New report reveals surprising change in long-running trend in global energy use: 'Puts some clear facts on the table'
Global energy use surged in 2024, and a new report from the International Energy Agency offers the clearest picture yet of why.
In its new Global Energy Review, the IEA reports that global energy demand grew by 2.2% last year, which is well above the 1.3% annual average of the previous decade.
The biggest driver of this increase was electricity use, fueled by "emerging and developing economies," along with record-breaking heat waves that sent air conditioner use soaring, more data centers, and more electric vehicles (though the report also noted that EVs and other clean tech have significantly reduced demand for dirty energy that creates heat-trapping pollution).
The surge even reversed a long-running trend: Advanced economies such as the U.S. and parts of Europe, which had seen energy use decline for years, are using more again.
"This new data-driven IEA report puts some clear facts on the table about what is happening globally. … Electricity use is growing rapidly, pulling overall energy demand along with it to such an extent that it is enough to reverse years of declining energy consumption in advanced economies," IEA Executive Director Fatih Birol said in a statement.
To keep up, more affordable energy sources such as solar and wind are playing a major role. Together with nuclear, renewable sources made up 80% of the increase in global electricity generation in 2024, per the report. And, for the first time ever, they provide 40% of all electricity worldwide.
Other reports corroborate this data, including the Canadian Renewable Energy Association's recent announcement that solar, wind, and battery storage in Canada jumped by nearly 50% in five years.
This momentum has ripple effects. Electricity demand pushed gas use significantly higher, though the growth in oil demand slowed. This is partly because 1 in 5 new cars sold last year were electric, according to the IEA.
Even with the world's economy growing, harmful carbon emissions from energy use rose only slightly and fell by 1.1% in advanced countries.
Another recent study found that if we go all in on clean energy, we could cut energy costs by nearly 60% and certain pollution-related social impacts, including on health, by more than 90%.
Do you think the U.S. should tax goods from China?
Definitely
No way
Only certain goods
I'm not sure
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
The Global Energy Review shows that, at the very least, we're taking steps in the direction of a cleaner, healthier planet.
"The strong expansion of solar, wind, nuclear power and EVs is increasingly loosening the links between economic growth and emissions," Birol added.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Iraq Accelerates This Oil Megaproject To Meet 7 Million Bpd Production Target
Even before the latest potentially game-changing developments began involving its longtime financial, political, and military ally Iran, it was clear that Iraq needed to focus more on the independent development of its own resources -- most notably in energy -- for its future. In the weeks leading up to the Western-backed Israeli attacks on Iran, the U.S. removed the longstanding waivers that allowed Iraq to keep importing electricity and gas from its neighbour to power 40% of its grid and rolled out new sanctions aimed at cutting Baghdad's support for Tehran. For years, Iraq has been talking about increasing its oil production to various figures – 6 and bit million barrels per day (bpd), 7 and a bit million, 8 and a bit million– whatever; they have all amounted to nothing. Now though, Baghdad will need to start doing something to achieve these increases. So, can it meaningfully increase its oil production, and will it do so? Theoretically, Iraq has the natural resources to increase its oil production to way above the current average of just over 4 million bpd. Iraq officially holds 145 billion barrels of proved crude oil reserves (nearly 18% of the Middle East's total, and the fifth biggest on the planet). Unofficially, it likely holds much more oil than this, with the Oil Ministry stating in October 2010 that its undiscovered resources amounted to around 215 billion barrels. This number had independently been arrived at back into 1997 by highly respected oil and gas firm, Petrolog. That said, the figure did not include the parts of northern Iraq in the semi-autonomous region of Kurdistan. With conservative estimates for these included, the International Energy Agency underlined that Iraq's ultimately recoverable resources totalled about 246 billion barrels of crude and natural gas liquids. Given this, the 'Integrated National Energy Strategy' (INES) report of 2012 that was funded and developed by the World Bank, with further assistance from management consultancy firm then-Booz & Company, identified three realistic future oil production scenarios, as analysed in full in my latest book on the new global oil market order. These showed how the country could increase