PM Modi will launch development projects worth Rs 60,000 crore: Minister Nadendla Manohar
Addressing a Rachabanda programme at Inavolu village in Guntur district, the minister said the event would mark a crucial milestone in Andhra Pradesh's development. He said the Prime Minister would launch development projects worth Rs 60,000 crore during his visit.
Minister Manohar said the government would develop all 29 capital region villages and recalled how farmers had voluntarily contributed 34,000 acres in just 50 days for Amaravati. 'This sacrifice must not go in vain,' he said.
He criticised the previous YSRCP regime for halting projects and dismantling infrastructure such as roads and cables, alleging that it had betrayed public trust and lacked administrative experience.
Highlighting the NDA government's vision, he said Amaravati would be developed with world-class infrastructure including outer and inner ring roads and an airport.
'This is the first time in India that a Prime Minister is attending a second foundation event for a capital,' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
5 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Nuclear laws and the role of Opposition
Political parties in India, especially the Opposition, will soon need to take a view on a critical subject with a bearing on the country's energy security and climate change mitigation. The proposal to amend the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damages Act (CLNDA), 2010, and the Atomic Energy Act (AEA), 1962 — which in the past witnessed intense debate — sooner or later, is expected to come up in Parliament. With the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led National Democratic Alliance government indicating its intention to introduce it during the monsoon session, Parliament will revisit the issue whenever the Bills are introduced. The plan is to amend the CLNDA and the AEA to address the vexatious issue of liability on the suppliers of equipment and permit private parties in the field of nuclear energy, respectively. The India-U.S. Civil Nuclear Agreement and the enactment of the CLNDA led to a series of standoffs between the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance government and Opposition parties — the BJP and the Left parties led by CPI(M). Historical context Fifteen years ago, the government introduced a Bill to write laws for compensation to the people for nuclear accidents, as India was not a party to any of the existing conventions. Parliament was engaged in a lengthy debate, as the government preferred the passage of liability along the lines of international covenants. Lack of requisite strength in the Rajya Sabha, dreadful memories of the suffering of people from the 1984 Bhopal gas leak, the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, and the damage to the nuclear reactor at Fukushima, Japan, following an earthquake, provided the backdrop. Sensing an opportunity, the combined opposition pressed to raise the compensation bar on suppliers of nuclear reactor equipment and beyond the immediate compensation liability on the operator. The insertion of the clause rendered the Act dead on arrival. Western country equipment suppliers shied away. An attempt to tweak it a decade ago made little difference, and international response remains lukewarm. In 2007, during the debate around the nuclear deal, questions were raised about whether it was considering amending the AEA, allowing private sector participation. The government then noted that the 1997 report of the Dr. Raja Ramanna Committee had been examined, and a review of the Act had been under consideration since then. Now both issues are scheduled to return on Parliament's agenda. Raising concerns In February this year, the Congress raised objections to the announcement to amend the Acts. It said the move dilutes accountability of suppliers, raises domestic risk, and protects equipment suppliers, reflecting the Convention on Supplementary Compensation, compromising the citizens' safety, and leaning in favour of international corporations. The party also alleged that the move was intended to appease foreign interests, particularly France and the U.S., ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit. Back in 2010, then-Prime Minister Manmohan Singh stated that the process for compensation for nuclear accidents began in 1999, and such a law was needed. The government then dismissed claims that the proposed law was timed with a visit by President Barack Obama. Now, the central issue is whether the Congress will take a studied stance on the proposed legislation. There is a serious debate taking place outside on the move to build small modular reactors, with many countries vying to have a piece of the pie. The contribution of energy from nuclear power is estimated to be slightly over 3% of the total power generation. At the end of last year, the installed capacity of 24 nuclear power plants stood at 8.8 GW, the government informed Parliament. This was when the country set a target of 10 GW by the year 2000. The government now aims for 22.48 GW by 2031-32 and an ambitious 100 GW by 2047. In the past, the Opposition took an about-turn on three key issues. At the turn of the century, opposition led to a delay in enacting an amendment to the Patents Act, 1970. Eventually, after a change of sides, the Opposition's support resulted in the mandatory amendment. A decade ago, on two other contentious issues, the Opposition stalled laws, one on insurance law to raise the foreign direct investment ceiling, and the ratification of the exchange of enclaves with Bangladesh under the Land Border Agreement. Finally, these proposed laws were enacted with the then-Opposition offering support, with minor or no concessions. Leaders across the aisle walked together to arrive at an agreed position as the governments of the day worked, in their assessment, to further the national interest. Need for a debate Today, the NDA government does not have to look across the aisle for support. The current issues have long-term implications, and there is a need for a well-rounded discussion that takes into account all factors around nuclear energy, the shift towards small modular reactors, the larger question of disposal of nuclear waste, and allied subjects. The Opposition should play a leading role in initiating this discussion and decide accordingly. Otherwise, during a debate on a contentious issue two decades ago, a member on the Treasury Benches remarked to another member of the Opposition that a change of sides should not result in a change of stand. K. V. Prasad is a senior Delhi-based journalist and authored a book Indian Parliament Shaping Foreign Policy
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Anticipating GST changes, Ludhiana industry wants reforms expedited.
