Marjorie Taylor Greene slammed Trump's Iran strike – but Maga voters stand by him: ‘That's biblical'
Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia congresswoman and Maga firebrand, was quickly critical of missile strikes ordered Saturday by Donald Trump on Iranian nuclear facilities.
Her constituents are not.
In the past week, Israel and Iran traded strikes until the US attempted to intervene, both with its own bombs on three sites, and then with an attempted Trump-brokered ceasefire on Monday, which crumbled within hours. Greene took to social media on Saturday to stridently argue (in her longstanding style) that the US involvement wastes resources to feed the military-industrial complex.
'I've watched our country go to war in foreign lands for foreign causes on behalf of foreign interests for as long as I can remember,' Greene wrote on X.
'America is $37 TRILLION in debt and all of these foreign wars have cost Americans TRILLIONS AND TRILLIONS of dollars that never benefited any American. American troops have been killed and forever torn apart physically and mentally for regime change, foreign wars, and for military industrial base profits. I'm sick of it.'
'It feels like a complete bait and switch to please the neocons, warmongers, military industrial complex contracts, and neocon tv personalities that MAGA hates and who were NEVER TRUMPERS!' she said in another post.
It was a sentiment often repeated by Trump allies throughout his electoral campaign in 2024, when the president repeatedly promised to bring world peace. But in interview after interview in Georgia's heavily Republican 14th district, voters generally expressed satisfaction with the president's decision to attack Iran, offering the president wide latitude for the use of military force.
'This should have happened 15 years ago,' said Richard Hodges of Rome, Georgia, having a midday drink with a friend. Iran would destroy the United States if it had the power to do so – they chant as much as rallies, he said. 'They can't have a nuclear bomb. They can't. They're liars, basically. We gave them the opportunity to do nuclear energy, but they want to enrich it. They're close to having a nuclear weapon. We back Israel.'
His friend had reservations.
'I wish Trump didn't have to do it,' said Brooke Brinson of Rome, Georgia. 'My opinion'.
Last year, Trump both pledged to avoid committing America to additional wars and threatened to blow Iran to 'smithereens' if it attacked the United States, while repeatedly describing the Biden administration as leading the country down the path to the third world war.
'I don't think that they can't be trusted,' Brinson said of Iran. 'I wish nobody had nukes. That's my opinion. I wish nobody had nukes and we could all get along. But that's not going to happen.'
Greene's district is more conservative than 93% of House districts. Greene herself, though a close Trump ally, draws mixed reviews.
'She probably would not be who I would vote for if there was another Republican alternative, but there's not,' said Angela Hilliard, who lives near Rome. She supported Trump's decision to bomb Iran, describing the country as 'a persistent threat' and this action as a frightening moment.
'I feel like it ultimately is the right thing to do, but I'm not going to lie, it was very scary, and I'm still kind of just, not, 100% for sure. I think it was the right decision, but I still think there could possibly be consequences.'
Greene's comments over the weekend raised eyebrows among conservatives, prompting her to issue a string of comments about her support for the president. Nonetheless, it is another heterodox position that draws attention to Greene, and to her district.
For Michelle Gibson of Murray county, Georgia, Greene is the default choice. 'I mean, I'm always going to vote with my party–I'm not saying I have always done that–but usually it aligns more with my beliefs than the other side,' she said. 'Do I think she's a little bit extreme sometimes? Yes.'
Gibson does not begrudge Greene for her views on attacking Iran, she said. 'Even though I'm for it, I realize everybody else is not going to be. And ultimately, whoever the president is, I have to try and support their decision,' Gibson said. 'And I do agree with it. I think we should stop [Iran] now. I think a lot more people, and leaders and countries over there are so glad we did it, even though they're not going to come out and say it, because [Iran is] a threat to everyone, especially over there.'
Her views on Iran are strongly shaped by her Southern Baptist faith, Gibson said.
'This is all about religion,' she said. 'This isn't about politics. You're looking at it from a wrong standpoint. I guess because I was raised Southern Baptist, you just always protect God's people.'
