logo
Marjorie Taylor Greene slammed Trump's Iran strike – but Maga voters stand by him: ‘That's biblical'

Marjorie Taylor Greene slammed Trump's Iran strike – but Maga voters stand by him: ‘That's biblical'

The Guardian24-06-2025
Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia congresswoman and Maga firebrand, was quickly critical of missile strikes ordered Saturday by Donald Trump on Iranian nuclear facilities.
Her constituents are not.
In the past week, Israel and Iran traded strikes until the US attempted to intervene, both with its own bombs on three sites, and then with an attempted Trump-brokered ceasefire on Monday, which crumbled within hours. Greene took to social media on Saturday to stridently argue (in her longstanding style) that the US involvement wastes resources to feed the military-industrial complex.
'I've watched our country go to war in foreign lands for foreign causes on behalf of foreign interests for as long as I can remember,' Greene wrote on X.
'America is $37 TRILLION in debt and all of these foreign wars have cost Americans TRILLIONS AND TRILLIONS of dollars that never benefited any American. American troops have been killed and forever torn apart physically and mentally for regime change, foreign wars, and for military industrial base profits. I'm sick of it.'
'It feels like a complete bait and switch to please the neocons, warmongers, military industrial complex contracts, and neocon tv personalities that MAGA hates and who were NEVER TRUMPERS!' she said in another post.
It was a sentiment often repeated by Trump allies throughout his electoral campaign in 2024, when the president repeatedly promised to bring world peace. But in interview after interview in Georgia's heavily Republican 14th district, voters generally expressed satisfaction with the president's decision to attack Iran, offering the president wide latitude for the use of military force.
'This should have happened 15 years ago,' said Richard Hodges of Rome, Georgia, having a midday drink with a friend. Iran would destroy the United States if it had the power to do so – they chant as much as rallies, he said. 'They can't have a nuclear bomb. They can't. They're liars, basically. We gave them the opportunity to do nuclear energy, but they want to enrich it. They're close to having a nuclear weapon. We back Israel.'
His friend had reservations.
'I wish Trump didn't have to do it,' said Brooke Brinson of Rome, Georgia. 'My opinion'.
Last year, Trump both pledged to avoid committing America to additional wars and threatened to blow Iran to 'smithereens' if it attacked the United States, while repeatedly describing the Biden administration as leading the country down the path to the third world war.
'I don't think that they can't be trusted,' Brinson said of Iran. 'I wish nobody had nukes. That's my opinion. I wish nobody had nukes and we could all get along. But that's not going to happen.'
Greene's district is more conservative than 93% of House districts. Greene herself, though a close Trump ally, draws mixed reviews.
'She probably would not be who I would vote for if there was another Republican alternative, but there's not,' said Angela Hilliard, who lives near Rome. She supported Trump's decision to bomb Iran, describing the country as 'a persistent threat' and this action as a frightening moment.
'I feel like it ultimately is the right thing to do, but I'm not going to lie, it was very scary, and I'm still kind of just, not, 100% for sure. I think it was the right decision, but I still think there could possibly be consequences.'
Greene's comments over the weekend raised eyebrows among conservatives, prompting her to issue a string of comments about her support for the president. Nonetheless, it is another heterodox position that draws attention to Greene, and to her district.
For Michelle Gibson of Murray county, Georgia, Greene is the default choice. 'I mean, I'm always going to vote with my party–I'm not saying I have always done that–but usually it aligns more with my beliefs than the other side,' she said. 'Do I think she's a little bit extreme sometimes? Yes.'
Gibson does not begrudge Greene for her views on attacking Iran, she said. 'Even though I'm for it, I realize everybody else is not going to be. And ultimately, whoever the president is, I have to try and support their decision,' Gibson said. 'And I do agree with it. I think we should stop [Iran] now. I think a lot more people, and leaders and countries over there are so glad we did it, even though they're not going to come out and say it, because [Iran is] a threat to everyone, especially over there.'
Her views on Iran are strongly shaped by her Southern Baptist faith, Gibson said.
'This is all about religion,' she said. 'This isn't about politics. You're looking at it from a wrong standpoint. I guess because I was raised Southern Baptist, you just always protect God's people.'
Gibson was aware of broad concerns about the conduct of the Israeli government, but said her faith prompts a tradeoff. 'I think with anything we do in life, there's always going to be a good and a bad to it, and you just have to pick whatever decision you make in life. What's the good and does it outweigh the bad? And supporting Israel, to me, outweighs the bad.'
Many conservative voters in the district Greene represents hold overtly Christian Zionist views not primarily out of political alignment, but because they see the modern state of Israel as a necessary step in God's prophetic timeline, tying Jewish sovereignty to their eschatological beliefs about how the world will end and Christ will return.
'I think America needs to stand with Israel. It clearly states in the Bible that any friend of Israel is a friend of Him,' said Johnny Hames of Aragon, Georgia, expressing support for the military strikes. 'I'm not real political, and I don't look at what's going on a lot … for me it's just processing towards the end of the world, and I think Israel will never be defeated again. That's biblical.'
He was surprised Greene came out against the strike, he said. 'Everybody's got their own opinion. I wouldn't want somebody in office that agrees with the president on everything he does if she thinks it's wrong,' Hames said. 'I thought she was a big Trump supporter, but then again, she got her own mind and she got her own reasons.'
Iran's nuclear threat against Israel demanded action, said Kevin Bishop, of Taylorsville, Georgia.
'Well, I mean, I'm a strong Christian,' Bishop said. 'Israel is fatherland, homeland, whatever you want to call it. I don't think that Iran needs any nuclear bombs. They have no good intentions with them. So, we just got rid of them and I think it was a good thing to do.'
One thing Greene and her Republican constituents continue to have in common is that at the end of the day they remain true to Trump above other political interests.
After Trump declared the ceasefire on Monday, Greene was quick to clean up. 'Thank you, President Trump, for pursuing PEACE,' she posted on X.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DOJ to hand over Epstein files to Congress
DOJ to hand over Epstein files to Congress

