
Trump Tariffs: Textiles, jewellery, gems...; check complete list of Indian exports likely to be hit hardest by US' 50% tariffs
Trump Tariffs India: Domestic export sectors such as leather, chemicals, footwear, gems and jewellery, textiles and shrimp will be severely impacted by the imposition of the 50 per cent tariff by the US, say industry experts. US President Donald Trump on Wednesday slapped an additional 25 per cent tariff, raising the total duties to 50 per cent on goods coming from India, as a penalty for New Delhi's continued purchase of Russian oil.
The United States has imposed additional tariffs or penalty for Russian imports only on India while other buyers such as China and Turkey, have so far escaped such measures.
'The tariffs are expected to make Indian goods far costlier in the US, with potential to cut US-bound exports by 40–50 per cent,' think tank GTRI said.
After the new tariff, it said, organic chemicals' exports to the US will attract additional 54 per cent duty. The other sectors which will attract high duties include carpets (52.9 per cent), apparel – knitted (63.9 per cent), apparel – woven (60.3 per cent), textiles, made ups (59 per cent), diamonds, gold and products (52.1 per cent), machinery and mechanical appliances (51.3 per cent), furniture, bedding, mattresses (52.3 per cent).
The 25 per cent duty, announced on July 31, will come into force from August 7 (9.30 am IST).
The additional 25 per cent will be implemented by the US from August 27. These will be over and above the existing standard import duty in the US.
In 2024-25, the bilateral trade between India and the US stood at USD 131.8 billion (USD 86.5 billion exports and USD 45.3 billion imports).
The sectors, which would bear the brunt of 50 per cent duty include textiles/ clothing (10.3 billion), gems and jewellery (12 billion), shrimp (USD 2.24 billion), leather and footwear (USD 1.18 billion), chemicals (2.34 billion), and electrical and mechanical machinery (about USD 9 billion).
Kolkata-based seafood exporter and MD of Megaa Moda Yogesh Gupta said that now India's shrimp will become expensive in the US market.
'We are already facing huge competition from Ecuador as it has only 15 per cent tariff. Indian shrimp already attracts a 2.49 per cent anti-dumping duty and a 5.77 per cent countervailing duty. After this 25 per cent, the duty will be 33.26 per cent from August 7,' Gupta said.
The Confederation of Indian Textile Industry (CITI) said that it is 'deeply concerned' about the potential adverse impact of the effective 50 per cent US tariff rate for India.
The US is India's largest market for textile and apparel exports..
'The US tariff announcement of August 6 is a huge setback for India's textile and apparel exporters as it has further complicated the challenging situation we were already grappling with and will significantly weaken our ability to compete effectively vis-à-vis many other countries for a larger share of the US market,' it said.
It urged the government to urgently take steps to help the sector during these hugely testing times.
Colin Shah, MD, Kama Jewelry, said this move is a severe setback for Indian exports, with nearly 55 per cent of India's shipments to the US market directly affected.
The 50 per cent reciprocal tariff effectively imposes a cost burden, placing our exporters at a 30–35 per cent competitive disadvantage compared to peers from countries with lesser reciprocal tariff, he said.
'Many export orders have already been put on hold as buyers reassess sourcing decisions in light of higher landed costs. For a large number of MSME-led sectors, absorbing this sudden cost escalation is simply not viable. Margins are already thin, and this additional blow could force exporters to lose long-standing clients,' Shah said.
Kanpur-based Growmore International Ltd MD Yadvendra Singh Sachan said the exporters should look for new markets to maintain export growth.
Exporters are hoping that early finalisation of the India-US bilateral trade agreement will help in dealing with the tariff challenges.
The negotiations between India and the US are still going on for an interim trade deal, though there will be no compromise on the red lines with regard to duty concessions on agriculture items, dairy, and genetically modified (GM) products, sources said.
The two countries are negotiating a bilateral trade agreement (BTA). They are aiming to conclude the first phase of the pact by fall (October-November) this year.