Gibson was aware of broad concerns about the conduct of the Israeli government, but said her faith prompts a tradeoff. 'I think with anything we do in life, there's always going to be a good and a bad to it, and you just have to pick whatever decision you make in life. What's the good and does it outweigh the bad? And supporting Israel, to me, outweighs the bad.'
Many conservative voters in the district Greene represents hold overtly Christian Zionist views not primarily out of political alignment, but because they see the modern state of Israel as a necessary step in God's prophetic timeline, tying Jewish sovereignty to their eschatological beliefs about how the world will end and Christ will return.
'I think America needs to stand with Israel. It clearly states in the Bible that any friend of Israel is a friend of Him,' said Johnny Hames of Aragon, Georgia, expressing support for the military strikes. 'I'm not real political, and I don't look at what's going on a lot … for me it's just processing towards the end of the world, and I think Israel will never be defeated again. That's biblical.'
He was surprised Greene came out against the strike, he said. 'Everybody's got their own opinion. I wouldn't want somebody in office that agrees with the president on everything he does if she thinks it's wrong,' Hames said. 'I thought she was a big Trump supporter, but then again, she got her own mind and she got her own reasons.'
Iran's nuclear threat against Israel demanded action, said Kevin Bishop, of Taylorsville, Georgia.
'Well, I mean, I'm a strong Christian,' Bishop said. 'Israel is fatherland, homeland, whatever you want to call it. I don't think that Iran needs any nuclear bombs. They have no good intentions with them. So, we just got rid of them and I think it was a good thing to do.'
One thing Greene and her Republican constituents continue to have in common is that at the end of the day they remain true to Trump above other political interests.
After Trump declared the ceasefire on Monday, Greene was quick to clean up. 'Thank you, President Trump, for pursuing PEACE,' she posted on X.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
15 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Israel 'never had a better friend than Trump in the White House', says Netanyahu
In video remarks issued by the prime minister's office, Benjamin Netanyahu has declared that Israel 'never had a better friend that President Trump in the White House'. The Israeli prime minister said that Israel in its 12 days of war with Iran had removed 'the threat of nuclear annihilation'
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Stephen Miller owns stock in ICE contractor Palantir — a company powering deportations
White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, the architect of much of the Trump administration's anti-immigration agenda, owns up to $250,000 dollars in stock in government contractor Palantir, according to disclosures. The investment, held in one of Miller's children's brokerage accounts, raises conflict of interest red flags as the tech company continues to play a substantial role in the work of U.S. immigration officials. 'Given Palantir's contracts with ICE, and Miller's work with the agency, that raises ethics concerns,' watchdog group Citizens for Ethics in Washington wrote on X on Tuesday. The government dismissed the concerns over the holdings, which were disclosed in financial filings obtained by the Project on Government Oversight watchdog group, showing revisions as recent as June 4. Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin called the group's report 'very silly' while the White House claimed that Miller confirmed to ethics officials that 'he has and will continue to recuse from participating in official matters that could affect those stocks.' Palantir has long served as a government contractor, working with a variety of U.S. agencies on issues ranging from tax data to distributing vaccines, but the firm has occupied a prominent — and lucrative — role as the Trump administration pursues its mass deportation campaign. In April, the firm won a $30 million Immigration and Customs Enforcement contract to deliver an operating system tracking and managing deportations, as well as granting 'near real-time visibility' on those who 'self-deport.' Leaked chats obtained by 404 Media describe the company assisting ICE with finding the physical location of people slated for deportation. The firm is also reportedly assisting the Trump administration as it looks to streamline and centralize government data about millions of Americans, an effort which has drawn criticism from members of Congress who fear it could usher in mass surveillance. Palantir insists it is not building any 'master list' for the government, and that its separate agency customers control the data they process using Palantir tools within clear legal and ethical guardrails. Miller's reported investments are the latest sign of Palantir's deep ties with the new administration. As of December, the firm was reportedly in talks with defense tech company Anduril, as well as eventual