Daily Mail​

time5 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

DOJ to hand over Epstein files to Congress

Lawmakers in Congress expect to begin receiving Department of Justice files on Jeffrey Epstein's [sexual] trafficking case this week. House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky, the leader of the House probe into Epstein, announced that the DOJ will send over Epstein files on Friday. The files are expected to include never-before-seen documents related to the late, well-connected New York financier's 2019 federal [sexual] trafficking investigation. 'There are many records in DOJ's custody, and it will take the Department time to produce all the records and ensure the identification of victims and any child sexual abuse material are redacted,' the Kentucky Republican said in a statement. Comer initially subpoenaed the DOJ for the Epstein files on August 5. At the time, the chairman gave the department until August 19 to hand over the documents. His announcement that the files would come by Friday appears to give the federal agency additional time to prepare the Epstein investigation documents. When the Daily Mail asked the DOJ if they would turn over the Epstein files by the deadline on Tuesday, a spokesperson responded, 'No comment.' It's unclear whether the files the DOJ plans to hand over are the same ones that would be released under a bipartisan bill that could force the department to release all its files on Epstein , except in a few exceptions. It also remains to be seen whether the files expected to be released on Friday will satisfy voters' demands to see the Epstein documents. Epstein, a wealthy money manager who authorities say [killed himself] while in federal custody in 2019 while awaiting his federal [sexual] trafficking trial, has been the subject of extreme interest since the DOJ announced in July that it did not have a 'client list' many believed the government had. The unsigned memo put out by the DOJ and FBI poured cold water on many voters' hopes to learn more about the infamous financier. This outrage became particularly acute due to Attorney General Pam Bondi saying earlier this year that the 'client list' was on her desk. Epstein's former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, who is currently serving a 20-year sentence for [sexual] trafficking, met personally with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche multiple times in early August. The Oversight Committee is also investigating Maxwell and had planned and then rescheduled a time to interview the Epstein accomplice. The committee said it would speak with Maxwell after her petition before the Supreme Court regarding her [sexual] trafficking case has been heard. Shortly after she met with Blanche, Maxwell was reassigned to a lower security prison. The Bureau of Prisons (BOP), which is under the DOJ, acknowledged that Maxwell was transferred but did not share a reason why. The House Oversight Committee has also sent subpoenas to many high-profile politicians to determine what they know of Epstein's crimes . Former President Bill Clinton, who has admitted to flying on Epstein's private jet - named the Lolita Express - as well as former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, have also been subpoenaed by the committee. Both are being asked to sit for interviews in the Epstein probe in October. Former Attorney General Bill Barr, who served under Trump during his first term, was also subpoenaed and sat for an interview on Monday. 'Mr. Barr made clear that President Trump never provided any views or instructions related to the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein or his death, and that he never saw any evidence suggesting President Trump committed a crime,' a committee spokesperson told the Daily Mail of the session. 'He further stated that he believed the Biden Department of Justice would have released any incriminating evidence against President Trump if such evidence existed,' the spokesperson continued. 'Mr. Barr stands by his original conclusion that Epstein died by [killing himself].'

‘Nothing about Success': Trump rages that ‘woke' Smithsonian teaches ‘how bad Slavery was'
‘Nothing about Success': Trump rages that ‘woke' Smithsonian teaches ‘how bad Slavery was'

The Independent

time6 minutes ago

  • The Independent

‘Nothing about Success': Trump rages that ‘woke' Smithsonian teaches ‘how bad Slavery was'

President Donald Trump has launched an attack on the nation's museums for being 'WOKE,' specifically targeting the Smithsonian, calling it 'OUT OF CONTROL.' In a post on Truth Social on Tuesday afternoon, the president wrote: 'The Museums throughout Washington, but all over the Country are, essentially, the last remaining segment of 'WOKE'.' He continues: 'The Smithsonian is OUT OF CONTROL, where everything discussed is how horrible our Country is, how bad Slavery was, and how unaccomplished the downtrodden have been — Nothing about Success, nothing about Brightness, nothing about the Future.' Trump laid out his intentions, writing: 'We are not going to allow this to happen, and I have instructed my attorneys to go through the Museums, and start the exact same process that has been done with Colleges and Universities where tremendous progress has been made.' He concluded: 'This Country cannot be WOKE, because WOKE IS BROKE. We have the 'HOTTEST' Country in the World, and we want people to talk about it, including in our Museums.'

Trump's Justice Department is investigating whether DC police officials falsified crime data
Trump's Justice Department is investigating whether DC police officials falsified crime data

The Independent

time6 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump's Justice Department is investigating whether DC police officials falsified crime data

The Justice Department has opened an investigation into whether police officials in Washington, D.C., have falsified crime data, according to a person familiar with the probe who wasn't authorized to publicly discuss an open investigation. The investigation comes amid an escalating — and political — showdown between the Trump administration and the city over control of the police department. It wasn't immediately clear what federal laws could have been violated by the possible manipulation of crime data. The mayor's office declined to comment on the matter. The New York Times was first to report on the investigation. Earlier this year, a Metropolitan Police Department commander suspected of manipulating crime data was placed on paid administrative leave, NBC Washington reported. ___ Associated Press writer Matt Brown contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store