Sarah Witty v Adam Bandt: how an unlikely Labor champion took down a Greens giant
Labor could hardly be considered a metaphorical David in most federal election contests. But in the progressive seat of Melbourne, where the now-beaten Greens leader Adam Bandt had reigned for 15 years, there are similarities to the oft-told biblical story.
On 28 March, when Anthony Albanese called an election date for May, Melbourne appeared on no one's list as a battle to watch.
Just five months before the campaign began, Labor's candidate against Bandt, Sarah Witty, had unsuccessfully run for a seat on Yarra city council. She came third behind independent and Greens candidates.
By February, less than two months from polling day, Witty was Labor's choice to run in Melbourne against the long-serving Greens MP.
From the outset, the seat wasn't on federal Labor's radar. 'I don't think we even had it in the winnable column,' a Victorian Labor source said.
A Greens insider said there had been no indication Melbourne was in trouble, noting the party didn't have the resources for single-seat polling in the way the major parties do.
Both the Greens and Labor will reflect on the unexpected result in the coming weeks to figure out what happened.
For the Greens, it will be a sobering look at how Bandt, regarded as a unifying leader within the party, lost the seat he had held for so long.
Local Labor volunteers from the Melbourne and Richmond branches were out on the hustings daily. Even Witty's social media was run by a volunteer, who updated the page in their free time.
How-to-vote cards were supplied by the national campaign but rank-and-file members had to fundraise through raffles and auctions to pay for campaign shirts and corflutes.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
A senior Victorian Labor source, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, described Witty's campaign as 'run on the smell of an oily rag', with donations from the active Melbourne and Richmond branches.
Another Labor source, who helped the campaign, said: 'It was a very, very sparsely funded campaign, all raised from locals. It wasn't like there were massive amounts of money coming from a national office.'
The idea of Labor as David in a battle against the Greens Goliath doesn't sit well with the Greens camp. They argue that Labor's federal megaphone gives even the most under-resourced campaigns a big chance.
While the 'people-powered' campaign is credited by Labor sources as the reason Witty ousted Bandt, a 'perfect storm' had also hit.
The Greens leader's chance of winning a sixth term in office was dampened by three key factors, the electoral analyst Kevin Bonham said.
The electoral boundaries for the seat shifted before the election, lowering Bandt's primary vote from 49.6% in 2022 to 44.7%. On a two-candidate preferred basis, it had dropped from 60.2% to 56.5%.
After days of tense post-election vote counting, Bandt on Thursday conceded to Witty, saying a Greens win in Melbourne was like 'climbing Everest'.
'We needed to overcome Liberal, Labor and One Nation combined, and it's an Everest that we've climbed a few times now, but this time we fell just short,' he said.
Bonham said preference flows had not favoured the Greens this time around.
More Liberal and One Nation votes went to Labor than previously.
The rightwing activist group Advance ran a campaign against the Greens to reduce its vote in both houses, claiming Bandt's defeat as a win.
Social media advertising analysis showed the group had spent no money on targeted ads in the seat during the campaign.
A source inside Bandt's camp said a post-election review would look at third-party campaigns against the party to understand their impact on the inner-city seat.
Bonham said another factor against Bandt couldn't be written off as easily: the Greens leader's primary vote dipped just enough, even after the boundary redistribution, to set the wheels in motion for his loss.
'It's a perfect storm,' he said. 'He had a lower baseline, he had a swing against him on the primary vote, and he had a swing against him on preferences.
'Those three things combined have got rid of him.'
Swings against Bandt in progressive booths, including Fitzroy and Collingwood, will require further analysis to determine how the Greens came undone in the lower house.
A Victorian Labor source from the left faction hoped the Greens 'looked critically' at their failings.
'I really do see the value of having strong leftwing crossbenchers in the parliament,' they said. 'I think it's good for democracy, and I think it's really good for the Labor party when we do have a viable leftwing minor party.
