logo
Euro 2025: Why England's Lioness will not take a knee in their semi-final against Italy

Euro 2025: Why England's Lioness will not take a knee in their semi-final against Italy

Indian Express5 days ago
England have decided to not take the knee in their UEFA Women's Euro 2025 semifinal match against Italy on Tuesday in support of their defender Jess Carter, who has faced racist abuse online. In what is almost a repetition of what happened after England's loss to Italy in the final of the men's tournament in 2021, Carter released a statement in which she stated that she hopes people sending her the abuse will think twice before doing the same to someone else.
'Whilst I feel every fan is entitled to their opinion on performance and result I don't agree or think it's ok to target someone's appearance or race,' Carter, who has been playing for England since 2017, said in her statement. 'As ever I am grateful for all of the support from the genuine fans but I am taking this measure to protect myself in a bid to keep my focus on helping the team anyway I can.Hopefully speaking out will make the people writing this abuse think twice so that others won't have to deal with it. We have made some historic changes with this Lionesses squad that I am so proud to be a part of and my hope is that by speaking out about this it will make another positive change for all. I'm now looking forward and focusing on putting all of my energy into helping my team.'
Carter, a full-back with the England Lioness team, has played in all four matches that they have played in the 2025 Euros. The 27-year-old along with the other full-back Lucy Bronze had a tough time against French strikers Delphine Cascarino and Sandy Baltimore during the 1-2 loss against France during England's opening match in the tournament. Carter, who has so far played in 49 matches for England and was also part of the runner-up England team in the 2023 FIFA Women's World Cup, had posted her statement on her social media followed by the Football Association also approaching police.
'Our priority is Jess and giving her all the support she needs. We strongly condemn those responsible for this disgusting racism. As soon as we were made aware of the racist abuse Jess received, we immediately contacted UK police. They are in touch with the relevant social media platform, and we are working with police to ensure those responsible for this hate crime are brought to justice.' Mark Bellingham, CEO, Football Association (FA), stated in his statement.
With Carter talking about the racial abuse, the England Lionesses team too came with a joint statement in which they said they won't be taking the knee in the semi-final against Italy. The team had taken a knee at the Euros as a gesture to protest racism and police brutality towards Black people, during all the four games in the tournament.
'Representing our country is the greatest honour. It is not right that while we are doing that, some of us are treated ­differently ­simply because of the colour of our skin. Until now, we have chosen to take the knee before matches. It is clear we and football need to find another way to tackle racism. We have agreed as a squad to remain standing before kick-off on Tuesday. Those behind this online poison must be held accountable.' the England Lioness team stated in a joint statement.
The incident has also sparked reaction from UK PM Sir Keir Starmer. 'There is no place for racism in football or anywhere in society. I stand with Jess, the Lionesses, and any players who have suffered racism, on and off the pitch.' Starmer said in a statement.
In the past, three England players Marcus Rashford, Jadon Sancho and Bukayo Sako were targeted on social media after England's defeat in the penalty-shoot in the Euro 2020 final against Italy. At that time, UK Football Policing Unit (UKFPU),had carried out an investigation and UK Police had arrested 11 fans over the online abuse incidents. Carter's team-mate Lucy Bronze had questioned the measures taken to tackle online abuse against players. 'We feel as a collective, is the message as strong as it used to be?. Is the message really hitting hard? Because it feels like it's not if these things are still happening to our players in the biggest tournaments of their lives. More needs to be done in football and society, what that is right now as an individual, I don't exactly know,' Bronze had said in a press conference last week.
Carter, who plays for Gotham FC in the USA, had earlier played for Chelsea FC. The US club also had supported Carter.
'We are heartbroken and outraged by the racist abuse directed at Jess Carter. Jess is not only a world-class football player — she is a role model, a leader and a valued part of our Gotham FC family. At Gotham, we believe in a culture of mutual respect and remain committed to building a game — and a community — where everyone feels safe, respected and celebrated. There is no place for racism in our sport.'' Gotham FC stated in a statement.
Apart from UEFA, which has condemned the incident, FIFA president Gianni Infantino has also condemned the incident. 'No player should be discriminated against in any way. They should be free to be at their very best on the pitch.' Infantino stated.
Carter has also found support from NWSPL Player Association in the USA. 'The NWSL Players Association unequivocally denounces the racist abuse targeting Jess Carter. We will not allow abuse of any kind to be normalised, minimised, or ignored.' NWSPL Player Association stated.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

French court upholds some of Assad's protections, allows future warrants
French court upholds some of Assad's protections, allows future warrants