(Only the headline has been reworked by India.com staff. Copy comes from an agency feed)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
14 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Supreme Court relists case where it took judge off criminal cases after 13 Allahabad HC judges protest
Following an unprecedented protest by several judges of the Allahabad High Court, the Supreme Court on Friday will rehear the matter in which it had barred a judge of the Allahabad High Court from hearing criminal cases till his retirement. At least 13 judges of the Allahabad High Court on Thursday sought a full court reference to discuss the SC observations and directions against their colleague, a sitting judge of the HC. It is learnt that one judge moved a letter seeking a full court discussion while 12 of his colleagues signed it. The top court had criticised the HC judge for permitting criminal prosecution in what it said was essentially a civil dispute. The matter will be reheard by a bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan, which had also passed the August 4 order barring the judge. Sources said there was a view among some of the SC judges that the court could have gone easier in the matter as against the HC judge, and this was conveyed to the CJI. In its August 4 order, the SC asked the Allahabad HC Chief Justice to 'make the concerned judge sit in a division bench with a seasoned senior judge of the high court. We further direct that the concerned judge shall not be assigned any criminal determination till he demits office. If at all at some point in time, he is to be made to sit as a single judge, he shall not be assigned any criminal determination.' The case involved a dispute between a yarn supplier and a cloth manufacturer. Lalita Textile Concern had supplied thread worth Rs 52,34,385 to Shikhar Chemicals, of which Rs 47,75,000 was paid and the rest remained unpaid since August 2019. The owner of Lalita Textile alleged he did not receive payment despite multiple attempts. He moved a magistrate court, which took cognisance of the complaint, and issued summons for the offence punishable under Section 406 (criminal breach of trust) of the IPC. This was challenged before the high court, which dismissed the same. The case then came to the Supreme Court. It said in its verdict: 'With all due deference and humility at our command, we are constrained to observe that the impugned order is one of the worst and most erroneous orders that we have come across in our respective tenures as judges of this court.' The top court added, 'The judge concerned has not only cut a sorry figure for himself but has made a mockery of justice. We are at our wits' end to understand what is wrong with the Indian judiciary at the level of high court. At times, we are left wondering whether such orders are passed on some extraneous considerations or it is sheer ignorance of law. Whatever it be, passing of such absurd and erroneous orders is something unpardonable.' The SC set aside the high court order and remanded the matter to the high court for considering it afresh. The court asked the Chief Justice of the Allahabad HC to assign the matter to any other HC judge.


Deccan Herald
14 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Trump tariff effect: Gem & jewellery exporters stare at severe losses
India's competitors like Turkey, Vietnam, and Thailand enjoy significantly lower tariffs of 15%, 20%, and 19% respectively, thereby making Indian products relatively less competitive in the US market.


Hindustan Times
14 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Russia confirms Vladimir Putin's meeting with Donald Trump amid bid to end Ukraine war
US President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, might have a meeting next week, Moscow's deputy UN Ambassador Dmitry Polyanskiy confirmed on Thursday. The Kremlin said on August 7, 2025 that a milestone summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin to resolve the conflict in Ukraine was set for the "coming days".(AFP) Polyanskiy also said that he was not aware of any planned meeting between Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. "As far as I heard, there are a number of locations, but they agreed to something that they don't want to disclose. The timeline is, I think, next week, but that's again judging from what presidents said themselves," Polyanskiy told reporters about the Putin-Trump meeting. While he said that he hadn't heard about any planned meeting between Putin and Zelensky, Polyanskiy also did not rule it out. "I haven't heard about any meeting planned with President Zelenskiy, but I am not in the loop," he added. When was the last time that a US President met Vladimir Putin? The last time that Vladimir Putin met any US President was back in June 2021, when he had a meeting with Donald Trump's predecessor Joe Biden in Geneva. There has been no summit involving the Russian and the US leaders since then. Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, citing what it called threats to its security. Kyiv and its Western allies cast the invasion as an imperial-style land grab. Donald Trump had vowed to end Russia's war in Ukraine in 24 hours after he took office. But almost seven months into his second term, it remains an unfulfilled promise. The Republican put an additional 25 percent tariff on goods imported from India due to New Delhi buying oil from Russia. This came even as Trump hailed a meeting between his envoy Steve Witkoff and Putin on Wednesday, saying that 'progress was made'. The White House had said that Russia wanted to meet Trump and that a meeting could happen as soon as next week. This is a renewed bid to end the Russia-Ukraine war that has been raging for more than three years.