logo
#

Latest news with #Syria-born

Zohran Mamdani celebrates wedding with 3-day bash in lavish Uganda estate
Zohran Mamdani celebrates wedding with 3-day bash in lavish Uganda estate

Hindustan Times

time3 days ago

  • Entertainment
  • Hindustan Times

Zohran Mamdani celebrates wedding with 3-day bash in lavish Uganda estate

New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani recently celebrated his nuptials with a lavish, three-day bash at his family's sprawling compound in Uganda, according to a report in The New York Post. The family's private compound is located in a wealthy area outside of Kampala, the capital of the east African nation, and it saw a stream of guests coming together to celebrate the wedding of Zohran Mamdani and Rama Duwaji. Zohran Mamdani is married to Syria-born illustrator Rama Duwaji. {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} Zohran Mamdani, 33, and Rama Duwaji, 27, had hosted an engagement and wedding ceremony in Dubai in December last year. This was followed by a civil ceremony in New York City. Mamdani's Ugandan celebration {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} The celebrations in NYC and Dubai were followed by three days of festivities in Uganda – the country where Mamdani was born. He moved to the United States at the age of seven and became a US citizen in 2018. Zohran Mamdani is the son of celebrated Indian filmmaker Mira Nair and Ugandan academic Mahmood Mamdani. He told his social media followers on Sunday that he was visiting Uganda to celebrate his nuptials. {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} The celebrations took place at the Mamdani family's lavish estate in the Buziga Hill area that is home to some of the country's richest, including billionaire businessman Godfrey Kirumira. The Mamdani family estate has a house set on two acres of lush gardens and overlooks Lake Victoria. It has at least three security gates. {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} The celebrations took place at the Mamdani family's lavish estate in the Buziga Hill area that is home to some of the country's richest, including billionaire businessman Godfrey Kirumira. The Mamdani family estate has a house set on two acres of lush gardens and overlooks Lake Victoria. It has at least three security gates. {{/usCountry}} Read More {{^usCountry}} The New York Post reported that armed guards were posted outside the estate while a cellphone jamming system was set up to prevent leaks during the three days of festivities. {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} The New York Post reported that armed guards were posted outside the estate while a cellphone jamming system was set up to prevent leaks during the three days of festivities. {{/usCountry}} {{^usCountry}} 'Outside the Mamdani house were more than 20 special forces command unit guards, some in masks, and there was a phone-jamming system set up — and all for the strictly invite-only Mamdani event,' one witness confirmed to The Post. 'One gate had around nine guards stationed at it,' they added. {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} 'Outside the Mamdani house were more than 20 special forces command unit guards, some in masks, and there was a phone-jamming system set up — and all for the strictly invite-only Mamdani event,' one witness confirmed to The Post. 'One gate had around nine guards stationed at it,' they added. {{/usCountry}} {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} {{^userSubscribed}} {{^usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{#usCountry}} {{/usCountry}} {{/userSubscribed}} SHARE THIS ARTICLE ON

Elizabeth Gilbert asks $1.19M for her light-filled NYC home
Elizabeth Gilbert asks $1.19M for her light-filled NYC home

