
Can India become a global leader in battery manufacturing?
In light of this, the 2025 Union Budget removed Basic Customs Duty (BCD) on 28 capital goods used in mobile battery manufacturing, encouraging local output for consumer electronics. As part of a broader strategy since the July 2024 Budget, India had already nullified BCD on 25 critical minerals. The 2025 Union Budget's exemptions on cobalt powder, LiB scrap, lead, zinc, and 12 other critical minerals aim to strengthen sourcing of affordable critical mineral feedstock at competitive price, strengthen domestic battery production, and cut import dependence.
Removing BCD on critical minerals lowers costs, attracts investment in refining and recycling, and strengthens India's battery supply chain for global competitiveness. However, this is a long-term journey, requiring approximately five to six years to rapidly scale up domestic production, enhance recycling capacities and strengthen R&D investments. This effort is key to cutting imports and building a resilient circular economy.
India's battery manufacturing sector is still in its nascent stage. LiBs, essential for powering consumer electronics, have become the dominant technology due to their high energy density and longer lifespan. India's rising LiB demand highlights its import dependence due to limited local manufacturing. Without strong policy support and industrial growth, reliance on countries like China, South Korea, and Japan may threaten long-term energy security and economic resilience.
Currently, China dominates the global LiB market manufacturing, accounting for 77% of worldwide cell capacity and 80% of raw material refining. To counter China's dominance and boost local capacity, India has launched initiatives like Make in India for self-reliant manufacturing, the National Critical Mineral Mission (NCMM) for critical mineral supply, and a PLI Scheme for Critical Minerals to promote recycling and advanced technologies—together strengthening domestic industry and accelerating manufacturing.
Despite efforts to boost domestic manufacturing, securing raw material supply chains remains urgent. Under NCMM, India may form strategic partnerships with friendly nations like Australia and Chile having the largest lithium reserves to bridge the raw material gap.
India and Australia have already committed $43.2 million for joint initiatives between Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) and Indian partners, fostering collaboration in critical minerals research and technology development. India and Chile share a long-standing trade relationship, formalized by a 2005 Framework Agreement and a Preferential Trade Agreement to boost bilateral trade, including minerals and energy. These partnerships can help secure lithium supply and support India's battery manufacturing. However, India must also invest in refining and processing to cut import dependence.
Another key hurdle to India's LiB growth is low R&D investment. India's Gross Expenditure on R&D (GERD) across sectors stands at just 0.64% of GDP, significantly lower than China (2.4%) and the US (3.4%). With low overall GERD, battery R&D investment remains limited, hindering innovation. To compete globally, India must strengthen multi-institutional R&D collaborations. The ministry of electronics and IT had taken an initiative to establish a Centre of Excellence on Rechargeable Battery Technology at Centre for Materials for Electronics Technology, Pune to support SMEs the R&D needs on material, machine and process of advanced chemistry cell including cathode and anode materials of various rechargeable batteries like Li-ion, sodium ion, solid state Li-ion and flexible batteries. Scaling more public-private partnerships can boost local IP and aid industry. India should explore alternative chemistries like sodium-ion, sodium-sulphur, metal-air, redox flow, and lithium-metal—to reduce reliance on vulnerable critical mineral supply chains.
Efforts may be focused on building a strong recycling framework and boosting R&D via support labs and start-up incubators can help lower costs and reduce import dependence. However, globally, the present recycling rate of Ni, Co and Li are merely 60%, 32%, and 0.5% respectively, which is due to challenging reverse logistics of collecting end-of-life batteries and lack of profitable recycling technologies with limited volume. Recycling and refining industries must adopt innovative technologies to make metal extraction more profitable.