Business Standard

time4 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

French court upholds some of Assad's protections, allows future warrants

France's highest court on Friday upheld some of Syrian ex-leader Bashar Assad's personal immunity as a head of state while green-lighting possible future war crime warrants, drawing criticism from human rights lawyers and Syrian activists. The Cour de Cassation upheld Assad's head-of-state immunity, but added that since he is no longer in office, new arrest warrants may have been or may be issued against him for acts that may constitute war crimes or crimes against humanity. The decision is a blow to activists who had hoped the court would set aside the immunity, a decision that could have had far-reaching consequences for other leaders accused of atrocities. From our side as a victim, this is a huge mistake. This will support another dictatorship to keep doing this kind of crime they know they will enjoy immunity, said Mazen Darwish, president of the Syrian Centre for Media, which collected evidence of war crimes. It is a sad day for us, Darwish said. Missed opportunity for 'justice' The president of the Cour de Cassation, Christophe Soulard, said in the ruling that 19 judges had declined to lift Assad's immunity, but that a new arrest warrant could be issued to pave the way for his trial in absentia in France over the use of chemical weapons in Ghouta in 2013. Human rights lawyers had sought to enable prosecution of leaders linked to atrocities while they are in power, not just when they leave. But international law currently forbids it. Under current international law, crimes against humanity and war crimes are not exceptions to the principle of jurisdictional immunity for sitting foreign heads of state, Soulard said. Assad, the former leader of Syria now in exile in Russia, retained no lawyers for these charges and has denied that he was behind the chemical attacks. The court's ruling is a missed opportunity for justice, said Mariana Pena, a lawyer with the Open Society Justice Initiative, which helped bring the case to the court. But she said that the ruling leaves the door open to the prosecution of Assad. Silver lining for some The court also ruled on a case against a former Syrian government finance minister in Assad's government, allowing that he could be prosecuted. Adib Mayaleh's lawyers have argued that he too had immunity under international law. That is to some a silver lining in the court's ruling by establishing in France the right for courts to go after heads of state when they leave office and even current high-ranking officials. This is a huge step, but not an absolute victory in the fight against impunity, said lawyer Clemence Witt, who with Jeanne Sulzer brought the case against Assad to the court. She said that the French courts can now for the first time issue warrants for high-ranking officials currently in power with adequate evidence. Every official except head of state, head of government and head of foreign affairs can be prosecuted in France if we have evidence of genocide, war crimes or crimes against humanity, Witt said. War crimes accusations For more than 50 years, Syria was ruled by Hafez Assad and then his son Bashar. During the Arab Spring, rebellion broke out against their tyrannical rule in 2011 across the country of 23 million people, igniting a brutal 13-year civil war that killed more than 5,00,000 people, according to the Syrian Observatory of Human Rights. Millions more fled to Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey and Europe. The Assad dynasty manipulated sectarian tensions to stay in power, a legacy driving renewed violence in Syria against minority groups, despite promises that the country's new leaders will carve out a political future for Syria that includes and represents all of its communities. The International Criminal Court isn't bound by head of state immunity and has issued arrests warrants for leaders accused of atrocities like Russian President Vladimir Putin in Ukraine, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Gaza, and Rodrigo Duterte in the Philippines. The Syrian government denied in 2013 that it was behind the Ghouta attack, an accusation that the opposition rejected, because Assad's forces were the only side in the brutal civil war to possess sarin. Assad held onto power, aided militarily by Russia and Iranian-backed proxies, until late 2024, when a surprise assault by rebels swept into Aleppo and then Damascus, driving Assad to flee to safety to Russia on December 8, 2024. Possibility of warrants New warrants after Friday's ruling in France could lay the groundwork for the former leader's trial in absentia or potential arrest, if he travels outside Russia. Any trial of Assad, whether in absentia or if he leaves Russia, would mean this evidence could then be brought to light, Pena said, including an enormous trove of classified and secret evidence amassed by the judges during their investigations. Syrians often took great personal risk to gather evidence of war crimes. Darwish said that in the aftermath of a chlorine gas attack in Douma, for example, teams collected witness testimonies, images of devastation and soil samples. Others then tracked down and interviewed defectors to build a chain of command for the Syrian government's chemical weapons production and use. We link it directly to the president himself, Bashar al-Assad, he said. Fighting against impunity Syria today remains beholden to many awful legacies of the Assad dynasty. Poverty, sectarianism, destruction and violence still haunt the country. Syrian authorities are now investigating nearly 300 people for crimes during several days of fighting on the coast earlier this year. The new interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa in Damascus have pledged to work with the United Nations on investigating further war crimes of the Assad government and the civil war. While disappointed in the verdict in France, Darwish is working on 29 cases against Assad and other figures who have fled to Russia, the Gulf, Lebanon and Europe. He said that many Syrians hope Assad sits for a fair trial in Syria. It should be done in Damascus, but we need also a lot of guarantees that we will have a fair trial even for this suspect, he said. His organisation has already received requests to bring to court war crimes accusations against those involved in recent bloodshed in southern Syria. So anyone, whatever his name, or the regime, or their authority, we will keep fighting this type of crime, Darwish said.

