The CIRCLE Act: A blueprint for revitalizing American manufacturing through recycling
Each year, 37 million tons of recyclable household materials in the United States are landfilled or incinerated. That loss weakens our supply chains, drives up costs for American manufacturers and wastes taxpayer-funded resources. If we are serious about revitalizing domestic production, keeping dollars in local economies and strengthening U.S. competitiveness, we must modernize our recycling system and scale access for every household.
Recycling already delivers for American industry. Recycled content makes up 40 percent of U.S. manufacturing inputs. People across the country are doing their part: setting out blue carts, dropping off batteries, returning pallets. But the system supporting them is uneven. More than 41percent of Americans still lack access to basic recycling services, and billions in raw material value is lost each year as a result. Congress has a clear opportunity to lead.
The bipartisan CIRCLE Act, introduced by Reps. Suozzi (D-N.Y.) and Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), is a targeted, practical solution. It would create a 30 percent investment tax credit for businesses, nonprofits and individuals building or upgrading recycling infrastructure — from curbside collection to sortation and processing.
The model is proven. Like the tax credits that fueled growth in solar and semiconductors, this approach will drive innovation, reduce risk for private investors, and build a stronger, more resilient domestic supply chain. We already know this investment pays off. According to The Recycling Partnership, a $17 billion commitment to universal recycling access would create more than 200,000 U.S. jobs, return $8.8 billion in materials to the economy and save taxpayers nearly $10 billion in five years. Few investments can match that return.
Global momentum is also building. As nations convene to negotiate a global treaty on plastic pollution, the U.S. has a chance to lead from a position of strength. Investing in domestic recycling infrastructure is not just good policy, it is essential to showing global leadership on waste, sustainability and economic development.
We cannot afford to waste valuable glass, metals, plastics and paper. Nor can we ignore the growing need for extended producer responsibility policies that require producers to fund better systems, as already seen in seven U.S. states and across the globe.
The EPA's Solid Waste Infrastructure for Recycling grant program offers a strong foundation. First passed with bipartisan support during the Trump administration, it has already attracted more than 450 applications. These investments are popular, cost-effective and widely supported by both Republicans and Democrats. As the EPA turns its focus to the Great American Comeback, continued funding for the Solid Waste Infrastructure for Recycling grant program is a smart and strategic move.
But policy must go further. As more recycled plastic moves through our economy, Health and Human Services should ensure materials are safe for use in food, health and household products. Regulatory clarity is critical as manufacturers increase their use of recycled content. Protecting public health should go hand-in-hand with accelerating circularity.
Recycling is one of the rare areas that unites rural, suburban and urban interests. It creates jobs, reduces waste, lowers costs for businesses and delivers environmental returns. At a time when Americans expect real solutions, this is one Congress and the administration can act on now.
Passing the CIRCLE Act would send a clear message: the U.S. is ready to lead the world in smart, sustainable manufacturing. Recycling is a proven path to jobs, resilience and economic strength. Let's stop wasting potential and start investing in it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
11 minutes ago
- USA Today
RFK Jr. defunds mRNA vaccine research. His anti-vax policies will kill people.
It's ridiculous that Kennedy is in this position following a lifetime of gargling conspiratorial and dangerous health nonsense, but his actions are now deadly serious. In his ongoing crusade to make America sicker and dumber, Health and Human Services Secretary (I bristle every time I type that title) Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has axed about $500 million in vital mRNA vaccine research funding. It's the latest salvo in Kennedy's war against science, and it's about as predictably stupid as any of the Neanderthal-brained things he has done since President Donald Trump foisted him on the American public. (My apologies to any Neanderthals offended by the comparison.) You might recall being fortunate beyond measure to receive mRNA vaccine shots during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Nobel Prize-winning vaccine development saved millions of lives globally and was hailed by Trump himself as a 'medical miracle.' 'This may be the most dangerous public health judgment that I've seen' Messenger RNA, or mRNA, vaccines are far more nimble and easier to produce and alter than traditional vaccines, so continued development is seen as crucial ‒ not just for future pandemics but for everything from responding to bioterrorism attacks to cancer prevention. Michael Osterholm, head of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, told NPR this when asked about Kennedy's mRNA funding decision: 'This may be the most dangerous public health judgment that I've seen in my 50 years in this business. ... It is baseless, and we will pay a tremendous price in terms of illnesses and deaths.' Every day RFK Jr. is in charge is a bad day for science In a New York Times report, University of Pennsylvania immunologist Scott Hensley, who has been researching an mRNA flu vaccine, said: 'This is a bad day for science.' That can be said about every day as long as we have a wholly unqualified anti-vaccine nutter like Kennedy in charge of America's health. And remember, as with all things RFK Jr., his 'concerns' and 'fears' about mRNA vaccines are wholly unfounded and not supported by science. They are safe and have been studied for decades. It's ridiculous that Kennedy is in this position