'So I really hope that they take some time to critically look at their failings.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Ben Fordham unleashes withering spray as Albanese fails to meet housing target because of immigration
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and his government has been slammed by radio host Ben Fordham over Australia's worsening housing crisis. It follows the release of a report from the Government's National Housing Supply and Affordability Council (NHSAC), showing Australia will miss its own housing targets. According to the report, housing construction is at its lowest point in a decade, with just 177,000 new dwellings completed in 2024, well short of the government's 233,000 target. The Council warned that housing is not being built quickly enough to meet growing demand and relieve affordability pressures. 'The Council's analysis shows that expected new housing supply will be insufficient to meaningfully improve housing affordability for all households,' the report stated. It forecasts that only 938,000 new dwellings will be completed across Australia over the five-year Housing Accord period ending 30 June 2029, far below the 1.2 million target. No state or territory is expected to meet its allocated share. On Thursday, Fordham lashed out at the government, blaming slow building rates and rising immigration for exacerbating the crisis. 'The Albanese government promised to build more houses, today they're building less. They promised to lower immigration, today, they're bringing in more,' he said. 'The PM will tell us he's bringing down the migration numbers... and building as many homes as he can, but we're not seeing it.' 'We simply can't build the houses fast enough. What we need is a sharp focus on skilled migration and coordination of housing supply policy with immigration numbers.' The NHSAC report also pointed to persistent challenges such as labour shortages, low productivity, and rising material costs as major factors dragging down new supply. Shadow Minister for Housing and Homelessness, Senator Andrew Bragg, has slammed at Labor's performance, saying the government had failed to support the very people responsible for delivering new housing. 'Labor has failed to get the houses built because they have done nothing to help the people who build houses: builders, tradespeople and developers,' Bragg said. He further highlighted that the government's flagship $10billion Housing Australia Future Fund (HAFF) failed to deliver a single new home during the previous term. 'Instead, it was acquiring existing housing, thereby making the supply problem worse... Labor's Housing Infrastructure Fund also failed to build any homes with $1.5 billion,' he added. Housing Minister Clare O'Neil last week pointed to bureaucracy as a major barrier to construction. 'It's just too hard to build a house in this country,' O'Neil told the ABC. 'And it's become uneconomic to build the kind of housing that our country needs most: affordable housing, especially for first home buyers.' One person arrives to Australia to live every 44 seconds according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). Under the Albanese government, overseas migration reached record highs. In 2022–23, net overseas migration hit 536,000, the highest in Australia's history. While in 2023–24, it dropped to 446,000, and is expected to fall to 340,000 in 2024–25. As of March 2025, the national median dwelling price surpassed $1million for the first time, reaching $1,002,500, following a 0.7 per cent quarterly increase. The annual growth rate slowed to 5.9 per cent in March 2025, down from 9.5% the previous year New data about Australia's migration will be released on Friday.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Proposed Macquarie University restructure will ‘hollow out' humanities, academics say
Academics have accused Macquarie University of 'hollowing out' the humanities after the institution announced a restructure that would halve some arts faculties and drastically reduce course offerings for some degrees. Under the proposed changes, seen by Guardian Australia, 42 full-time equivalent academic roles in the Faculty of Arts and 33 in the Faculty of Science and Engineering would be cut, making about $15m in net savings. Curriculum changes would be made in 2026 and 2027, with mergers and reductions largely attributed to low enrolment figures. The proposal, released to staff on 3 June, said the prospect of international student caps and 'uncertainty' in domestic student growth meant Australian universities could no longer rely on boosting enrolments to ensure financial sustainability. 'The objective of the changes … is to resize the workforce in areas where current staff profile and capacity is not aligned to student demand.' Staff have less than a month to provide feedback about the cuts. A final decision is expected to be made in early July. A spokesperson for Macquarie said the proposed curriculum changes were designed to ensure education remained 'transformative' for students. 'The needs of employers and students are evolving and universities, including Macquarie, need to adapt to modern demands,' they said. 'While we are preserving traditional humanities subjects such as history, philosophy, and English literature, we are at the same time offering majors and courses that are focused on employability and meeting areas of student interest and demand.' Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email President of the National Tertiary Education Union (NTEU) and academic at Macquarie, Dr Alison Barnes, said she had been receiving 'constant calls' from academics worried about changes at their institutions. More than a dozen universities are undergoing restructuring, including ANU, UTS, Western Sydney University and the University of Wollongong. The NTEU estimated that more than 1,000 roles were on the line, less than five years after more than 17,000 job cuts during the pandemic – or 13% of the workforce. 'Another round of job cuts is extremely damaging to people's wellbeing, they're living with systemic uncertainty,' Barnes said. 'It's also having a corrosive impact on students. They need to be able to study things that they are inherently interested in.' At Macquarie, ancient history and archaeology, creative arts, politics and international relations and the school of sociology would all lose up to, or more than, half of their FTE staff, while media and communications – which jointly operates the 2SER radio station with the University of Technology, Sydney – would be reduced by about one quarter under the proposed changes. Majors would also be discontinued in a string of study areas including politics, gender studies and performing arts, while a number of bachelor degrees would be abolished, including music, ancient history and archeology – which would be incorporated into a new bachelor of history. The number of media majors would also be reduced from six to three. Ten new research positions would be created in science and engineering, and two in education. Barnes said it 'shocked' her that the humanities was being particularly targeted. 'It's this hollowing out of our institutions. You've got people who've worked their entire lives in these disciplines, and then that knowledge is lost, which is why I think these decisions are so incredibly damaging and shortsighted. 