Eramet's shares slide as Gabon plans manganese ore export ban
Gabon's plan, announced by the government in a weekend statement, comes as several African countries — including Guinea with bauxite, Zimbabwe with lithium, and Mali and Tanzania with gold — seek to move from exporting raw material to local processing.
Demand for manganese, used in steel production and increasingly in electric vehicle batteries, has grown globally. Eramet is the main shareholder in Gabon-based manganese mining firm Comilog, whose Moanda mine is the world's biggest for manganese.
Eramet said in a statement that it noted the Gabonese government's intention to ban crude manganese exports from January 1, 2029 and would continue to work with the authorities "in a spirit of constructive partnership and mutual respect".
The group will aim to safeguard the 10,460 Gabonese jobs sustained by Comilog and Comilog railway transport unit Setrag, it added. Eramet shares fell as much as 5.5% before paring losses to trade about 4% lower by 8am GMT.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
8 hours ago
- eNCA
Air Canada suspends plan to resume flights as union vows to continue strike
TORONTO - Air Canada on Sunday suspended its plan to resume flights over a strike by flight attendants that has effectively shut down the airline and snarled summer travel for its passengers around the world. The announcement came despite the country's industrial relations board ordering an end to the strike by around 10,000 flight attendants, which had prompted the airline to say it would resume flying on Sunday. "Air Canada... has suspended its plan to resume limited flying by Air Canada and Air Canada Rouge," citing a decision by the union representing the workers to continue with striking, despite the government directive. "The airline will resume flights as of tomorrow evening," the flag carrier said in a statement. Earlier, the Canada Industrial Relations Board (CIRB) "directed Air Canada to resume airline operations and for all Air Canada and Air Canada Rouge flight attendants to resume their duties by 14:00 EDT on August 17, 2025," the airline said. Air Canada cabin crew walked off the job early Saturday after rejecting an updated contract proposal. Hours later, Canada's labor policy minister, Patty Hajdu, invoked a legal provision to halt the strike and force both sides into binding arbitration. "The directive, under section 107 of the Canada Labour Code, and the CIRB's order, ends the strike at Air Canada that resulted in the suspension of more than 700 flights," the Montreal-based carrier said. The Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE), which is representing the workers, sought wage increases as well as to address uncompensated ground work, including during the boarding process. In a statement on Sunday, CUPE's Air Canada unit said the strike would continue. "CUPE National President Mark Hancock made it loud and clear that our members will NOT be returning to work until such time as the government orders Air Canada back to the bargaining table where we can reach an attempted agreement that our members can vote on," it said. "We will not have our rights and protections removed." The union urged passengers not to go to the airport if they had a ticket for Air Canada or its lower-cost subsidiary Air Canada Rouge. CUPE earlier slammed the Canadian government's intervention as "rewarding Air Canada's refusal to negotiate fairly by giving them exactly what they wanted." "This sets a terrible precedent," it said. The union also pointed out that the chairwoman of CIRB, Maryse Tremblay, previously worked as legal counsel for Air Canada. Tremblay's ruling on whether to end the strike was "an almost unthinkable display of conflict-of-interest," the union posted on Facebook. On Thursday, Air Canada detailed the terms offered to cabin crew, indicating a senior flight attendant would on average make CAN$87,000 ($65,000) by 2027. CUPE has described Air Canada's offers as "below inflation (and) below market value." In a statement issued before the strike began, the Business Council of Canada warned an Air Canada work stoppage would exacerbate the economic pinch already being felt from US President Donald Trump's tariffs. Canada's flag carrier counts around 130,000 daily passengers and flies directly to 180 cities worldwide. bur-lb-aha/des
Daily Maverick
9 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
The Finance Ghost: Capitec, Weaver Fintech show growth is possible in SA
Local companies such as Capitec and Weaver Fintech are delivering solid growth in earnings despite South Africa's tepid economy. Goodness knows we are used to hearing about how tough things are in South Africa and how difficult it is to find growth. We regularly have to suffer through announcements such as the latest one from Truworths, where things are so bad in the local business that it has more than offset the growth in the UK, leading to a drop in headline earnings per share (Heps) for the group. And even when we go in with low expectations, such as in the case of KAP, companies can still disappoint us with their local performance. Luckily, there are local companies that restore balance to the world by delivering solid growth in earnings despite the tepid economy. We need to be careful with the definition of 'local' though, as there are many companies listed on the JSE that are generating great results based on factors that are external to South Africa. The JSE isn't SA Inc A good example of the gap between JSE-listed company numbers and the on-the-ground situation in South Africa is Standard Bank, where double-digit growth in Heps and the dividend is thanks mainly to the performance of its African businesses. South Africa only contributes roughly half of Standard Bank's earnings, with lower growth in the local business than in Africa in the latest period. And it's not only about top-line growth, with