logo
Nutrition warning labels are hitting shelves near you — earlier than expected

Nutrition warning labels are hitting shelves near you — earlier than expected

Yahoo01-07-2025
Health Canada's new front-of-package nutrition warning labels are beginning to appear on store shelves six months ahead of the food industry's deadline.
First announced in 2022, the black-and-white labels alert shoppers if a product is high in sugar, sodium and/or saturated fat — which the federal department says can lead to increased health risks like stroke, obesity, heart disease, Type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure and some types of cancers.
"I think these can be a really great starting point for people that are looking to use labels as nutrition information sources. But I do think that there are some limitations," said Brittany Brown, a dietitian based in Dartmouth, N.S.
"... Right now, it's just going to be kind of functioning as a nutrition warning label, so it's going to give consumers the information when things are high in sodium, high in saturated fat [and] high in sugar, but it's not really going to tell them more details than that."
Brown said flipping over the package will show details about percentages of daily value. She said the new label is automatically placed on foods that have 15 per cent or more of the daily value of sugar, saturated fat or sodium.
"If something only has 14 per cent of the daily value of sodium, it's not going to trigger the nutrition warning so that's a bit of a missed opportunity."
The intention behind the labels, according to Health Canada, is to help shoppers make "quick and informed choices" when buying food and support health professionals in educating people about food.
Brown said other countries have been using front-of-label packaging for years. For example, some European countries use Nutri-Score, which grades foods between A and E. "A" foods would be high nutritional quality while "E" would be lower nutritional quality.
Brown said while Health Canada's labels can be useful, they don't address certain complexities around food like cost.
"We know that food security is a really big challenge that people are faced with. So even if I am looking at the grocery store and I see that something is high in sugar, but my dollar only goes so far, I'm still going to have to choose that food item potentially," Brown said.
For example, Brown said things like frozen entrees could end up with these labels, but for some that may be all an individual or family can afford.
"So I think that there is a bit of a risk with making us feel a little bit more judgy about some of the foods that we're eating, and we really need to be careful about not not putting that on to people."
Liesel Carlsson, a professor of nutrition and dietetics at Acadia University in Wolfville, N.S., said she thinks shoppers may be surprised when the labels begin to appear on daily staples, like cereal, breads and some dairy products — though she could see that changing with time as companies adjust their recipes to no longer trigger the label.
"These labels don't look good on packaging. So the real story here and part of the reason that industry was given a very long time in order to get their labels onto their packages is that many industry players will reformulate their products," Carlsson said.
But what's most interesting, she said, is that these labels are likely to result in more products that are inexpensive "that are still in this highly processed category but are less damaging to health."
In terms of the labels themselves, Carlsson said there is evidence to show that they're effective.
"Even when consumers are not even seeking nutrition information, this type of front-of-pack label will catch people's eyes," she said, but added the look of Canada's labels are "a little bit underwhelming" — especially when compared to some South American countries, which use large black stop signs to communicate a similar message.
Although the food industry has until Jan. 1, 2026, to put the front-of-package labels on the foods, some products already have it.
The Nova Scotia-based grocery chain Sobeys, for example, has the label on many of its store-brand products, like Compliments and Big 8.
These included items in the frozen food and snack aisle, like microwave popcorn, frozen chicken wings, burgers and pop.
"We are committed to meeting the Health Canada front of pack labelling requirements and to empowering customers with clear information that supports the choices they make in our stores every day," Sobeys said in an email to CBC News.
"We have made good progress to make the labelling changes to our Own Brands assortment ahead of the deadline by working proactively with our supplier partners."
The labels are mandatory for prepacked foods, but Health Canada notes there are some exemptions.
Certain dairy products such as plain milk, plain yogurt and cheese are exempt "because they are important sources of calcium that is needed to promote bone health and reduce the risk of osteoporosis."
Health Canada said raw, single-ingredient ground meats and poultry are exempt "to avoid giving the impression they are nutritionally inferior to whole cuts that do not carry a nutrition label."
Butter, sugar, salt and other products used for the same purpose are also exempt. Some products are also exempt for technical reasons, like foods in very small packages.
MORE TOP STORIES
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Doctors Think We Need To Cool It With Our Obsession With This 1 Nutrient
Doctors Think We Need To Cool It With Our Obsession With This 1 Nutrient

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Doctors Think We Need To Cool It With Our Obsession With This 1 Nutrient

