logo
Rural schools feel the pinch from Trump administration's cuts to mental health grants

Rural schools feel the pinch from Trump administration's cuts to mental health grants

Independent5 hours ago

In parts of rural upstate New York, schools have more than 1,100 students for every mental health provider. In a far-flung region with little public transportation, those few school counselors often are the only mental health professionals available to students.
Hennessey Lustica has been overseeing grant-funded efforts to train and hire more school psychologists, counselors and social workers in the Finger Lakes region, but those efforts may soon come to end — a casualty of the Trump administration's decision to cancel school mental health grants around the country.
'Cutting this funding is just going to devastate kids,' said Lustica, project director of the Wellness Workforce Collaborative in the Seneca Falls Central School District. 'The workforce that we're developing, just in my 21 school districts it's over 20,000 kids that are going to be impacted by this and not have the mental health support that they need.'
The $1 billion in grants for school-based mental health programs were part of a sweeping gun violence bill signed by President Joe Biden in 2022 in response to the school shooting in Uvalde, Texas. The grants were meant to help schools hire more psychologists, counselors and other mental health workers, especially in rural areas.
Under the Biden administration, the department prioritized applicants who showed how they would increase the number of providers from diverse backgrounds, or from communities directly served by the school district. But President Donald Trump's administration took issue with aspects of the grant programs that touched on race, saying they were harmful to students.
'We owe it to American families to ensure that taxpayer dollars are supporting evidence-based practices that are truly focused on improving students' mental health,' Education Department spokesperson Madi Biedermann said.
School districts around the US cut off training and retention programs
Lustica learned of her grant's cancellation in April in a two-page letter from the Education Department, which said the government found that her work violated civil rights law. It did not specify how.
Lustica is planning to appeal the decision. She rejected the letter's characterization of her work, saying she and her colleagues abide by a code of ethics that honors each person's individuality, regardless of race, gender or identity.
'The rhetoric is just false,' Lustica said. 'I don't know how else to say it. I think if you looked at these programs and looked at the impact that these programs have in our rural school districts, and the stories that kids will tell you about the mental health professionals that are in their schools, it has helped them because of this program.'
The grants supported programs in districts across the country. In California, West Contra Costa Unified School District will lose nearly $4 million in funding. In Alabama, Birmingham City Schools was notified it would not receive the rest of a $15 million grant it was using to train, hire and retain mental health staff.
In Wisconsin, the state's Department of Public Instruction will lose $8 million allocated for the next four years. The state had used the money to boost retention and expand programs to encourage high schoolers to pursue careers in school-based mental health.
'At a time when communities are urgently asking for help serving mental health needs, this decision is indefensible,' state superintendent Jill Underly said in a statement.
In recent House and Senate hearings, Democrats pressed Education Secretary Linda McMahon on the end of the grants and the impact on students. McMahon told them mental health is a priority and the grants would be rebid and reissued.
'Anyone who works or spends time with kids knows these grants were funding desperately needed access to mental health care services,' American Federation of Teachers president Randi Weingarten said in a statement. 'Canceling the funding now is a cruel, reckless act that puts millions of children at risk.'
Grant programs put more mental health specialists in schools
The strains on youth mental health are acute in many rural school districts.
In one upstate New York district, half the students have had to move due to economic hardship in the last five years, creating instability that can affect their mental health, Lustica said. In a survey of students from sixth through 12th grade in one county, nearly half reported feeling sad or depressed most of the time; one in three said their lives lacked clear purpose or meaning.
'We've got huge amounts of depression, huge amounts of anxiety, lots of trauma and not enough providers,' Lustica said. 'School is the place where kids are getting a lot of the services they need.'
Some families in the region are unable to afford private counseling or are unable to get their children to appointments given transportation challenges, said Danielle Legg, a graduate student who did an internship as a school social worker with funding from the grant program.
'Their access to mental health care truly is limited to when they're in school and there's a provider there that can see them, and it's vital,' Legg said.
In the past three years, 176 students completed their mental health training through the program Lustica oversees, and 85% of them were hired into shortage areas, she said.
The program that offered training to graduate students at schools helped address staffing needs and inspired many to pursue careers in educational settings, said Susan McGowan, a school social worker who supervised graduate students in Geneva City School District.
'It just feels, to me, really catastrophic,' McGowan said of the grant cancellation. 'These positions are difficult to fill, so when you get grad students who are willing to work hand in hand with other professionals in their building, you're actually building your capacity as far as staffing goes and you're supporting teachers.'
___
The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senate parliamentarian's role under scrutiny over as Republicans call for her firing over the ‘Big, Beautiful Bill'
Senate parliamentarian's role under scrutiny over as Republicans call for her firing over the ‘Big, Beautiful Bill'