its oil output to either the 'Low Production' scenario of 6 million bpd by 2025, the 'Medium Production' scenario of 9 million bpd by 2020, or the 'High Production' scenario of 13 million bpd by 2017.A combination of indolence on the part of some of those in charge of Iraq's oil strategy and corruption from others in the corollary political apparatus meant years of little tangible progress being made on any of these scenarios. It also eventually resulted in the withdrawal of many Western firms from Iraq that could effect such significant oil output increases, as repeatedly detailed by At that point onwards, it had become increasingly clear that the intention of the Federal Government of Iraq in Baghdad (and its key backers China and Russia) was to push the West out of a unified Iraq, having subsumed the northern semi-autonomous Kurdistan region into the rest of the country. However, given this scenario, the U.S. and its allies have pushed back with the opposite agenda, as also analysed in full in my latest book. To put it plainly: the U.S. and its key allies ultimately want to the northern Kurdistan region of Iraq to terminate all links with Chinese, Russian and Iranian companies connected to the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps over the long term. This could then be used as a bridgehead to reassert the West's influence in the rest of Iraq through big investment deals firstly and then related infrastructure developments. On the other side of the equation, China and Russia have long been behind the idea of rolling the Kurdistan Region into the wider Iraq and keeping the West out forever. As a senior political source in Moscow exclusively told many months ago: 'Iraq will be one unified country and by keeping the West out of energy deals there, the end of Western hegemony in the Middle East will become the decisive chapter in the West's final demise.' The West's recent strategic push in this context has seen not just the US$25bn five-oil field development by the U.K.'s BP in the north of the country around the Kurdistan Region announced but also the US$27 billion four-pronged deal by France's TotalEnergies in the south of the country as well. Several other deals by Western firms are in the making too, all of which are aimed at preventing the final move of Iraq into the China-Russia sphere of influence and eventually reversing it. Indeed, May 19 saw two deals signed by U.S. firms HKN Energy, and WesternZagros, to develop two fields – the Miran gas field and the Topkhana oil and gas field -- in the Kurdistan area. U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright made it very clear about the deeper intention behind these deals, saying that they align with the administration's broader strategy of striking commercial deals with allies to counter Iran's influence. By extension, given the extremely strong links between Tehran and Beijing and Moscow, this also means countering China's and Russia's influence across Iraq as well. More recently in this precise regard was the announcement that the Iraqi Drilling Company (IDC) is making steady progress on its project to drill 15 oil wells in the North Rumaila oil field, alongside the U.S.'s Halliburton and the Basra Energy Company, with the latter being wholly owned by BP and also PetroChina, for the time being at least. The entire Rumaila field – split into North and South -- lies around 30 kilometres north of Iraq's southern border with Kuwait and, together with Kirkuk, has produced around 80% cent of Iraq's cumulative oil production to date. BP has long been in talks with Iraq's Oil Ministry to push production up to 2.1 million bpd from the current circa-1.2 million bpd which, given the field's estimated 17 billion barrels in proven reserves, should not be difficult. However, there is a catch – and this is that in order to achieve this step up in production substantial sustained water-injection would be needed to maintain the required pressure. Happily for the West's plans for Iraq, this is exactly what one of TotalEnergies' four key projects is geared to do in the shape of the Common Seawater Supply Project (CSSP). This involves taking seawater from the Persian Gulf and transporting it to oil production facilities to boost pressure at key oil reservoirs. Both the longstanding stalwart fields of Rumaila and Kirkuk -- the former beginning production in the 1950s and the latter in the 1920s -- require major ongoing water injection on this scale from this project. Rumaila produced more than 25% of its oil in place before water injection was required because its main reservoir formation (at least its southern part) connects to a very large natural aquifer that has helped to push the oil out of the reservoir. In Kirkuk's case, production dropped significantly after output of only around 5% of the oil in place. Most of Iraq's oil fields fall between these two cases in terms of water injection requirements, but its other big fields -- West Qurna (1 and 2), Majnoon, and Zubair – are at the higher end. This means that for Iraq to reach any of the significant increases in oil production envisaged in the key 2012 INES report – from 6 million bpd up to 13 million bpd – Iraq's Oil Ministry, and whichever government is in power at the time, will need the CSSP up and running and working sustainably, and this means TotalEnergies and the West. Given this confluence of geopolitical and economic imperatives, the chances of Iraq finally meaningfully increasing its oil production to a level even vaguely commensurate with its huge reserves look better than they have ever done. By Simon Watkins for More Top Reads From Read this article on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Scientific American
