logo
Sarah Witty v Adam Bandt: how an unlikely Labor champion took down a Greens giant

Sarah Witty v Adam Bandt: how an unlikely Labor champion took down a Greens giant

The Guardian09-05-2025

Labor could hardly be considered a metaphorical David in most federal election contests. But in the progressive seat of Melbourne, where the now-beaten Greens leader Adam Bandt had reigned for 15 years, there are similarities to the oft-told biblical story.
On 28 March, when Anthony Albanese called an election date for May, Melbourne appeared on no one's list as a battle to watch.
Just five months before the campaign began, Labor's candidate against Bandt, Sarah Witty, had unsuccessfully run for a seat on Yarra city council. She came third behind independent and Greens candidates.
By February, less than two months from polling day, Witty was Labor's choice to run in Melbourne against the long-serving Greens MP.
From the outset, the seat wasn't on federal Labor's radar. 'I don't think we even had it in the winnable column,' a Victorian Labor source said.
A Greens insider said there had been no indication Melbourne was in trouble, noting the party didn't have the resources for single-seat polling in the way the major parties do.
Both the Greens and Labor will reflect on the unexpected result in the coming weeks to figure out what happened.
For the Greens, it will be a sobering look at how Bandt, regarded as a unifying leader within the party, lost the seat he had held for so long.
Local Labor volunteers from the Melbourne and Richmond branches were out on the hustings daily. Even Witty's social media was run by a volunteer, who updated the page in their free time.
How-to-vote cards were supplied by the national campaign but rank-and-file members had to fundraise through raffles and auctions to pay for campaign shirts and corflutes.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
A senior Victorian Labor source, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, described Witty's campaign as 'run on the smell of an oily rag', with donations from the active Melbourne and Richmond branches.
Another Labor source, who helped the campaign, said: 'It was a very, very sparsely funded campaign, all raised from locals. It wasn't like there were massive amounts of money coming from a national office.'
The idea of Labor as David in a battle against the Greens Goliath doesn't sit well with the Greens camp. They argue that Labor's federal megaphone gives even the most under-resourced campaigns a big chance.
While the 'people-powered' campaign is credited by Labor sources as the reason Witty ousted Bandt, a 'perfect storm' had also hit.
The Greens leader's chance of winning a sixth term in office was dampened by three key factors, the electoral analyst Kevin Bonham said.
The electoral boundaries for the seat shifted before the election, lowering Bandt's primary vote from 49.6% in 2022 to 44.7%. On a two-candidate preferred basis, it had dropped from 60.2% to 56.5%.
After days of tense post-election vote counting, Bandt on Thursday conceded to Witty, saying a Greens win in Melbourne was like 'climbing Everest'.
'We needed to overcome Liberal, Labor and One Nation combined, and it's an Everest that we've climbed a few times now, but this time we fell just short,' he said.
Bonham said preference flows had not favoured the Greens this time around.
More Liberal and One Nation votes went to Labor than previously.
The rightwing activist group Advance ran a campaign against the Greens to reduce its vote in both houses, claiming Bandt's defeat as a win.
Social media advertising analysis showed the group had spent no money on targeted ads in the seat during the campaign.
A source inside Bandt's camp said a post-election review would look at third-party campaigns against the party to understand their impact on the inner-city seat.
Bonham said another factor against Bandt couldn't be written off as easily: the Greens leader's primary vote dipped just enough, even after the boundary redistribution, to set the wheels in motion for his loss.
'It's a perfect storm,' he said. 'He had a lower baseline, he had a swing against him on the primary vote, and he had a swing against him on preferences.
'Those three things combined have got rid of him.'
Swings against Bandt in progressive booths, including Fitzroy and Collingwood, will require further analysis to determine how the Greens came undone in the lower house.
A Victorian Labor source from the left faction hoped the Greens 'looked critically' at their failings.
'I really do see the value of having strong leftwing crossbenchers in the parliament,' they said. 'I think it's good for democracy, and I think it's really good for the Labor party when we do have a viable leftwing minor party.
'So I really hope that they take some time to critically look at their failings.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Watch: TV reporter shot in leg by LA police
Watch: TV reporter shot in leg by LA police

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Watch: TV reporter shot in leg by LA police