At the same time, the emphasis on using domestically recycled materials under the Battery Waste Management Rules,2022(BWMR) though challenging, offers a chance to boost India's self-sufficiency in critical materials. The regulation allows the targets to be met using any battery component, including non-critical materials like aluminum and plastics, rather than focusing on reclaiming lithium, cobalt, or nickel. Given the complexities, realistic timelines are key to avoid supply chain disruptions. While South Korea took over two decades to set recycled content guidelines after starting LiB production, India is aiming to introduce such regulations within just three years of commercial-scale manufacturing—highlighting the need for a more pragmatic timeline. India's recycling infrastructure is underdeveloped, with most end-of-life LiBs poorly processed in the informal sector, causing major material losses. The current pace of progress is insufficient, making it imperative to accelerate domestic LiB manufacturing and recycling capacities in the next five to six years to meet BWMR guidelines and reduce dependency on external supply chains.
Battery recycling can reduce India's reliance on raw material imports by recovering lithium, cobalt, and nickel from end-of-life LiBs for reuse in battery production. Unlike China, which is currently the only market with significant LiB recycling infrastructure, India's ecosystem is deterred by limited investment and unorganised battery waste management.
As India moves towards becoming a global leader in consumer electronics, ensuring a stable and sustainable supply of LiBs will be critical. Creating reserves of recycled critical minerals under NCMM, can help achieve true Atmanirbharta. India is at a crucial juncture in its journey toward self-sufficiency in LiB manufacturing, a sector vital for clean energy, digital growth, and industrial expansion. While schemes like PLI, customs duty cuts, and NCMM offer policy momentum, building a resilient battery ecosystem needs scaled-up production, secure supply chains, and stronger R&D. Addressing raw material gaps through global tie-ups, enhancing refining & processing capacities, and advanced battery recycling can cut import dependence. Multi-institutional R&D, alternative chemistries, and phased recycling mandates will enable a circular economy. Well-structured regulations, industry-government collaboration, and smooth execution, India can shift from assembly to value addition and emerge as a global leader in sustainable battery manufacturing.
This article is authored by Shiksha Dahiya, senior manager public policy, Chase Advisors and Sandeep Chatterjee, former senior director, ministry of electronics and information technology.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
7 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
US imports see a rapid fall in June due to concerns over Donald Trump's tariffs, data shows
Imports into the United States fell more than expected in June as concerns around shifting tariff policies hit retailers, raising fears of fewer product options in stores for shoppers, data from the National Retail Federation showed on Friday. Since April's "Liberation Day" announcement of a 10% baseline tariff, Donald Trump has adjusted rates frequently.(Bloomberg) WHY IT'S IMPORTANT The data comes as several of US President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs went into effect this week. As of August 7, duties range from 10% to 50%, with India, Brazil, and Switzerland facing some of the highest rates. Since April's "Liberation Day" announcement of a 10% baseline tariff, Trump has adjusted rates frequently. A temporary truce with China in May reduced tariffs to 30%, but new hikes resumed in July. BY THE NUMBERS U.S. ports covered by NRF's report handled 1.96 million 20-foot containers or its equivalent in June, which was down 8.4% year-over-year, but up 0.7% from May. That was a bigger drop from the NRF forecast from a month ago. The trade body had then projected ports would handle 2.06 million TEU in June, up 5.9% from May but down 3.7% year over year. Moreover, import cargo volume at major container ports in the U.S. is tentatively expected to end 2025 5.6% below 2024's volume, NRF's forecast showed on Friday. CONTEXT Apparel retailers, including Under Armour, Deckers Outdoor have reported tariff impacts in the past couple of months and are taking steps to diversify their supply chain to avoid tariffs on goods routed through or sourced from Southeast Asian countries like Vietnam. "The uncertainty around tariffs has impacted retailers' ability to forecast holiday orders and shipments. As tariff rates increase, consumers will ultimately face higher prices and less choice and availability during the holiday season," NRF Vice President for Supply Chain and Customs Policy Jonathan Gold said. "We need binding trade agreements that open markets by lowering tariffs, not raising them." Tariffs will result in higher prices for U.S. consumers, less hiring, lower business investment and a slower economy, he added.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
US, Russia discuss truce deal that would cement Putin's territorial gains in Ukraine: Report