2 days ago
- Scientific American
AI Could Be Harnessed to Cut More Emissions Than It Creates
CLIMATEWIRE | Artificial intelligence could cut global climate pollution by up to 5.4 billion metric tons a year over the next decade if it's harnessed in ways that would improve transportation, energy and food production. Those reductions would outweigh even the expected increase in global energy consumption and emissions that would be created by running power-hungry data centers associated with AI, according to research by the Grantham Research Institute that was published in the journal npj Climate Action. 'The key will be to channel practical AI applications towards key impact areas to accelerate the market adoption rate and efficiency of low-carbon solutions,' the study said, noting that governments will have a vital role to play. On supporting science journalism If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today. 'Governments must regulate AI to minimise their environmental footprint,' the study said, pointing to the need for energy efficient AI models and the use of renewable energy to power data centers. It also says governments should invest in AI infrastructure and education in developing countries, 'ensuring that the benefits of AI are shared equitably.' The use of AI has boomed in recent years and President Donald Trump has made its expansion a priority as he seeks to outcompete China on advanced technologies. But its voracious use of energy has raised concerns about its climate impact, particularly as Trump and other officials argue that winning the race for AI is a reason to expand fossil fuels. The International Energy Agency projects that by 2030 data centers will consume twice as much electricity as they do today. Growing energy demands are already challenging the U.S. grid, and oil companies are using AI to find new areas to drill. BloombergNEF has said fossil fuels will provide most of the new power for data centers over the next decade, imperiling efforts to cut carbon pollution. There are ways to mitigate the damage, the Grantham study said. It outlines five areas where AI can be harnessed to reduce emissions, including consumer behavior, energy management and technology innovation. For example, AI can help integrate renewables into the grid by better forecasting supply and demand fluctuations and help the grid distribute energy more accurately, reducing concerns about intermittency. That can increase the uptake of solar and wind and lower the use of polluting backup power sources, the report said. 'Power grids are at the heart of the entire economy, so improving their efficiency reduces emissions across multiple sectors,' Roberta Pierfederici, a policy fellow at the Grantham Research Institute and author of the study, said in an email. AI can also identify new types of protein to replace meat and dairy in human diets — industries that are heavy emitters. And it can improve transportation by lowering the cost of electric vehicles through battery improvements or encouraging people to switch to shared transport. Those actions combined could reduce emissions by 3.2 billion to 5.4 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent annually by 2035 compared to their current trajectory, the study said. That's more than the entire European Union. By comparison, the U.S. released 6.2 billion metric tons of climate pollution in 2023. Those cuts are not in line with what's needed to keep global temperatures from rising more than 1.5 degrees Celsius since the beginning of the industrial age. But they could keep a check on warming by more than offsetting the emissions released by using AI. The study estimated that energy emissions tied to data centers and AI will reach 0.4 billion to 1.6 billion metric tons of CO2 equivalent over the next decade. The study does have its limitations, given how quickly the field of AI is changing. The authors acknowledged that they might have underestimated AI's potential to reduce emissions, because they only looked at how AI is applied currently to three sectors. On the other hand, the study didn't consider how energy efficiency gains from AI could lead to increased consumption elsewhere that could drive emissions up. Pierfederici said while the rise in emissions from data centers is a valid concern, she believes the study makes a strong case for using AI to help tackle rising temperatures. 'That said, governments need to play an active role in guiding how AI is applied and governed, to make sure the downsides are managed effectively and the full potential of AI for climate action is realized,' she added.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