Ludhiana: As Prime Minister Narendra Modi unveiled what he called a "Diwali gift", major reforms to the Goods and Services Tax (GST), industrial and trade bodies are expressing cautious optimism. While they welcome the simplification, stakeholders insist that swift implementation, especially of refunds, is essential to prevent disruptions and revive consumption. In his August 15 Independence Day address, PM Modi revealed plans to overhaul GST by October, aimed at easing the tax burden on daily-use items and MSMEs. The long-standing four-slab system (5%, 12%, 18%, 28%) is being anticipated to be replaced by a streamlined two-slab structure with rates of 5% and 18%, and a special 40% rate on sin and luxury goods like tobacco and pan masala, as per reports of proposal having been sent to the group of ministers (GoM) and state finance ministers, ahead of the GST council's meeting. Industrialists and businessmen of Ludhiana expect that this reform could boost domestic consumption, exports, and market sentiment. "The prospect of two main GST rates are welcome, but delayed refunds could cripple operations. If we must wait for GST refunds on expenditure on raw materials, it's going to be tough," Avtar Singh Bhogal, vice-president, UCPMA, said, stressing that timely refunds would support purchasing power and curtail GST evasion. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt's Daughter Shiloh Now Goes by a New Name After Dropping Pitt BigGlobalTravel Undo Upkar Singh Ahuja, president of the Chamber of Industrial and Commercial Undertakings (CICU), echoed the urgency. He warned that markets were already slow and showed signs of recession, with consumers delaying purchases in anticipation of GST relief. "Whatever changes are to be done, do them now, not wait until Diwali," he urged. "People are have stopped purchasing on big items anticipating lower GST and, thus, prices," he said. There have been long-standing industry demands for GST simplification, Harsimarjit Singh Lucky, UCMPA president said. He added that reforms would bring relief that would curtail evasion and simplify compliance. Sonu Nilibar, president of the Punjab Textile Merchant Association, said "A uniform 5% GST rate on garments would be a landmark reform. It will bring much-needed clarity, make goods affordable, boost consumption, and ease compliance. On behalf of trade, I warmly thank Prime Minister Modi for considering this long-awaited reform." Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
Despite warnings by RPSC, attendance still low in exams
Ajmer: Despite making strict rules and issuing warnings to ensure that attendance in its recruitment exams is high, Rajasthan Public Service Commission (RPSC) continues to face the problem of a large number of absentees. The secretary of RPSC released a notification on May 9 this year, stating that if a candidate remains absent in two or more recruitment exams, their one-time registration will be blocked. To reopen the registration, a penalty of Rs 750 would have to be paid. A penalty of Rs 1,500 would have to be paid by those who remain absent in four exams. The commission also warned e-mitras against filling applications on behalf of candidates. Efforts were also made to prevent ineligible candidates from filing applications. "The RPSC has to prepare exam halls for a large number of candidates, but when most of them remain absent, it is a waste of money and efforts," said an official of RPSC. However, attendance in recruitment exams conducted by RPSC has not increased as yet. Exams conducted in July and Aug saw low attendance. On Wednesday, the recruitment exam for analyst-cum-programmer and deputy director in department of DOIT &C, for which 7,367 candidates applied, saw only 3,170 in the morning session and 3,157 in the evening session, a 42.85% attendance. In the assistant fisheries development officer exam on July 29, the attendance was only 5.88%: of the 4,118 candidates who applied, only 242 appeared. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
