Trump govt admits Mahmoud Khalil was detained without warrant, says he was a flight risk
Trump administration admitted to the court that Mahmoud Khalil was detained without a warrant.
Columbia University student and pro-Palestinian activist
Mahmoud Khalil
whose arrest sent shockwaves among university students in the country was detained without an arrest warrant, the Donald Trump administration admitted to the court. It cited exigent circumstances for the warrantless arrest and said there was a flight risk. Mahmoud Khalik said he would not cooperate and intended to leave the scene,the immigration authorities said.
Khalil, a Syria-born legal US resident with a green card, was arrested March 8 after he returned from an Iftar meal during Ramadan. Video footage of the arrest shows Khalil cooperating and telling officers, "Yes, I'm coming with you."
DHS argued in court documents submitted to the court Thursday that it did not need to obtain a warrant before the arrest because immigration officers have the power to detain people where there is suspicion of 'an offense against the United States.'
"The HSI [Homeland Security Investigations] supervisory agent believed there was a flight risk and arrest was necessary," the DHS wrote. "The agents had reason to believe that the respondent was likely to escape before a warrant could be obtained," it continued.
Khalil's lawyers claim he was cooperating with the agents
Khalil's attorneys, however, argue DHS did need a warrant to enter their client's apartment building. Khalil's legal team is calling for the case to be dismissed, claiming that he cooperated with authorities throughout the arrest and that no evidence has been presented to prove he was a flight risk.
"We learned for the first time that the DHS agents who arrested Mahmoud lied to him: they wrote in their arrest report that the agents told him that they had an arrest warrant, but DHS has now admitted in their filing that that was a lie and that there was no warrant at all at the time of the arrest," Marc Van Der Hout, one of Khalil's attorneys, said in a statement.
Khalil not allowed to see his newborn
Khalil's wife Noor Abdalla gave birth to their first son in New York while Khalil remains in ICE detention in Louisiana. "I welcomed our son into the world earlier today without Mahmoud by my side. Despite our request for ICE to allow Mahmoud to attend the birth, they denied his temporary release to meet our son. This was a purposeful decision by ICE to make me, Mahmoud, and our son suffer," Khalil's wife said in a statement issued on April 21.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Illegal alien': Steve Bannon demands federal probe into Musk's immigration status; says SpaceX should be seized ‘before midnight'
Former White House official Steve Bannon on Thursday called for to be investigated and deported, claiming the billionaire is in the US illegally. 'They should initiate a formal investigation of his immigration status, because I am of the strong belief that he is an illegal alien, and he should be deported from the country immediately,' he said while talking to The New York Times. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Bannon also demanded investigations into Musk's alleged drug use and an incident in which the South African-born entrepreneur reportedly tried to obtain a classified Pentagon briefing on China. He said Musk's security clearance should be suspended, and his government contracts canceled during the probe. Additionally, during his "War Room" podcast, he urged Trump to invoke the Defense Production Act to take control of , following Musk's brief threat to decommission the Dragon spacecraft used by to transport astronauts to the International Space Station. Musk later walked back the statement, but Bannon insisted Trump act swiftly. The Defense Production Act, first enacted during the Korean War, allows the president to prioritise government contracts for national defense but does not explicitly grant the power to seize private companies. Tensions between Musk and Trump have been rising over Musk's support for a congressional spending bill and his growing criticism of the former president. Trump expressed disappointment in Musk during an Oval Office meeting on Thursday, saying, 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore.' Musk responded on X by accusing the Trump administration of withholding documents related to and suggesting Trump should be impeached and replaced by vice president JD Vance. Bannon, a longtime Musk critic, has previously called him 'a parasitic illegal immigrant' and accused him of having no respect for American values. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now On his podcast, Bannon argued that Trump had given Musk significant power, which the billionaire then used for personal gain. 'He turned on President Trump. He turned on MAGA. But most importantly, he turned on the country and the American people,' Bannon said. He warned that Musk might financially back progressive leaders like house minority leader Hakeem Jeffries and support efforts to impeach Trump.
Deccan Herald
an hour ago
- Deccan Herald
Operation Bluestar anniversary: Radical outfits raise pro-Khalistan slogans
Pro-Khalistan slogans were raised by activists of outfits, including the Dal Khalsa, former MP Simranjit Singh Mann-led Shiromani Akali Dal (Amritsar), his associate and former MP Dhian Singh Mand, at the Akal Takht.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump-Musk fallout: How it will impact the president and the tycoon
It was always just a matter of time, insist some, after US President Donald Trump and billionaire tech mogul Elon Musk fell out in dramatic fashion over the past week. Their partnership played a critical part in powering the Republican Party and Trump to a dominant victory in the 2024 election, allowing both men to realise their ambitions to reshape American politics. At the heart of their disagreement is Trump's major tax cut bill, dubbed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' The White House has argued that the bill's tax cuts will unleash unprecedented economic growth. However, according to the congressional budget office, the cuts could expand America's fiscal deficit by a staggering $2.5 trillion over the next decade. Musk has been clear that he opposes the bill, which is a centrepiece of Trump's economic agenda. As head of the department of government efficiency (DOGE), Musk promised to cut the deficit by radically restructuring the federal government and cutting spending. Musk has vehemently opposed the One Big Beautiful Bill for running against his efforts at DOGE, since the bill could potentially expand the fiscal deficit and worsen America's debt burden. The bill also cuts tax credits for electric vehicles, which could hit Musk's Tesla. These disagreements spilled into a very public breakdown in relations between Trump and Musk. The consequences for both men could be serious. For Trump, Musk has been a determined political ally who could become a dogged opponent of his agenda. The 'One Big Beautiful Bill' remains controversial within the Republican Party, and Musk's criticism of it has given some Republicans — including, for example, Florida's governor Ron DeSantis — some cover to criticise the bill. The legislation must now go to the Senate, and Musk's opposition could make passing Trump's signature financial bill harder. More broadly, Musk has been a major financial engine powering Trump's political campaigns. The South African-born entrepreneur gave an estimated $250 million to Trump's 2024 presidential election campaign. Large sums were also expected to be allocated to the Republican Party for the 2026 midterm elections, where the party will face a difficult fight to hold on to control of America's House of Representatives and the Senate. Without Musk, things will be harder for the party. Musk's ownership of X, previously Twitter, has also helped amplify Trump and his movement's message to millions of users around the world. However, Musk will likely suffer some blowback for his public attacks on Trump. Musk left the administration towards the end of May to refocus on his flagship businesses, including electric vehicle maker Tesla and space technology firm SpaceX. The latter business has received billions in government subsidies over the last few decades as it develops cutting-edge technology for cheaper space travel and satellite internet. Following their fallout, Trump has threatened to eliminate government subsidies and contracts with Musk's companies. This sent the stock price of Tesla spiralling downwards. Many investors had expected Musk to benefit from a closer relationship with the Trump administration, which now seems to be in jeopardy. Musk is also likely to face significant political heat for his decision to attack Trump. Musk and his companies — especially Tesla — faced protests and even arson because of his work on DOGE. These political controversies could be further amplified, with even conservatives moving against Musk.
