culminated Wednesday in a claim of defamation Martinez filed against CTU, its president, Stacy Davis Gates, and Chicago Board of Education President Sean Harden. Martinez hopes to add the claim as an amendment to an ongoing lawsuit he filed against the board after he was fired in late December. He starts a new job as the commissioner of elementary and secondary education in Massachusetts on July 1. In the interview with the Tribune, Martinez did not hold back from describing the toll the drama-laden back-and-forth had taken on him and his family. He compared the political positions of the board members and officials who led the charge to fire him to the polarization under President Donald Trump. 'What you see on both sides is that they both feel they're right. They don't care what the evidence shows. They don't care what the truth really is. They just feel they're right,' he said. Martinez was the first Latino appointee to head CPS on a permanent basis. The eldest of 12 children, he credits Pilsen's churches for welcoming his family to the city from Mexico. He didn't get his visa until his junior year at Benito Juarez High School in Pilsen. He said he feels 'blessed' to have attended the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and to have received his MBA from DePaul University, noting that many undocumented students aren't being afforded the same opportunities because of the federal immigration crackdown. 'I feel for our community, because I understand the fear. I understand the uncertainty,' he said. Martinez worked as the chief financial officer for CPS from 2003 to 2009 under then-CEO Arne Duncan. He was a network chief before leaving to serve as superintendent of school districts in Nevada and San Antonio. He returned as CPS CEO in 2021 under then-Mayor Lori Lightfoot, just as the world was emerging from the COVID-19 pandemic. Though Martinez was born in Mexico, he said he always considered himself a Chicagoan first. 'When I came back, they started calling me the son of Chicago,' he said. 'I've gotta tell you, it's probably the best compliment I've ever received in my entire career.' A 96-page amended lawsuit, filed late Wednesday by Martinez's lawyer, William Quinlan, lays bare the CPS CEO's fight to retain his title. The conflict began in September when the mayor, a former teacher and CTU organizer, pushed for Martinez's removal after Martinez opposed a $300 million loan meant to fund a new teachers contract and a $175 million pension payment to nonteacher CPS employees. 'I really thought (the mayor and I) were aligned,' Martinez reflected Thursday. 'He knew my financial background. He even told me, 'Pedro, you have credibility.'' Martinez said he was caught off guard when Johnson asked him to step down at the September meeting due to his opposition to the loan, which he believed relied on short-term fixes for long-term financial needs. He said he had warned the mayor at least five times before their meeting that the city's financial advisers offered flawed guidance. He believes his differing stance from the mayor on borrowing stems from his tenure as CPS' chief financial officer in the 2000s. Between 2003 and 2007, when he was CFO, the Tribune found CPS issued $1 billion in a type of long-term debt called auction-rate securities. Martinez later defended the borrowing. But he contends that after his time away from the district in Nevada and San Antonio, he returned to find that CPS had relied on high-interest borrowing from 2015 to 2018, more straightforwardly expensive than the auction-rate borrowing under his leadership. When Martinez left CPS, the district 'had over a billion dollars in the bank,' he said. Upon returning as CEO in 2021, he said he was stunned to find the district was 'the second-largest junk bond producer in the country, second only to Puerto Rico.' 'I really didn't feel it would be a responsible path forward to just push issues to the future for somebody else,' he explained, when asked about the controversial $300 million loan that made headlines for months. The mayor's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. After the mayor-appointed school board refused to fire Martinez at Johnson's bidding, all seven members resigned in early October. Johnson quickly replaced them, and the new handpicked board — allegedly 'inadequately vetted,' according to Martinez's suit — moved to terminate the CEO 'without cause.' Martinez's lawsuit claims the board tried to 'manufacture' a cause to justify his removal. He was allowed to stay on for 180 days. In the months that followed his December firing, Martinez's relationships with the mayor-appointed board members and CTU grew increasingly complicated. The week after the ouster and amid contract negotiations, Cook County Judge Joel Chupack granted Martinez a temporary restraining order barring the school board from interfering with his duties or assuming control over the CPS staff. The recent defamation claims against Davis Gates were added to Martinez's ongoing lawsuit. Judge Chupack is expected to rule on whether to accept the amended complaint. Chalkbeat Chicago first reported the complaint. On Thursday, Martinez spoke with the Tribune about the 'obvious' relationship between mayor-appointed board members and the CTU. He said Davis Gates was pushing 700 proposals in the new teachers contract that would have cost billions in debt. 'It was (the mindset of), 'This is what we deserve,'' he said. 'And the mayor was right there with her.' In the complaint, Martinez cites multiple public statements and social media posts Davis Gates made during contract negotiations that he says falsely portrayed him as unfit to lead. Among the examples: a graphic depicting him as 'the Grinch,' a CTU statement accusing him of putting 'personal politics' and 'media stardom' ahead of students, and a comment from Davis Gates comparing him to a disruptive student who should have an individualized education program — a remark that she later apologized for. In a statement, Steve Mandell, representing CTU in the lawsuit, called the complaint a 'brazen attempt to silence legitimate public advocacy' and stated that Davis Gates and CTU were advocating for change to improve the lives of students and teachers. 'If this sort of advocacy were actionable, the courts would literally be flooded with baseless defamation claims arising out of everyday labor disputes,' said the statement from Mandell, who also is on retainer to represent the Chicago Tribune in some legal matters. On Thursday, Martinez denounced Davis Gates' leadership style. He said it's important for parents to have CPS leadership they can trust, because 'we are the ones that are educating their children.' 'We're seeing this across the country … individuals who are now in power just want what they want,' he said. 'You will never see me bashing people, lying and insulting people.' Martinez claims in the suit that the union falsely blamed him for proposing mass school closures, including the shutdown of seven of 15 Acero charter schools in October — a decision he says he had no role in. He also alleges that board President Harden publicly criticized his budget plans for the coming year and stated that his departure from CPS should be accelerated. Martinez is seeking damages and a court order to enforce the terms of his contract. At a board meeting on Wednesday, the board voted to raise the payment cap for its law firm, Cozen O'Connor, from $75,000 to $135,000. The firm, along with Davis Gates and Harden, did not respond to requests for comment. This summer, the district again faces challenging budget circumstances, but under considerably different leadership dynamics. At Wednesday's board meeting, members appointed Macquline King as the new interim CPS chief. King comes from a post as the city's senior director of educational policy, so in theory, she is aligned with the mayor's priorities. She may clash with him less than Martinez did. The search for a permanent replacement is ongoing, and the district aims to pick a candidate later this fall. Before King's appointment, the Chicago Westside Branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People sent a letter to Harden, requesting that board members 'hire a Black person who is a qualified Educator' for both the interim and permanent roles. The Tribune obtained a copy of the letter. Last week, the City Council's Latino Caucus sent a letter to Johnson requesting the appointment of a 'qualified Latino leader to serve as interim CEO.' The caucus's letter cites data that schools are 47% Latino, but states that 'our communities remain underrepresented in key leadership roles across City government and its sister agencies.' Asked about the optics of the two groups fighting each other through open letters to city leadership, Martinez pointed out that both Black and Latino students have seen significant improvements in literacy rates under his tenure. 'We're seeing so many of our students doing so much better,' he said. Thursday morning, he teared up as he talked about what this job has meant to him. 'I am a product of this system and all of the complexities,' he said.