'It's a travesty, and it's heartbreaking.' Acting president of the Australian Historical Association (AHA), Prof Kate Fullagar, said the cuts were part of the 'ongoing devaluation' of humanities at Macquarie and most Australian universities. 'What we're most concerned about is the reduction in unit offerings and staff – ancient history has been massively depleted, and that sector was clearly the best in the country,' she said. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'It took Macquarie 40 or 50 years to build up … it's the university's own investment that they're undermining, and it just seems like recklessness. 'Inevitably, what will happen is that with less offerings and less choices for the students, numbers go down, and then you get into this horrible cycle where they cut you further.' In an email sent to Macquarie students on 3 June, the deputy vice-chancellor (academic), Prof Rorden Wilkinson, said students may notice a 'more focused structure' to their course, major or units from 2026. 'The units you choose from will be based on the best education offerings in each faculty,' he wrote. 'Your study choices will be clearer. The curriculum you study will be more purposeful. Your pathway to graduation will be easier.' Associate professor in the department of history and archaeology at Macquarie, Paul McKechnie, who has worked at the university for almost 20 years, said it would be challenging to adequately cover teaching with 'so few staff'. McKechnie said he was 'skeptical' about Macquarie's claims that the cuts were being made because of falling student numbers. A change paper seen by Guardian Australia, which was published by the university and distributed to staff, last year, showed the arts generated $133m in annual profit but cost $48.6m to run. The vice-chancellor of Macquarie, Prof Bruce Dowton, said universities in Western democracies were facing a 'range of external pressures' and Australia was no exception. Macquarie has run a deficit for five of the past six years, including a $4m loss in 2024. It cut its workforce in 2020 and 2021 around the time of the Covid-19 pandemic. 'We understand that changes of this nature can be unsettling, and we do not take them lightly,' Dowton said. 'Our community can be assured that we are proposing these changes because they are needed.' NTEU branch president for Macquarie, and senior lecturer in quantitative sociology, Nicholas Harrigan, said the cuts were a 'disgrace'. 'That is simply stealing from students,' he said. The spokesperson said the proposed changes were the result of 'careful planning and reflection'. They said teaching overall was 'generally financially sustainable' but that wasn't 'uniformly true'. 'Courses and units with low enrolments are generally more likely to be loss-making after all costs are fully allocated,' they said. 'Strategic realignment allows us to focus on areas of sustainable strength, invest in emerging disciplines, and make choices to safeguard our future.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Taxing actual rather than unrealised super gains would mean ‘significant' costs for millions of Australians, Treasury says
Treasury says taxing actual instead of unrealised gains would have meant millions of super fund members were hit with 'significant' compliance costs as part of a policy aimed at trimming concessions for just 80,000 of the country's wealthiest savers. Labor's proposal will put an extra 15% tax on earnings generated from super balances over $3m in an effort to make the super system more equitable and sustainable. The Coalition and interest groups have attacked the policy's method of taxing changes in the value of super assets (unrealised gains), rather than on cash profit (realised gains), saying it transgresses tax norms. Nationals senator Matt Canavan vowed earlier this month to 'fight to the death' against the proposed change, arguing that taxing unrealised gains was 'incredibly unfair'. In its impact analysis document released in 2023, Treasury concluded that taxing cash profits 'would be the most accurate method for determining taxable earnings'. However, the trade-off would be imposing an unacceptably high compliance and regulatory burden on the large super funds which manage the super accounts of millions of Australians with smaller benefits, and who would not be affected by the tax change. Super funds currently calculate and report taxable income at the fund level and not at the member level, Treasury noted. As such, taxing cash earnings would 'involve a substantial burden on the superannuation industry to implement as it would involve developing and maintaining a complex new accounting and reporting regime to calculate taxable income at a member level,' the policy document says. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email 'These significant compliance costs would be borne across all funds and all members, including the 99.5 per cent of account holders who are not impacted by this policy, despite this proposal impacting only approximately 30,000 high balance members with accounts in APRA [Australian Prudential Regulation Authority]-regulated funds.' David Knox, one of the country's leading actuaries and a former senior partner at Mercer, said it was more appropriate to think of the proposed additional levy as a tax on wealth, rather than income. Knox said the approach of taxing unrealised gains was not as radical as some have suggested, saying it was similar to the way council rates (a cash levy) increased with the market value of the land. He also pointed to the fact that pension payments were reduced when a pensioner's home value went up. In both cases, an individual paid in cash – either through higher rates or lower pension payments – for what is a change in notional wealth. The super industry is split into two 'subsystems': Apra-regulated funds – including the big industry and for-profit funds such as AustralianSuper and AMP, respectively – and self-managed super funds. The Apra-regulated funds account for about 94%, or 16m of the 17m Australians with super accounts – but only 76% of the more than $4tn in the super system. There are about 1.1 million people in SMSFs, but this 6% share accounts for 24% of total assets. The Self-Managed Super Fund Association has been among the loudest opponents of the bill. It has highlighted the risk that SMSFs with big holdings in illiquid assets could be forced to sell in order to raise the cash to pay for the notional change in the value of their balances. Treasury's policy document noted that 'some stakeholders have noted that as a result of the changes, there may be a greater focus on investing in income generating assets, such as shares and bonds, as opposed to property and other more illiquid assets'. 'This could represent a positive shift as it would better align with the intention of superannuation to provide income in retirement.' The Treasury documents show that this risk applies to a sliver of those likely to be caught up in the new tax. Fewer than 5% of the estimated 77,400 Australians who will be affected by the changes – or fewer than 4,000 people – have more than 80% of their retirement savings in non-residential retail property, such as farms. Bob Breunig, the director of the ANU's Tax and Transfer Policy Institute, had previously said: 'Running businesses and property portfolios inside super, they shouldn't be doing that, that's not what it's for.'
