Number of Australian journalists hit by US law enforcement during LA protests climbs to four
The number of Australian journalists hit by law enforcement while covering ongoing immigration protests in Los Angeles has climbed to four, with reporters for Nine, the ABC and the New York Times affected.
One incident involved Australian journalist Livia Albeck-Ripka, who works for The New York Times. Albeck-Ripka, now based in LA, said she was hit in the torso by a munition fired by law enforcement while covering the protests.
'Officers began firing crowd-control munitions in our direction, and I was hit below my ribcage. It was a pretty intense, instant pain, I felt winded,' she said in a video for the New York Times. 'I was really lucky because I was not seriously injured, I just have a nasty bruise.'
Albeck-Ripka, originally from Melbourne, was hit on Sunday night US time. She noted that less-lethal rounds could kill people if they were struck in the head.
Lauren Day, the North American correspondent for the ABC, has said she and her crew were teargassed when the protests escalated following a long stand-off with police on Monday night local time. The experience was 'extremely unpleasant', she said.
'All of a sudden, we heard large bangs and the crowd started running. I then felt the unmistakable burn of tear gas — first in my eyes, then in my nose, lips and throat,' Day reported for the ABC.
'It really stings your entire face and makes it difficult to breathe until the point you almost want to throw up.'
Later in the night, the cameraman working with Day was shot in the chest with a less-than-lethal round while filming protesters. Day said the cameraman had been wearing a Kevlar vest and had not sustained injuries. He described the pain to the ABC as 'like being punched in the chest'.
In response to a question from the Guardian about Day's report of being hit with teargas, the LAPD said it was 'aware of less-lethal deployment use during the protests'.
On Friday, a series of immigration raids across the city prompted several mostly peaceful protests around the city. On Saturday, Donald Trump sent in the national guard, in a move condemned by the California governor, Gavin Newsom, as 'purposefully inflammatory'.
Since the deployment of the national guard, tensions have escalated with large crowds gathering in downtown centres. There have been reports of protesters throwing rocks, garbage and other objects at police and of police deploying tear gas and firing less-than-lethal munitions. A curfew has been declared.
The Australian prime minister, Anthony Albanese, has condemned the actions of an officer who shot Nine journalist Lauren Tomasi with what the network said was a rubber bullet live on air.
Sign up to Morning Mail
Our Australian morning briefing breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Tomasi was describing the situation in LA on Sunday, when an LAPD officer turned and took aim in her direction before firing his weapon.
Albanese has said the footage of Tomasi being shot was 'horrific' and he had raised his concerns with the US government.
The LAPD said it was investigating the use of excessive force by officers – in an apparent reference to Tomasi.
The Los Angeles police chief, Jim McDonnell, said the LAPD was aware and 'very concerned' about media being hit with crowd-control munitions.
'I know that situation you're referring to, with the member of the media. We saw that, we're very concerned about it and we're looking into that,' he said this week.
Also on the weekend, British news photographer Nick Stern was injured while covering the protests near Paramount. He believes he was likely hit by a less-than-lethal round shot by deputies.
