UK secretly paid YouTube influencers for propaganda
Zinc is a London-based company that pays YouTubers and internet personalities in Central and Eastern Europe and the Baltics to produce political content. While the company says it is committed to transparency, the creators it employs are bound by strict non-disclosure agreements not to disclose ties to the British government.
Former employees have described the operation as 'state propaganda.' One told Declassified that the relationship between Zinc and the influencers was 'extremely exploitative.'
Another claimed that Zinc had interfered in Slovakia's 2023 elections by targeting young voters with influencer content designed to boost turnout for Progressive Slovakia, a pro-European party. The vote was ultimately won by Robert Fico's Smer party, which has advocated maintaining friendly relations with Russia and draws support from older voters.
Zinc had previously been exposed for running covert Muslim news platforms. In 2021, it was also reportedly looking to recruit comedians and YouTubers to run psyop campaigns in the Baltics to shift the opinions of Russian-speaking communities.
Aside from the UK government, the company has also received millions in funding from the US, as well as from the Belgian government, according to public documents.
The full scale of Zinc's operations is unclear as the Foreign Office has only partially disclosed its contracts with the company, despite repeatedly being ordered to do so by the UK's Information Commissioner.
The UK government has defended the operation as a way to 'counter disinformation' and 'champion truth and democratic values.'
Meanwhile, Russia's security services have recently accused several British institutions, including the British Council and Oxford Russia Fund, of running covert campaigns to destabilize Russian society and promote Western agendas.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Trump questions Kiev's use of US aid (VIDEO)
US President Donald Trump has claimed that billions of dollars in American aid given to Ukraine under his predecessor Joe Biden may have been misused. The US became Kiev's top foreign backer under the Biden administration, allocating over $170 billion in military and financial aid, according to official data. Trump, however, has long argued the total is far higher, estimating $350 billion in 'equipment and cash' and criticizing Biden for 'giving away' money without returns. He reiterated the point at a Republican meeting at the White House on Tuesday, questioning whether Kiev had actually used US aid for defense needs. 'Biden gave away $350 billion worth of equipment or cash. Worse than equipment – cash… They were supposed to buy their own equipment. But I have a feeling they didn't spend every dollar on the equipment,' Trump said. 'We want to find out about that [money], someday, I guess, right?' 'Not every dollar allocated to Ukraine by Biden for weapons was actually spent on them' – Trump believes that the Ukrainians partially embezzled American aid.'I am very proud that European countries will buy our weapons, pay 100% of their price, and then distribute them… Trump's comments echo growing concerns over corruption in Ukraine. The country has long struggled with graft, and its Defense Ministry has faced multiple scandals since the conflict with Russia escalated in 2022. Both the US and EU have pressed for audits and stronger anti-corruption measures. In April, US National Security Adviser Michael Waltz urged tighter oversight of aid, calling Ukraine 'one of the most corrupt nations in the world.' Despite calls for transparency, Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky signed a law this week reducing the independence of Ukraine's anti-corruption bodies, claiming it would streamline investigations. The legislation has triggered international scrutiny and protests across the country, with critics saying the move could be aimed at shielding Zelensky's inner circle and concealing the embezzlement of military funds. Moscow has long argued that Western aid prolongs the fighting without changing the outcome of the conflict. Russian officials have also long accused Kiev of misusing foreign funds. UN envoy Vassily Nebenzia told RT last month that it's 'an open secret' Ukraine 'stole billions of dollars out of the aid' and that Zelensky clings to power to avoid consequences.
Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Slovak state gas firm eyes full Russian supply
Slovakia's largest natural gas company is planning to turn to Russia for 100% of its supplies next year, Bloomberg has reported. Company officials cited cost benefits as EU countries face a ban on spot purchases of Russian energy, the outlet said. The EU aims to phase out Russian energy imports by the end of 2027 as part of its RePowerEU strategy. The plan includes a ban on new pipeline and LNG contracts with Moscow, as well as an end to imports under existing spot agreements. However, the scheme has faced pushback from Slovakia and Hungary. Both countries are expected to receive transitional exemptions, enabling them to continue to uphold long-term contracts with Gazprom. The ban, set to take effect in January, could free up additional pipeline capacity for Slovakia's Slovensky plynarensky priemysel (SPP) and Hungary's MVM Magyar Villamos Muvek, the outlet said on Monday. 'Russian gas is the most cost-effective for us, which is why we prioritize it,' Michal Lalik, SPP's trade director, told Bloomberg. 'We could be buying 100% of our needs, that's about 8 million cubic meters per day.' Last week, Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico said Bratislava had accepted guarantees from the European Commission to limit the impact of a halt in Russian gas supplies. As a result, Bratislava lifted its veto on the EU's 18th package of sanctions against Russia. Slovakia has resisted the EU's push to sever energy ties with Russia, warning of severe economic consequences. Fico has condemned the bloc's plan as 'imbecilic,' saying it would undermine Slovakia's energy security and destabilize the wider EU. Slovakia, which still receives Russian gas via TurkStream under a long-term contract with Gazprom through 2034, warns that losing access to cheaper supplies would harm its competitiveness. Without Turkstream, Slovakia would be forced to rely on western supply routes – mainly via Germany, Austria, and the Czech Republic – leading to higher transit costs. 'Price disparities within the supposedly unified European energy market will distort competition and severely weaken the position of Slovak companies,' said Roman Karlubik, vice president of the Federation of Employers' Associations.