New York Post

time6 days ago

  • Entertainment
  • New York Post

Elizabeth Gilbert asks $1.19M for her light-filled NYC home

Eat, pray, list! Author Elizabeth Gilbert, whose readers have followed her journey from 'Eat, Pray, Love' — which became a 2010 film starring Julia Roberts — to this year's 'All the Way to the River: Love, Loss, and Liberation,' has re-listed her Gramercy Park home for $1.19 million. It was asking $1.49 million early this year. She paid $1.69 million for it in 2017, according to property records — so she will be selling it at a loss. In a moving interview, Gilbert told Gimme Shelter that the home was her sanctuary and writing cocoon while she recovered from the loss of her love, Rayya Elias. Gilbert hopes it will creatively nurture the next person who lives there too. 8 Elizabeth Gilbert now spends her days in New Jersey. Getty Images for Pennsylvania Conference for Women 2019 8 Built in book cases frame the home office-slash-writing space. Rich Caplan 8 Pops of color and a dangling chandelier add depth to the space. Rich Caplan 'I bought the apartment right before my partner Rayya died [of cancer],' Gilbert said. 'I knew that it was going to be the place where I was going to heal from her death and live and learn how to live alone, and she saw it right before she died.' 'It's kind of something we set up together,' Gilbert added. 'Rayya said she wanted to picture where I was going to be, so she slept there one night, which I really felt was like a benediction. I knew when we left that when I came back, I would be coming back alone.' Elias — who had many talents — was a Syria-born Douglas Elliman broker, as well as an author, a filmmaker, a hairdresser and a musician. The sun-filled one-bedroom, one-bath home is at 224 E. 17th St., which is also known as 1 Rutherford Place. It was built in 1855 as a townhouse, and it's where Gilbert wrote her 2019 novel, 'City of Girls.' 'The apartment in that novel is based on this apartment, where my character late in life finds a place in the Gramercy area and settles down for the rest of her life,' Gilbert said. 'That was going to be my intention too. Then COVID happened, I left New York and moved out to the country [in New Jersey] and found that I didn't really want to come back, which I think is probably a pretty common story. Life has taken a different turn.' Gut-renovated, the classic prewar co-op features striking oversize casement windows and white oak floors. The second-floor spread comes with an elegant open living and dining room, and a windowed kitchen with a wine cooler. 8 The space is thoughtfully planned out. Rich Caplan 8 The kitchen is also a delight. Rich Caplan 8 The updated kitchen has everything you need in a compact space. Rich Caplan The apartment, Gilbert said, 'was like a nest. It's such a romantic space, with these windows overlooking Rutherford Place, which is this tiny little corner of New York that even people who live in the neighborhood don't know what it is. It was very magical to be there in my grief.' Gilbert says she is in the 'post-beauty' phase of her life, living 'like a 60-year-old dude' with close-cropped/shaved hair in comfortable clothes and shoes. She's spending the time in a home converted from an old church that she has owned for two decades in New Jersey, spending more time traveling, to destinations including Costa Rica. That's why, she said, it was time to 'let the apartment go.' 'It served its purpose and it sheltered me during a really delicate time and moment in my life, and maybe it will shelter somebody else and inspire someone else because it's also a very good place to write,' Gilbert said. 8 The bedroom also has its fair share of built-ins. Rich Caplan 8 The bathroom. Rich Caplan Gilbert said she bought the apartment from an architect who gut-renovated the apartment and was very intentional about maximizing its space. But while she was renovating, the architect heard a voice telling her that she was designing the space for a writer. 'When I showed up, she said, 'Oh, there you are. I was wondering who the writer was that I was making this for was!' So of course there is a very romantic, mystical part of me that is wondering who the next creative person who's going to live there will be, using the light and the space to make their own projects. I'm very curious to find out,' Gilbert said. 'There's great magic in the apartment,' she added. 'It's got great ju-ju.' The main bedroom also features a casement window, plus built-ins, a large custom closet and a windowed-bath. There's also a Lutron light system, lots of storage throughout the apartment and more storage in the basement along with laundry and bike storage. The listing broker is Serhant's Jessica Taylor, a cast member of the Netflix streaming series, 'Owning Manhattan,' and Ravi Kantha, also of Serhant. While Gilbert no longer lives in the city, she will be back on Sept. 9 as part of her book tour, speaking at the Great Hall at Cooper Union, 7 E. Seventh St., sponsored by the Strand.

Iran-Israel Conflict: US objectives are far more than what meets the eye, says West Asia analyst
Iran-Israel Conflict: US objectives are far more than what meets the eye, says West Asia analyst

India Gazette

time29-06-2025

  • Politics
  • India Gazette

Iran-Israel Conflict: US objectives are far more than what meets the eye, says West Asia analyst