Breaking News Live Updates: Muizzu congratulates PM Modi for becoming second-longest-serving Indian Prime Minister in consecutive terms
Breaking News Live Updates: Muizzu congratulates PM Modi for becoming second-longest-serving Indian Prime Minister in consecutive terms

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Breaking News Live Updates: Muizzu congratulates PM Modi for becoming second-longest-serving Indian Prime Minister in consecutive terms

06:09 (IST) Jul 26 A former Georgia sheriff's deputy has been sentenced to 16 months in federal prison for repeatedly punching a Black detainee whose beating by guards was recorded by a jail security camera nearly three years ago. A U.S. District Court judge sentenced 27-year-old Ryan Biegel on Thursday. The former Camden County deputy had pleaded guilty earlier this year to violating the due process rights of Jarrett Hobbs by using unreasonable force. Hobbs of Greensboro, North Carolina, was booked into the Camden County jail near the Georgia-Florida line for traffic violations and drug possession charges on Sept. 3, 2022. Security video from that night showed Hobbs standing alone in his cell before five guards rushed in and surrounded him. At least three deputies were shown punching him in the head and neck before Hobbs was dragged from the cell and hurled against a wall. Hobbs' attorneys, Harry Daniels and Bakari Sellers, said in a statement Friday that jailers 'beat him mercilessly' with false confidence they would never be prosecuted. 'Let this sentence serve as some solace to everyone who has been terrorized by violence masquerading as law and order and a warning to their brutalizers,' the lawyers' statement said. 'Your badge will not protect you any more than it protected Ryan Biegel.'

Pant was 'milking' injury, should have been 'timed out': England icon reveals sensational chatter at Old Trafford
Pant was 'milking' injury, should have been 'timed out': England icon reveals sensational chatter at Old Trafford

First Post

timean hour ago

  • First Post

Pant was 'milking' injury, should have been 'timed out': England icon reveals sensational chatter at Old Trafford

Rishabh Pant had heroically walked out to bat on Thursday, a day after suffered a fracture on his foot while attempting to reverse sweep a Chris Woakes yorker, with the wicketkeeper-batter going on to complete his fifty. Some, however, chose to view Pant's brave gesture in a different light. read more Rishabh Pant walked out to bat on Day 2 of the fourth Test at Old Trafford despite nursing a fracture on his right foot. Image: JioStar India wicketkeeper-batter Rishabh Pant was widely praised for his brave gesture of walking out to bat a day after suffering a fracture on his right foot during the fourth Test against England in Manchester. Pant, who was batting on 37 when he was struck by a yorker from Chris Woakes that he was attempting to reverse sweep, ended up completing his 18th Test half-century and also helped India cross the 350-mark in the process. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD There are, however, those who don't buy into Pant's heroics in Manchester, with some believing that he was 'milking' his injury, and that he should have been 'timed out'. English cricketer-turned-commentator David Lloyd revealed hearing some of these sensational comments on Pant at 'Bumble Legends Lounge' – Lancashire Cricket's special hospitality experience where guests can spend time with the former all-rounder at Old Trafford's 1864 Suite during international games. 'I've never had a metatarsal, which I think is somewhere in the foot, seeing Rishabh Pant. I have had a smashed hand against Andy Roberts and a broken cheekbone. I couldn't bat on after either, although I think I did continue when I had a broken finger,' Lloyd said on talkSPORT Cricket. 'Pant looked in pain; pretty heroic of him to come out, though. Northerners, whether they are tough enough, but I was in that legends lounge today, and the consensus was 'He has milking that injury. It can't be that bad. He's milked it, coming down those steps, and one or two said, 'He should be timed out,'' the former England head coach added. Lloyd voices support for substitutes in cricket Lloyd also chimed in on the discussion of substitutes in cricket, which gained traction following Pant's injury that has ruled him out of the fifth and final Test against England that takes place at The Oval next week. While the 78-year-old disagreed with the concept of a runner, he felt that situations like that of the Indian vice-captain did call for a substitute. 'I probably am against runners, but I am pro substitutes for an external injury. It opens up a can of worms, it really does. But if it is an external injury, a break and medically he isn't going to be fit for six weeks, you could have a like-for-like substitute. So that's something else that you've got to consider. Not like replace a batter with a spinner though,' he added. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The injury has forced reserve keeper Dhruv Jurel to fill in for Pant during England's innings, with the former having also kept wickets for the better part of the third Test at Lord's – where Pant had suffered an finger injury.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store