Even a quick walk through the aisles of your local market will confirm what you've probably already suspected — just about everyone wants more protein in their diet. While keto and paleo dieters are centered around it, others are seeking ways to get enough of it through powders, beverages, bars, pasta and snacks. While many consumers are loading up on as much protein as they can get, experts say, we can jump off the 'all protein, all the time' bandwagon and start looking for a more generally balanced diet. Protein Does Lots Of Great Things Dr. Zhaoping Li, chief of the division of clinical nutrition at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, said protein provides the building blocks of our organs and body, and that it's essential to improve the immune system. 'It's also used to make neurotransmitters, can function as hormones or can provide fuel through glucogenic or ketogenic pathways.' Related: 'Protein is essential for health because it's a central component of all our tissues and bodily functions, such as enzyme secretion and immune function,' said Jorn Trommelen, an expert on nutrition and an assistant professor in the department of human biology at Maastricht University in the Netherlands. 'Bodily proteins are continuously broken down to amino acids, which are recycled in new proteins. But there is a net loss of bodily protein in the absence of protein ingestion, so dietary protein is essential to maintain our tissue mass and function.' Most People In The Developed World Are Getting More Than Enough When you read that list of important jobs protein does, it makes sense that you'd want to get lots of it in your diet. But experts are saying that, as so often happens, we've gone overboard with our latest 'superfood' ingredient. 'The vast majority of Americans already consume enough protein, and we don't need more,' said Dr. Dariush Mozaffarian, director at the Tufts Food is Medicine Institute, and a cardiologist, public health scientist and professor at the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy. 'The nation's growing obsession with protein arises more from misconceptions than value for health.' 'We've been sold the idea that protein is the golden ticket to health, but this has far more to do with marketing than with science,' said Dr. Luke Wilson, a general practitioner, lifestyle medicine practitioner and board director at Doctors for Nutrition, which champions plant-based nutrition for disease prevention and care. 'In reality, our bodies are incredibly efficient at getting what they need from regular, plant-based whole foods. If you're eating enough calories from a variety of plant foods, you're getting enough protein.' Just In Case, Here Are Protein-Deficiency Symptoms The list of protein-deficiency symptoms is somewhat vague and equally rare. Mozaffarian said, 'Unless protein intake is very low for a long time, there are few symptoms. If it's very low and prolonged, then people can experience fatigue, hair loss, muscle loss, skin and nail changes, ankle swelling and brain fog.' Trommelen noted a syndrome known as kwashiorkor, a severe form of malnutrition caused by protein deficiency that can stunt growth, is unlikely to occur in the Western world. Of course, if you're experiencing any of these symptoms or are concerned about your protein intake, it's a good idea to consult with your health care provider, especially if you're undereating or taking weight-loss medication. One Chicken Breast Could Be Enough Protein should account for 10% to 35% of your calories, according to the American Heart Association. On a 2,000-calorie-a-day diet, that's 200 to 700 calories from protein, or 50 to 175 grams. The Department of Agriculture has a calculator of dietary reference intakes to help you determine how much protein you need. The recommended dietary allowance is 0.8 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight, or 0.36 grams per pound. That means a 50-year-old woman who weighs 140 pounds and who doesn't exercise would need 53 grams of protein a day. As examples, 7 ounces of cooked chicken breast contains roughly 50 grams of protein, and so does 5.5 ounces of Greek yogurt eaten with 3 ounces of chicken breast. The American Heart Association says that most people, even athletes, can get enough protein by eating a serving of dairy for each of three meals in a day, plus a piece of meat the size of a deck of cards at lunch and supper. Related: As you get older, protein needs may increase, experts said. 