Australia news live: Labor's women's health package offers cheaper contraceptive pills and HRT; Queensland on flood watch
Show key events only Please turn on JavaScript to use this feature Labor's $573.3m package for women's health
Show key events only Please turn on JavaScript to use this feature Cait Kelly
Some measures will take effect almost immediately, like the PBS listing of the first new contraceptive pills in more than 30 years, and the first new menopausal hormone therapies in more than 20 years.
Other measures will be implemented following the re-election of the Albanese Labor Government.
Minister for Women Katy Gallagher:
Women have asked government to take their healthcare seriously, and we have listened.
Our investment of more than half a billion dollars will deliver more choice, lower costs, and better healthcare for women at all stages of their lives.
These changes could save women and their families thousands of dollars across their lifetimes.
Whether it's saving hundreds of dollars on contraceptives, opening more endo and pelvic pain clinics, or ensuring more reliable support for women going through menopause – this comprehensive package will deliver for millions of women and their families. Share Cait Kelly
Today the Labor party will announce a $573.3m it says will deliver more choice, lower costs and better healthcare for women.
The package of measures includes: The first PBS listing for new oral contraceptive pills in more than 30 years.
Larger Medicare payments and more bulk billing for IUDs and birth control implants saving about 300,000 women a year up to $400 in out-of-pocket costs.
A new Medicare rebate for menopause health assessments, funding to train health professionals, the first clinical guidelines and a national awareness campaign.
The first PBS listing for new menopausal hormone therapies in over 20 years.
Opening 11 new clinics for endometriosis and pelvic pain, and ensuring these and the existing 22 clinics are also staffed to provide additional specialist support for menopause.
Contraceptives and treatment for uncomplicated UTIs directly from pharmacies, with two national trials to benefit 250,000 concession cardholders. Share Rafqa Touma
And welcome to our live news blog. I'm Rafqa Touma updating you with the stories of the day as they happen.
We woke up to news that a heatwave, bringing high humidity and hot nights, is moving east from southern and central Australia. Southern parts of the Northern Territory and far western parts of Queensland are bearing the brunt, while Melbourne and Hobart are also expected to experience a run of unusually hot weather.
Yesterday thousands of people attended rallies across Australia to show solidarity with transgender youth and their families, after the Queensland government's decision to pause essential healthcare for trans minors. Twenty rallies were held, including crowds of 5,000 gathering in Brisbane and Melbourne, 2,500 in Sydney and more than 200 in Cairns, a lead organiser said.
And Australia's largest childcare provider is facing activist pressure to give staff paid parental leave. Australian employers commonly offer paid parental leave – in addition to the government scheme – to attract and retain workers in a competitive jobs market. But the largest listed childcare provider in Australia, G8 Education, has no such policy, drawing the attention of activist shareholders who want to pressure it to change.
Now let's get into the news of the day. Share
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
2 hours ago
- NBC News
Australia confident U.S. will proceed with AUKUS submarine deal after review
SYDNEY — Australia 's defense minister said Thursday he was confident that the AUKUS submarine pact with the United States and Britain would proceed, and that his government would work closely with the U.S. while the Trump administration conducted a formal review. Australia in 2023 committed to spend 368 billion Australian dollars ($239 billion) over three decades on AUKUS, the country's biggest ever defense project with the U.S. and Britain, to acquire and build nuclear-powered submarines. A Pentagon official said the administration was reviewing AUKUS to ensure it was 'aligned with the President's America First agenda' on the eve of expected talks between President Donald Trump and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. In an Australian Broadcasting Corporation radio interview, Australian Defense Minister Richard Marles said AUKUS was in the strategic interests of all three countries and that the new review of the deal signed in 2021 when Joe Biden was the U.S. president was not a surprise. 'I am very confident this is going to happen,' he said of AUKUS, which would give Australia nuclear-powered submarines. 'This is a multi-decade plan. There will be governments that come and go and I think whenever we see a new government, a review of this kind is going to be something which will be undertaken,' Marles told the ABC. Albanese is expected to meet Trump for the first time next week on the sidelines of the Group of 7 meeting in Canada, where the security allies will discuss a request from Washington for Australia to increase defense spending from 2% to 3.5% of gross domestic product. Albanese has said defense spending would rise to 2.3% and has declined to commit to the U.S. target. The opposition Liberal party on Thursday pressed Albanese to increase defense spending. Under AUKUS, Australia was scheduled to make a $2 billion payment in 2025 to the U.S. to help boost its submarine shipyards and speed up lagging production rates of Virginia-class submarines to allow the sale of up to three U.S. submarines to Australia starting in 2032. The first $500 million payment was made when Marles met with his U.S. counterpart, Pete Hegseth, in February. The Pentagon's top policy adviser Elbridge Colby, who has previously expressed concern that the U.S. would lose submarines to Australia at a critical time for military deterrence against China, will be a key figure in the review, examining the production rate of Virginia-class submarines, Marles said. 