White House advisor Elon Musk's SpaceX, to form a consortium to bid on government contracts, according to the Financial Times. Alex Karp, CEO of Palantir, was among the scores of tech executives who donated to Trump's inauguration in January — $1 million, in his case — and Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel was a key backer and former employer of Vice President JD Vance. Once Trump was in office, the firm won a $795 million Pentagon contract, and its name appeared among the high-profile corporate sponsors of the Army's 250th anniversary event in Washington earlier this month. Palantir's chief technology officer was among the prominent tech executives formally sworn into the Army's new innovation corps this month. The watchdog group that obtained Miller's filing identified 11 other administration officials who either currently hold or have owned stock in Palantir, though none with holdings as large as Miller. In May, a group of former Palantir employees warned in an open letter that the company was 'normalizing authoritarianism under the guise of a 'revolution' led by oligarchs.' 'By supporting Trump's administration, Elon Musk's DOGE initiative, and dangerous expansions of executive power, they have abandoned their responsibility and are in violation of Palantir's Code of Conduct,' the employees wrote. The company has long insisted it is guided by a patriotic mission and strict care for civil liberties. 'Palantir's founding mission and our commitment to privacy and civil liberties, which have guided our work for over 20 years, help the US government deliver essential services to the American people,' it wrote in a June blog post, after Democratic lawmakers sent a letter to company leadership criticizing it for allegedly 'enabling and profiting from serious violations of federal law by the Trump administration.'
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Early US intelligence report suggests US strikes only set back Iran's nuclear program by months
A U.S. intelligence report suggests that Iran's nuclear program has been set back only a few months after U.S. strikes and was not 'completely and fully obliterated' as President Donald Trump has said, according to two people familiar with the early assessment. The report issued by the Defense Intelligence Agency on Monday contradicts statements from Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about the status of Iran 's nuclear facilities. According to the people, the report found that while the Sunday strikes at the Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites did significant damage, the facilities were not totally destroyed. The people were not authorized to address the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. The U.S. has held out hope of restarting negotiations with Iran to convince it to give up its nuclear program entirely, but some experts fear that the U.S. strikes — and the potential of Iran retaining some of its capabilities — could push Tehran toward developing a functioning weapon. The assessment also suggests that at least some of Iran's highly enriched uranium, necessary for creating a nuclear weapon, was moved out of multiple sites before the U.S. strikes and survived, and it found that Iran's centrifuges, which are required to further enrich uranium to weapons-grade levels, are largely intact, according to the people. At the deeply buried Fordo uranium enrichment plant, where U.S. B-2 stealth bombers dropped several 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs, the entrance collapsed and infrastructure was damaged, but the underground infrastructure was not destroyed, the assessment found. The people said that intelligence officials had warned of such an outcome in previous assessments ahead of the strike on Fordo. The White House pushes back The White House strongly pushed back on the DIA assessment, calling it 'flat-out wrong.' 'The leaking of this alleged assessment is a clear attempt to demean President Trump, and discredit the brave fighter pilots who conducted a perfectly executed mission to obliterate Iran's nuclear program,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement. 'Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration.' The CIA and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence declined to comment on the DIA assessment. ODNI coordinates the work of the nation's 18 intelligence agencies, including the DIA, which is the intelligence arm of the Defense Department, responsible for producing intelligence on foreign militaries and the capabilities of adversaries. The Israeli government also has not released any official assessments of the U.S. strikes. Trump has said in comments and posts on social media in recent days, including Tuesday, that the strike left the sites in Iran 'totally destroyed' and that Iran will never rebuild its nuclear facilities. Netanyahu said in a televised statement on Tuesday that, 'For dozens of years I promised you that Iran would not have nuclear weapons and indeed ... we brought to ruin Iran's nuclear program." He said the U.S. joining Israel was 'historic" and