The Tea app was intended to help women date safely. Then it got hacked
'We have engaged third-party cybersecurity experts and are working around the clock to secure our systems,' San Francisco-based Tea Dating Advice Inc. said in a statement.
404 Media, which earlier reported the breach, said it was 4Chan users who discovered an exposed database that 'allowed anyone to access the material' from Tea.
The app and the breach highlight the fraught nature of seeking romance in the age of social media.
Tea founder Sean Cook, a software engineer who previously worked at Salesforce and Shutterfly, says on the app's website that he founded the company in 2022 after witnessing his own mother's 'terrifying'' experiences. Cook said they included unknowingly dating men with criminal records and being 'catfished'' — deceived by men using false identities.
Tea markets itself as a safe way for women to anonymously vet men they might meet on dating apps such as Tinder or Bumble — ensuring that the men are who they say they are, not criminals and not already married or in a relationship. "It's like people have their own little Yelp pages,'' said Aaron Minc, whose Cleveland firm, Minc Law, specialises in cases involving online defamation and harassment.
In an Apple Store review, one woman wrote that she used a Tea search to investigate a man she'd begun talking to and discovered 'over 20 red flags, including serious allegations like assault and recording women without their consent.'' She said she cut off communication. 'I can't imagine how things could've gone had I not known," she wrote.
A surge in social media attention over the past week pushed Tea to the No. 1 spot on Apple's U.S. App Store as of July 24, according to Sensor Tower, a research firm. In the seven days from July 17-23, Tea downloads shot up 525% compared to the week before. Tea said in an Instagram post that it had reached 4 million users.
A female columnist for The Times of London newspaper, who signed into the app, on Thursday called Tea a 'man-shaming site'' and complained that 'this is simply vigilante justice, entirely reliant on the scruples of anonymous women. With Tea on the scene, what man would ever dare date a woman again?''
'Over the last couple of weeks, we've gotten hundreds of calls on it. It's blown up,' attorney Minc said. "People are upset. They're getting named. They're getting shamed.''
In 1996, Congress passed legislation protecting websites and apps from liability for things posted by their users. But the users can be sued for spreading 'false and defamatory'' information, Minc said.
In May, however, a federal judge in Illinois threw out an invasion-of-privacy lawsuit by a man who'd been criticised by women in the Facebook chat group 'Are We Dating the Same Guy,″ Bloomberg Law reported.
State privacy laws could offer another avenue for bringing legal action against someone who posted your photograph or other personal information in a harmful way, Minc said.
In its statement, Tea reported that about 72,000 images were leaked online, including 13,000 images of selfies or photo identification that users submitted during account verification. Another 59,000 images that were publicly viewable in the app from posts, comments and direct messages were also accessed, according to the company's statement.
No email addresses or phone numbers were exposed, the company said, and the breach only affects users who signed up before February 2024. 'At this time, there is no evidence to suggest that additional user data was affected. Protecting tea users' privacy and data is our highest priority,' Tea said.
It said users did not need to change their passwords or delete their accounts. "All data has been secured.''
Lawyer Minc said he was not surprised to see Tea get targeted. 'These sites get attacked,'' he said. 'They create enemies. They put targets on themselves where people want to go after them.''