By Kavya Dubey New Delhi [India], June 29 (ANI): The world paused on June 13 when Israel targeted major military and nuclear facilities, and crucial personalities in Iran as it launched a series of attacks to disempower the West Asian country. The involvement of the Houthis of Yemen and the US in this high-tension conflict stopped short of a nuclear apocalypse--but this was not entirely unexpected. Some saw this coming. Supporting Israel, the US went ahead and struck three key nuclear sites in Iran on the ninth day of the military aggression. In support of Iran, the Houthis read this as a 'declaration of war' and called off their ceasefire with the US. This escalation was a result of the searing animosity between the arch rivals of West Asia--Iran, for its resistance to Western influence, and Israel, for the challenge to its hegemony. So, Israel categorically intends to fracture Iran's nuclear capabilities. But what does this mean for the world at large to strike down nuclear facilities in acts of war--instead of pushing for a 'no first use policy' like India? Waiel Awwad, Syria-born veteran international journalist and an expert on Middle East, in conversation with ANI, explained that Israel--a nuclear state, a state that is not a signatory to Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, that does not allow the mandatory inspection by the International Atomic Energy Agency, and has more than 90 nuclear warheads--attacks a country that is declared to have no nuclear bombs according to agencies, then 'it's a clear indication that it is not the nuclear we are looking at,' but the regime in Iran that is targeted 'on the pretext of the nuclear [weapons],' he said. It is widely reported that Israel is going through a situation internally. Does that necessitate Israel to engage in external aggression to the extent of targeting Iran in a predictable move? The conspicuously active involvement of the US in the Israel-Iran conflict points to a larger agenda. 'Israelis themselves are against any kind of war, they don't want him [Netanyahu] to go for war. Even the public opinions in the US and Israel show that,' said Awwad, as he quoted former US President Bill Clinton from a recent interview: 'Netanyahu has long wanted to fight Iran because that way, he can stay in office forever--he's been there for last 20 years.' Awwad seconded this, adding that the Israeli Prime Minister is acting for his survival and to 'serve his own political career.' Pertinently, he mentioned with reference to the US' economy and its dependence on arms trade: 'Somebody put it for me, if the US does not go to war every 10 years, they will have a civil war inside the United States--look at their history.' He emphasised that 'If you are friendly with the United States, you would remain in their sphere of influence and you are safe. But the moment you start having your sovereign independence, you will be attacked, and that is what happened in Iran,' as he mentioned similar examples of Iraq and Libya. In 1953, the elected government of Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh in Iran was toppled by the US- and West-backed forces. 'It's a clear indication that America wanted to bring instability and have total control over their oil, as most of the revenue from Iran's oil was going to Britain.' PM Mossadegh had nationalised Iran's oil industry to reclaim sovereignty from British control. After he was ousted, monarch Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi's reign was significantly marked by US influence over Iran. While American entities acquired considerable control over their oil production as the US bagged 40 per cent profits, Iran aligned with the West while acting as a counterweight to the Soviet Union. The western influence was significantly visible in Iranian society to the point of marking it as an era in the country's history. People eventually revolted against the Shah as the Western forces were involved internally in Iran. The uprising in 1979 (the Islamic Revolution) marked the end of the Shah's rule and Iran's monarchy, replacing the Imperial State of Iran with the Islamic Republic of Iran. Cleric Ruhollah Khomeini became the new head of state. 'The religious leaders took advantage of this revolt and took the lead. So, America imposed sanctions on Iran and seized their assets,' said Awwad, adding, 'All the sanctions on Iran have nothing to do with the American interests, by the way, it is because of the Israeli interest. Because America has two interests in the West Asia: Oil and gas/natural resources, and to make sure that the dominance of Israel prevails and continues over the region' to further its own interest. With the Revolution in Iran, the new establishment replaced the embassy of Israel with the embassy of Palestine in support of their cause. This was when Iran took an anti-Israel stand, and 'in the same fashion, Israel took an anti-Iran stand.' Iran has a civilisational history and its present plentifully draws from it, making it a strong contender for hegemony--the persistent aspiration of Israel in the Middle East and the US in the world in general. In the present context, 'The attack on Iran is due to its stand against Israel and the US,' Awwad said. 