thanked Trump. The intelligence assessment was first reported by CNN on Tuesday. Outside experts had suspected Iran had likely already hidden the core components of its nuclear program as it stared down the possibility that American bunker-buster bombs could be used on its nuclear sites. Bulldozers and trucks visible in satellite imagery taken just days before the strikes have fueled speculation among experts that Iran may have transferred its half-ton stockpile of enriched uranium to an unknown location. And the incomplete destruction of the nuclear sites could still leave the country with the capacity to spin up weapons-grade uranium and develop a bomb. Iran has maintained that its nuclear program is peaceful, but it has enriched significant quantities of uranium beyond the levels required for any civilian use. The U.S. and others assessed prior to the U.S. strikes that Iran's theocratic leadership had not yet ordered the country to pursue an operational nuclear weapons, but the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency has repeatedly warned that Iran has enough enriched uranium to make several nuclear bombs should it choose to do so. Vice President JD Vance said in a Monday interview on Fox News Channel that even if Iran is still in control of its stockpile of 408.6 kilograms (900.8 pounds) of enriched uranium, which is just short of weapons-grade, the U.S. has cut off Iran's ability to convert it to a nuclear weapon. 'If they have 60% enriched uranium, but they don't have the ability to enrich it to 90%, and, further, they don't have the ability to convert that to a nuclear weapon, that is mission success. That is the obliteration of their nuclear program, which is why the president, I think, rightly is using that term,' Vance said. Approximately 42 kilograms of 60% enriched uranium is theoretically enough to produce one atomic bomb if enriched further to 90%, according to the U.N. nuclear watchdog. What experts say Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi informed U.N. nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi on June 13 — the day Israel launched its military campaign against Iran — that Tehran would 'adopt special measures to protect our nuclear equipment and materials.' American satellite imagery and analysis firm Maxar Technologies said its satellites photographed trucks and bulldozers at the Fordo site beginning on June 19, three days before the Americans struck. Subsequent imagery 'revealed that the tunnel entrances into the underground complex had been sealed off with dirt prior to the U.S. airstrikes,' said Stephen Wood, senior director at Maxar. 'We believe that some of the trucks seen on 19 June were carrying dirt to be used as part of that operation.' Some experts say those trucks could also have been used to move out Iran's enriched uranium stockpile. 'It is plausible that Iran moved the material enriched to 60% out of Fordo and loaded it on a truck,' said Eric Brewer, a former U.S. intelligence analyst and now deputy vice president at the Nuclear Threat Initiative. Iran could also have moved other equipment, including centrifuges, he said, noting that while enriched uranium, which is stored in fortified canisters, is relatively easy to transport, delicate centrifuges are more challenging to move without inflicting damage. Apart from its enriched uranium stockpile, over the past four years Iran has produced the centrifuges key to enrichment without oversight from the U.N. nuclear watchdog. Iran also announced on June 12 that it has built and will activate a third nuclear enrichment facility. IAEA chief Grossi said the facility was located in Isfahan, a place where Iran has several other nuclear sites. After being bombarded by both the Israelis and the Americans, it is unclear if, or how quickly, Isfahan's facilities including tunnels could become operational. But given all of the equipment and material likely still under Iran's control, this offers Tehran 'a pretty solid foundation for a reconstituted covert program and for getting a bomb,' Brewer said. Kelsey Davenport, director for nonproliferation policy at the Arms Control Association, a nonpartisan policy center, said that 'if Iran had already diverted its centrifuges,' it can 'build a covert enrichment facility with a small footprint and inject the 60% gas into those centrifuges and quickly enrich to weapons grade levels.' But Brewer also underlined that if Iran launched a covert nuclear program, it would do so at a disadvantage, having lost to Israeli and American strikes vital equipment and personnel that are crucial for turning the enriched uranium into a functional nuclear weapon. ___ Liechtenstein reported from Vienna and McNeil reported from Brussels. Associated Press writers Eric Tucker, David Klepper, Ellen Knickmeyer and Aamer Madhani in Washington and John Leicester in Paris contributed to this report. —- The Associated Press receives support for nuclear security coverage from the Carnegie Corporation of New York and Outrider Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content. —- Additional AP coverage of the nuclear landscape:
