Another broken promise in the Ilitches' District Detroit. Color me surprised.
Knock knock.
Who's there?
The Ilitches.
The Ilitches who?
The Ilitches who aren't going to build affordable housing in the District Detroit, no matter how much public money we give them, but who knows, maybe they'll ask for more tax breaks anyway, I wouldn't put it past them, would you?
This joke would be funnier if we weren't the punchline.
In pursuit of public subsidies for its Little Caesars Arena and District Detroit projects, it seems the fabulously wealthy Ilitch family's Olympia Development will promise just about anything to the City of Detroit and the State of Michigan: to hire a workforce of 51% Detroiters to complete its projects, to build something other than parking lots around its new arena, to make 20% of the new housing it pledged to construct affordable.
And, it seems, there's just about no promise the Ilitch family won't break.
More: Officials strip affordable housing requirement for first District Detroit building
In 2013, the Ilitches talked their way to $324 million in public subsidies for the $863 million arena, pitched as 50 blocks of retail, office space and housing. But the auxiliary projects — the stuff around the arena that justified the subsides — didn't happen. Nor did the promise to hire a majority-Detroit workforce. Olympia built an arena, a business school named after family patriarch Mike Ilitch, a lot of parking, paid $2.9 million in fines for reneging on its workforce promises, but still managed to get an additional $74 million in subsidies for 'leveraging' investment.
In 2023, the family, now partnering with Stephen Ross' Related Cos., came back for a second round of subsidies — $800 million this time, again, about half of the project's $1.5 billion total cost — to complete the work they said they'd do back in 2013: namely, build housing and office space in the area around the arena.
Thanks to Detroit's community benefits ordinance, a council of citizen volunteers negotiated a deal, signed by Olympia, that included hiring Detroiters, and ensuring that regular folks would have access to the new apartment buildings by designating 20% of units across the development as affordable housing for 30 years, renting below market rate and reserved for tenants who earn less than 50% of the area median income — $33,600 each year for an individual or $47,950 for a family of four — and to accept Section 8 vouchers. The financial arrangement is offset by the public subsidies promised in return, and really, a small price to pay for $800 million in future tax benefits.
Or so you'd think.
This week, the Michigan Strategic Fund gave Olympia permission to ignore the affordable housing requirement the companies had agreed to, just two years before, in order to obtain a $615 million Transformational Brownfield Credit for the construction of an 18-story, 261-unit residential building at 2205 Cass Ave. The building will be next to the also-under-construction University of Michigan Center for Innovation, and the university plans to lease the entire thing for student housing, a siting decision it's hard to imagine wasn't in the works before Olympia agreed to the affordable housing requirement.
Not to fret, says Olympia — they'll simply shift the promised affordable housing at 2205 Cass to the additional buildings it plans to (someday) build in the District Detroit.
If you buy that, I've got a tax subsidy I'd like to pitch you.
More from Freep Opinion: Detroiters have little choice in Ilitch project ― and it feels like deja vu
Here's where I'd normally recap the tortured history of the Ilitch family's promises to build things in exchange for tax benefits, but honestly, it's exhausting: Just picture Charlie Brown trying to kick the football, all the way back to 1994, the first time the Ilitches promised to transform Detroit in exchange for tax incentives (back then, it was Comerica Park and a casino district).
It's not that the Ilitches don't do any of the things they say they will. We've got a baseball stadium and a hockey arena, and there's no arguing that part of Detroit is objectively better than it was 30 years ago, when broad scale disinvestment left Woodward Avenue lined with empty and deteriorating storefronts. And they're partnering with Cinnaire Solutions, a nonprofit community development organization with a track record of accomplishments in affordable housing, to rehab seven low-income apartment buildings at Henry Street and Cass Avenue, just behind the arena. The companies say 49% of those units will be low-income, and accommodate the buildings' existing tenants.
But the Ilitches tend to do only the things that offer direct benefit to the family's business operations, like building an arena and a sea of parking lots. Which would be fine, except they want public money to do it.
The subsidies the Ilitches receive aren't blank checks, but either exemption from future tax payments or, thanks to a new law, the ability to capture taxes paid by residents and workers in its buildings, a kind of feudal tax arrangement that deprives the state and city of the normal bump in tax revenue that comes with new development. If 20% of the apartments in the planned 10-building development are filled with current Detroit residents paying below market rates, the company will also receive forgiveness for a $24 million loan from the Downtown Development Authority.
