Revealed: Four banks failed to pass on May rate cut in full
Well, we did it! Our rate cut shame list ensured lenders went one better than in February and all 111 lenders being monitored ending up passing on a cut.
Even Virgin Money, who stubbornly refused to pass on the first cut this year, were quick to move in May, announcing it would pass on a 25 basis point reduction to its lenders on the same afternoon the RBA cut the official rate from 4.1 per cent down to 3.85 per cent.
Experts had warned, and indeed history has shown, that lenders will often pass the first cut on in full at the beginning of a lowering cycle, but are not as reliable when further cuts are announced.
Lenders improved their overall response time in May, compared with the February cut.
Finder analysis revealed banks took an average of 14 days to pass on the May rate cut, which was the same as February, but the longest time it took a lender to pass on in May was just 27 days, compared to 42 in February.
However, while all lenders dropped rates in May, not all passed on the full 25 basis points.
Family First Credit Union dropped its best variable rate by just 0.05 per cent, Finder research showed, which is only one fifth the savings being enjoyed by customers of other banks.
Laboratories Credit Union passed on a 0.1 per cent cut, while Bank of China and Dnister both gave customers a 0.2 per cent discount.
The difference sounds small, but let's look at the savings you could make with a $1 million mortgage, being paid off over 30 years.
If you started with a 6 per cent interest rate on your loan and your lenders passed on a full cut to drop your new rate to 5.75 per cent, you would save $160 a month and about $58,000 over the life of the loan.
If your cut was 0.2 per cent, you would save $119 a month and $43,000 over the loan term.
A 0.1 per cent cut would mean you'd save $60 a month and $21,000 over 30 years.
A 0.05 per cent cut would save you $30 a month and just over $10,000 over the loan term.
So that's nearly $50,000 in difference over your loan term, from just one small variation in a single rate cut.
Banks go to war over Aussie homeowners
Finder's home loan expert Richard Whitten says borrowers need to hold their lenders to account, or risk missing out on big savings.
'If your lender hasn't fully passed on a recent interest rate cut, now is the time to consider refinancing to get a better deal,' Mr Whitten said.
'Compare the interest rate on your loan with what competitors are offering. Many lenders are quick to pass on rate increases but lag with decreases, so don't assume your current rate is the best you can get.'
And if your lender has passed on the cut in full, it doesn't necessarily mean your deal is up to scratch, Mr Whitten warned.
'There's a high chance another lender is offering a better deal to new borrowers,' he said. 'If you find a better offer, contact your current lender and negotiate. It never hurts to ask for a lower rate. But be prepared to switch if they don't budge.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
SBS Australia
27 minutes ago
- SBS Australia
No new taxes before the next election, declares PM
No new taxes before the next election, declares PM Published 7 August 2025, 9:03 am The Prime Minister has all but ruled out any tax changes before the next election. There have been competing pitches for reforms ahead of the government's upcoming economic roundtable. One proposal is increase to the GST, but with every Australian to receive a cashback compensation.
News.com.au
38 minutes ago
- News.com.au
How big government is making life more expensive
We're in trouble … Right now in Australia, more than half of working-age adults get their main source of income from the government. That includes from JobSeeker, family payments, disability support, and more, as well as from income in public sector jobs. According to The Australian Financial Review, we're at the highest level of dependency since World War II. Meanwhile, the shape of the job market is shifting dramatically. According to The Australian, 82 per cent of all jobs created over the past two years were government-funded positions. In 2024, the private sector added just 53,000 jobs, while public employment surged at five times the normal rate. Economists are warning this is creating serious distortions in the labour market and driving Australia's ongoing productivity slump. But here's the worst part. To sustain this level of income support and public hiring, the government has to dramatically increase both taxes and spending. And that's what they've done. Total tax revenue hit a record $801.7 billion in 2023–24, or nearly 30 per cent of GDP – the highest in modern history. Income tax alone is expected to rise above $343 billion by 2025–26. That's a bigger tax burden on individuals and businesses than we've seen in decades. But it hasn't just been funded through tax. Over the past decade, the Reserve Bank and the government have massively expanded the money supply. Australia's M3 broad money measure – essentially the total pool of cash in the system – has grown to more than $3.15 trillion, up 80 per cent since 2015. That's more money in the economy, chasing the same supply of goods, housing, and services. And that's exactly what causes inflation. We're seeing that play out in everyday prices – at the supermarket, in energy bills, and most of all, in housing. Government overspending has helped weaken the Australian dollar. That makes imported goods and building materials more expensive – driving up construction costs. Meanwhile, inflation has pushed investors toward property as a store of