the outperformance in Africa leading to a positive impact on Standard Bank's margins, as the pockets of growth in Africa offer higher margins than in South Africa. It's also not helpful to use the gold sector as an example of a feel-good story around South Africa, as the reason for growth in earnings is based on global gold prices rather than the state of the local economy. Nobody who holds a JSE Top 40 ETF is complaining about this, but it's an important nuance to keep in mind when considering the JSE vs the South African economy. Luckily, there are names on the JSE that are showing strong growth, thanks to their performance right here at home, illustrating exactly how much potential there is for stock pickers in the financial services sector. Capitec: still the apex predator when it comes to growth Capitec is a company that just doesn't seem to ever stop growing. Come rain or shine in South Africa (and usually the former), it keeps posting great numbers. Capitec is easily the best-performing banking stock on the JSE this year (and over almost any time period you can think of) and it provides a case study of how a focused strategy can win market share and grow earnings even when the broader sector isn't exciting. Sure, that means that this growth comes at the expense of competitors, but Capitec investors are more than fine with that. A recent trading statement noted that Capitec's Heps for the six months to August 2025 will be up by 22% to 27%. The performance has been driven by both net interest income and non-interest revenue, accompanied by a stable credit loss ratio in an environment where all the banks are singing a positive tune around credit quality. Capitec is therefore achieving growth in the loan book without sacrificing quality, helping it win market share from the traditional banking names. It's just more of the stuff that Capitec investors are used to, really. And if there's one thing that investors love, it's dependable growth. Weaver Fintech: the new kid on the block Nobody is surprised anymore by great numbers at Capitec, as the bank is famous for the disruption it has caused to local banking. But there's another name coming through the ranks in financial services that is also causing disruption in the sector, albeit in terms of payments rather than banking. That name is Weaver Fintech, a company that I invested in earlier this year. Weaver used to be called HomeChoice, which for the longest time was a retail-led business that few people paid any attention to. But behind the retail branding, there was a strong lending business being developed. Then, with an acquisition in the buy-now, pay-later (BNPL) space, Weaver suddenly found itself at the forefront of one of the most exciting fintech verticals in South Africa. BNPL is disrupting the way that people pay for retail products. The product does exactly what it says on the tin: customers buy a product (and receive it) and only have to pay later. But unlike a credit card, it's possible to achieve this at absolutely no cost to the consumer – provided that the full amount is paid back in a matter of weeks. Where customers need a longer repayment period, the BNPL service providers offer competitive interest rates. But how can even the short-term deal be free, you ask? The secret sauce is that the merchant is footing the bill. Before you panic about how sustainable that is, it's hardly any different to the credit card commissions that would typically be paid by the merchant when customers pay by card. BNPL therefore gives the merchants a way to sell to a wider base of customers on similar economics to credit card sales. In a country like South Africa where so many consumers are literally living from one payday to the next, this can make the difference between an abandoned cart and a confirmed sale. BNPL is just one part of the Weaver story, with a broader financial services offering that is also performing well. In the six months to June 2025, Weaver grew revenue by 29% and Heps by 45%. Cash quality of earnings is evident, with the interim dividend up 47%. These excellent results have given the company confidence to expand not just the retail footprint (an important distribution channel for financial products), but also the size of the credit book. With such strong growth, the main risk is any deterioration in the credit quality of the book and whether Weaver will grow too quickly to keep things under control, an issue that has claimed many start-up scalps over the years. I'm very happy with my Weaver position in my portfolio, but I've sized it appropriately for a more speculative play that still has a long way to go. Having said that, Capitec also had to start somewhere. I'm happy to have gotten in at what feels like an early stage in the BNPL journey. DM
Daily Maverick
9 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Competition Commission and international banks to square off in ConCourt over rand price-fixing accusations
The case stems from allegations that the banks were manipulating the foreign exchange rate between the US dollar and the rand over several years by sharing information on messaging platforms. The Constitutional Court is due to hear four days of legal argument in a matter involving the Competition Commission and more than two dozen banks from across the world, which the commission has accused of 'the most egregious form of anti-competitive conduct'. The case stems from allegations that the banks were manipulating the foreign exchange rate between the US dollar and the rand over several years by sharing information on messaging platforms. Three cases, one brought by the commission and the other two brought by the French bank BNP Paribas and US-based Credit Suisse Securities, have been combined into a single massive hearing at which the court will determine whether all or some of the banks should be held liable for colluding. Years of legal battles The case has its origin in a 2017 referral by the Competition Commission to the Competition Tribunal, in which the commission alleged that international traders were using the Bloomberg instant messaging service to discuss the pricing of the US dollar to rand exchange rate. The commission eventually included 28 banks in its case referral. 