Watch: Two Chinese Vessels Collide During Philippine Boat Chase In South China Sea
A Chinese navy vessel collided with one from its own coast guard while chasing a Philippines patrol boat in the South China Sea on Monday, Manila said, releasing dramatic video footage of the confrontation.
The incident occurred near the contested Scarborough Shoal as the Philippine coast guard escorted boats distributing aid to fishermen in the area, spokesman Commodore Jay Tarriela said in a statement.
Video released by Manila showed a China Coast Guard ship and a much larger vessel bearing the number 164 on its hull colliding with a loud crash.
While attempting to chase and corner a patrol boat with the Philippine Coast Guard near Bajo de Masinloc in the West Philippine Sea on Monday, a ship with the China Coast Guard (CCG-3104) collided with a Type 052D Destroyer of the Chinese People's Liberation Army Navy (DDG-164).… pic.twitter.com/D1Ph8zkO7W
— OSINTdefender (@sentdefender) August 11, 2025
"The (China Coast Guard vessel) CCG 3104, which was chasing the (Filipino coast guard vessel) BRP Suluan at high speed, performed a risky manoeuvre from the (Philippine) vessel's starboard quarter, leading to the impact with the PLA (People's Liberation Army) Navy warship," Tarriela said.
"This resulted in substantial damage to the CCG vessel's forecastle, rendering it unseaworthy," he said.
Gan Yu, a Chinese coast guard spokesperson, confirmed that a Monday confrontation had taken place without mentioning the collision.
"The China Coast Guard took necessary measures in accordance with the law, including monitoring, pressing from the outside, blocking and controlling the Philippine vessels to drive them away," he said in a statement.
The reported collision is the latest in a series of confrontations between China and the Philippines in the South China Sea, which Beijing claims almost entirely despite an international ruling that the assertion has no legal basis.
More than 60 per cent of global maritime trade passes through the disputed waterway.
Speaking at a morning news conference, Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos said the country's patrol vessels would "continue to be present" in the area to defend, as well as exercise Manila's sovereign rights over, what it considers to be part of its territory.
The Scarborough Shoal -- a triangular chain of reefs and rocks -- has been a flashpoint between the countries since China seized it from the Philippines in 2012.
It was unclear if anyone was hurt in Monday's incident.
Tarriela told AFP the Chinese crew "never responded" to the Filipino ship's offer of assistance.
Earlier in the confrontation, the BRP Suluan was "targeted with a water cannon" by the Chinese but "successfully" evaded it, Tarriela's statement said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 minutes ago
- First Post
Report says China a 'global mining mafia': At least 15 gold-rich nations complain about illegality
Illicit mining operations in nations like Indonesia, where oversight is frequently compromised and enforcement is lax, are now contributing to meeting that demand A growing network of Chinese-led syndicates is fueling an increase in illicit gold mining throughout Indonesia, turning small-scale, traditional operations into large-scale businesses and igniting concerns about corruption, environmental damage, and geopolitical risk. Demand for gold has surged as a result of China increasing its gold reserves as part of a larger plan to lessen reliance on the US dollar. Illicit mining operations in nations like Indonesia, where oversight is frequently compromised and enforcement is lax, are now contributing to meeting that demand, according to a recent Washington Post investigation. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Local communities pushed aside What were formerly unofficial, artisanal mining sites have evolved into highly mechanised areas controlled by Chinese investors and operators in areas like West Kalimantan and West Nusa Tenggara. These syndicates extract gold on a scale well beyond the law, frequently without the necessary permits or safety precautions, using imported heavy machinery, chemical leaching systems, and a large number of local workers. In one instance, Chinese investors allegedly made over $5.5 million a month from illicit mining in Lombok's Sekotong district before local communities rebelled due to contaminated water and disappearing farmland. Only after villagers set fire to the mining site in August 2024, forcing authorities to step in, was the operation shut down. Yu Hao, a Chinese national, was arrested in Ketapang, West Kalimantan, for running a gold mine without a license in another well-known case. According to the prosecution, his company used shell corporations and falsified documents to unlawfully extract more than $67 million worth of gold and silver. Despite being found guilty and