Britain faces having to pay billions to EU in order for UK firms to access bloc's new €150bn defence fund
Sir Keir Starmer boasted in May how his Brexit 'reset' deal with the EU would pave the way for UK defence firms to access the Security Action for Europe (SAFE) fund.
The Prime Minister said British participation in the fund would support thousands of jobs and boost economic growth.
But Sir Keir was also warned there would be a 'pay to play' element for British access to SAFE, following French demands for a UK financial contribution.
According to the Financial Times, this will see Britain having to pay the EU a percentage of the value of any weapons bought from UK companies via SAFE.
The newspaper reported the exact figure Britain will have to pay to access the fund is still under discussion by EU member states.
They are finalising their position on the deal with the UK, which is expected to be published later this week.
Brussels is set to argue that because UK firms would receive EU money to create jobs and expand capacity under the scheme, London should recompense the bloc.
An EU diplomat said: 'What was written in the SAFE regulation is that there shall be a fair balance as regards the contributions and the benefits.'
Another diplomat revealed how France is pushing for a high UK contribution but other countries, led by Germany, want to ensure the UK is not dissuaded from joining.
SAFE was set up by Brussels amid the threat posed by Russia and following threats by US President Donald Trump to scrap American security guarantees for Europe.
The multi-billion fund will allow EU member states to take out loans for weapons from funds raised against the EU budget.
There are strict rules on where arms can be purchased from, with initial fears that British defence firms would be excluded from the fund.
These include a 'buy European' clause that means the fund can only be used to purchase arms from EU-linked countries or Ukraine.
Brussels officials previously outlined how the fund would only consider buying British arms if the UK struck a new security and defence partnership with the EU.
Sir Keir agreed such a partnership with the EU as part of his Brexit 'reset' in May.
In order for UK defence products to qualify, the value of their components from members of SAFE must be at least 65 per cent.
Other restrictions relate to the purchase of complex weapons systems where non-EU countries hold 'design authority'.
Concerns were recently expressed in Germany that the US has the power to shut off F-35 fighter jets, which are widely used across Europe.
But the US denied the existence of a 'kill switch'.
A Government spokesperson said: 'We won't preempt our discussions with the EU.
'It is in all our interests for the UK and EU to bring together our unique capabilities and expertise to make Europe a safer, more secure, and more prosperous place.
'That is why we agreed a landmark Security and Defence Partnership, enhancing our security and defence cooperation and delivering for citizens across the continent.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
21 minutes ago
- Times
Palestine pledge could break the law, top lawyers warn Starmer
Some of Britain's most prominent lawyers have warned Sir Keir Starmer that his government's pledge to recognise a Palestinian state risks breaking international law. Their intervention, signed by 40 members of the House of Lords, said a Palestinian state would not meet the criteria for recognition as set out under the Montevideo Convention, a treaty signed in 1933. The letter, seen by The Times, was sent to Lord Hermer, the attorney-general and the government's top legal adviser. The signatories point out that Starmer's pledge risked undermining the government's commitment that international law goes 'absolutely to the heart' of its foreign policy. Among those who signed the letter were seven KCs, including Lord Pannick, one of the UK's most respected lawyers. Pannick represented the government in its Supreme Court battle over the Rwanda relocation scheme. The peers, including some of parliament's most prominent Jewish voices, wrote to Hermer: 'We call on you to advise him [Starmer] that this would be contrary to international law. 'You are on record as saying that a commitment to international law goes absolutely to the heart of this government and its approach to foreign policy. 'You have said that a selective 'pick and mix' approach to international law will lead to its disintegration, and that the criteria set out in international law should not be manipulated for reasons of political expedience. 'Accordingly, we expect you to demonstrate this commitment by explaining to the public and to the government that recognition of Palestine would be contrary to the principles governing recognition of states in international law. We look forward to your response.' The 1933 treaty, signed in the Uruguayan capital, laid out the four key criteria for statehood in international law. The treaty says a state must possess a permanent population, a defined territory, a government and the capacity to enter into relations with other states. The letter added that there is no certainty over the borders of a proposed Palestinian state, while the government would face difficulty continuing to recognise millions of Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza as 'refugees', given recognition of statehood would mean they were in their own territory. They also argued that there is no functioning single government, and it has no capacity to enter into diplomatic relations. Hamas is a proscribed terror group in the UK. Among the 40 peers to sign the letter were prominent legal figures including Lord Collins of Mapesbury, a former Supreme Court judge, Lord Verdirame KC, a leading barrister and professor in international law, Lord Faulks KC, a leading human rights lawyer, and Lord Banner KC, whose report on radical planning reforms are being accepted by Starmer to speed up major infrastructure projects. Labour signatories include Lord Mendelsohn, Lord Turnberg, Lord Shamash and Lord Winston, while Lord Harrington of Watford, the former refugee minister, and Lord Walney, the government's former adviser on political violence and disruption, also signed the letter. Former cabinet ministers include Lord Pickles, Lord Lansley, Lord Ellis KC, Lord Hamilton of Epsom and Baroness Foster of Oxton. Several former Labour attorney-generals are also said to be supportive of the letter. Starmer insisted on Wednesday that Britain's recognition of Palestinian statehood is 'not a gesture' but will secure a viable two-state solution as he embarked on a diplomatic push to secure support for his Middle East peace