'Older adults slowly lose muscle mass, and there's data suggesting it's perhaps partially because they are less efficient at using dietary protein,' Trommelen noted. 'It's been suggested that older adults should consume up to 1.2 grams per kilogram of weight per day, up from the general recommendation of 0.36 grams, although this is still a topic of debate.' Have You Considered The Rest Of Your Diet? You may also want to consider what other nutrients might help your body do its best. Fewer than 10% of U.S. adultsmeet the daily recommended intake for vegetables (2 to 3 cups a day), and only 20% eat enough fruit (1 1/2 to 2 cups daily). That lack of produce consumption has left us with many nutrient shortfalls, including vitamins A, D, E and C, folate, calcium, magnesium, fiber and potassium. For adolescent and premenopausal females, iron is also a shortfall nutrient. Nutritionists are especially concerned about four nutrients — fiber, calcium, vitamin D and potassium. To Avoid Protein-Related Visceral Fat, Try Strength Training Many of us aren't engaging in lifestyles that will help us absorb protein in the most efficient way possible. If you want more muscle growth, you'll need extra strength training, not extra protein. Mozaffarian said that you've got to be working out on the regular for protein to be able to make a difference. 'Eating more protein is valuable when people are engaged in a regular program of strength training and when they're working out several times per week, where it helps build muscle mass and strength.' Trommelen agreed, saying: 'Physical activity, especially resistance exercise, greatly enhances the body's use of dietary protein.' It's also true that since the body can't store protein, amounts that are more than your body needs end up being used for energy or stored as fat. 'Without a regular program of strength training, eating more protein has little health value,' Mozaffarian said. 'Just eating more protein alone won't build muscle. In fact, excess dietary protein is converted to visceral fat, increasing the risk of insulin resistance and diabetes. That's because when protein intake is high, insulin rises, just like it does with starch or sugar intakes. In studies across the world, people who have the highest levels of protein actually have higher risk of diabetes.' Recommended Sources Of Protein 'If you want to build muscle mass, engage in a regular program of strength training or resistance exercise, and focus on healthy food sources of protein,' Mozaffarian said. 'Otherwise, emphasize a generally healthy diet, and rather than being obsessed with protein, seek out minimally processed fruits, vegetables, nuts, seeds, legumes, whole grains, plant oils, fish and yogurt. Avoid soda, candy, processed meat and ultraprocessed foods high in starch, sugar or salt. 'Focus on the food source and its overall impact on your health, rather than the grams of protein,' Mozaffarian said. 'Avoid processed meats, ultraprocessed foods like protein bars and protein powders. Protein-rich foods with evidence for general health benefits include fish, shellfish, yogurt, cheese and milk. Legumes, grains and nuts also provide protein and substantial health benefits. Unprocessed red meats are OK in moderation, up to two servings per week.' Related: Head For The Produce Aisle Wilson wrapped it up this way: 'If you're living in a high-income country and you're eating enough calories, you're not protein deficient. We need to stop pathologizing normal fatigue or poor diet quality as being caused by not enough protein.' 'The real health benefits come from eating fewer ultra-processed foods, reducing consumption of animal products and building meals around beans, whole grains, vegetables and fruits. That's a way of eating that lowers your risk of heart disease, type 2 diabetes and cancer — and it gives you all the protein you need, without even trying.' Related... Protein Isn't Just For Weightlifters. Here's How Much Everyone Should Eat. The Best Proteins To Eat If You Want The Most Bang For Your Buck Feeding Your Kid Protein Powder? These Pediatricians Want You To Reconsider.