The Independent

time10 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Senate parliamentarian's role under scrutiny over as Republicans call for her firing over the ‘Big, Beautiful Bill'

Republicans are calling for the removal of Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough after she ruled that some of the measures outlined in President Donald Trump 's signature 'Big, Beautiful Bill' could not be included on budgetary grounds. MacDonough blocked several measures in the legislation that would have provided tens of billions of dollars in savings, including one that would have shut down state strategies for obtaining federal Medicaid funding and another that would have limited student loan repayment options. MacDonough is the first woman to hold the office since its founding in 1935. The parliamentarian is primarily responsible for advising the upper chamber of Congress on adherence to the law, with the House having its own parliamentarian to perform the same function. They are also charged with providing information to members of Congress and their staff on a strictly nonpartisan and confidential basis. Her actions leave lawmakers scrambling to make cost-cutting compromises over the weekend ahead of their July 4 deadline. Alabama Senator Tommy Tuberville raged on X on Thursday evening: 'President Trump's landslide victory was a MANDATE from 77 million Americans. The One Big Beautiful Bill delivers on that mandate. The Parliamentarian is trying to UNDERMINE the President's mandate and should be fired.' Florida Rep. Greg Steube called MacDonough 'an unelected swamp bureaucrat,' complaining that she is not accountable to voters. 'It is time for our elected leaders to take back control,' he continued. ' JD Vance should overrule the Parliamentarian and let the will of the people, not some staffer hiding behind Senate procedure, determine the future of this country.' Appearing on Newsmax's Chris Salcedo Show, Kentucky Senator Rand Paul fumed that MacDonough's authority to determine which provisions in the legislation are matters of policy or budget allowed her excessive discretion and would be best left up to lawmakers. 'I think most Americans would be perplexed to know why an unelected person is making these decisions,' he said. 'These are profound, big decisions.' Summarizing his argument, Paul said: 'Essentially, it's this. When we have reconciliation, there's a question: Is the predominant effect of the portion of the legislation about the budget, or is it about policy? But a lot of things are a tough call, and they can be about both policy and budget, as I think this is. 'This person who has not been elected by anybody can't be unelected, can't be removed from office, and for which the public has no way of expressing displeasure is making these decisions. 'It's a terrible situation, and it's a bizarre sort of situation that we are all beholden. No one has voted for this person.' Unlike Tuberville and Steube, Paul was careful to make clear he did not object to MacDonough personally. MacDonough initially worked in the Senate library, left to earn a law degree from Vermont Law School, and then advanced through the Justice Department before being appointed to her present position by then-Speaker Harry Reid in 2012. She was retained by Republican Mitch McConnell when he became majority leader in 2015. She steered the Senate through Trump's first and historic second impeachment trials during his first term and had her office ransacked by Capitol rioters on January 6 2021. But she has also frustrated Democratic ambitions, notably blocking Joe Biden 's administration from including a minimum wage hike in his Covid-19 relief bill in the pandemic and dropping immigration provisions from the party's climate legislation. The House and Senate parliamentarians make recommendations, but they can be overruled; the final decision lies with the presiding officer overseeing the proceedings. Michael Thorning, director of structural democracy at the Bipartisan Policy Center, told the Associated Press he believed Republicans are unlikely to challenge MacDonough and that both sides regard her as 'very much an honest broker.' 'The Senate relies on her,' he said. 'Sometimes, those decisions cut your way, and sometimes, they don't. I also think members recognize that once you start treating the parliamentarian's advice as just something that could be easily dismissed, then the rules start to matter less.'