How the closure of Strait of Hormuz could impact markets
Commodity markets were volatile on Monday as the world waited to see whether Iran would carry out its threat to shut down the Hormuz Strait. Iran's parliament voted at the weekend to shut down the vital Hormuz shipping channel in retaliation for US president Donald Trump's attack on the country's nuclear facilities. The final decision to shut the pathway rests with Iran's supreme national security council, following the non-binding vote. If the closure happens, it would be unprecedented and likely have profound consequences for the global economy and energy supply. Here's everything you need to know: Around a fifth of the world's oil consumption flows through the Strait of Hormuz. It is the entry and exit point to the Persian Gulf and a cornerstone for the energy market, with around 30% of the world's liquified natural gas sourced there, too. In May, approximately 17.8 million to 20.8 million barrels of crude, condensate, and fuels flowed through the strait daily, according to data from analytics firm Vortexa. Read more: LIVE: Wall Street wavers, European stocks fall as investors await Iran's response to US strikes Saudi Arabia uses it to export around 6 million barrels of crude oil per day, more than any neighbouring country. Meanwhile, Iran exports about 1.7 million barrels per day, according to the International Energy Agency. Iran exported $67bn (£49.8bn) worth of oil in the financial year ending March 2025 — its highest oil revenue in the past decade — according to estimates by the Central Bank of Iran. The majority of exports are sent to Asia. China alone is estimated to buy around 90% of the oil that Iran exports to the global market. However, the economic inflationary shocks of any closure could be felt globally, with increased energy prices rippling into the real economy. If the Strait is closed by Iran's national security council, the country will have to decide how to close the stretch of water. To the north of the passage is Iran, and to the south is the UAE and Oman. It's about 33km wide at its narrowest point and 50km at its entrance and exit. UN rules allow countries to exercise control up to 12 nautical miles (13.8 miles) from their coastline. So far, Israel's military and US attacks have been focused on Iran's nuclear programme and other targets, instead of its naval assets. According to reports and analysis, Iran's navy could move to lay out a number of mines in the sea via fast attack boats and submarines to protect the closed Strait on the country's southern border and stop ships passing into the Persian Gulf. Stocks: Create your watchlist and portfolio While this might be the most effective way to block the Strait, the US and other countries could then wrest control back through military means to re-establish the passage of ships. For markets, the long-run impact of closing this shipping route is largely unknown. Oil prices ticked between gains and losses on Monday reflecting anxiety, but many traders are still in "wait and see" mode as Iran weighs its options. 'The markets are not yet reacting with any degree of panic to the US airstrike on Iran's nuclear facilities as they await to see how Tehran responds," said Russ Mould, investment director at AJ Bell. 'The promised two-week hiatus as the US weighed its decision didn't materialise as the Trump administration acted on Saturday. After briefly spiking above $80 per barrel when the market opened in Asia on Monday, Brent pared those gains to trade modestly higher." Analysts at Goldman Sachs predicted that disruptions could push the price of Brent crude over $100 per barrel — the highest point since August 2022. This would push up transport costs, lift inflation and hurt growth across Western economies. And when oil prices move, so do the stock prices of oil majors. FTSE 100 (^FTSE) stalwarts BP (BP.L) and Shell (SHEL.L) are likely to be in the crosshairs for any impact. On Monday, oil majors' share prices ticked higher, with BP more than 1.4% in the green by the afternoon and Shell seeing a 0.8% uplift. Shipping operators and container companies are keeping a close eye on any movement. "We continue to monitor the situation very closely, especially considering the US involvement in the conflict," Maersk ( wrote on its website. "At the moment, sailing through the Strait of Hormuz continues, but we are ready to re-evaluate this based on information available. Equally, we will continuously monitor the security risk to our specific vessels in the region and are ready to take operational actions as needed," it added. Read more: Oil jumps to 5-month high after Iran votes to close Strait of Hormuz Trending tickers: IAG, Novo Nordisk, Shell, Stellantis, LVMH Strait of Hormuz saber-rattling ramps up following US attack. Whether the key waterway will close is less clear