'I'm walking around taking photos … when I felt a mighty pain in my leg. I put my hand down and felt a lump kind of sticking out the back of my leg,' he told the Guardian. He underwent emergency surgery.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
40 minutes ago
- Telegraph
RFK Jr appoints new vaccine committee – including vaccine sceptic doctor
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has appointed a new vaccine advisory panel, including a medical doctor who has claimed that Covid vaccines 'may damage [children's] brains, their heart, their immune system, and their ability to have children in the future.' The move comes just two days after the US health secretary unprecedentedly dismissed all 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), the body responsible for advising on vaccine recommendations to prevent and control diseases. Of the eight new members, four have actively spoken out against vaccination in some form. The most controversial pick is Dr Robert Malone, a prominent opponent of mRNA vaccines who also falsely claims to have invented the technology. While Dr Malone was involved in some of the early research on mRNA, his role was minimal at best, say experts. Dr Malone has previously stated that mass vaccination programs during the pandemic were enabled by 'mass formation psychosis,' an unrecognised medical term he coined, which he says also explains how Nazi Germany carried out the Holocaust. He was temporarily banned from X (formerly Twitter) for spreading misinformation about Covid-19, including claims that mRNA vaccines are experimental gene therapy that could cause irreparable harm, particularly to children. Also on the panel is Dr Martin Kulldorff, a former Harvard Medical School professor who was dismissed from his position in 2024. Dr Kulldorff was a key figure in the Great Barrington Declaration, an open letter published in 2020 that opposed widespread lockdowns and was widely criticised by experts as dangerous and anti-scientific. Of the panel, which includes Joseph Hibbeln, Retsef Levi, Cody Meissner, James Pagano, Vicky Pebsworth and Michael Rossm, four who have previously worked on committees associated with either the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), or the Food and Drug Administration. 'All of these individuals are committed to evidence-based medicine, gold-standard science, and common sense,' Mr Kennedy said in a post on X. It's not clear what process these figures went through, but it typically takes more than a year to be appointed to a federal advisory panel. Dr Noel Brewer, a professor in public health at the University of North Carolina who was a member of the ACIP, said it typically takes more than a year to be appointed as a member of a federal advisory panel – and that he went through a 1.5 year process to serve on ACIP. 'You apply by writing an essay,' he told the Telegraph. 'Once you're approved, you fill out maybe 20 or 30 forms. You disclose all of your financial stakes in companies and all sources of income. Then you get ethics training.' The health secretary added that the panel would attend a CDC meeting on June 25, where advisors are expected to deliberate and vote on who should receive a number of vaccines, including the flu shot, Covid-19 boosters, and vaccines for RSV, HPV, and meningococcal disease. Dr Peter Hotez, a vaccine expert and Dean for the National School of Tropical Medicine at the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, said: 'Kennedy is leading a MAHA [Make America Healthy Again] pseudoscience agenda, mostly as an economic stimulus for a very corrupt wellness/influencer industry'.
The Sun
41 minutes ago
- The Sun
Jockey, 50, who got knocked out in fight HE started hit with massive ban after admitting ‘anger management' issues
A LEGENDARY jockey who got knocked out in a fight HE started has been hit with a massive ban. Multiple Group 1-winning rider Noel Callow was rushed to hospital with injuries following an explosive weighing room bust-up with rival rider Kyle Wilson-Taylor. 2 2 Callow, 50, bumped into Wilson-Taylor, 25, at the scales and chased him back into the jockeys' quarters. An investigation ruled Callow made 'aggressive contact' with Wilson-Taylor from behind before the pair fell to the ground. Wilson-Taylor was then said to have mounted Callow and delivered two blows to the head at Doomben racecourse in Australia. Callow, who was concussed in the scrap, was quickly taken to hospital and immediately stood down from racing. Bosses have now given him a huge three-month ban, which will be reduced to two once he completes an anger management course. Callow, who has won more than £22million in his career, admitted in a written note to stewards he had issues with his temper. He also has to provide evidence he has been to see a sports psychologist before being allowed to race again. In a brilliant blow-by-blow account of how the fight went down, the stewards' report read: "Following the running of race six at Doomben on Wednesday 28 May 2025, both Mr Wilson-Taylor and Mr Callow presented to steward Simon Fletcher to weigh in for their respective rides in race six. "Mr Wilson-Taylor proceeded to the scales to weigh in with Mr Callow positioned behind him awaiting his turn to weigh in. "Mr Callow then positioned himself in close proximity to Mr Wilson-Taylor that then resulted in Mr Wilson-Taylor making contact with Mr Callow in order to exit the scales. "Mr Wilson-Taylor has then made the comment 'I'm not scared of you' to Mr Callow. "Mr Callow then proceeded to weigh in as Mr Wilson-Taylor then proceeded into the male jockeys' room. "Upon completing being weighed