Manchester bar's opening hours cut after brawl with metal bars
Councillors said they considered cancelling the bar's licence but have instead decided to restrict its opening hours and alcohol sales.
Barbara Gora, who is legal adviser to the licensing panel, said it understood "the need to defend themselves but it was clear they lost control"."Instead of seeing if customers were safe inside, they pursued them and smashed the vehicle, putting other road users in danger."She said the bar had "not previously come to the attention of police" and she was disappointed the DPS did not attend the meeting.The bar will not be able to open until it has a new DPS and licensed door staff, the Local Democracy Reporting Service said.Two men, aged 38 and 41, have been charged with offences including affray, possession of an offensive weapon in public place and assault.
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Manchester on Sounds and follow BBC Manchester on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Death of Prince William's businessman pal who 'collapsed after swallowing a bee' sparks a £3billion inheritance row
The death of an Indian billionaire and friend of Prince William who swallowed a bee has triggered a feud over a £3 billion inheritance. Sunjay Kapur, 53, collapsed in front of horrified teammates during the game at Guards Polo Club in Windsor. Indian-born Mr Kapur was thought to have suffered a fatal heart attack after being stung in the mouth, potentially triggering anaphylactic shock. Kapur was the heir too the global car parts giant Sona Comstar, a £2.7 billion business founded by his father. Now the company has been plunged into a bitter succession battle, between the businessman's mother Rani Kapur and the firm's board of directors, The Telegraph reported. Rani Kapur reportedly wrote to the board on July 24 saying her son had died in 'suspicious and unexplained circumstances'. It came just a month after the board unanimously appointed a new chairman on June 23. In the letter, she reportedly accused people in the company of exploiting the family's grief to 'wrestle control' of the company. She said she had been forced to sign documents behind locked doors while under emotional distress. Mrs Kapur claimed she had been blocked from accessing her bank accounts and did not authorise appointments to represent her family. In her letter, which was also sent to India's market regulator, she claimed her late husband, who died in 2015, made her the sole beneficiary of his estate as well as majority shareholder of the Sona Group. The company said Mrs Kapur had not been a shareholder for six years and said she was not majority shareholder of the group. Sunjay Kapur's widow Priya Sachdeva also appears to have sided with Sona Comstar. Ms Sachdeva was appointed as a non-executive director at the company's annual meeting on July 25, despite Ms Kapur's objections and request to delay the meeting. Her office last week shared the coroner's report which confirmed that her husband had died of natural causes. The report said he died from ventricular hypertrophy and ischaemic heart disease and the investigation was closed. Ms Kapur wrote to the UK authorities calling for an investigation into his death, which was rejected. Mr Kapur's sister Mandhire Kapur has also been dragged into the dispute. In an Instagram post, she shared a photograph with her brother and mother saying she would 'protect what you would have wanted, and what Dad dreamed' Mrs Kapur claimed there was a conspiracy to take control of the company away from her family. Vaibhav Gaggar the senior advocate who represents Ms Kapur, told The Telegraph: 'It quite clearly reinforces what she's been saying, that her entire legacy is being usurped and no one is willing to look into the cause of death.' 'It may all be very well interlinked and she has quite unequivocally said there is a conspiracy behind her son's death.'