'Iran knew that a day would come when America and the West would take on it, because look at the region--it is destroyed totally from Palestine, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq--who's left in West Asia? The only country left in West Asia is Iran. And once you remove the Iranian government from power, all its allies--India, Russia, China will have great impact and ramifications on oil security, food security, because once America and the West take control, they will conquer the whole of West Asia,' Awwad asserted. Additionally, the West Asia expert highlighted the tendency of the US of 'using terrorism as a tool to achieve political objectives--they tried it in Afghanistan, they tried it in Libya, Syria, Iraq. When America goes to war, terrorists appear in the region. America wanted to give it a religious tag, along with the Israelis, that this has to do with religion, so they attack one country after another, and whole region is under turmoil. Their objectives are far more than what meets the eye,' he concluded. Given the situation between Iran and Israel, and the active participation of the US and the dynamics discussed herewith, does India face any risk in taking any kind of stand that would amount to going against Israel, and in turn, against the US? American scholar and South Asia expert Michael Kugelman, in an email interview with ANI, clarified that 'There's no risk of that at the moment. Both India and the US have strong partnerships with Israel. And yet at the same time, Washington and New Delhi both made clear that they strongly supported de-escalation.' However, 'India's support for de-escalation and for the ceasefire should not be seen as going against Israel, given that Israel agreed to the ceasefire. That said, there is the future potential scenario of the ceasefire collapsing, and Israel resuming strikes on Iran. The question in that case is whether India would oppose--even if indirectly--Israeli strikes, or if it would take a muted position as it did the last time around and sympathise with Israel's position,' Kugelman said. It was widely abuzz that, should the aggressions escalate, the Strait of Hormuz might have to be closed. If that happens, it would be an unprecedented act in the world's history. India would also bear its brunt should such a proposition materialise. 'There would be considerable and indeed damaging impacts on India's economy. India's petroleum minister indicated several days back that many Indian supplies don't travel through the strait, because India has been able to diversify its sources of supply. It's true that India has developed stronger energy partnerships with countries outside the Middle East, from Russia to the US. But, even with that diversification, anywhere from a third to nearly 50 per cent of India's crude oil imports and up to nearly 55 per cent of its LNG imports still transit the Strait of Hormuz. If the strait is shut and all those goods have to take more circuitous routes, Indian energy import costs would soar,' Kugelman explained. However, a closure of the strait doesn't appear imminent, as 'Iran itself could face major economic costs if it were to shut it down. But given the continued volatile situation in the region, one can't completely rule out Iran making the move sometime in future--especially if the ceasefire collapses and the conflict with Israel resumes.' But in the event of such an extreme occurrence, can India cushion the economy from its impact? Does India have an alternative? Kugelman maintains that it will 'likely redouble India's efforts to diversify its source of energy supplies, to reduce reliance on the Strait of Hormuz, and also to tap in more to indigenous energy sources, including and especially renewables like solar, wind, and green hydrogen. India's only immediate alternative would be to route its energy supplies through routes beyond the Strait of Hormuz. But this is not ideal because transport trade costs would soar.' India's position between West Asia and China China, a close partner of Tehran, is one of Iran's top oil customers, and it relies heavily on the Strait of Hormuz. 'The China factor is likely one of various reasons why Tehran didn't actually move to close the strait. If the strait were to be closed, there would be a mad scramble to find alternative routes to ship energy supplies. And since China is such a major importer of Iranian oil, the scramble would be especially frantic. India, with its own reliance on the strait, would be caught up in it,' said the South Asia expert. But for India in general, there are some notable implications stemming from the close China-Iran energy partnership. 'India doesn't have the deepest of ties with Tehran, but it's a friendly relationship, and New Delhi places great value in its current efforts to develop Chabahar Port: It sees this port development project as part of a key broader strategic goal to strengthen connectivity and access to Central Asia, via Iran and Afghanistan,' Kugelman highlighted. However, given the closeness of China-Iran ties, and in light of China-India competition, 'There will be concerns that Beijing may try to undercut India's efforts to partner with Iran in building out Chabahar--an objective that already presents challenges for India because of US sanctions on Iran. China might do this by urging Iran to reduce its cooperation with India on the port--and perhaps offer its own support to develop Chabahar,' he pointed out. There are at least eight million Indian expatriates in the Gulf region, and that's a core reason for New Delhi's strong preference for there to not be an escalated regional war. 'It's not just about safety considerations, but also economic,' the South Asian expert said. 'Remittances from the Middle East constitute a substantive portion of India's overall remittance revenue, and so evacuations of Indian expatriates from the region would have had broader implications for India's economy--even though remittances don't constitute as large a share of the economy as they do in some of the smaller economies in India's neighborhood,' he said. Awwad pointed out that with a hefty number of Indian diaspora in the Middle East, and should they return to India in the face of war, it is unlikely to have a contingency plan to evacuate millions of Indians safely. India will be 'one of the biggest losers in this war,' noted Awwad. (ANI)