value, sending demand – and prices – even higher. So, while the government talks about 'affordability,' its own policies are fuelling the very forces that make housing less affordable. And the pressure isn't just on prices. It's on productivity. To keep the machine running, the government is taxing more – especially on income, savings, and investment. But high taxes make it harder for people to start a business, grow one, or take financial risks. The result? Investment slows. Innovation stalls. Businesses hesitate. And Australia's ability to actually produce more – to meet all this demand – keeps falling behind. That's when inflation really sticks: when demand is pumped up by public spending, but supply can't keep up. Prices rise faster, and stay higher. According to former Treasury Secretary Ken Henry, Australia's poor productivity performance over the past 25 years has cost the average worker around $500,000 in lost income. And the Centre for Independent Studies puts it plainly: 'Australia's prosperity depends on private sector-led growth – not government spending propping up demand.' But right now, that's exactly what we're doing. We're building an economy on dependence – not on productivity. We're growing jobs in government – not in business. We're taxing more – but getting less. And we're printing money – instead of creating value. This isn't just about budgets or ideology. It's about whether we build an economy that rewards effort, innovation, and work – or one that makes us more dependent, more taxed, and more stuck. And right now, we're heading down the wrong path.
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Nauru sells first passports to help fund relocations as sea levels rise
Australia's Pacific neighbour, Nauru, has sold its first passports as part of a program raising funds for the relocation of residents affected by rising sea levels. The tiny island nation launched the scheme in February but it only approved its first six applicants this week, nearly half a year after it started. Selling for at least $US105,000 ($160,000), Nauru's "golden passports" offer citizenship by investment and the country claims it would enable visa-free entry into 89 countries. These are said to include the United Kingdom, Hong Kong, Singapore and the United Arab Emirates. Edward Clark, the head of Nauru's Economic and Climate Resilience Citizenship Program, told ABC Pacific Beat that a "relatively well-known" German family was among the successful applicants. He said, altogether, the family of four paid around $US250,000 ($380,000), with $US140,000 of these funds to go toward climate resilience projects in Nauru. "They had a long-standing family business in Germany, they sold it recently, and had relocated to Dubai," Mr Clark said. "Our understanding is that they're concerned about some of the volatility in Eastern Europe and the impact that might have on them as a family. Despite the slow start, Mr Clark said there were around 20 other applications being processed. "We are a new program so we are working to build credibility and awareness in the market," he said. "We are starting to build interest and work through the existing pipeline of applications ... and we have many others we know are coming." Nauru President David Adeang was upbeat about the latest milestone. "We welcome our new citizens whose investment will assist Nauru to secure a sustainable and prosperous future for generations to come," he told AFP on Thursday. Mr Clark said the target for the passport program is to generate $60 million a year. Nauru is particularly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, with scientists measuring sea levels rising 1.5 times faster than global averages. Unusually pure phosphate deposits — a key ingredient in fertiliser — once made Nauru one of the wealthiest places, per capita, on the planet. But these supplies have long dried up and researchers estimate 80 per cent of Nauru has become uninhabitable due to mining. What little land Nauru has left is threatened by encroaching tides, which local authorities believe will force 90 per cent of its residents to relocate to higher ground. The first phase of this mass relocation is estimated to cost more than $US60 million. While the island has pinned its hopes on the new passport program to foot the bill, there are fears the scheme could be ripe for exploitation. Mr Clark told AFP one application has already been withdrawn after officials flagged "adverse findings" during background checks. "The application would have been rejected had it not been withdrawn," he said. Meanwhile, Mr Clark told the ABC the government conducts an "in-depth" due diligence process involving the financial intelligence unit, police, and third-party checks. "This is important to uphold and maintain the reputation for the country ... and for maintaining the integrity of the Nauru passport," he said. A previous Nauru attempt to sell passports ended in disaster. In 2003, Nauru officials sold citizenship to Al-Qaeda members who were later arrested in Asia. When asked how successful applicants could be sure their funds went toward economic and climate resilience projects, Mr Clark said it would appear in government records. "Because the program is at an early stage, the funds will just be co-mingled into the government treasury accounts and will be reported on through that mechanism," he said. "We are in discussions with Nauru government to set up a framework to make sure that those funds are allocated toward specific projects or initiatives if the program starts to generate revenue that is above the $10 million threshold." ABC/AFP