given a prison sentence, a local court controversially reversed the decision; however, in response to public outcry, Indonesia's Supreme Court later upheld the verdict. Environmental Damage and Global Supply Chain Risks These mining mafias sometimes operate under dormant mining licenses, bribe local officials, and take advantage of legal grey areas. Investigators caution that the criminal networks responsible for them are cross-provincial and could be connected to international smuggling rings and money laundering schemes. According to analysts, the illicit gold trade now generates more than $30 billion a year worldwide. The effects on the environment are dire. Gold processing uses cyanide and mercury, which have ruined crops, contaminated groundwater and rivers, and increased health problems in the communities around them. Due to corruption or the influence of well-funded foreign actors, local authorities frequently do nothing. Despite international concerns, China has refused to engage in multinational efforts to regulate illegal gold flows, and its gold import practices remain opaque. Analysts warn that without coordinated global action, tainted gold will continue to enter legitimate markets, undermining supply chain integrity and fueling further environmental damage.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
32 minutes ago
- First Post
'Sovereignty violated, security undermined': China fumes after USS Higgins destroyer 'intrudes' into South China Sea
China has accused the United States of violating its sovereignty and undermining its security after a US warship entered the waters off the Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea, which China claims and calls Huangyan Island. The international community largely recognises the Philippines' claim on the island. The photograph shows the guided-missile destroyer USS Higgins conducting an independent deployer certification exercise off the coast of Southern California on April 30, 2015. (Photo: US Navy) China on Wednesday said that a US warship violated its sovereignty and undermined its security by 'intruding' into its territorial waters in the South China Sea. China said that USS Higgins, a destroyer part of the Japan-headquartered 7th Fleet of the US Navy, intruded into its territorial waters off the 'Huangyan Island' and was driven by Chinese navy. The United States has rejected the accusation. The navy mobilised forces to monitor, track, warn, and drive away USS Higgins, spokesperson Senior Colonel He Tiesheng said in a statement in in Chinese. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Huangyan Island' is what China calls the Scarborough Shoal, which is disputed between China and the Philippines. Much of the international community, including the United States and India, has recognised the Philippines' claim to the island, which considers it to be a part of its exclusive economic zone (EEZ). 'The path of the US warship seriously violated China's sovereignty and security, severely undermined peace and stability in the South China Sea, and contravened basic principles of international law and international relations. The Southern Theater Command Navy will maintain high alert at all times, resolutely safeguard national sovereignty, security, and regional peace and stability,' the Chinese statement further said. US rejects China's charge The United States has rejected China's version of events and the accusation and said USS Higgins was sailing in line with the international law. The USS Higgins was conducting a 'freedom of navigation operation' in accordance with international law, Sarah Merrill, a spokesperson for the 7th Fleet, told CNBC. 'China's statement about this mission is false…The United States is defending its right to fly, sail and operate wherever international law allows, as USS Higgins did here. Nothing China says otherwise will deter us,' Merrill further said. World rejects China's claims on Scarborough Shoal China lays claim to Scarborough Shoal, which it calls Huangyan Island, as part of its broader claims to nearly the entire South China Sea on the basis of its self-claimed maritime border based on self-written 'nine dash lines'. The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) rejected Chinese claims to the South China Sea and the Scarborough Shoal in 2016 under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). The PCA ruled that there was no legal basis to 'nine dash lines' and territorial claims arising from it. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The PCA further held that China had violated the Philippines' sovereign rights in its EEZ by interfering with fishing and petroleum exploration and building artificial islands. The United States, India, Australia, Japan, the United Kingdom (UK), and the European Union (EU) have supported the PCA ruling, essentially supporting the Philippines' claim on Scarborough Shoal.