'It is important that those production and sustainment rates are improved,' he added. AUKUS would grow the U.S. and Australian defense industries and generate thousands of manufacturing jobs, Marles said in a statement. John Lee, an Australian Indo-Pacific expert at Washington's conservative Hudson Institute think tank, said the Pentagon review was 'primarily an audit of American capability' and whether it can afford to sell up to five nuclear-powered submarines when it is not meeting its own production targets. 'Relatedly, the low Australian defense spending and ambiguity as to how it might contribute to a Taiwan contingency is also a factor,' Lee said. John Hamre, president of the Center for Strategic and International Studies and a former senior Pentagon official, told a Lowy Institute seminar in Sydney on Thursday there is a perception in Washington that 'the Albanese government has been supportive of AUKUS but not really leaning in on AUKUS,' and that defense spending is part of this. Under the multi-stage pact, four U.S.-commanded Virginia submarines will be hosted at a Western Australian navy base on the Indian Ocean starting in 2027, which a senior U.S. Navy commander told Congress in April gives the U.S. a 'straight shot to the South China Sea.' Albanese wants to buy three Virginia submarines starting in 2032 to bring its submarine force under Australian command. Britain and Australia will jointly build a new AUKUS-class submarine that is expected to come into service starting in 2040. Following a recent defense review, Britain said it would boost spending on its attack submarine fleet under AUKUS. Former Prime Minister Scott Morrison, who struck the AUKUS deal with Biden, said Thursday that Australia should 'make the case again' for the treaty.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Linda Reynolds alleges Mark Dreyfus had conflict of interest when he signed off on Brittany Higgins' $2.4m settlement
Linda Reynolds is suing the commonwealth over Brittany Higgins' $2.4m settlement, alleging in court documents that former attorney general Mark Dreyfus committed 'misfeasance of public office' by denying her an opportunity to defend herself against allegations she mishandled the incident. It comes as the federal anti-corruption watchdog released its findings on Thursday, concluding there was 'no corruption issue' in Higgins' settlement and 'no inappropriate intervention' by the Labor government. In an updated statement of claim to the federal court on Wednesday, the former Liberal senator alleged Dreyfus had a conflict of interest in signing off on the settlement in December 2022 because of public statements he had made. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Reynolds is suing the commonwealth and its lawyers for damages and legal costs in an effort to 'vindicate and restore her reputation', the statement of claim said. Reynolds' claim alleges Dreyfus' role in the matter 'enabled and encouraged the falsity of Ms Higgins' claim', referencing a speech the then opposition attorney general made in March 2021. In the lower house, Dreyfus quoted a speech Higgins delivered on the lawns of Parliament House where the former Liberal staffer claimed 'people around me did not care about what happened because of what it might mean for them' and that she was a 'political problem'. 'It's very clear the prime minister [Scott Morrison] has made looking after Liberal party mates his main focus – not looking after women, not looking after the country and not looking after the rule of law or justice but looking after his political mates,' Dreyfus said at the time. The deed, released during Bruce Lehrmann's failed defamation case in December 2023, compensated Higgins for her loss of earning capacity, legal costs, medical expenses, domestic assistance and '$400,000 for hurt, distress and humiliation'. As part of Higgins' claim, the former staffer alleged the commonwealth had breached its duty of care because Reynolds and her staff mishandled the matter and did not adequately support her. Documents released to the Western Australian supreme court last year showed Reynolds was asked to not attend the mediation in December 2022 or make any public commentary about Higgins and to maintain confidentiality of information related to the settlement and civil claims in order to give the commonwealth the 'best position to achieve a resolution at the mediation'. The settlement was signed a week later. In court in August 2024, Reynolds accused Dreyfus of 'seeking to silence' her. She said the claims that she had not given Higgins adequate support after her alleged rape in March 2019 were 'utterly defendable'. 'My defence was to be no defence … I was outraged.' Reynolds told the court the letter had made her 'very angry' and she considered the federal government was attempting to 'lock me down'. The day before the mediation, 13 December 2022, Reynolds sent the June letter from her personal email address to Janet Albrechtsen, a columnist at the Australian newspaper. 