plan. In a round of calls with world leaders, Starmer said 'recognition needed to be rooted in a process of change that made a material difference to the situation on the ground'. He told his Australian counterpart, Anthony Albanese, that 'recognition was not a gesture, but a driver for real change that ensured a viable two-state solution', Downing Street said. Starmer also stressed the need for a ceasefire, the release of all hostages, the acceleration of aid and ensuring Hamas played no role in a future state. Starmer's announcement has been widely criticised by both Jewish groups and the families of Britons who were held captive, and who have accused the government of reducing hostages to a 'bargaining chip'. On Wednesday evening, Sir Ephraim Mirvis, the Chief Rabbi, accused Starmer of fundamentally undermining the peace and security of both Israelis and Palestinians and said that the announcement at a time when hostages remain captive can 'only disincentivise Hamas from agreeing to a ceasefire'. Writing in The Times, Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative Party leader, warned that Starmer's 'knee-jerk recognition of Palestinian statehood will embolden our enemies at abroad and at home'. The letter was announced after Palestine Action won permission to challenge its ban by the UK government. The High Court ruled that the decision by Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, to proscribe the group as a terrorist organisation should be reviewed in the courts. Huda Ammori, Palestine Action's co-founder, lodged a bid to challenge the proscription, which was made under anti-terror legislation. The proscription was announced by Cooper after the group claimed responsibility for breaking into RAF Brize Norton on June 20 and inflicting millions of pounds of damage to two Voyager aircraft. In a major ruling at the High Court, Mr Justice Chamberlain said it was 'reasonably arguable' that the proscription 'amounts to a disproportionate interference' of Ammori's rights to freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. He concluded that a substantive hearing at the High Court should be held in order to decide the legality of the decision to proscribe the group. Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, said: 'The court has confirmed the continuation of the proscription order against Palestine Action Group in line with its previous judgement, while allowing permission for a further hearing under the normal judicial review procedures. 'The decision to proscribe was based on strong security advice and the unanimous recommendation by the expert cross-government Proscription Review Group. This followed serious attacks the group has committed, involving violence, significant injuries and extensive criminal damage.' She added: 'Those who seek to support this group may yet not know the true nature of the organisation. But people should be under no illusion — this is not a peaceful or non-violent protest group.'
Reuters
21 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK's Starmer, Oman's sultan agree to deepen ties in energy, defence and tech
LONDON, July 30 (Reuters) - British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Oman's Sultan Haitham bin Tariq al-Said agreed on Wednesday to deepen collaboration across energy, technology, defence and security, a Downing Street spokesperson said. During talks in London where the leaders also discussed the ongoing UK-Gulf Cooperation Council trade negotiations, the leaders called for urgent humanitarian aid to reach Gaza, saying the current situation "cannot continue." "The Prime Minister updated His Majesty on his conversations with other leaders in recent days, and both agreed on the need for a longer-term peace plan, which includes a pathway to recognition," the spokesperson said. Starmer announced on Tuesday that Britain would recognise a Palestine state in September unless Israel took steps to improve the situation in Gaza and bring about peace. On Iran, Starmer thanked the sultan for Oman's continued efforts to help reach a diplomatic solution and avoid a return to conflict in the region.
Telegraph
21 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Ryanair calls for air traffic control chief to resign after latest failure
He added that Nats required urgent reform 'so that airlines and passengers are no longer forced to endure these preventable delays', A British Airways insider said that though the cause of the radar outage was not yet known, 'Nats are responsible for the radar, so you have to say that the buck stops with them'. The crisis renews pressure on Mr Rolfe, who has run Nats since 2015 and was paid £1.4m a year at the time of the 2023 fiasco. Michael O'Leary, Ryanair's chief executive, has called for Mr Rolfe to quit on several occasions. Mr O'Leary blamed the sluggish response to the 2023 incident over the August bank holiday on Mr Rolfe having allowed engineers crucial to the functioning of Nats to work from home on the busiest weekend of the year. He said that meant they were 'sat watching Football Focus in their jim-jams' at the time of the outage. The Ryanair boss went on to compare Nats – which runs the airspace over Britain and the whole of the eastern Atlantic – to Dad's Army, and said that it was 'short-staffed every summer'. Mr O'Leary has accused Mr Rolfe of being 'overpaid' and called him a 'clown'. 'Major failure' BA last year wrote to staff blaming Nats, which controls flights at the country's busiest airports, for the failure of jets to get away from Heathrow following weather related delays in September. Mr Rolfe has also been criticised for presiding over a recruitment policy that he admitted meant Nats 'spent a lot of time working on our diversity and inclusion agenda,' despite a chronic shortfall in headcount. An independent report into the 2023 meltdown commissioned by the Civil Aviation Authority and published last November said it represented a 'major failure' on the part of Nats. It made 34 recommendations, instructing Mr Rolfe to review back-up plans and his allocation of engineering resources, as well as provide earlier notification of any future disruption. UK-bound services operated by carriers including Ryanair, British Airways (BA) and EasyJet were unable to depart, while those already in the air were diverted to Paris and Brussels. The majority of outbound services were also grounded, with only those operating at a lower altitude on domestic trips and short flights to the Continent able to operate. Ryanair said that Nats, formerly known as National Air Traffic Services, must foot the bill for the disruption and compensate carriers and their customers accordingly.