'The traders shared competitively sensitive information and made arrangements to assist each other by coordinating their trading activities. The traders would regularly agree on the bid-offer spread or spot rate for buying and selling of the USD/ZAR currency paid,' said the commission. The traders would also make arrangements to manipulate the bid-offer prices on the Reuters trading platform by agreeing on the order of transacting, withholding their trades, or posting 'fake bids and offers', said Makgale Mohlala, the manager of the cartels division of the Competition Commission, in an affidavit before the ConCourt. Various banks filed appeals and exceptions to the case, alleging that the commission did not have the jurisdiction to refer the case. The Competition Appeal Court heard the matters and found that the commission had no jurisdiction with regard to 17 of the international banks. Just four international banks were retained in the case: BNP Paribas, Credit Suisse Securities, JPMorgan Chase and Co, and HSBC Bank PLC. South African banks Standard Bank, Nedbank Limited and FirstRand Bank Limited had also appealed against the initial referral, but the court dismissed their cases. 'Single overarching conspiracy' Mohlala said the commission 'cannot accept this outcome in a case involving the most egregious form of anti-competitive conduct'. The commission had said that there was a 'single overarching conspiracy' among the banks. 'The manipulation impacted on the exchange rate of the South African rand, which in turn affected various parts of the South African economy — including imports and exports, foreign direct investment, public and private debt, companies' balance sheets, with the attendant implications for the prices of goods and services and financial assets,' said Mohlala. The commission also alleges that the Competition Appeal Court (CAC) erred in several conclusions of its judgment, saying it created new requirements for jurisdiction and contradicted itself. No constitutional issue Some of the banks that were listed in the initial complaint have opposed the commission's application, criticising the way the commission handled the initial complaint and subsequent litigation. Standard Bank of South Africa is among these, saying the commission ignored important information when formulating its complaint. In an affidavit, Ian Sinton, the former general counsel and current consultant for Standard Bank, said the bank was opposing the commission because 'there is no constitutional issue implicated' and 'it is not in the interests of justice' that leave to appeal be granted. He claimed that the bank had raised several factual issues during the Competition Tribunal phase that were ignored. 'Numerous opportunities have been afforded to the commission to plead a sustainable case against [Standard Bank], and it has failed to do so. Contrary to its obligation of impartiality imposed by section 20 of the Competition Act, the commission has shut its mind to relevant information furnished to it by Standard Bank, including easily verifiable facts which dispose of the case,' said Stinton in court papers. The bank also argues that the commission didn't have jurisdiction to prosecute it because the alleged misconduct did not take place in its local office. 'The commission made out no case at all linking the activities of the Johannesburg branch to any cause of action, and so the deficiencies in alleging subject matter jurisdiction remain exactly as before,' said the bank through its lawyer Martin Versfeld. The lawyer for Bank of America and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Shawn van der Meulen, has criticised the commission for raising new legal issues that were not brought up during the initial appeal. JPMorgan Chase has also criticised the commission's decision to approach the ConCourt, saying the case 'does not legitimately raise a constitutional issue'. Banks appeal Two of the banks whose tribunal referral was ruled as valid, BNP Paribas and Credit Suisse Securities, have launched their own cases. BNP alleges that the commission has not properly pleaded its revised case. 'By failing to properly plead its case, the commission has fallen short of the requirements imposed on it by the CAC. This raises a constitutional issue in that this court is called on to decide whether the rule of law, enshrined in section 1 of the Constitution, can accommodate a situation in which the commission can exercise its prosecutorial powers in contravention of an order of the CAC, which binds the commission,' said Rudolph Labuschagne, BNP's attorney. Credit Suisse Securities has also taken issue with how the commission initiated its investigation. The commission 'exceeded [its] statutory power and thereby violated the principles of legality and the rule of law. These are quintessential constitutional matters,' said Paul Cleland, the attorney for Credit Suisse Securities. Credit Suisse also takes issue with the appeal decision, saying the CAC failed 'to treat like parties alike in the same proceedings — for no good reason whatsoever'. It believes it should have got an exception, like several other international banks. The bank says this action is 'patently arbitrary and irrational'. 'The CAC order violates the right to equal treatment before the law under section 9 (1) of the Constitution, which 'entitles everybody, at the very least, to equal treatment by our courts of law'.' Due to the similarity of issues being dealt with, the ConCourt has combined all three cases into one hearing. Argument will be heard from 19-22 August. DM