Indian Express
32 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Lesson for India in the China-EU freeze: Proceed with caution
The 50 per cent tariff shock on Indian exports to the United States has rattled exporters and policymakers alike. Garment manufacturers are scouting for alternative markets, while jewellery exporters are checking if their orders still stand. Meanwhile, the government plans credit measures to support SMEs and exporters who now potentially face a loss of their largest market. India now finds itself in a strategic bind. These developments come barely weeks before Prime Minister Narendra Modi's maiden visit to China since the Galwan clashes of 2020. The outreach aims to stabilise supply chains and secure critical technologies. Yet it coincides with Washington, India's key trading partner, tightening the screws over Delhi's Russia links, leaving India little room to manoeuvre. This is not dissimilar to the position the European Union finds itself in, vis-à-vis China and the United States. A summit marking 50 years of diplomatic ties in July ended in disappointment for Brussels. EU leaders raised concerns over China subsidising its EVs, market access issues, industrial overcapacity, and Beijing's support for Russia. On the other hand, President Xi Jinping warned against EU interference and criticised its de-risking policies. The EU-China diplomatic freeze has lessons for India. Only months earlier, with Donald Trump threatening sweeping tariffs on both the EU and China, Brussels and Beijing looked poised for closer ties. But that changed quickly when Trump paused tariffs on Chinese goods and Washington and Beijing agreed to resume cooperation on AI and critical minerals. The promise of renewed access to the US market dulled Beijing's appetite for compromise with Europe. Once China secured breathing space with Washington, it turned up the pressure on Brussels. It implemented anti-dumping tariffs on European brandy and expanded procurement restrictions on European medical equipment. The Chinese Commerce Minister called for the removal of EU sanctions on two Chinese banks alleged to have assisted Russia. Chinese export controls on rare earths were strengthened, and data localisation requirements affecting EU cloud and fintech companies were enforced. The EU and the US could have coordinated their leverage against China. Instead, the EU is under pressure from both sides, following the signing of a trade deal that imposes a 15 per cent tariff on its exports to the US. After years of border tensions and curbs on Chinese investment, New Delhi appears to be testing a modest thaw in relations. External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar's visit to Beijing in July coincided with the reopening of the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra, the resumption of direct flights, and the reinstatement of tourist visas for Chinese citizens. This revival is driven less by breakthroughs on the border and more by economic reality. The bilateral trade deficit reached a record $99.2 billion in FY25. Imports of solar components, lithium-ion batteries, electronics, and critical intermediaries surged by more than 25 per cent year-on-year. China's dominance in key sectors, such as EV components, green tech, APIs, and telecom equipment, keeps it entrenched in India's efforts to develop its own ecosystem. India is also exploring ways to ease curbs on Chinese investment, particularly in high-tech sectors. But this re-engagement is happening in the context of unresolved strategic issues. Despite an agreement last October, de-escalation along the LAC remains incomplete. Confidence-building measures are still minimal. And public sentiment remains wary. In this context, China may interpret India's opening as a sign of constraint rather than strength. If Beijing could pivot so quickly against the EU once Washington reopened its doors, it could just as easily do the same with India. India's best opportunity to avoid Europe's fate lies in direct negotiations with Chinese firms, ensuring a durable channel of communication, even when geopolitics turn cold. This does not necessarily mean filling out the calendar with high-level dialogues or offering joint ventures with Indian firms, to which Chinese companies may not freely transfer the latest technologies. Instead, India should identify critical supply chains integral to achieving its goals of economic growth, such as EV batteries, displays, EMS and connectors, solar wafers, precision machinery, and tooling. Subsequently, it should engage in dialogue with Chinese brands that have a strong global presence and established connections with upstream players in these fields. With strategic plans spanning two to three decades, these organisations are likely to assess commercial opportunities in India pragmatically and navigate political considerations in both countries as needed. India needs to establish a dedicated, multi-agency team to engage directly with key Chinese firms essential to its industrial goals. This team should comprise supply chain experts, Indian OEMs, state government representatives, and embassy staff, rather than general-purpose investment promotion bodies. Their focus should be on building strong, ongoing relationships with 25-30 major companies through private discussions and practical collaboration, rather than public initiatives. Currently, there is no coordinated outreach with these firms, and policies regarding Chinese companies in India are so unclear that only intermediaries can profit. To attract long-term investment, India needs to offer transparent and predictable guidelines that specify permitted activities, sectors, compliance requirements, and incentives. This clarity will encourage companies to invest, localise, and train for the future, resulting in knowledge and technology transfer. Not because it is mandated, but because companies will need to build for the long term. The Chinese establishment is likely to continue viewing India primarily from a strategic perspective. But when its firms and their shareholders stand to lose money by pulling out, the resistance to weaponising market access or regulatory tools will come from within. In a relationship marked by asymmetry, impassive commercial engagement may be India's strongest safeguard. The writer is Director, Geopolitics and Policy, at Koan Advisory Group, New Delhi. These are his personal views