RFK Jr will be ‘personally responsible' for children's deaths by halting vaccine alliance funding, experts say
RFK Jr will be ‘personally responsible' for children's deaths by halting vaccine alliance funding, experts say

The Guardian

time15 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

RFK Jr will be ‘personally responsible' for children's deaths by halting vaccine alliance funding, experts say

Robert F Kennedy Jr will be 'personally responsible' for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of children after he refused to renew US funding for a global vaccines body, public health experts said. The US health secretary said Wednesday that the United States would halt funding for Gavi, the vaccine alliance that has immunised more than one billion children since 2000, in a statement that has also been criticised for spreading disinformation on vaccine safety. Gavi is a partnership between public bodies and the private sector that works to provide vaccines in many of the world's poorest countries. It has prevented an estimated 18.8 million deaths, and hosts global emergency stockpiles against Ebola, yellow fever, meningitis and cholera. The US has long been one of its major funders, and provided around 13% of its budget. Gavi announced after a pledging event on Wednesday that it had secured more than $9bn in donations for the next five years, and would continue to chase the $11.9bn total it required. But in a video played at the event, Kennedy said the US would no longer contribute to the organisation until it had worked to 're-earn the public trust'. He criticised Gavi's actions during the Covid-19 pandemic, suggested it should not recommend Covid-19 vaccines for pregnant women, and said it had 'neglected the key issue of vaccine safety'. Gavi set out a detailed rebuttal to Kennedy's claims, stressing that its 'utmost concern is the health and safety of children'. Atul Gawande, a former senior official at USAID, wrote online: 'This pull out will cost 100s of thousands of children's lives a year – and RFK Jr will be personally responsible.' Gavi's own estimates, reported by the New York Times, suggest the loss of US support may mean 75 million children miss out on routine vaccinations over the next five years and 1.2 million die as a result. The UK government has also been criticised for lowering its funding for Gavi, although its £1.25bn ($1.7bn) pledge still made it Gavi's top donor country. Other major donors include the Gates Foundation, which committed $1.6bn, and the European Union a combined €2 billion ($2.3bn). In his video, Kennedy particularly criticised 'whole cell' DTP vaccines provided by Gavi, which protect against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis (whooping cough). The US and many richer countries, including the UK, have switched to a newer version that causes fewer short-term reactions but does not remain effective for as long, requiring more boosters. The World Health Organization says both types have 'excellent safety records'. Dr Tom Frieden, president and CEO of Resolve to Save Lives and a former CDC director, said: 'Many countries choose to continue the whole cell vaccine. They may have decided this because their populations have a greater risk of serious illness, they have healthcare systems less able to deal with serious pertussis infections, or may simply have made the opposite decision – more short-term adverse reactions, better protection against pertussis. 'Calling this choice not 'taking vaccine safety seriously' is misinformation, plain and simple.' Seth Berkley, former chief executive of Gavi, said in a post on LinkedIn that Kennedy's claims were 'a mix of misinformation and some disinformation' and 'disingenuous', adding: 'It is irresponsible to provide disinformation from a position of political power.' A major study partly funded by Gavi and published in the Lancet this week found vaccine coverage had stalled or reversed globally, driven by persistent health inequalities and rising levels of misinformation and hesitancy.

EU ready for trade deal with US but ‘all options on the table', says von der Leyen
EU ready for trade deal with US but ‘all options on the table', says von der Leyen

The Guardian

time25 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

EU ready for trade deal with US but ‘all options on the table', says von der Leyen