Liquid I.V. Debuts Innovative New Sugar-Free Hydration Multiplier in Canada
Liquid I.V. Debuts Innovative New Sugar-Free Hydration Multiplier in Canada

Business Upturn

time2 hours ago

  • Business Upturn

Liquid I.V. Debuts Innovative New Sugar-Free Hydration Multiplier in Canada

TORONTO, Aug. 14, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Today, Liquid I.V., the number one selling powdered hydration brand in Canada1 announced the expansion of their product portfolio with the launch of the new Sugar-Free Hydration Multiplier. Available in the delicious and refreshing White Peach flavour, this launch marks Liquid I.V.'s most significant innovation in the market to date and is the brand's first sugar-free offering for Canadians. 'Sugar-free marks a bold step forward for Liquid I.V., cementing our place not only as leaders but innovators of hydration solutions,' said Anusha Babbar, Senior Vice President of International, Unilever Wellbeing. 'Canadians have shown great love to Liquid I.V. these past two years in market, so we're thrilled to be expanding our Canadian offering in the wellness category to meet their demands for a sugar-free option.' Liquid I.V. entered Canada in 2023, marking its first expansion beyond the U.S., and quickly established itself as a leading provider of powdered hydration. Yet, fans of the electrolyte beverage have been vocal about the need for a sugar-free option to meet their lifestyle needs. Today, Liquid I.V. responds to the demand with a first-of-its-kind formula that is scientifically formulated to restore electrolyte imbalances that occur through performance, heat, travel and adventure, without the sugar. 'Sugar is often used as a key ingredient in electrolyte beverages for hydration support. We clinically tested countless sugar-free formulations to ensure that we weren't just ticking a box, but creating a formula backed by science that truly supported functional hydration,' said Lori Lauersen, Senior Vice President R&D, Unilever Wellbeing. 'What we developed was an amino acid blend available in our Sugar-Free Hydration Multiplier, all delivered within a delightful peach flavoured beverage.' Liquid I.V. Sugar-Free White Peach Hydration Multiplier delivers smart 0 sugar hydration that supports consumers in maintaining their wellness goals. It contains: 0g sugar 6 essential vitamins and minerals Blend of amino acids No artificial flavours or colours 100% + daily value of essential B vitamins (B3, B5, B12) To enjoy, simply pour one easy-to-open packet into 500ml of water, mix or shake, and hydrate. Its convenient single-serve, travel-friendly packets are easy to enjoy on the go. Liquid I.V. Sugar-Free White Peach is currently available at Costco Canada and will be available on later this month. About Liquid I.V.® Liquid I.V.® is a wellness company based in Los Angeles, CA. We believe hydration is the bedrock of wellness so our products are designed to deliver hydration and additional benefits with delicious flavour. The product line features great-tasting, non-GMO electrolyte drink mixes for enhanced hydration. As a purpose-driven brand, giving back is at the core of Liquid I.V.'s DNA, to date we've donated over 71 million servings to people in need around the globe. Liquid I.V.® contributes over 1% of brand revenue to our Impact Program focused on Clean Water Access & Hydration Aid. Liquid I.V.® provides grants to organizations that expand clean water access. We are committed to our goal of donating 150 million Liquid I.V.® sticks over the next 10 years. Liquid I.V. is available in-store at Costco, Walmart, and other national retailers, and online on To learn more, visit and follow @liquidivcanada on Instagram, TikTok and Facebook. For more information, please contact:Amanda FederchukKetchum, on behalf of Liquid I.V. [email protected] 416-505-0517

Draft of White House Report Suggests Kennedy Won't Push Strict Pesticide Regulations
Draft of White House Report Suggests Kennedy Won't Push Strict Pesticide Regulations

New York Times

time2 hours ago

  • New York Times

Draft of White House Report Suggests Kennedy Won't Push Strict Pesticide Regulations

