Sally Rooney will remain 'committed supporter of Palestine Action', court told
The Irish author said in court documents that the ban would prevent her from speaking at future public events as she 'could not in good conscience disguise or lie about my principles' if it comes into effect at 12.01am on Saturday as planned.
If the ban does come into effect, it would make membership of, or support for, Palestine Action a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
I am and will continue to be a committed supporter of Palestine Action
Rooney has provided support for a legal claim by Huda Ammori, the co-founder of Palestine Action, against the Home Office, over the decision to proscribe the group under the Terrorism Act 2000.
Ms Ammori asked a High Court judge on Friday to temporarily block the move from becoming law over the weekend, ahead of a bid to be given the green light to challenge the Government's decision later this month.
But in a ruling, Mr Justice Chamberlain refused to block the ban, stating that any harm caused is 'insufficient to outweigh the strong public interest in maintaining the order in force'.
Barristers for Ms Ammori are seeking to appeal against the ruling on Friday evening.
In her witness statement, cited in Mr Justice Chamberlain's judgment, Rooney said the 'cultural effects' of Palestine Action becoming proscribed 'could not be easily mended'.
She said: 'Though I am based in Ireland, my work is published in the UK. My novels regularly appear in bestseller lists, and I often travel to Britain to speak in public about my work.
'I am and will continue to be a committed supporter of Palestine Action.
'If… that support is criminalised, I will effectively be prevented from speaking at any future public events in the UK, since I could not in good conscience disguise or lie about my principles in public.
For any public figure to be labelled a 'supporter of terrorism' by the state would have serious consequences. It would likely end or severely restrict the careers of many emerging artists
'If I continue to voice support for Palestine Action from my home in Ireland, what are the likely consequences? Will I be denounced publicly by the Prime Minister?
'Will bookshops go on stocking the work of an author the home secretary has branded a 'terrorist' simply for supporting a protest group?
'The BBC has adapted two of my books for television; both series are presently promoted on the iPlayer service. Normal People, which I co-wrote and produced, was the BBC's most-streamed series in 2020, with over 62 million views.
'My beliefs have not changed since the making of that series, and I have done nothing but continue to express them.
'If the expression of those beliefs becomes a terror offence under UK law, would the BBC continue to screen and promote my work?
'Is it likely that I could ever again collaborate with British public institutions like the BBC as I have done in the past?
'The cultural effects of proscription could not be easily mended, even if the home secretary later changed her mind.
'For any public figure to be labelled a 'supporter of terrorism' by the state would have serious consequences.
If Palestine Action loses its bid to temporarily block the move, it is due to become a terrorist organisation on Saturday after the order was signed by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper (PA)
'It would likely end or severely restrict the careers of many emerging artists.
''Terrorism' is not a trivial word.'
In written submissions for Friday's hearing, Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, said that Rooney 'will continue to voice her support from Ireland' for the group.
He said: 'Given her public support for Palestine Action… she is concerned that being labelled a 'supporter of terrorism' would have serious impacts on her ability to collaborate and publicise her work.'
He continued: 'Ms Rooney notes that 'countless artists, writers and members of the public support direct action against complicity in what Israel is doing in Palestine', including Juliet Stevenson, Paul Weller, Tilda Swinton, Brian Eno, and other signatories to an open letter dated 30 June 2025.'
If Palestine Action loses its bid to temporarily block the move, it is due to become a terrorist organisation on Saturday, after the order was signed by the home secretary, Yvette Cooper.
Ms Cooper announced plans to proscribe the direct action group last month, after two Voyager planes were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, an action claimed by Palestine Action.