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
13 minutes ago
- Economic Times
NIIT Q1 profit dips 44 pc to Rs 4.3 cr; revenue rises 2 pc to Rs 84.1 cr
Skills and talent development firm NIIT Ltd on Friday posted a 43.6 per cent decline in consolidated net profit to Rs 4.37 crore in the April-June quarter due to headwinds from a turbulent environment in the technology and BFSI sectors. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Skills and talent development firm NIIT Ltd on Friday posted a 43.6 per cent decline in consolidated net profit to Rs 4.37 crore in the April-June quarter due to headwinds from a turbulent environment in the technology and BFSI had reported a profit (attributable to owners of the parent company) of Rs 7.75 crore in the year-ago period, according to a regulatory company's revenue from operations rose slightly to Rs 84.11 crore in Q1 FY26, from Rs 82.47 crore in Q1 sequentially, profit and revenue fell by 66.7 per cent and 2.5 per cent, business grew 7 per cent year-on-year and contributed 68 per cent to overall revenue. Revenue from Technology programs was up 7 per cent year-on-year, while revenue from BFSI & other programs was down 9 per cent sharp decline in BFSI (Banking, Financial Services & Insurance ) hiring reflected in reduced share of BFSI & other programs, and also contributed to the decline in share of Consumer business, the company said. Wipro , and HCL Tech cut 42K+ jobs in two years, including TCS's 12K layoff; WorkPro segment in ITeS hit hardest as clients stay cautious amid trade tensions and tech spend slowdown."Banking Q1 was tough (Axis, Kotak, HDFC, SBI ,ICICI) with margin pressures and muted hiring amid lower attrition; weakness spilled over to insurance (slower premium growth) and NBFCs (retail/personal loan moderation)," the company company's order intake during the quarter under review was Rs 106.5 crore, representing a 37 per cent year-on-year the quarter, NIIT Limited acquired a 70 per cent stake in Coimbatore-based AI-powered deep-skilling SaaS platform iamneo for around Rs 61.3 crore, with the remaining 30 per cent to be purchased in phases from its promoters upon achieving agreed financial milestones."In the current volatile environment, the company stayed the course on its investments in AI-powered learner-centric outcome-based education. The strategic investment in iamneo significantly enhances our capability to deliver impactful digital transformation curricula at scale," Vijay K Thadani, Vice Chairman & Managing Director, NIIT Limited, said.
Mint
15 minutes ago
- Mint
Wall Street and AI Startups Are Fighting Over Entry-Level Quants
(Bloomberg) -- At a rooftop bar on Manhattan's Lower East Side, roughly 150 quant researchers met with employees at the artificial-intelligence startup Anthropic who implored them to consider a life away from Wall Street. Over plates of potstickers and popcorn chicken, they rubbed shoulders at the June mixer with former hedge fund quants-turned-Silicon Valley evangelists who encouraged them to apply for jobs at Anthropic, according to the company. This month, the San Francisco-based firm is going global with another quant 'social hour' in London. The recruiting campaign mirrors similar efforts by rivals OpenAI and Perplexity AI. And a number of leading figures in the AI industry already come with quant backgrounds, including OpenAI Chief Research Officer Mark Chen and Perplexity co-founder Johnny Ho. But quants lured by dreams of building AI models and tools instead of profit-seeking algorithms for traders — often for lofty pay and benefits comparable to the world of finance — also face the risk of disappointment. 'The pitch is 'come and build the machine god,'' said Agustin Lebron, a former Jane Street trader who now works at a systematic trading startup. 'But I suspect that, for a lot of those people, it'll end up being 'come and figure out how to make people buy things from ads.'' Still, the AI industry's competition with finance is noticeably heating up. For Wall Street, it's an unwelcome wrinkle in an already-brutal war for quant talent. Unlike financial firms, AI companies aren't covered by the non-competition agreements that keep many of these researchers from easily switching jobs. 'I'd estimate we've seen a 40–50% increase over the past 12–18 months in AI-native and software companies specifically asking for talent with quantitative finance backgrounds,' tech recruiter Mike Doonan said. Entry-level quants are eligible for base salaries of as much as $300,000, based on external job listings, but that doesn't include what can be considerable bonus targets. AI firms today can offer comparable base salaries, with compensation packages bolstered with equity rather than bonuses. According to an analysis of LinkedIn announcements, social media posts and company news sites conducted by employment tracking company Live Data Technologies, firms including Jane Street and Citadel Securities have lost quants to AI firms over the past year. Aron Thomas and Charles Guo both left Jane Street earlier this year to join Anthropic. In an interview, they praised their former firm as a great place to work but said they were drawn to the excitement of being part of the next big thing. 