in, Mr Callow has then proceeded to run into the male jockeys' room in pursuit of Mr Wilson-Taylor. "Mr Callow has then made aggressive contact to Mr Wilson-Taylor from behind resulting in a physical altercation ensuing between Mr Callow and Mr Wilson-Taylor resulting in both Mr Callow and Mr Wilson-Taylor falling to the ground. "Shortly after falling onto the ground Mr Wilson-Taylor has then struck Mr Callow twice to the head whilst positioned on top of Mr Callow before other riders, along with steward Mr Fletcher, have then been able to separate Mr Callow and Mr Wilson-Taylor. "As quickly as the exchange escalated, it de-escalated and was finished. It might have taken 15 or 20 seconds. "This was not an incident thought out and planned beforehand. It was a momentary loss of temper, and any penalty should reflect that. "There was initiation of the altercation by Callow but that must be weighed against his subsequent restraint, his co-operation during the inquiry, early guilty plea, and steps taken toward rehabilitation. "The conduct was out of character with Callow's conduct over recent times and is unlikely to be repeated. "He has shown insight by taking steps in seeking assistance with anger management. "He has apologised in writing by his letter dated 31 May 2025." Commercial content notice: Taking one of the offers featured in this article may result in a payment to The Sun. You should be aware brands pay fees to appear in the highest placements on the page. 18+. T&Cs apply. Remember to gamble responsibly A responsible gambler is someone who:
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Erin Patterson denies all charges as triple murder trial testimony concludes
Erin Patterson has concluded her testimony in the Supreme Court of Victoria, marking the end of eight days in the witness box in her high-profile triple murder trial. Ms Patterson, 50, faces three charges of murder and one of attempted murder for allegedly serving death cap mushrooms in a beef wellington meal to her estranged husband's relatives at her home in Leongatha, Victoria, on 29 July 2023. Her former husband's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, and his aunt, Heather Wilkinson, took seriously ill after eating the lunch and died a few days later. Ms Wilkinson's husband, Ian, was hospitalised but survived. Ms Patterson has pleaded not guilty to the charges, maintaining the deaths were accidental. In the final moments of her cross-examination, chief prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC put three key accusations to Ms Patterson: that she deliberately sourced death cap mushrooms, knowingly included them in the beef wellington and intended to kill her guests. To all three, Ms Patterson responded: 'Disagree.' Ms Patterson claimed she dehydrated dried mushrooms from an Asian grocer before using them in the beef wellington. However, she admitted this detail wasn't mentioned earlier, prompting the prosecution to accuse her of making it up to obscure the origin of the mushrooms. Ms Patterson denied the accusation, insisting her explanation was truthful. 'I suggest this is another lie you made up on the spot,' the prosecutor Rogers said, accusing Ms Patterson of trying to hedge her bets by implying there could be several possible sources for the death cap mushrooms. 'Incorrect,' the accused responded. The prosecutor also implied that Ms Patterson might have lied about taking diarrhoea medication after the lunch, noting that she had previously claimed one reason for going to hospital was her belief they would provide a stronger treatment. Ms Patterson acknowledged that she hadn't informed hospital staff about taking the medication but insisted it was because no one asked. 'If you were looking for something stronger, you would've told medical staff you had already taken Imodium and it didn't work,' Ms Rogers said. 'I don't agree,' Ms Patterson responded. The prosecution also alleged that Ms Patterson had fabricated a story about stopping by the roadside to relieve herself while driving her son to a flying lesson. Her son had earlier testified this did not happen, but Ms Patterson stood by her version. 'I suggest he did not recall you stopping by the bushes on the side of the road because it did not happen,' Ms Rogers said. 'I suggest this is another lie you told the jury about how you managed the trip to Tyabb.' 'Disagree,' Ms Patterson said. Ms Patterson also told the court she ate only cereal the night after the fatal lunch and served her children leftover beef wellington with the mushrooms removed. Both children, however, told police she ate the same meal they did. Ms Patterson rejected their accounts, saying they were mistaken. Ms Rogers referred Ms Patterson to transcripts of her children's police interviews where they were questioned about what she ate for dinner on 30 July. 'Do you say [your daughter] is wrong about what you prepared yourself for dinner on the Sunday night?' 'She is,' Ms Patterson responded. Later, Ms Rogers asked: 'Do you say that [your son] is incorrect about what you prepared for dinner on the Sunday night?' 'Yes, he is,' Ms Patterson answered. Ms Patterson also denied hiding one of her phones from police, claiming she switched to another phone because the first wasn't working well. However, the prosecution noted that the first phone was still in use shortly after the lunch. Ms Patterson said she reset the new phone before handing it to police. When accused of lying about the first phone's condition, she disagreed. 'I suggest to you that there was nothing wrong with phone A and this is another lie,' Ms Rogers said. 'Disagree,' Patterson responded. The trial continues.