Read More
Eight men jailed for 129 years after record €157m cocaine seizure off Cork coast
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sunday World
24 minutes ago
- Sunday World
Conor McGregor's arch-nemesis says he cannot fight at White House as there is ‘no cocaine'
"I was being told the White House is going to have a heavy street drugs test policy' President Donald Trump announced last Thursday that a UFC fight would take place on White House grounds next year as part of America's 250th birthday celebrations. McGregor immediately threw his hat into the ring as he declared on social media that he would be eager to participate. McGregor with President Trump in the White House in March Today's News in 90 Seconds - July 5th He posted on X: "July 4th next year is a Saturday, regarding President Trump's UFC White House event. 'I will be reigning President of Ireland [in] just under 1 year when I step out on the lawns of the White House to throw down. 'Epic proportions! Or as I like to call it, Tuesday at the office. Vote McGregor." He added: 'The only place where disputes truly get settled. The White House!" Khabib Nurmagomedov and Conor McGregor at UFC 229 in Las Vegas Hoverer, Nurmagomedov's long-time manager Ali Abdlaziz replied with a cut-down jibe, as he wrote: "I was being told the White House is going to have a heavy street drugs test policy, and we all know you cannot pass that, maybe you can go fight in a China card, no cocaine in the White House anymore." The heated rivalry between the two began following the infamous 'bus incident' when McGregor threw a hand truck at a bus carrying several UFC fighters, including Nurmagomedov. This led to the infamous Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) showdown between the pair in October 2018 when 'The Eagle' subjected 'the Notorious' to a fourth-round submission. Read more McGregor claims that he would be running for president Ireland have been widely dismissed, however, in March he visited the White House where he criticised the Irish government in an attempt to raise awareness of "the issues the people of Ireland face." "Our government has long since abandoned the voices of the people of Ireland, and it's high time that America is made aware of what's going on in Ireland,' he said at the time. 'What is going on in Ireland is a travesty. Our government is a government of zero action and zero accountability," he said during an appearance alongside White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on March 20. McGregor who has not fought since 2021, when he lost to Dustin Poirier after breaking his leg said he would only return to fighting for an event that would take place in a large stadium. "I'll only come back to a stadium," he wrote in a post on X after WrestleMania 41, which was held at Allegiant Stadium in Las Vegas. He was slated to fight Michael Chandler at UFC 303 in June, but the fight was called off after he broke his toe during training.
Irish Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Conor McGregor loses nearly 1 million followers since civil rape case
Conor McGregor has lost nearly one million social media followers since being found liable for assault in a civil rape case brought forward by Nikita Hand. McGregor is back in the news with the appeal process taking place at the High Court earlier this, although the former MMA fighter was not present at proceedings. Since the case took place in front of a jury, McGregor's social media following has gradually dropped. In November, McGregor's Instagram follower count was 47.5 million, and in the nine months since, that number has dropped to 46,520,653, per Social Blade. In the last 30 days alone, McGregor has seen a net loss of 58,005 followers but has seen an update in the last week where he has eight days of positive growth in follower count. Since the court case took place, there have been steady losses for McGregor on social media. The losses are as follows McGregor and a couple he put forward and subsequently withdrew as witnesses in his appeal are now facing potential criminal prosecution. Three Judges of the Court of Appeal made the bombshell decision to refer documentation put forward by Counsel for Nikita Hand to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) today, following claims of 'perjury.' The Judges made the decision off the back of claims by John Gordon SC for Ms Hand, that 'perjury' may have occurred in this case after sworn affidavits were opened in court by the now withdrawn witnesses Samantha O'Reilly and Steven Cummins. The couple had sworn affidavits claiming they heard a row between Ms Hand and her then partner on the night of 9 December 2018, after the alleged rape, with Ms O'Reilly claiming she saw the row from her bedrooom in a house across the road. She claimed Ms Hand's then boyfriend pushed her and she saw him moving his arms and hips as though he was punching and kicking her. Mr Cummins had claimed he was woken by screams and shouts coming from Ms Hand's house but said he did not see what had happened. Their claims have now been totally withdrawn by McGregor - with Ms Hand's Counsel seeking an apology from him over the ordeal. It comes after Mr Gordon had asked the Judges yesterday that the court 'ought to allow me to cross-examine Ms. O'Reilly and her partner and Mr. Staines and then refer the matter for perjury proceedings to the Director of Public Prosecutions and subornation of perjury against Mr. McGregor.'