In exchange for waiving the affordable housing requirement at 2025 Cass, the Michigan Strategic Fund cut the amount of payroll taxes Olympia can collect to 50%, the Free Press' JC Reindl reported this week, and the company may lose some local subsidies, as well. This is a modicum of accountability, but it's more than the company has ever been asked to accept, so I suppose we can call it progress.
It's customary to note that the Ilitch family believed in Detroit when few did, renovating the Fox Theatre (in 1988) and keeping its Red Wings and Detroit Tigers in the city even as the Pistons and the Lions moved to the suburbs (although not averse to letting the threat of relocation loom during subsidy negotiations).
But it's not wrong to hope for more, or to be frustrated when it doesn't materialize — with the Ilitches, and with elected or appointed officials who allow this to happen, again and again and again.
Detroit needs the Ilitches. They own too much of our city, and are famously averse to selling, or even, at times, renovating. Ilitch-owned properties have racked up their share of blight tickets, and scion Chris Ilitch admitted in 2014 that while pursuing the arena plans, the family sat on some properties for a decade or more.
I can't pretend to know what it's like to be Chris Ilitch. I imagine it's easy to look at the tangible legacy your family has constructed, and brush off complaints that you haven't done enough as whining from the ungrateful. But I have to believe that no one can devote this many years to Detroit, this much time and attention, without caring about this place. And I hope that means listening to what the people who live here are trying to say.
Nancy Kaffer is the editorial page editor of the Detroit Free Press. Contact: nkaffer@freepress.com. Submit a letter to the editor at freep.com/letters and we may publish it online and in print.
This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Another broken promise in the Ilitches' District Detroit | Opinion
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Contributor: Trump's war on Latinos reaches a new low in abuse of Sen. Alex Padilla
The U.S. population includes an estimated 65.2 million Latinos, nearly a quarter of whom call California home. For over a century, Latinos were absent from the state's two U.S. Senate seats. In 2022, Sen. Alex Padilla reversed the willful neglect of Latino senatorial candidates by both major political parties, winning 61.1% of the vote, more than any other statewide candidate, including Gov. Gavin Newsom. On Thursday, in the midst of the Trump administration's largest immigration raids to date, Padilla was forcibly removed at a Department of Homeland Security press conference in his hometown, Los Angeles. Manhandled, for daring to exercise his congressional responsibilities. Pushed out of a job-related meeting for asking a question. For many Latinos, the abhorrent treatment of Padilla by the Trump administration is emblematic of a shared grievance: being pushed out of conversations about our lives, our families and our futures. The Trump administration's immigration raids are squarely a Latino issue. Not because immigration is a Latino issue — all issues are Latino issues — but because Trump's immigration enforcement is and has always been racially motivated. From Trump's campaign announcement in 2015, calling Mexicans rapists and criminals, to his fixation with building a wall across our southern border and having Mexico pay for it, to his 2024 campaign focused on falsehoods about immigrants and criminality, the central narrative has been 'us' versus 'them.' Immigration is a concern in every city and state, yet Trump's immigration enforcement seems to be exclusively focused on Latino communities. In Los Angeles, Trump's raids are explicitly targeting Latino-majority neighborhoods and cities including Westlake, Paramount and Compton, going beyond data-informed enforcement actions to the racial profiling of Latinos near schools, tending to errands like getting a car washed or sitting in a church parking lot. Over the last week, Los Angeles has been ground zero for Trump's federal overreach. Padilla's silencing and removal follow refusals to admit four U.S. House representatives at the Los Angeles federal detention center on Saturday and three representatives to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement processing center in Adelanto on Sunday. While immigration raids raise serious policy and human rights concerns, the unequal treatment of Latino congressional leaders by the Trump administration represents a different kind of hazard: a test for control of our democratic republic. America has three co-equal branches: legislative, executive, judiciary. This system of separation of powers and checks and balances is designed to prevent tyranny and ensure a balanced government. For the last five months, the Trump administration has upended our system of governance. The Trump administration bypassed Congress' budgetary actions by eliminating foreign aid. Trump officials willfully ignored judicial orders. They've blocked sitting members of the House and Senate from entering federal buildings, obstructed them from conducting oversight and undermined their inquiries. Like Trump's immigration enforcement actions, the administration's overreach is racially motivated. Latinos have long expressed that no one is listening to their needs — that they are left out of