'It became very clear quite quickly that AI is going to change a lot of things and drive many changes in the world, and it seemed pretty important to be involved,' said Guo. Jane Street declined to comment for this story. Citadel also declined to comment on personnel matters, but pointed to growing interest in the firm's own internship program, which saw 108,000 applicants for this summer, up 20% from last year. While OpenAI also declined to comment, its chief executive officer Sam Altman touted quant-focused recruitment events in an April post on X. Noam Brown, an ex-quant and top researcher at the company, weighed in, noting that recruits don't need to take a pay cut anymore. Perplexity's Ho said the company pays $200,000 base salaries but makes up the difference somewhat with equity. He stressed that the firm's pitch to quants isn't mainly financial, though. Instead, it was the opportunity to take on 'new and more exciting challenges,' said Ho, who previously worked at Tower Research Capital. Quants are uniquely adept at minimizing latency in algorithms, which makes them desirable to AI developers competing to ensure users get responses as quickly as possible from the large language models that power generative AI tools such as ChatGPT. And much like AI research, quantitative trading involves sifting through vast amounts of unstructured data. What's more, firms like Anthropic and Perplexity are pushing more into financial services offerings. For its part, Anthropic said in a statement that it's after 'the rigorous analytical thinking and empirical research methods' that quants possess. Such skills have 'substantial overlap with the technical challenges of developing safer and more capable AI systems,' the company said, adding that it's going to keep hiring people with specialized backgrounds as it scales. Quant firms have occasionally sued employees departing for rivals. But litigation is unlikely for quants moving to AI labs, which don't directly compete with financial firms. Moreover, California — where most big AI companies are based — largely prohibits non-competition agreements. Ho said Wall Street has hurt itself with non-competes. 'They are becoming more and more secretive,' he said. There are signs that Wall Street is attempting to hit back against the poaching attempts of AI companies. For example, Iain Dunning, who oversees AI at Hudson River Trading, posted on X in May: 'Are you a researcher at OAI/Anthropic/etc and tired of overhiring, the orgchart chaos, the lowered talent bar, want to move to NYC, or just want to do something different?' 'Email me, DM me, mail a postcard,' he wrote. More stories like this are available on
India.com
15 minutes ago
- India.com
Trump tariffs aftermath: Panic among US businesses as orders worth billions cancelled due to..., companies to layoff workers as...
Representational Image Trump tariffs: US President Donald Trump's latest round of tariffs on Indian imports, which came into effect on August 7, has triggered panic among Indian as well as American businesses as orders worth hundreds of crore have either been cancelled or put on hold since Wednesday, when the Trump administration imposed an 25% penalty on India for buying arms and crude oil from Russia. Why US and Indian businesses are in panic? According to media reports, US businesses are apprehensive because of the additional tariffs on Indian imports which will come into effect on August 27, 2025. The issue of purchasing Russian oil has also been the subject of talks between Indian exporters and American importers, they said. 'After 25 percent tariffs, we will have to pay 15 percent import duty, but the burden will become unbearable when the 50 percent tariff rate kicks in. Our product isn't unique and can be easily replaced by other exporters,' the CEO of an an Indian garments firm that exports Rs 600 crore worth of apparel, told his US client in a phone call, the Times of India reported. The Indian exporter said that apart from his business, Trump tariffs will also affect the livelihood of over 8000 workers in his company. How Trump tariffs impact India's marine exports? Similarly, Thomas Jose, a Kerala-based exporter whose family has been exporting lobsters to the US for three generations, said that a majority of his US buyers called him after the Trump tariffs came into effect, and told him to halt shipments. Jose, who runs the Choice Group– a Kerala based export firm that ships goods worth Rs 900 annually, said his clients said that anything above 25 percent import duty would be unbearable for this business, as the imports goods would be too costly to be sold in the US. India exports marine products worth more than Rs 25,000 crore to the US each year. What about textile and jewellery industry? Meanwhile, India's jewellery industry is also under stress due to the fresh tariffs. Vijay Kumar Mangukiya, the MD of Dhani Jewels– a Surat-based jewellery exporter– revealed his US clients are asking to negotiate on diamond prices to circumvent the effect of Trump's additional 25 percent tariffs. The jeweler said price negotiations are possible till the tariff rate is 25 percent, but will become impossible at 50 percent tariffs. 'The buyer has talked about negotiating with his retail customers to bear the increased price, but if it doesn't happen, then we have no other option but to cancel the order,' he said. In the textile industry, which is likely to be hit hardest due to Trump tariffs, the CEO of an Indian textile export firm said he received a call from his American client, asking the exporter to bear the increased cost. The CEO refused, following which the buyer threatened to shift his order to Bangladesh. Indian textile industry exports goods worth Rs 87,525 crore to the US annually, which is about 28 percent of India's textile imports.