The United States and Russia are seeking a deal to halt the war in Ukraine that would formalise Moscow's control over territories captured during its invasion, according to a report read more The United States and Russia are seeking a deal to halt the war in Ukraine that would formalise Moscow's control over territories captured during its invasion, according to a Bloomberg report on Friday, citing sources familiar with the matter. US and Russian officials are negotiating territorial terms in preparation for a potential summit between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, which could take place as early as next week, added the report. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The White House has dismissed the Bloomberg report suggesting a potential US-Russia deal on Ukraine as speculative. Putin continues to claim sovereignty over four Ukrainian regions — Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson — as well as Crimea, which was annexed in 2014. However, Russian forces do not have full control over all of these territories. Ukraine has previously indicated some flexibility in seeking an end to the war, which has devastated cities and claimed thousands of lives. Still, any agreement that formalises the loss of roughly 20% of Ukrainian territory would present a politically and emotionally fraught challenge for President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his government. According to Bloomberg, the tentative deal under discussion would involve Russia halting its offensive in the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions, freezing the battlelines as they currently stand. Since returning to the White House in January, President Donald Trump has pushed to repair ties with Moscow and bring the war to an end. His public stance on Putin has fluctuated between praise and criticism. Amid mounting frustration over Moscow's continued military aggression, Trump has threatened to impose new sanctions on Russia and its trading partners starting Friday, unless Putin agrees to a ceasefire. The proposed measures could be postponed or scrapped altogether depending on the outcome of the expected Trump-Putin summit, which may take place in the United Arab Emirates in the coming days. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff held three hours of talks with Putin in Moscow on Wednesday that both sides described as constructive. Meanwhile, Prime Minister Donald Tusk of Poland, a close ally of Ukraine, said earlier on Friday that a pause in the conflict could be close. He was speaking after talks with Zelenskyy. 'There are certain signals, and we also have an intuition, that perhaps a freeze in the conflict - I don't want to say the end, but a freeze in the conflict - is closer than it is further away,' Tusk told a news conference. 'There are hopes for this.' Tusk also said Zelenskiy was 'very cautious but optimistic' and that Ukraine was keen that Poland and other European countries play a role in planning for a ceasefire and an eventual peace settlement. With inputs from agencies


Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Average US tariffs top 20%, back to 1910s levels: WTO and IMF
The US tariff rate now averages 20.1 percent, the highest level since the early 1910s -- except for a brief spike earlier this year -- after new duties took effect Thursday, WTO and IMF data showed Friday. Trump's "reciprocal" tariffs on the United States's main trading partners and subsequent escalations, particularly on Chinese goods, briefly drove the average rate to 24.8 percent in May. (Bloomberg) The figure, calculated by the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), stands in contrast with the 2.4-percent rate in force at the time of President Donald Trump's inauguration on January 20. Trump's April 2 announcement of "reciprocal" tariffs on the United States's main trading partners and subsequent escalations, particularly on Chinese goods, briefly drove the average rate to 24.8 percent in May, a figure unseen since 1904, according to data from the United States International Trade Commission. A trade "truce" brought down sky-high tariff levels that the United States and China had imposed upon one another, but that is set to expire next week. The new figure by the WTO and IMF takes into account the trade deals the United States negotiated with the European Union, Japan, South Korea and other nations that have now come into force. It also includes the latest tariffs unilaterally applied by the United States on Brazil, Canada and semi-finished copper imports. These deals usually included lower tariff levels than Trump threatened in April but were higher than the baseline 10-percent rate the US introduced. The updated average tariff rate exceeds the nearly 20-percent rate that the United States applied in the 1930s, a period of high tariffs that economists widely consider behind the severity and duration of the Great Depression. However, the WTO and the IMF estimate the average rate, which is based on trade volumes, by applying the latest rates to 2024 trade volumes. Thus, it is an estimation as companies have already changed their behaviour by stockpiling and delaying purchases and may shift buying patterns or reduce imports in reaction to the new rates. According to the Budget Lab at Yale University, once changing consumption patterns and secondary effects are taken into account, the figure should fall towards 17.7 percent, provided Trump doesn't make any more shock announcements.