Daily Mail
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Sir Keir Starmer would not call shoplifters 'scumbags', No 10 says in the wake of 'data protection' saga
Sir Keir Starmer would not call shoplifters 'scumbags', No 10 has said amid the 'data protection' saga. Last week, a shopkeeper was left stunned after police told him to change his sign in which he called shoplifters 'scumbags' because it may be offensive. Rob Davies, 61, who runs the Run Ragged vintage shop in Wrexham, North Wales, installed the notice to tell shoppers some cabinets were locked against theft. The hard-working retailer put it up after he caught five thieves red-handed in the last 12 months alone and lost roughly £200 of stock to shoplifting. He felt the police did little to help when he reported the five thefts and so he gave up doing so, instead taking matters into his own hands to protect his small business. But officers later showed up at his store, demanding he remove a handwritten note that calling thieves 'scum bags' because it was 'provocative and potentially offensive'. Now, Downing Street has said that the Prime Minister would not use the same word to describe the thieves blighting Britain's retailers. When asked if he resonated with Mr Davies' view, the PM's official spokesman said: 'It is not the language I would directly use', the Telegraph has reported. The spokesman did, however, state that the government had been 'clear through our actions' that they see shoplifting as a 'serious' issue and recognise the detrimental impact it is having on the UK's high streets and local businesses. It comes following a warning from the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) that shaming shoplifting suspects could 'breach data protection' laws. On an advice page for tackling shoplifters, the UK data watchdog warned that putting up images of thieves in a local area could 'not be appropriate' behaviour. As a result, they advised retailers to 'only share personal information that's proportionate and necessary to achieve your purpose'. But shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick called the advice 'madness' and suggested that shopliters should be 'named and shamed'. He told The Telegraph: 'We should be letting the general public know of the photographs of people who have a track record of stealing in towns.' Meanwhile, Labour MP Alex Davies-Jones admitted that shoplifting across the UK had 'got out of hand'. When asked if it was right to display images of thieves in shop windows, Mr Davies-Jones responded: 'I think it is on all of us to be aware of what is going on in our local communities.' Taking to X, Shadow home office minister Katie Lam recounted a story about a constituent who had been ordered by police to remove pictures of suspected shoplifters. 'He gives police CCTV, card details, licence plates. No action apart from a visit to say he must take down pics of thieves "because of GDPR",' she wrote. 'Our system should crush the lawless and protect the law-abiding. It does the opposite.' The number of shoplifting incidents taking place in pharmacies and chemists across England has also been described as both 'unacceptable' and 'appalling' by Henry Gegg, the National Pharmacy Association (NPA) chief executive. In the past year, around nine in 10 pharmacies experienced an incident of shoplifting, while the number of thefts of drugs and other medical supplies increased by 88 per cent, according to figures obtained by the NPA. Of the 476 pharmacies across England surveyed, 87 per cent reported an increase in aggressive or intimidating behaviour towards staff, while 22 per cent recounted instances of physical assault. Around nine in 10 pharmacies experienced an incident of shoplifting, while the number of thefts of drugs and other medical supplies increased by 88 per cent in the past year, according to the National Pharmacy Association (NPA). Meanwhile, nearly three-quarters of those who had reported an incident to the police described the response as insufficient. Several pharmacy owners have resorted to putting up photos of thieves in their shop windows, wearing body cameras and even paying for security guards. Sanjeev Panesar, who owns a pharmacy in Birmingham, described a 'noticeable rise' in hostility towards staff As a result, several pharmacy owners have resorted to putting up photos of thieves in their shop windows, wearing body cameras and even paying for security guards. Sanjeev Panesar, who owns a pharmacy in Birmingham, described the 'noticeable rise' in hostility towards staff as both 'disheartening' but also capable of having a 'lasting effect on job satisfaction, morale, and feelings of safety at work.' Ashley Cowen, owner of three pharmacies across Leeds and York that have been subjected to incidents, described the lack of police action on the issue as 'shocking'. He also described witnessing brazen thieves going as far as to burn, cut and even sow through 'steel grilles' in a bid to access drug stock. Mr Davies, who says he was driven to put his handwritten sign on his shop door because of escalating shoplifting in Wrexham, told The Mail on Sunday that he had no intention of taking it down. He added: 'The sign is staying – and I may even get a bigger one. 'It's a simple point, in my opinion, and succinctly put, and can't cause offence apart from to anyone intending to steal from me. 'I was even polite and put "Thank you" on the bottom.' Mr Davies, 59, said he put it up a month ago in frustration after discovering that he was losing almost his entire monthly profit because of thieves – but was astonished to then get a visit from the police. He said: 'A police officer and PCSO came in. They said the sign was provocative and potentially offensive. 'When I asked, "Why, who it could be offensive to?" the officer didn't answer. The only person who can be offended by the words "scum bag" is a scum bag who wants to steal from me!' Mr Davies said he had received overwhelming support from fellow shopkeepers in the face of a tidal wave of theft in the town. 'There's been massive support everywhere since the sign went up,' he added. 'Shopkeepers are all in the same boat; everyone is having stuff stolen, even cafes.' A spokesman for the Information Commissioner's Office said: 'We don't set strict requirements on how organisations should respond to shoplifting, as data protection law recognises that circumstances can vary. Instead, we provide guidance to help organisations use people's information in a way that is lawful, fair and proportionate. 'Data protection law enables retailers to share images to prevent or detect crime, as long as it's necessary and proportionate in the circumstances. For example, this could include sharing images with the police, shopping centre security teams, or other relevant authorities. 'Retailers will need to consider the relevant privacy implications, such as having a legal reason and appropriate security measures, when considering publishing any images of suspected shoplifters.' North Wales Police said: 'All reports of shoplifting are taken extremely seriously. We are committed to combatting retail theft.' Shoplifting figures released this week by the British Retail Consortium (BRC) showed just 2.5 per cent of offences were recorded by the police each year. It said 50,000 shoplifting incidents go unreported every day as firms give up on the police. BRC chief executive Helen Dickinson said: 'Many retailers do not see the point of reporting incidents to the police.'