following a lifetime of gargling conspiratorial and dangerous health nonsense, but his actions are now deadly serious, and they're often cloaked by the daily insanity spun up by Trump himself, from tariffs to migrant cruelty to the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Out go the smart people, in come the vaccine skeptics In June, Kennedy fired all 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and replaced them with people he handpicked (that's a red flag if I've ever seen one), including several vaccine skeptics. Now they're reexamining your children's vaccine schedule and echoing baseless fears heard in anti-vax circles for years. Kennedy is also reportedly considering getting rid of all members of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, which gives guidance to doctors and health insurers on preventive medicine. Dr. Thomas Lew, an assistant clinical professor of medicine at the Stanford University School of Medicine and frequent contributor for USA TODAY Opinion, told CBS News: "This will greatly damage all the work we've done in preventative care, making people sicker, and driving up costs and premiums. To put it mildly, this is extremely concerning ‒ and doing the opposite of making America healthy.' Kennedy is so bad for health that he's being sued by major medical groups Kennedy has removed the COVID-19 vaccine from the recommended immunization schedule for healthy children and pregnant women, prompting a lawsuit from leading medical groups like the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Physicians. At the end of March, the highly respected top vaccine regulator at the Food and Drug Administration was forced out, and wrote in his resignation letter: 'It has become clear that truth and transparency are not desired by the secretary, but rather he wishes subservient confirmation of his misinformation and lies.' Food inspections? Hand washing? What's next to come under RFK Jr.'s ax? Whether through Trump's magical branding skills or Republican malpractice or both, Kennedy was able to take on enough of a veneer of credibility to become health secretary. But he is still the same raw-milk-guzzling, roadkill-eating, vaccine-alarmist dipstick he was for all those years when his gibberish was nothing more than a punchline for jokes about conspiracy-addled loons. And he is now doing things that are making us fundamentally less safe, whether by sowing doubt about vaccines, derailing medical research or curbing food safety inspections. Kennedy's policies are almost certainly going to kill people A year ago, if you asked me and many other sane people to come up with the most irresponsible public figure to put in charge of America's health, we would have said RFK Jr. And here we are, staring down radical changes inspired not by science but by suspicion and opportunistic hearsay. The ineptitude and absurdity of the Trump administration can be almost laughable at times. But I'm convinced people will die because of Kennedy's policies, weirdo worldviews and actions. And I'm not laughing a bit. Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at
Boston Globe
11 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
More Ukrainians now want a negotiated end to the war with Russia, new Gallup poll shows
Advertisement Since the start of the full-scale war, Russia's relentless pounding of urban areas behind the front line has killed more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians, according to the United Nations. On the 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line snaking from northeast to southeast Ukraine, where tens of thousands of troops on both sides have died, Russia's bigger army is slowly capturing more land. The poll came out on the eve of U.S. President Donald Trump's Friday deadline for Russia to stop the killing or face heavy economic sanctions. In the new Gallup survey, conducted in early July, about 7 in 10 Ukrainians say their country should seek to negotiate a settlement as soon as possible. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy last month renewed his offer to meet with Russia's Vladimir Putin, but his overture was rebuffed as Russia sticks to its demands, and the sides remain far apart. Advertisement Most Ukrainians do not expect a lasting peace anytime soon, the poll found. Only about one-quarter say it's 'very' or 'somewhat' likely that active fighting will end within the next 12 months, while about 7 in 10 think it's 'somewhat' or 'very' unlikely that active fighting will be over in the next year. Approval of US falls, approval of Germany rises Ukrainian views of the American government have cratered over the past few years, while positive views of Germany's leadership have risen, according to Gallup. Three years ago, about two-thirds of Ukrainians approved of U.S. leadership. That's since fallen to 16% in the latest poll, reflecting new tensions between the two countries since Trump took office in January. But although the dip from last year was substantial — approval of U.S. leadership was 40% in 2024 — positive views of U.S. leadership were already dropping before Trump took office, perhaps related to the antipathy that prominent Republican politicians showed toward billions of dollars in U.S. support for Ukraine. Germany has grown more popular among Ukrainians over the past few years, rising to 63% approval in the new poll. Hope for NATO, EU acceptance has fallen Ukrainians are much less optimistic that their country will be accepted into NATO or the European Union in the next decade than they were just a few years ago. In the new poll, about one-third of Ukrainians expect that Ukraine will be accepted into NATO within the next 10 years, while about one-quarter think it will take at least 10 years, and one-third believe it will never happen. Advertisement That's down from 2022, when about two-thirds of Ukrainians thought acceptance into NATO would happen in the coming decade and only about 1 in 10 thought it would never happen. Hope for acceptance into the EU is higher but has also fallen. About half, 52%, of Ukrainians now expect to be part of the EU within the next decade, down from 73% in 2022. Hatton reported from Lisbon, Portugal.