Russia Today
3 hours ago
- Russia Today
Mass protests against Zelensky's crackdown on anti-graft bodies: What we know so far
Hundreds of Ukrainians took to the streets across the country on Tuesday to protest Vladimir Zelensky's crackdown on anti-corruption agencies. The campaign is seen by many as an authoritarian push by the Ukrainian leader towards consolidating power. The National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and Special Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) were placed under executive oversight following security raids on the NABU, with Zelensky suggesting that the anti-corruption infrastructure was subject to Russian influence. The NABU and SAPO were established in 2015 as part of a Western-backed initiative to combat high-level corruption in Ukraine. Both agencies were seen as crucial conditions for EU membership talks and continued Western financial assistance. The NABU has also played a key role in investigating corruption in the Ukrainian military and procurement schemes. While the agencies were designed to operate independently, with support from the US, UK, and EU, local media suggests they have links to the US Democratic Party. Tensions escalated following recent NABU investigations into politically sensitive cases, including a probe into former Defense Minister Rustem Umerov, former Unity Minister Aleksey Chernyshov, and former Vice Prime Minister Olga Stefanishina. Earlier this week, security officials raided the NABU and SAPO, reportedly without court warrants and at the behest of Andrey Yermak, a top Zelensky aide. The raid resulted in the arrest of one senior official on suspicion of cooperating with Russia. On Tuesday, the Ukrainian parliament approved legislation that placed the NABU and SAPO under the purview of the Prosecutor General, which was signed into law by Zelensky the same day. The controversial move sparked backlash from MPs and Zelensky's political rivals. MP Anastasia Radina warned that the reform would cripple Ukraine's anti-graft system and render it 'purely decorative.' Kiev Mayor Vitaly Klitschko, a critic of Zelensky, accused the government of 'using the war as a pretext to dismantle the anti-corruption agencies' and pushing Ukraine toward authoritarianism. MP Yaroslav Zheleznyak warned that the two agencies would completely lose their independence. The controversial move sparked protests across Ukraine, with rallies in Kiev, Lviv, Dnepr, and Odessa. Demonstrators chanted 'Veto the bill,' carrying signs reading 'Shame!' 'Treason!' and 'We are not suckers!' Others shouted 'Zelensky is devil' and 'f**k Yermak,' referring to the Ukrainian leader's powerful chief of staff. The Ukrainian leader rejected criticism of his authoritarian tendencies, insisting that 'the anti-corruption infrastructure will work – just without Russian influence.' Vasily Malyuk, the head of the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU), claimed that the authorities are fighting Russian intelligence, not the anti-corruption agencies – arguing that people in the agencies will be 'delighted' by the changes. Prominent MP Yulia Timoshenko said the move would shield the country from 'colonialism' and Western influence. Opponents of the reform have drawn parallels with Ukraine's 2014 Maidan protests, which paved the way for the Western-backed coup in Kiev and the ousting of then-President Viktor Yanukovich, with some protesters accusing Zelensky of 'betraying' Ukraine. The original Maidan protest began after Yanukovich – who also faced criticism over perceived authoritarianism – abruptly scrapped legislation for closer integration with the EU. The Group of Seven (G7) has said it has 'serious concerns' about the situation regarding Ukraine's anti-corruption agencies. Katarina Mathernova, the EU's ambassador to Ukraine, hinted that the bloc could reconsider its backing of Kiev, writing on X: 'It is as important as ever to preserve the reform achievements to maintain the support needed to prevail over the enemy.' The Wall Street Journal also argued that Zelensky's political gamble could strip Ukraine of much-needed support in the conflict with Russia. Meanwhile, an Economist report described the development as 'a full-frontal assault on the Maidan-era reforms,' adding that it 'implies that something sinister is at work.' 'The vote to undermine Ukraine's most consequential anti-corruption reforms casts a shadow over the country's future course,' it said.