Irish Post
3 hours ago
- Irish Post
The unanswered questions of Irish presidential elections
LATER this year Ireland will elect a new president. By Ireland, of course, I mean the twenty six county Republic of Ireland which takes its name from the whole island — a little unfairly you might think if you live in Northern Ireland, the portion in the north east which remains part of the United Kingdom. We in this northern part will not have a vote on the presidency. That's OK by me though others are campaigning strongly for us to be included. There have been times when the current president, Michael D Higgins has cheered me by saying the things that much of the country felt needed said, particularly in his criticism of Israel's management of its war in Hamas and the heedless slaughter of Palestinian civilians. There have been times when he has seemed gauche and tactless, even unduly irascible, but then he is human and no one can be note-perfect every time. He has changed the terms on how a president functions. Essentially the holder of that office should be a figurehead representing the people of Ireland but only with the consent of the government of the time. The president should be like a British monarch, impressive and engaging and yet somehow devoid of any but the most anodyne opinion. That hasn't been sustainable. Past presidents made significant impacts just through being elected or through the rituals of office. Mary Robinson, the first woman president, signalled a change in the character of modern Ireland with essentially, a fillip to feminism and the status of 'na Mná na hÉireann ', the women of Ireland. She retained a traditional Irish concern for developing countries, particularly in Africa, a legacy of past Irish Catholic missionary endeavour, and she facilitated the peace process in the north by travelling there and meeting people that party politicians preferred to distance themselves from. Her successor, another woman, northerner Mary McAleese, welcomed the British Queen to Ireland. Elizabeth II actually bowed in reverence before a memorial to the Irish rebels who had fired on and killed British soldiers in Dublin in 1916. This was essentially a message to the British identifying people of the North that if they derided the Irish nationalist tradition they could not say that they were doing it on her behalf. Currently we have little idea who the next president might be though there is little prospect of northerners or the diaspora getting that desired vote in the short time left. Intriguing complications might arise if they did. British identifying unionists in Northern Ireland have the right, under the Good Friday Agreement, to identify as Irish and to carry Irish passports, which many do. But how might they vote in a presidential election? Most might be indifferent but some might be tempted to vote mischievously and disruptively for candidates who are unpopular in the Republic. Some might think more strategically about how they might vote to influence attitudes away from the aspiration for Irish unity. If the idea of an extended franchise was to include all the Irish resident in Britain or even across the whole diaspora, the actual home vote for a president might be a minority, even a tiny fraction, of the eligible electorate. These would then be the people with least say in who would represent the country as a national figurehead. Surely that would be a calamity. Currently we don't even know who the candidates will be. In the past, big political parties have pushed forward retired ministers, rewarding them for their service. In this spirit some think that former Taoiseach Bertie Ahern should get the job; others perhaps that Gerry Adams, the former president of Sinn Féin should stand. His would be a much more controversial candidacy given his past in republicanism. Then there is a prospect, though a slight one, that the new mood of anti-immigration angst in the country, which has led to rioting on both sides of the border, might throw up a right wing racist. Some have suggested Conor McGregor, the mixed martial arts champion who was welcomed into the Oval Office and even warmly hugged by Donald Trump on St Patrick's Day. In a civil case earlier this year, McGregor agreed to a financial settlement with a woman who had alleged sexual assault - a claim he has denied and for which no criminal charges were brought. One big consideration for parties appointing candidates will be whether they want to restore the presidency after Higgins's spell as a ritual figurehead or to continue with a trend towards opinionating and seeking to influence government policy. There is an argument that the president, as elected by the people, has a duty to represent popular concern at times when a serious matter is overlooked. Unfortunately popular concern does not always express the liberal secular perspective that modern Ireland prides itself on. For now, the anti-migrant cause, despite its energy and passion, seems not to have found its spokesperson; but should such a person step up, a ready constituency is available and presumably a huge swathe of votes too. Parties nominating candidates have to ask themselves now not just who they want as president but what kind of presidency they want, a vociferous presidency in the style of Michael D Higgins or a quiet genteel, ritual, well behaved presidency that disturbs no one. See More: Ireland, President Higgins, Presidential Elections, Voters