A highly anticipated White House report on the health of American children would stop short of proposing direct restrictions on ultraprocessed foods and pesticides, which the health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has called major threats, according to a draft of the document that was reviewed by The New York Times. The report, if adopted, would be good news for the food and agriculture industries, which feared far more restrictive proposals than the ones outlined in the draft. Through his 'Make America Healthy Again' movement, Mr. Kennedy has sought to overhaul the nation's diet by pushing those industries to make major changes. The draft includes an array of policy proposals calling for research into topics like electromagnetic radiation, children's oral health, the role of the microbiome and the health effects of air quality and microplastics. It also recommends government action on a wide range of issues, including initiatives to increase breastfeeding rates, address infertility, promote physical activity and educate the public on the effects of vaping. Questions about a possible push for new pesticide regulations were raised in May when the White House released an initial report, from a presidential commission chaired by Mr. Kennedy, that raised strong concerns about possible links between pesticides and childhood diseases. It also linked the dominance of ultraprocessed foods in children's diets to a range of chronic diseases. Those findings touched off tensions between Mr. Kennedy's movement and Republican lawmakers who have traditionally drawn support from powerful agriculture, food and drug lobbyists. The Times obtained the draft of the new report from a former federal official. An industry official confirmed that it was nearly identical to a copy the administration had recently shown the official at the White House. Kush Desai, a White House spokesman, on Thursday would not verify the draft. At this stage, any draft would go through a number of revisions before it is finalized. The document The Times reviewed was labeled 'pre-decisional' and dated Aug. 6. Called the 'Make Our Children Healthy Again Strategy,' the report comes from the commission led by Mr. Kennedy, which includes cabinet secretaries and agency heads from across the government. The White House has not said when the report will be made public, though it was to have been presented to President Trump on Tuesday, the deadline set by Mr. Trump's executive order establishing the 'MAHA Commission.' The final report is expected to be released in the coming weeks. The draft report says that environmental regulators will work with 'food and agricultural stakeholders' to ensure that the public is aware of and confident in existing pesticide review procedures. It described those procedures as 'robust' and did not propose new restrictions. It also says the Trump administration will back research on technologies to try to help farmers reduce pesticide use and on the health effects of Americans' cumulative exposure to chemicals. After the first report was published in May, agriculture groups, including the American Soybean Association and the National Corn Growers Association, urged the Trump administration to listen to farmers as the commission prepared its follow-up report outlining a strategy. The draft reviewed by The Times does not mention how the proposed research and the new policy initiatives would be funded or how much money might be allocated to them. But it says that the Department of Health and Human Services will form a working group to evaluate 'overprescription trends' involving mental health medications, such as S.S.R.I.s and stimulants, for children. It reiterates Mr. Kennedy's pledge to study the 'root causes' of autism. Mr. Kennedy has spent much of his tenure as health secretary characterizing modern American childhood as a state of stress and sickness, with children mainly eating ultraprocessed food, which he has called 'poison,' tethered to screens and reliant on pills and shots. And he has railed against the pharmaceutical industry, which he says exerts undue influence over scientific research, all while the Trump administration has decimated funding for many academic research programs. Mr. Kennedy has also condemned scientific experts. In June, he fired all the members of an influential vaccine advisory panel. The first report, from May, reflected many of Mr. Kennedy's key talking points. It was heavily scrutinized. While some scientists applauded its focus on flaws within the American food system, many noted it misrepresented the scientific consensus on issues like vaccines. The report also cited studies that did not exist. In recent weeks, Mr. Kennedy's aides and allies have publicized what they described as the administration's most significant steps to improve American health. These include persuading some food makers to phase out petroleum-based food dyes, working with several states to remove soda and candy from their food stamp programs and trying to tighten oversight of food additives. The draft reiterates that the administration will continue these efforts. Some researchers have cautioned that such steps may not do much to improve the overall healthfulness of the American food supply. Ultraprocessed foods, which make up about 62 percent of the calories consumed by U.S. children, are explicitly mentioned in the draft of the second report only once, in a line about the administration's effort to define them. The near-omission of ultraprocessed foods from the draft report raises questions about the administration's appetite for regulation, which the food industry is likely to vehemently oppose. The draft does describe prioritizing 'whole, healthy' foods in federal programs like those providing meals in schools. It suggests offering these foods in 'MAHA boxes' for food stamp recipients. The draft touches on a number of other topics, including vaccines, a focus of Mr. Kennedy's. It says the health department will develop a framework for 'Ensuring America has the Best Childhood Vaccine Schedule.' Mr. Kennedy, one of the nation's most prominent vaccine skeptics, recently pledged to overhaul the nation's system to compensate people harmed by vaccines. Earlier this month, he canceled nearly $500 million in contracts for mRNA vaccines. The draft report also suggests that the government will consider developing guidelines that would limit marketing of unhealthy foods directly to children and will more vigorously enforce restrictions around direct-to-consumer drug advertising. It says the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention will update its recommendations on fluoride in water. On Tuesday, Calley Means, a senior adviser to Mr. Kennedy, spoke at a Heritage Foundation event on the role of agriculture in public health, presenting farmers as key players in American health care. 'We are not going to win if the soybean farmers and the corn growers are our enemy,' he said. There are signs that the report, as drafted, could land with a thud among Mr. Kennedy's followers. In July, 500 people, including leaders of advocacy groups aligned with Mr. Kennedy's movement, sent a letter to Mr. Kennedy and other members of the White House commission urging them to ban pesticides like glyphosate. Hundreds of people tied to the MAHA movement, including Vani Hari, a prominent food activist and MAHA influencer, also sent a letter addressed to Mr. Trump on Monday urging him to take action against protections for pesticide manufacturers. Over the first six months of his presidency, Mr. Trump has largely supported Mr. Kennedy's decisions, after urging him during the campaign to 'go wild' on health. This month, though, after Mr. Kennedy canceled the contracts for mRNA vaccines, Mr. Trump told reporters that the mRNA coronavirus vaccine development initiative from his first term, Project Warp Speed, was 'one of the most incredible things ever done in this country.' He said he had scheduled a meeting with Mr. Kennedy to discuss the cancellations. While Mr. Trump convened the commission, and put Mr. Kennedy at the helm, he does not have to follow its guidance. 'Unlike other administrations, we will not be silenced or intimidated by the corporate lobbyists or special interests,' Mr. Trump said in May during an event celebrating the release of the commission's first report. 'I want this group to do what they have to do.' 'In some cases, it won't be nice, or it won't be pretty,' he added, 'but we have to do it.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store