Correspondent from Syria new Foreign Correspondents Club chief
Correspondent from Syria new Foreign Correspondents Club chief

New Indian Express

time26-05-2025

  • Politics
  • New Indian Express

Correspondent from Syria new Foreign Correspondents Club chief

NEW DELHI: Dr Waiel Awwad, a senior Syria-born foreign correspondent based in India, was elected as the new President of the Foreign Correspondents Club (FCC) of South Asia and Veteran editor, political commentator and author Prakash Nanda was re-elected as the Secretary of the Club for the 2025–27 term. P. M. Narayanan, a television journalist with German TV, was re-elected as the Treasurer, a statement form FCCSA said. Dr Awwad succeeds Venkat Narayan, another highly respected foreign correspondent. The elections followed the Annual General Body Meeting, held within the FCC premises. A total of nine members were also elected to the General Council. The elected members are Mayank Bhardwaj (Reuters), Krishnan P. Nayar (Emirates News Agency), Anoop Saxena (German TV), Devina Gupta (BBC), Eshani Mathur (Bloomberg), Ruslan Imaev (Russia Today), Sidhartha Srivastava (CAN), C. K. Nayak (Jan Aastha Abroad), Amitav Srivastava (SABC). Polls held within FCC premises The elections followed the Annual General Body Meeting, held within the FCC premises. A total of nine members were also elected to the General Council. The new team will serve for two years form 2025 to 2027.

Trump govt admits Mahmoud Khalil was detained without warrant, says he was a flight risk
Trump govt admits Mahmoud Khalil was detained without warrant, says he was a flight risk

Time of India

time26-04-2025

  • Politics
  • Time of India

Trump govt admits Mahmoud Khalil was detained without warrant, says he was a flight risk

Trump administration admitted to the court that Mahmoud Khalil was detained without a warrant. Columbia University student and pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil whose arrest sent shockwaves among university students in the country was detained without an arrest warrant, the Donald Trump administration admitted to the court. It cited exigent circumstances for the warrantless arrest and said there was a flight risk. Mahmoud Khalik said he would not cooperate and intended to leave the scene,the immigration authorities said. Khalil, a Syria-born legal US resident with a green card, was arrested March 8 after he returned from an Iftar meal during Ramadan. Video footage of the arrest shows Khalil cooperating and telling officers, "Yes, I'm coming with you." DHS argued in court documents submitted to the court Thursday that it did not need to obtain a warrant before the arrest because immigration officers have the power to detain people where there is suspicion of 'an offense against the United States.' "The HSI [Homeland Security Investigations] supervisory agent believed there was a flight risk and arrest was necessary," the DHS wrote. "The agents had reason to believe that the respondent was likely to escape before a warrant could be obtained," it continued. Khalil's lawyers claim he was cooperating with the agents Khalil's attorneys, however, argue DHS did need a warrant to enter their client's apartment building. Khalil's legal team is calling for the case to be dismissed, claiming that he cooperated with authorities throughout the arrest and that no evidence has been presented to prove he was a flight risk. "We learned for the first time that the DHS agents who arrested Mahmoud lied to him: they wrote in their arrest report that the agents told him that they had an arrest warrant, but DHS has now admitted in their filing that that was a lie and that there was no warrant at all at the time of the arrest," Marc Van Der Hout, one of Khalil's attorneys, said in a statement. Khalil not allowed to see his newborn Khalil's wife Noor Abdalla gave birth to their first son in New York while Khalil remains in ICE detention in Louisiana. "I welcomed our son into the world earlier today without Mahmoud by my side. Despite our request for ICE to allow Mahmoud to attend the birth, they denied his temporary release to meet our son. This was a purposeful decision by ICE to make me, Mahmoud, and our son suffer," Khalil's wife said in a statement issued on April 21.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store