logo
Fed should ditch current policy framework, group of former top central bankers says

Fed should ditch current policy framework, group of former top central bankers says

Yahoo30-04-2025
By Howard Schneider
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A group of former top world central bankers says the Federal Reserve should scrap its nearly five-year-old bias towards jobs and keep a stricter focus on inflation, a recommendation offered as the U.S. central bank conducts its own strategy review.
The Fed should "always seek to bring inflation back to its 2% inflation target" and drop the current pledge to use periods of high inflation to offset periods when prices rise too slowly, said the panel, chaired by former New York Fed President William Dudley and including former central bank officials from China, Mexico, Japan, England, and Israel.
The current approach of ignoring low unemployment as an inflation risk and viewing maximum employment as a "broad-based and inclusive goal" should also be dropped, the group said.
"The Federal Reserve's monetary policy tools are ill-suited to ensuring that employment will necessarily be broad-based and inclusive when the economy is at full employment," the group said in a report issued by the G30, a private organization of former top central bank and finance officials. "Including this language in the Federal Reserve's monetary policy framework commits the Federal Reserve to an objective that the Federal Reserve cannot achieve in practice if it also wants to hit its 2% inflation target."
The language on jobs was developed in the context of heightened concerns about economic inequality in the U.S. and tensions over police violence in U.S. cities.
The Fed is in the middle of its own review of that operating strategy, which was put in place in August 2020, when the economy was still struggling through the COVID-19 pandemic and the aftermath of an unprecedented economic shutdown.
Fed officials already seem inclined to revise their approach given the inflation struggles that emerged, though debate remains on key issues like how to manage potential tradeoffs between inflation and unemployment, and how to better describe the central bank's use of bond purchases as a monetary policy tool.
'LAST WAR'
The G30 report, released on Wednesday, said the Fed's current framework made sense emerging from the 2010-2020 era of weak inflation and low interest rates, but slowed the Fed's response as inflation pressures began building in the wake of the pandemic and made the whole episode riskier than it needed to be.
The framework, which led the Fed to promise it would keep interest rates low and continue buying government securities until the job market was healed from the pandemic shutdown, "weakened the inclination for the Fed to be preemptive as the risks to the outlook changed" and inflation began rising, the G30 report concluded.
"In essence, the Fed ended up fighting the last war" from an era when inflation seemed lodged below the central bank's 2% target, and low rates of unemployment did not seem to have the same impact on rising prices, as had been the case in previous business cycles.
The response, a combination of allowing higher inflation as a "make-up" strategy and pledging not to view low unemployment in itself as an inflation risk, made the Fed "slow to respond to evidence of strong growth, an extraordinarily tight labor market, and rising inflation in 2021."
While subsequent rate hikes cooled inflation, the episode raised the risk the Fed would lose control of public expectations and have an even worse problem to fix. The rapid pace of rate hikes that was eventually used to attack inflation, meanwhile, contributed to stress in the financial sector.
The group also recommended that the Fed change how it manages interest rates, issue more robust forecasts, and offer more explicit guidance on its use of bond purchases.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pulte Criticizes Fed Chair Powell Over Soaring Housing Imbalance
Pulte Criticizes Fed Chair Powell Over Soaring Housing Imbalance

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Pulte Criticizes Fed Chair Powell Over Soaring Housing Imbalance

PulteGroup (PHM, Financials) heir and Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte has renewed criticism of U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell following new housing data showing a deepening market imbalance. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Sign with UAL. Redfin reported this week that U.S. home sellers now outnumber buyers by over 500,000 the widest gap ever recorded. In response, Pulte posted on X that Jerome Powell is hurting the housing market, blaming high mortgage rates driven by Fed policy. In another post, Pulte said, Compared to President Trump's First Term, mortgages are now double the cost because of Joe Biden and Jerome Powell, and urged the Fed to cut rates, writing, Jerome Powell must lower rates. Now. The 30-year fixed-rate mortgage is currently near its highest levels since 2007. While not directly set by the Fed, these long-term rates often move in tandem with the federal funds rate, which influences the yield on 10-year Treasury bonds. Rising inflation expectations and macroeconomic pressures have also played a role in driving yields imbalance between sellers and buyers suggests a weakening demand environment; affordability remains constrained by high borrowing costs. Analysts say this could further suppress home sales activity through the rest of the year unless rates fall meaningfully. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

Fed May Tweak Rates as Growth Cools
Fed May Tweak Rates as Growth Cools

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Fed May Tweak Rates as Growth Cools

Neel Kashkari is sounding the alarm on a cooling economy and hinting the Fed may have to step in sooner than expected. Speaking on CNBC, he said with the labor market softening and prices inching higher, in the near term, it may become appropriate to start adjusting the federal funds rate. That's despite holding the range at 4.25%4.50% and penciling in two cuts this year. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with JOBY. He warned tariffs are a wild cardunlike anything we've seen in 100 yearsand could push core goods prices up. Kashkari admits he's watching how quickly those effects show up and whether they spill into other categories. He's open to tweaking rates even if it means pausing or reversing course once we get more clarity. If tariffs keep prices elevated while growth slows, investors may see rate tweaks rather than cuts. Investors will be tuning into the Fed's September 17 meeting for any hints of that shift. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio

SPX- Today's Three Most Important Stock Market Drivers
SPX- Today's Three Most Important Stock Market Drivers

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

SPX- Today's Three Most Important Stock Market Drivers

Stocks mounted a relief rally Monday in the wake of the sharp pullback in the back half of last week. Fundamentals have marginally deteriorated since July, as we saw negative shifts on tariffs and the economy. But despite the slightly negative shift, the S&P 500 Index (^SPX) actually rose over the past month, observes Tom Essaye, president of the Sevens Report. To get more articles and chart analysis from MoneyShow, subscribe to our .) This reflects the fact that stocks 1) have still priced in a lot of continued future positives and 2) are still vulnerable to disappointment on multiple fronts. (Editor's Note: Tom is speaking at our Real Estate Plays for Profit and Income Expo, scheduled for Aug. 19-20, 2025. Click HERE to register for a FREE pass.) What's changed? The most important influences on this market. For the past few months, the 'TACO' principle (the idea that tariffs won't be as bad as feared) was the main influence on markets. But that changed last week as the very soft jobs report brought economic growth back to the top of important market influences. As we have consistently said throughout 2025, economic growth is, by far, the most important medium-term market influence. If recession fears rise, the stock market will drop sharply (easily more than 10%) regardless of Federal Reserve rate cuts. To that point, Fed rate cuts have now become the second-most important influence on the markets. In the near term, investors are going to want to see the Fed fulfill very dovish expectations and confirm, as much as they can, that a rate cut is coming in September. See also: BBH: A Biotech Fund That's Ripe for a Major Turnaround Finally, the previously most important market influence, TACO, is now third in importance for a simple reason: TACO has been proven at least partially false. With reciprocal tariffs announced and trade 'deals' struck with most major trading partners, the reality is that most firms expect aggregate tariff rates to settle between 15%-20%. That is solidly higher than the previous 10%-15%, and it increases the risk of stagflation. But it will also provide some semblance of stability in trade going forward. More From RNST: A Southeastern Bank Whose Shares Look Cheap AES: A Global Utility Worth Targeting Despite Tougher Market Conditions Market Minute 8/5/25: Markets Waffle, While AI Darling Palantir Delivers Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store