The European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, has said the EU is ready for a trade deal with Donald Trump, but 'all options remain on the table'. Von der Leyen said she was analysing the latest US negotiating document received on Thursday. 'Our message today is clear, we are ready for a deal,' she told reporters, after briefing EU leaders at a summit in Brussels. 'At the same time, we are preparing for the possibility that no satisfactory agreement is reached … and we will defend the European interest as needed. In short, all options remain on the table.' The commission is responsible for trade on behalf of the EU's 27 member states, but wanted a steer on how to approach the economically critical talks with the White House. Trump has threatened to impose 50% tariffs on all EU goods from 9 July unless the two sides reach a deal. Most EU goods already face a 10% tariff, with levies of 25% on cars and car parts and 50% on steel and aluminium. Von der Leyen also floated a 'beginning of redesigning' the World Trade Organization amid concern the global trading system is being undermined by trade wars and bilateral deals. She said the Asia Pacific CPTPP bloc, which also includes the UK, was interested in 'structured collaboration' with the EU, which wanted the same. 'We can think about this as a beginning of redesigning the WTO … to show the world that free trade with a large number of countries is possible on a rules-based foundation,' she said. As Trump's deadline draws near, differences are emerging between Germany and France over how to handle the US talks. The German chancellor, Friedrich Merz, said a quick and simple trade deal was better than 'slow and complicated'. The new centre-right chancellor is under heavy pressure from German carmakers and other exporters, some of whom argue that an asymmetric deal – ie higher US tariffs on European goods – may be better than no deal. The French president, Emmanuel Macron, argued that accepting an unequal trading relationship would be damaging to Europe's long-term competitiveness. One EU diplomat rejected the suggestion member states were divided, but said: 'If we accept 10%, how long will it last?', suggesting Trump could launch a new front in the trade war, or that it could affect negotiations with other trading partners. 'Many member states realise this is not only one game. Maybe it will affect the way India approaches us, or China.' Ireland's prime minister, Micheál Martin, said: 'Getting a deal is important for certainty so that we know the landscape ahead of us and that industry knows the landscape ahead of it, so that we can protect jobs, which is our number one priority.' Striking a more outspoken note, Spain's prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, said Trump's tariff threat was 'doubly unfair', because his country runs a trade deficit with the US. He was responding after Trump said Spain would 'pay twice as much', after Sánchez refused to commit to the 5% Nato spending target. Diplomats are increasingly pessimistic about negotiating away the 10% baseline tariffs. As this reality sinks in, two approaches are emerging: a quick deal that would mean certainty for business, or retaliation to press for something better. 'Do we go into aggressive retaliation mode or are we less vocal and do a quick deal,' said one source. The US has shown little obvious interest in the EU's offer of a 'zero-for-zero' free-trade zone on industrial goods, while continuing to attack the bloc's tech regulation and VAT rules. Earlier this week, von der Leyen reiterated that changes to the EU's Digital Markets Act – regulations affecting US tech companies – was off the table. 'Of course we discuss tariff lines, we discuss non-tariff barriers like standards and norms … but where it is the sovereign decision-making process in the European Union and its member states that is affected this is too far.' Belgium's prime minister, Bart De Wever, said tariffs should be avoided at all costs. 'So we will not allow ourselves to be provoked, we will remain calm, we will negotiate and we hope to reach an agreement. If this is not the case, we will naturally adopt countermeasures, but these will be appropriate countermeasures,' he said. The EU has suspended levies on €21bn (£18bn) US goods until mid-July to allow more time for negotiations. The bloc is consulting on further retaliatory tariffs targeting €95bn of US goods, although the final total is likely to be smaller, if approved. The EU previously dropped plans to target American bourbon, after protests from France and Ireland, who feared retaliation against French cognac and Irish whiskey. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Merz criticised the EU's approach as too complicated at an industry conference in Berlin on Monday. He also suggested the EU should concentrate on negotiating in five sectors including the automotive and steel industries, which have been already been hit with tariffs, and pharmaceuticals, which remain in Trump's crosshairs. Peter Leibinger, the president of the German Federation of Industries (BDI), said at the same conference that he [Merz] needed to 'carry the pain' being felt by German manufacturers to the Brussels bubble. The BDI said the tariffs would cost the German economy approximately 0.3 percentage points of growth, depressing an economy 'where industrial production remains significantly below the pre-crisis level of 2019'. The EU's chief trade negotiator, Maroš Šefčovič, said: 'The car industry of Europe, it's clearly bleeding. And really to have tariffs at the level of 27.5%, which is a scary state, it is clearly unsustainable.' Carmakers face a 25% tariff, in addition to the 2.5% that pre-dated Trump's second term. Šefčovič said his 'one wish' was unity in the EU's approach. He was 'ready to fight tooth and nail' for the EU's interests, telling German business leaders to 'talk to us, criticise us, but support us'. He also revealed he was seeking an insurance clause in any deal: 'I think it would be clearly desirable … that we would have some kind of stand still clause, which would kind of prevent a surprise with sudden spikes [in tariffs] and volatility.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store