The Guardian
16 minutes ago
- The Guardian
More countries added to UK's ‘deport first' scheme for foreign criminals
Foreign criminals from 15 more countries face deportation before they have a chance to appeal in an expansion of the UK government's 'deport first, appeal later' scheme. Ministers are extending the scheme, which applies in England and Wales and was restarted in 2023, to cover 23 countries including India, Bulgaria, Australia and Canada. The policy, which was introduced by the Conservatives in 2014, removes the right of foreign criminals to appeal against their conviction in the UK unless they show they are at risk of harm if they are deported to their country of origin. It is already operational in eight countries including Tanzania, Finland, Estonia and Belize. Other countries brought under the scheme by Labour ministers include Angola, Botswana, Brunei, Canada, Guyana, Indonesia, Kenya, Latvia, Lebanon, Malaysia, Uganda and Zambia. The move is part of the Labour government's efforts to step up the deportations of foreign criminals to deal with overcrowded prisons and public concerns about crime. Shabana Mahmood, the justice secretary, announced proposals on Sunday to allow foreign criminals given fixed-term sentences to be deported immediately after sentencing and barred from re-entering the UK. Those serving life sentences, such as terrorists and murderers, are exempt and will serve their full prison sentence in the UK before being considered for deportation. The policy has come under fire from two former Conservative justice secretaries who say it risks making the UK a soft touch for foreign criminals, because offenders would not be serving sentences at home. The former justice secretary Alex Chalk told the Guardian: 'I have real misgivings about this, and it could make people in Britain a magnet for crime from foreign national offenders.' He told Times Radio that 'rapists, people who commit child cruelty, aggravated burglars, knife crimers, domestic abusers' who were deported to their home countries 'would not have to spend a day in custody'. 'If you have been the victim of an appalling rape that has shattered your life, and you pluck up the courage to go to court, the jury convict this guy [and] within two weeks he's in Tirana, drinking a cocktail paid by the British taxpayer, and on TikTok laughing at his victim,' Chalk said. 'The real danger is you're giving a green light to foreign national offenders. You come to Britain, you're not going to get punished. You're thinking: the worst that happens to me is I'm released immediately and put on a plane.' He added: 'You've got to have a measure of justice so if you come to our country and commit a crime, you expect punishment. I would urge parliament to scrutinise this extremely carefully'. Robert Buckland, another former justice secretary, said Chalk was right to express concerns. 'Many victims of these crimes want justice to be served here first before deportation. Has the government taken the views of victims into consideration in all of this?' The Ministry of Justice confirmed to the Guardian that foreign offenders deported under the expansion of the 'deport first, appeal later' scheme would not necessarily face prison in their home country. After a legal challenge, the supreme court ruled in 2007 that the 'deport first, appeal later' system was unlawful because it infringed on people's right to give live evidence to their appeal. The government dealt with the court's concerns by setting up agreements with several countries for foreign criminals to give live evidence to their appeal hearings using a video link. The scheme was restarted in 2023. Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, said that 'for far too long, foreign criminals have been exploiting our immigration system, remaining in the UK for months or even years while their appeals drag on. That has to end. 'Those who commit crimes in our country cannot be allowed to manipulate the system, which is why we are restoring control and sending a clear message that our laws must be respected and will be enforced.' David Lammy, the foreign secretary, said ministers were in talks with several countries about extending the scheme. Foreign offenders make up about 12% of the prison population in England and Wales, with each prison place costing an average of £54,000 each year, according to the government. Of the new countries covered by the scheme, only Indians are in the top nationalities in the prison population. Officials said that in the year since Labour came to power in July 2024, 5,179 foreign nationals who had been convicted of crimes had been deported, a 14% increase on the year before.