the conversation and never at the table where decisions are being made. Research has made clear that Latinos bear the brunt of underrepresentation across important societal institutions such as academia, private enterprise, philanthropy and news media. The list goes on. Unfortunately, when Latinos achieve positions that ought to wield power — such as Padilla's ascent to the Senate — the positions themselves tend to be diminished, so that — again, like Padilla being silenced at a press conference — the Latinos who gain prominence are denied the power that non-Latinos enjoy in parallel positions. This week's events provide a new chapter in the diminishment of Latino agency and dignity; members of Congress were denied entry to do their jobs, and in the case of Padilla, forcibly removed and detained. One thing is consistent: the repeated dehumanization of Latinos and their needs. Latinos are not a monolith, but the Trump administration is surely treating us as such. His administration has rolled out a carte blanche attack on Latinos. From Latino community members being stalked and apprehended in Home Depot parking lots, at places of worship or their children's school graduations, to targeted attacks on the sustainability and operations of Latino-led nonprofit organizations, to the physical assault of a U.S. senator. The subjugation of Latinos is currently on full display in Los Angeles, a region that fuels the world's fourth-largest economy (California) and is the global epicenter of media and entertainment. The absence of meaningful Latino participation in shaping narratives, trends and the public imagination is cause for concern. Any conversation on the fragility of American democracy, the resurgence of fascism and authoritarianism and the future of the Constitution is, inherently, a discourse about Latinos — and about all Americans. So long as Latinos remain silenced, ostracized and relegated to the periphery in conversations about the future of this nation, that future remains bleak. The test of how America responds in real time to the wholesale attack on its second-largest demographic group is now a shared assignment. And the group's leader is Padilla. Sonja Diaz is a civil rights attorney and co-founder of the Latina Futures 2050 Lab and UCLA Latino Policy & Politics Institute. If it's in the news right now, the L.A. Times' Opinion section covers it. Sign up for our weekly opinion newsletter. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Los Angeles Times
5 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump's war on Latinos reaches a new low in abuse of Sen. Alex Padilla
The U.S. population includes an estimated 65.2 million Latinos, nearly a quarter of whom call California home. For over a century, Latinos were absent from the state's two U.S. Senate seats. In 2022, Sen. Alex Padilla reversed the willful neglect of Latino senatorial candidates by both major political parties, winning 61.1% of the vote, more than any other statewide candidate, including Gov. Gavin Newsom. On Thursday, in the midst of the Trump administration's largest immigration raids to date, Padilla was forcibly removed at a Department of Homeland Security press conference in his hometown, Los Angeles. Manhandled, for daring to exercise his congressional responsibilities. Pushed out of a job-related meeting for asking a question. For many Latinos, the abhorrent treatment of Padilla by the Trump administration is emblematic of a shared grievance: being pushed out of conversations about our lives, our families and our futures. The Trump administration's immigration raids are squarely a Latino issue. Not because immigration is a Latino issue — all issues are Latino issues — but because Trump's immigration enforcement is and has always been racially motivated. From Trump's campaign announcement in 2015, calling Mexicans rapists and criminals, to his fixation with building a wall across our southern border and having Mexico pay for it, to his 2024 campaign focused on falsehoods about immigrants and criminality, the central narrative has been 'us' versus 'them.' Immigration is a concern in every city and state, yet Trump's immigration enforcement seems to be exclusively focused on Latino communities. In Los Angeles, Trump's raids are explicitly targeting Latino-majority neighborhoods and cities including Westlake, Paramount and Compton, going beyond data-informed enforcement actions to the racial profiling of Latinos near schools, tending to errands like getting a car washed or sitting in a church parking lot. Over the last week, Los Angeles has been ground zero for Trump's federal overreach. Padilla's silencing and removal follow refusals to admit four U.S. House representatives at the Los Angeles federal detention center on Saturday and three representatives to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement processing center in Adelanto on Sunday. While immigration raids raise serious policy and human rights concerns, the unequal treatment of Latino congressional leaders by the Trump administration represents a different kind of hazard: a test for control of our democratic republic. America has three co-equal branches: legislative, executive, judiciary. This system of separation of powers and checks and balances is designed to prevent tyranny and ensure a balanced government. For the last five months, the Trump administration has upended our system of governance. The Trump