An Australian journalist was shot by Los Angeles police with a rubber bullet as she covered the protests against immigration raids in the city. In the middle of a live broadcast, a police officer appeared to aim and shoot from close range at Lauren Tomasi, the US correspondent for Nine News, with a non-lethal live round during the third day of the unrest. On Sunday, the demonstrations against Donald Trump's immigration crackdown intensified as the LAPD and National Guard clashed with large crowds. Standing near a police barricade, Tomasi told the camera: 'After hours of standing off, this situation has now rapidly deteriorated, the LAPD moving in on horseback, firing rubber bullets at protesters, moving them on through the heart of LA.' Seconds later, she was shot with a rubber bullet. The footage, posted online by Nine, shows an officer lift a gun and fire in the direction of the journalist and her camera operator. Tomasi screams out in pain and grabs her calf as a man's voice then yells: 'You just f---ing shot the reporter!' Asked if she was OK, the reporter replies: 'I'm good, I'm good.' In a statement on Monday, Nine said: 'Lauren Tomasi was struck by a rubber bullet. Lauren and her camera operator are safe and will continue their essential work covering these events. 'This incident serves as a stark reminder of the inherent dangers journalists can face while reporting from the front lines of protests, underscoring the importance of their role in providing vital information,' the network told The Guardian. Tomasi was reporting close to the centre of the protests, which started on Friday, in down-town LA. The LAPD had advised the press to 'keep a safe distance from active operations'. Sarah Hanson-Young, an Australian lawmaker, has urged Anthony Albanese, the Australian prime minister, to raise the incident with the US president, describing it as 'shocking' and 'completely unacceptable'. The incident came shortly after Nick Stern, a British news photographer, underwent emergency surgery after being hit by a rubber bullet while covering the protests in Paramount, a city in LA county. 'My initial concern was, were they firing live rounds?' he told the PA news agency, describing how protestors carried him to safety as blood poured down his leg. 'I intend, as soon as I am well enough, to get back out there,' he added. The large-scale protests, which were triggered by a wave of immigration raids in the city, escalated on Sunday after Mr Trump ordered 2,000 National Guard troops onto the streets. The White House said the move was 'essential', but Gavin Newsom, the governor of California, condemned their deployment as 'purposefully inflammatory'. Tens of thousands joined the protests over the weekend, blocking off a major motorway and setting cars on fire as the authorities used tear gas, rubber bullets and flash bangs to control the crowd. By Sunday evening, protesters had dispersed as police declared an unlawful assembly, a move that comes ahead of officers moving in to make arrests of those who do not leave.

New details emerge about Anthony Albanese's super tax and the bold move to win over supporters
New details emerge about Anthony Albanese's super tax and the bold move to win over supporters

Daily Mail​

time5 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

New details emerge about Anthony Albanese's super tax and the bold move to win over supporters

Labor's new plan to tax superannuation balances above $3million will reportedly allow people to pay the charge from their super funds, rather than having to sell assets to cover the costs. The federal government wants to impose an extra 15 per cent tax on earnings for super balances above $3 million, bringing the total tax rate to 30 per cent for those in that bracket. The proposal has sparked criticism for including unrealised capital gains, meaning that assets that have increased in value, such as property or shares, could also be taxed even before they're accessed. There were fears this could force self-managed super funds to sell assets like properties and shares to avoid being slugged. But Sky News Australia reports that individuals in that tax bracket could pay the levy out of their super balances, rather than being forced to sell assets. This mirrors existing arrangements for people who are already taxed more on earnings above $250,000. Treasurer Jim Chalmers reportedly believes the fact that people can pay the tax out of their super should quieten critics who claim people will be forced to offload assets to pay for it. The Coalition confirmed last week it would consider voting in favour of Labor's policy to raise taxes if it scrapped the unrealised gains element and indexed the $3million threshold. But Treasurer Jim Chalmers dropped a major hint that he will not negotiate with the Opposition as the government does not need the Opposition's approval as it has the numbers to get any bill through the Senate with the help of the Greens. Dr Chalmers told 7.30 host Sarah Ferguson the government would prefer to deal with the Greens than the Coalition. 'I'm not convinced that they're fair dinkum when it comes to making superannuation tax concessions a little bit fairer, and I think my opposite number has made that clear that they're not interested in that,' he said. 'We'll obviously have discussions with other parties in the Senate to do what we can to pass that legislation.' This refusal to negotiate with the Opposition was made despite Prime Minister Anthony Albanese last week saying the government would negotiate with the Coalition over super policy. 'We do not have a majority in the Senate; we obviously work with different parties,' the Albanese said. While Labor has a landslide majority in the House of Representatives, it needs the support of 10 other senators to get any legislation passed through the upper house. The Greens are enthusiastic about the proposed tax, and in fact want it to kick it on balances of $2million and above, not $3million. Crossbencher senators David Pocock and Jacqui Lambie last year refused to support Labor's plan to tax unrealised gains, meaning the government could only rely on the Greens in the Senate. Shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien this week said the Coalition would be open to negotiating with the government on super provided it dropped plans to tax unrealised gains and indexed the $3million threshold. 'When it comes to all policies, including this one, the Coalition will always be open however that doesn't mean a blank cheque,' he told Sky News. 'If indeed, Jim Chalmers wants to come and have a discussion with the Coalition about his super tax, he would have to firstly walk away from the unrealised capital gains component, at least. 'He should be compromising on indexation. Now, if he caves in on all of those things and wants to talk about super reform, let's have a chat about super reform.' Accountants argue taxing unrealised gains would stop self-managed super funds from investing in assets that can quickly appreciate in value, such as technology start-ups; starving that sector of funds. Concerns have also been raised about Labor's decision no to index the proposed $3 million tax threshold to inflation. This means that far more people will be pushed into that tax bracket in future. , even if compulsory employer super contributions stayed constant. They are rising to 12 per cent on July 1, up from 11.5 per cent.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store