'The letter of confidentiality was never signed by me so my recollection is while they sent the proposal, what the Commonwealth wanted in terms of locking me down, I never agreed,' Reynolds said. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'So therefore I had no particular concern about sending that to Ms Albrechtsen.' In October 2023, Reynolds referred the settlement to the National Anti-Corruption Commission to examine the process. The Nacc released the findings of its preliminary investigation into the matter on Thursday, concluding there was 'no inappropriate intervention' by the Labor government. The Nacc found there was 'no material difference' in legal advice received by the former Coalition government before the May 2022 election and advice subsequently received by the newly elected Albanese government. The Nacc concluded: 'There was no inappropriate intervention in the process by or on behalf of any minister. The then attorney general approved the settlement in accordance with the departmental advice. 'There is no evidence that the settlement process, including the legal advice provided, who was present at the mediation, or the amount, was subject to any improper influence by any Commonwealth public official. 'To the contrary, the evidence obtained reflected a process that was based on independent external legal advice, without any inappropriate intervention by any minister of either government. There is therefore no corruption issue.' In a statement on Thursday, Reynolds said she was 'bitterly disappointed' by the decision, questioning how the settlement 'could possibly settle unsubstantiated and statute-barred claims made against me' without 'taking a single statement from me or speaking to me at all'. Dreyfus responded that he regretted 'the baseless allegation of corruption has been so widely publicised ahead of this finding and hope future matters can be resolved in a more timely manner'. A case management hearing is scheduled in Perth next Thursday. Reynolds is awaiting the judgment of a separate defamation case in the Western Australia supreme court against Higgins over a series of social media posts, published in July 2023, which the former minister claims damaged her reputation.
Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The big change to superannuation 'all young Aussies' should fear
Millionaire and entrepreneur Mark Bouris has warned young Australians will be the hardest hit by Labor's proposed tax hike on superannuation. The Albanese government plans to double the tax on superannuation balances above $3million from 15 to 30 per cent from July 1. Labor expects the hike, which will also apply to unrealised gains, to only affect an estimated 80,000 people or 0.5 per cent of the population. Mr Bouris said young Australians should be wary of the proposal given they stand to be denied the same tax conditions that benefited older generations. 'Every young person in the country should be worried about this, and I'll tell you why,' he said on his Mentored Plus podcast. 'Because every old person in the country has experienced building their superannuation up with only 15 per cent tax rate from day one, for the last 30, 40 years. 'We've had this, all of us had this fantastic low-tax situation with the money we earn in our super fund,' he said, adding young people 'will not have the same benefits'. Bouris dismissed the idea that young people stand to gain as older Aussies look to withdraw and gift their savings to avoid paying the higher tax. 'If you're a young person now and you're saying: "Oh this is great, because the rich people are going to transfer the wealth across to the younger people", you will be transferring it to your kids and it's going to keep going like that forever.' Mr Bouris said former Prime Minister Paul Keating, who oversaw the introduction of compulsory superannuation in Australia, must feel 'completely demoralised'. 'All this is going to do is put more strain on the government because people are not going to retire with enough money because they're paying too much tax,' he said. The Greens want the threshold to be lowered to $2million and indexed to inflation while deputy Liberal leader Ted O'Brien has ruled out any compromise. O'Brien suggested the Coalition would be open to a deal on the tax hike if Labor agreed not to tax unrealised gains - but has since taken a harder approach. 'Labor's super tax - it's super big, it's super bad. It flies in the face of what we believe as a Coalition,' O'Brien told Sky News last week. 'We will definitely, as a Coalition, oppose this unfair super tax of Labor's every step of way. Every step of the way.' The 30 per cent tax rate would only apply to the value of a super account over a $3million threshold, while the 15 per cent rate would continue below that amount. Industry groups have warned the threshold, which will not be indexed to inflation, will capture an increasing number of Aussies in line with rising costs and wages. Modelling from Treasury and the Grattan Institute estimated one in ten Australians will have super balances over $3million by the 2050s. Treasurer Jim Chalmers last week said the proposal had undergone multiple rounds of consultation and would not undermine superannuation tax concessions. 'We provided years of opportunities for people to suggest different ways to calculate that liability and nobody has been able to come up with one,' he said. Labor, which does not have a majority in the Senate, will need to work with the Greens or the Coalition to get the proposal over the line.