administration bypassed Congress' budgetary actions by eliminating foreign aid. Trump officials willfully ignored judicial orders. They've blocked sitting members of the House and Senate from entering federal buildings, obstructed them from conducting oversight and undermined their inquiries. Like Trump's immigration enforcement actions, the administration's overreach is racially motivated. Latinos have long expressed that no one is listening to their needs — that they are left out of the conversation and never at the table where decisions are being made. Research has made clear that Latinos bear the brunt of underrepresentation across important societal institutions such as academia, private enterprise, philanthropy and news media. The list goes on. Unfortunately, when Latinos achieve positions that ought to wield power — such as Padilla's ascent to the Senate — the positions themselves tend to be diminished, so that — again, like Padilla being silenced at a press conference — the Latinos who gain prominence are denied the power that non-Latinos enjoy in parallel positions. This week's events provide a new chapter in the diminishment of Latino agency and dignity; members of Congress were denied entry to do their jobs, and in the case of Padilla, forcibly removed and detained. One thing is consistent: the repeated dehumanization of Latinos and their needs. Latinos are not a monolith, but the Trump administration is surely treating us as such. His administration has rolled out a carte blanche attack on Latinos. From Latino community members being stalked and apprehended in Home Depot parking lots, at places of worship or their children's school graduations, to targeted attacks on the sustainability and operations of Latino-led nonprofit organizations, to the physical assault of a U.S. senator. The subjugation of Latinos is currently on full display in Los Angeles, a region that fuels the world's fourth-largest economy (California) and is the global epicenter of media and entertainment. The absence of meaningful Latino participation in shaping narratives, trends and the public imagination is cause for concern. Any conversation on the fragility of American democracy, the resurgence of fascism and authoritarianism and the future of the Constitution is, inherently, a discourse about Latinos — and about all Americans. So long as Latinos remain silenced, ostracized and relegated to the periphery in conversations about the future of this nation, that future remains bleak. The test of how America responds in real time to the wholesale attack on its second-largest demographic group is now a shared assignment. And the group's leader is Padilla. Sonja Diaz is a civil rights attorney and co-founder of the Latina Futures 2050 Lab and UCLA Latino Policy & Politics Institute.


Motor 1
8 hours ago
- Motor 1
Three Major Players in the Auto Industry Are Partnering. Here's How an Expert Says It Will Improve Your Car-Buying Experience
A new partnership between Kelly Blue Book, AutoTrader, and AutoCheck is being touted as the start of a fully transparent used car marketplace. Some are saying it's the future of car buying. Others think it's just a brand deal that won't make much of a dent in the marketplace. Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . Creator Shawn Payne (@goatforreal216) bills himself online as a leading car sales expert. Payne is enthusiastic about the partnership and its potential to provide car buyers with more information to bring to the negotiation table. 'It is the very beginning of a fully transparent process. It's gonna save you guys more time, you're gonna know more about the vehicle that you're buying, you're gonna have the tools that dealers have,' he says while pacing outside GM headquarters in Detroit. The post has been viewed more than 147,000 times. Cox Automotive, which owns Kelley Blue Book (KBB) and AutoTrader, has announced that it will now prominently feature Experian's AutoCheck vehicle history reports across all eligible listings on both and This marks a formal expansion of an existing partnership, effectively co-branding AutoCheck with these platforms to "bring buyers better vehicle history reports" and enhance transparency. Experian, one of the world's largest data firms, owns AutoCheck, a vehicle history service integral to auction houses and dealer inventories. AutoCheck is used by dealers to uncover issues like frame damage, salvage, and flood history through auction data. It represents what many consider the industrial-strength alternative to consumer-focused reporting. Until now, consumers have predominantly relied on Carfax for vehicle history. With KBB and AutoTrader embedding AutoCheck directly into their listings, the service may compete—or even edge out—Carfax in consumer visibility and usage. Potential Benefits Trending Now 'Never Knew This:' Honda Civic Driver of 3 Years Reaches for Key Fob. Then She Realizes It Has a Little-Known Feature 'Why I Hate New Cars': Man Tries to Replace a Headlight Bulb on His 2022 Toyota Corolla. Then He Learns Something Unexpected With this partnership, customers are expected to have access to more granular data. AutoCheck provides deeper insight into critical issues like structural or frame damage, salvage, flood history, odometer rollbacks, and auction notes. These details often exceed what's offered in basic consumer-grade reports. This means the partnership could result in a more transparent car-buying experience. Consumer demand for vehicle history upfront has escalated. Some think having more data about a used car scares off potential buyers, but the opposite may be true. Cox Automotive itself has highlighted benefits. For example, listings with free AutoCheck reports purportedly see 44% more lead conversions on AutoTrader's vehicle detail pages versus competitors. Jade Terreberry, senior director of strategic planning for Autotrader and Kelley Blue Book, characterizes the partnership as a game changer. 