Business Insider
12 minutes ago
- Business Insider
A Gen X couple living in a camper says hourly wages aren't enough to afford housing: 'It just feels like it's out of reach'
Things fell apart for Chris Hoskey in 2020. She lost her job of nine years managing returns for a cashmere clothing company just north of Detroit because of the pandemic. Without her $14-per-hour income, she couldn't afford rent at her mobile home park, so she sold her trailer for a few thousand dollars and left town. "Losing my job made me lose everything," said Hoskey, who is now 49. In search of work and a place to stay, she bought a camper and moved to northern Michigan, where she found a string of low-wage jobs in fast food and hotel housekeeping. After several months of unemployment, she started a new part-time job in early July at an Amazon delivery station, making $18.50 an hour. Hoskey would rather have a full-time job. She's had trouble landing more than 20 hours of work in a week. An Amazon spokesperson told Business Insider that all associates at the Traverse City facility are limited to part-time work, or what the company calls "flex time." Despite having a job, supplementing healthcare and food costs with Medicaid and SNAP, and splitting costs with her husband, Jason, Hoskey doesn't see a path out of her camper. Jason recently began working nearly full-time at a landscaping company, where he makes $16.75 an hour, but the work is seasonal. "Right now, financially, things suck," she said. "It's becoming more and more difficult to try to get out of this situation." Hoskey and her husband are among a growing number of Americans who are working but experiencing homelessness. Many have low-wage jobs with unpredictable schedules that don't offer them the financial security and stability needed to pay rising rents. Nearly 5 million American workers want full-time work but can only get part-time, a number that's been creeping up in recent years. The Department of Housing and Urban Development counts people who resort to living in campers or RVs without utilities like running water "unsheltered homeless" population. The overall population of people who are working but can't afford basic necessities is growing. "There's different types of homeless," Hoskey said. "There are the people you see on TV, and then there are people like me who are working for a living." If you have a story to share, reach out to this reporter at erelman@ and read more Business Insider coverage on how renters, homeowners, and people experiencing homelessness are dealing with a shortage of housing and rising costs: A boomer quit nursing to live on $2,972 monthly in Social Security in an RV in America's parks: 'I literally live in heaven' America's unhinged real estate market is driving down the birth rate Meet the boomer homeowners who are sitting on their valuable properties because of a tax they hope is on the way out Working and homeless About a month into her new job, Hoskey likes working at Amazon, where she says her colleagues are friendly and caring. But despite having work that pays more than Michigan's $12.48 minimum wage, the unpredictable part-time gig likely isn't enough for Hoskey to chart a path out of homelessness. A 2024 survey of Amazon's warehouse workers by the University of Illinois in Chicago found that 48% had difficulty paying for rent or other housing costs in the prior three months, 53% experienced food insecurity, and 33% relied on one or more forms of public assistance. Amazon has disputed the UIC study's findings, calling its methodology flawed. Similarly, a 2019 report by the nonprofit Economic Roundtable found that full-time Amazon warehouse workers in Southern California received an average of $5,094 in public assistance annually. "Wages are inadequate, jobs are intermittent, hours are unpredictable and unstable, and people don't get enough money to pay rent," Daniel Flaming, president of the Economic Roundtable, said of workplaces like Amazon's warehouses. "The bottom line is this: our goal is to be an employer of choice and over the last five years we've worked to do that in part by investing more than $5 billion in hourly pay, increasing our average to $22 per hour in the United States," Amazon spokesperson Eileen Hards said in a statement. When running water is a luxury For now, the couple is parked on Jason's employer's property, where they pay a minimal fee to use the company's electricity, bathroom, and kitchen. They don't have running water in their camper. Hoskey relies on government health insurance and food assistance. Michigan's state housing authority stopped issuing new Section 8 housing vouchers and closed the waitlist for the program in 2024 amid a shortage of federal funding. When they've gotten really desperate, Hoskey said Jason has asked his mother for $50 here and there. "I feel so bad about it," Hoskey said. "Because she lives on Social Security." They have a propane heater to stay warm in the frigid northern winters, but they cover their 28-foot travel trailer with a tarp for part of the year to keep snow and ice off of it. In the summer, they have an air conditioning unit, but they turn it off when they want to microwave something or use the air fryer. "I want to be able to wash my dishes in my own sink," Hoskey said. "It's the little things that I miss." The couple hopes to eventually save up enough money to buy a piece of land in northwest Michigan, build a house, and become homesteaders. "I try to stay optimistic as much as possible, but we've been here doing this for so long, it just feels like it's out of reach," Hoskey said.