'This collaboration delivers a more transparent, personalized experience for consumers and a smarter, higher-performing solution for dealers,' Terreberry told Motor1 via email. 'Dealers gain 80–90% visibility into consumer behavior—far beyond traditional CRM systems—and benefit from 44% higher lead conversion on Cox platforms.' Things We Still Don't Know There are some unanswered questions about the partnership. First off, is it really new? Consumers have had access to AutoCheck through standalone subscriptions or via dealer sites for years. What's new is the wider rollout and front-and-center placement, though it's unclear how widespread or visible it will be. Secondly, will all listings include it, and is it free? Cox says reports are on 'eligible listings.' What qualifies as eligible? Is this added at no cost, or will buyers need to pay? Past integrations suggest options regarding how much and whether consumers pay, but details on this rollout's scope are currently vague. And finally, are consumers going to see dealer-level data? The big question: Does this integration include all the granular data dealers get at auctions? Or is it a curated, sanitized version that looks good in marketing but doesn't provide full transparency? Until sample reports are compared, the real scope of the data remains uncertain. More Data, Less Guesswork The headline promise of this new partnership is simple: more data, less guesswork. By embedding AutoCheck vehicle history reports directly into Kelley Blue Book and AutoTrader listings, Cox Automotive reportedly aims to level the playing field between buyer and seller. Traditionally, AutoCheck has been a behind-the-scenes tool used primarily at auctions and in dealer operations—a backroom advantage for professionals. Now, that same dataset is being put in front of the public. This shift could alter how cars are bought and sold, particularly in the mid-tier and online resale markets. Buyers will have easier access to information about prior accidents, frame damage, title issues, and other red flags—insights that once required paying for a report separately or trusting a dealer's word. That transparency, while a win for consumers, may not be so welcome for all sellers. Dealers, especially those who have long relied on AutoCheck as part of their sourcing and pricing strategy, may lose a modest but meaningful edge. When every buyer has access to the same information, dealers may need to compete more on pricing, warranties, or customer service. Private sellers could also feel the pressure. If a consumer compares a private-party listing without a vehicle history report to a dealer listing that includes an AutoCheck, the expectation of transparency may make cars without reports harder to sell. This development also raises the stakes for competitors, particularly Carfax, which has long enjoyed near-monopoly status in the vehicle history market thanks to strong branding and dealership integrations. On the other hand, AutoCheck is cheaper, often offers more detailed information, and now has a massive distribution channel via KBB and AutoTrader. That combination could begin to chip away at Carfax's dominance—or force it to improve access and pricing to stay competitive. Other automotive marketplaces like CarGurus, and TrueCar may also need to upgrade their vehicle history reports to compete, lest they risk appearing outdated. Consumers React Payne describes the partnership as 'awesome.' He says consumers want to know what the dealer knows. In his view, the partnership between Kelly Blue Book, AutoTrader, and AutoCheck is a strong step towards greater transparency in the car buying business. 'Finally, a big company went out on a limb and is hanging its future on consumer transparency,' Payne says in the TikTok. His audience isn't so sure. Several said that AutoCheck has been around for years, so this really isn't going to change anything. Some questioned the quality of AutoCheck, with one quipping that it's 'the Temu version of Carfax.' (Temu is an online retailer.) 'Auto check is inferior to Carfax in every way,' another said. 'At least at this point. Maybe they'll make it better.' Payne wasn't perturbed by the haters. 'I understand that a more transparent and consumer friendly buying process isn't important to everyone,' he wrote sarcastically in response to one. At least a few people are as excited as he is. 'This is great news for lenders as well!!!' wrote one. Motor1 reached out to Payne via direct message and text message. We'll be sure to update this if he responds. More From Motor1 First-Time Shopper Buys Her 'Dream Car.' Then the Salesman 'Scams' Her out of Her Audi GM's EV Sales Are Booming. But Can It Catch Tesla? 'We Get It Fixed': Woman Says Her 2020 Ram's Steering Wheel 'Randomly' Locks Up. The Dealership Says It's Fine The Cheapest Ford Maverick Now Costs $30,000 Thanks to Tariffs Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )