What's going on at crisis club Morecambe?
How has this situation evolved?
Just four years ago Morecambe won promotion to League One for the first time in their history through the 2020-21 League Two play-offs at a Covid-restricted Wembley Stadium.Manager Derek Adams, who is currently in his third spell as Shrimps boss, left that summer but returned at the tail end of the following season to help them stay in the third tier, finishing two points above the drop zone in 19th.It was no mean feat for a club of Morecambe's size and stature, with wins against Sheffield Wednesday and Charlton Athletic providing the points to keep them in a division filled with comparative giants.Since then, though, things have quickly gone downhill for the Lancashire club.The Shrimps were put up for sale by owners Bond Group in September 2022, but a deal has still not been completed, and two relegations in three seasons since have seen the club drop into the National League for the first time since 2007.Late payment of wages, transfer embargoes and points deductions have all overshadowed matters on the field.The club were docked three points late on during the 2023-24 League Two season after failing to adhere to an agreed decision imposed on them for failing to pay players' wages on time the previous August.They were then given a suspended two-point deduction last season for failing to report on five separate occasions the non-payment of amounts owed to HMRC within the required two working days.With just over two weeks until the start of the upcoming 2025-26 campaign, two parties have had bids to buy the club accepted, but it is unclear how close a deal is to getting over the line.
Who is Morecambe owner Jason Whittingham?
Jason Whittingham, through Bond Group, took over Morecambe in May 2018 with the club then at risk of relegation to the National League.Whittingham was also part-owner of rugby union club Worcester Warriors, who eventually lost their place in the Premiership in 2022 having gone into administration.In the aftermath of Worcester's demise, Whittingham later put Morecambe up for sale.Nearly three years on, a takeover still has not been completed.Speaking to BBC Radio Lancashire in January, Whittingham said he "could not wait" to get out of the club.That month the Shrimps were unable to sign players until they offered the EFL sufficient proof of funds that they could operate until the end of the season, which was only secured with days of the transfer window remaining and 19 games left.Despite beginning that run with victory over Lancashire rivals Fleetwood on 1 February, they managed only four more wins and one draw, and ended the season with a six-game losing run as they finished bottom of League Two and were relegated.Whittingham has been contacted by BBC Radio Lancashire for comment.
What has happened at Morecambe during the summer?
In April, the club said "positive progress" had been made towards a sale, with Adams predicting the club would bounce back to the EFL. But just days later he criticised the owner and board of directors for "not having a plan" in place for 2025-26.There appeared to be good news at the start of June as a consortium known as Panjab Warriors had their takeover bid approved by the EFL.However, after the club's board claimed Whittingham appeared to be "considering reneging" on the deal and raised concerns about the Shrimps' future existence, local MP Lizzi Collinge said the businessman "needed to get on" with the sale. On 1 July, the board said they would begin the process of putting the club into administration if Whittingham did not sell the club, claiming "Bond Group do not have the required funds to meet the club's full payroll commitment".In response, Whittingham sacked the board, claiming he did so in order to give Bond Group the time it needed to ensure the club could avoid administration.On 4 July, Whittingham said terms were agreed with Panjab Warriors and invited the former directors of the club back in order to oversee the final stages of the sale process, which he said would take place on 7 July.When that did not happen, the board stepped down, with Whittingham insisting he was still committed to a sale.On 9 July, a "last minute bid" was made for the club by an unnamed party which was later confirmed by Whittingham to be from a consortium led by an investor he said is named Jonny Cato.Two weeks on, Cato's bid has not been completed and it is unclear where Panjab Warriors' deal stands. Cato has not been seen or heard from in public.
Who are Panjab Warriors and Jonny Cato?
Panjab Warriors, understood to be a group of Sikh businessmen, have been attempting to purchase Morecambe for more than a year and claim they have made significant financial contributions towards the running of the club during that time.They previously said, external they had already paid £3.8m to Bond Group alongside a separate payment of £630,000 to clear outstanding loans against the club.The group have also claimed they had loaned a further £1.7m to the club over the past 14 months to "ensure its ongoing survival".In a statement on 19 July, Panjab Warriors said, external their solicitors had served legal notices to Whittingham and Bond Group over "repeated breaches of what has been agreed".As for Cato, not much is known about his identity but in a statement last week, Whittingham claimed Cato did not have a connection to himself or Bond Group.Supporters' group the Shrimps Trust claimed in a statement, external earlier this week the club's players would not play until the ownership situation was rectified.This comes after players and staff were only paid a third of their most recent wages and Tuesday's planned pre-season friendly against Barrow was cancelled.However, in a statement given to BBC Radio Lancashire on Tuesday, boss Adams said his players were not on strike."The players are not on strike and they all trained today at the training ground," Adams said."Their professionalism has been magnificent during this difficult time. We all want this situation to be resolved and the best outcome for Morecambe Football Club."
Where does this all leave Morecambe now?
Former co-chairman Rod Taylor said he was fearful for the club's existence last week, and fellow former board member James Wakefield painted a similarly bleak picture, saying he was "amazed the club was still alive".Morecambe's woes continue as the landmark Football Governance Act received Royal Assent on Monday, establishing a regulator to oversee the men's game in England's top five divisions.The Act grants greater powers to a body that is independent from government and football authorities, and Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said the bill would make a difference to clubs like Morecambe and "can't come soon enough".Speaking to BBC sports editor Dan Roan, Nandy said: "I'm horrified by what is happening at Morecambe."It's a scenario that too many football fans will recognise up and down the country, including my own in Wigan, and it is heartbreaking for the fans involved who don't know when they wake up in a morning if their club is going to be there or not."This bill will make a significant difference to situations like the one facing Morecambe fans because the regulator will not only have a much tougher owners and directors' test but will also be able to compel owners to sell up if the club is placed at risk of harm. It can't come soon enough for Morecambe."
What is the human impact?
Morecambe are due to play Boston United on 9 August to kick-off their 2025-26 National League campaign.Derek Quinn, who has covered the club for the BBC for 30 years, fears they might not even make it to that stage as things stand."The club is definitely on the brink of going under and it is heartbreaking to see," he said."Players and staff have now not been paid for more than three weeks and community events [at the stadium] such as school proms and private bookings for weddings, funerals and parties have had to be cancelled at the last minute."The sight of one fan, who has supported the club with her family for more than 50 years, breaking down in tears while being interviewed was heartbreaking."For these fans, and thousands of others, this is not just about football - it is about their families and their community."One thing is for sure - there will be far more tears shed if Morecambe Football Club's 105-year existence comes to a crushing end."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ben Stokes' handshake row is a distraction – this England decision will decide India series
Even the conversation, Ben Stokes said, was 'ridiculous'. Injury substitutes, he argued, should not be a part of cricket. About 20 minutes earlier, the India coach Gautam Gambhir had provided the opposite answer. 'Imagine if you have to play with 10 men against 11, how unfortunate that would be?' he said after Rishabh Pant broke his foot. 'You stick me in an MRI scan and you'd get someone else in right away,' countered Stokes, with his ample experience of playing through the pain barrier. Pant will not play when these sides, after the briefest of pauses, reconvene at The Oval on Thursday. Stokes, following the furore surrounding his offer to shake hands before Washington Sundar and Ravindra Jadeja reached centuries, is left pondering a different kind of substitutes, whether due to injury or fear of it, ineffectiveness or exhaustion, but at the start, not mid-match. England responded to the draw at Old Trafford by adding Jamie Overton to the squad, just as Stokes had said that they would veer from their usual policy of naming the team two days early. In different ways, there are reasons to wonder if any of their fast bowlers can fulfil the same role in the fifth Test. Stokes will play, almost regardless of medical advice. He didn't bowl on Saturday, was troubled by his bicep on Sunday and yet still produced the day's most menacing spell. Jasprit Bumrah is the world's top-ranked bowler but Stokes is the series' leading wicket-taker. Given the astonishing exploits, and longevity, of James Anderson and Stuart Broad, the threat Jofra Archer and Mark Wood posed at their best and Chris Woakes' record at home, it is a moot point if Stokes has ever been definitively England's best bowler. Now, at 34 and 115 Tests into his career, he is. But that reflects, too, on the rest of the attack. There is a case of changing each of the seamers. All four Tests have gone deep into the fifth day. The compressed nature of this series means these teams have played for 20 days since 20 June, with five more to come. It is a test of powers of resilience, but also strength in depth. Whether or not England have psychological scars from 143 overs in the field at Old Trafford, and only two wickets in the last 142 of them, they could be fatigued. Woakes and Brydon Carse have played all four Tests. Archer has played the last two, after just one first-class game since May 2021. It would seem a risk to then play him in three successive matches. It would also bring the question of whether they come with diminishing returns after five wickets at Lord's and four more expensive ones at Old Trafford. For Woakes, the series has brought 10 wickets at 52; for Carse, nine at 60. The 36-year-old may have bowled better than the figures suggested, particularly in the last two Tests, but not dramatically better. Carse went wicketless at Old Trafford: banging the ball in too short, getting too little movement, his average for the series against left-handers is over 200. Which, unless Usman Khawaja, Travis Head and Alex Carey suddenly and inexplicably start batting right-handed, could be an impediment in the Ashes. So England's chances of recording their most prestigious series win under Stokes' captaincy could come down to a second-string bowling unit. Liam Dawson, the only spinner in the squad, was summoned only because Shoaib Bashir was injured; the 35-year-old was more economical than the off-spinner probably would have been at Old Trafford, but arguably produced fewer potentially wicket-taking deliveries. Dawson's 47-over marathon in India's second innings was Jack Leach-esque: lending control but lacking the magic ball. Overton's last outing was inauspicious, with figures of 14-0-81-0 for Surrey at Scarborough. Gus Atkinson was omitted by his county then, sent to play Second XI cricket, where he took 2-64 and 1-29 against their Somerset counterparts. He has an outstanding Test record but has barely played this summer, though his total of six County Championship wickets is still four more than Overton's tally. Josh Tongue showed he could mop up the tail at Headingley but is short of top-order victims. They could comprise the fast bowlers, unless England press the weary into action again. And if India, who face a decision of their own about Bumrah, who has played the three Tests that was supposed to be his limit for the summer, win at The Oval; when their next matches are against West Indies in October, who they should be able to beat without him. And they, unlike England, definitely do need to take 20 wickets at The Oval. They need to win; though a lesson of the Bazball era is that someone will, with draws so rare. For both teams, there is a legacy at stake. For Shubman Gill and his new-look team, it could be the start of something; for Stokes, India and then an Ashes away provide the chance for a defining achievement. The first could depend on whether it is better to trust a tiring attack that, in two cases, has found wickets elusive or back-ups, in two cases, with little first-class cricket of late. It could be a decision with considerable repercussions. It all gives England bigger problems than a row than Stokes' offer to shake hands earlier than India were willing to. Sundar and Jadeja wanted to reach the centuries their efforts merited, even if it involved doing so against Harry Brook's odd attempts at off-spin. Its significance lay largely in revealing England's frustration at their rearguard action. But they will be rather more frustrated if a series victory slips through their grasp.
The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
Expensive t-shirts are not more durable, first study into the garment finds
There is no correlation between the price and durability of t-shirts, a first major study into the popular garment has found. The most expensive t-shirt tested by the University of Leeds Institute of Textiles and Colour (LITAC) and environmental group Wrap was outperformed by one costing just a 30th of its price. The study concluded that price has 'very little' to do with the durability of most t-shirts sold in the UK, and that spending more money does not guarantee the item will be more hard-wearing. Researchers tested the durability of 47 t-shirts – 24 male and 23 female designs – from UK clothing brands, including luxury items. They washed the t-shirts using a standard mixed 30C wash cycle followed by a tumble dry 50 times. The t-shirts were graded for pilling – when small balls form on the surface of an item, and the main reason people dispose of the garments – as well as colour fading, shrinkage and general appearance. Of the top 10 best performing t-shirts, six cost less than £15, outperforming many more expensive tees including the most expensive costing £395. The research found more hard-wearing t-shirts tend to have a percentage of synthetic fibres in the composition such as polyester, polyamide, and elastane. Cotton t-shirts tended to have higher shrinkage than synthetic ones, which can be exacerbated with tumble drying. However, the research found four of the 10 top garments were made of 100% cotton. LITAC's Dr Eleanor Scott said: 'If circularity in fashion is to be truly effective, durability must come first. 'Durability underpins the reuse and resale market, as well as keeping our loved items in use longer. Crucially, these findings show that durability is not a luxury reserved for the few — it's achievable at any price point.' Mark Sumner, Wrap's programme lead on textiles, said: 'Most shoppers use price as an indicator of how hard-wearing clothes are – 'the more I spend, the more I'm bound to get out of my purchase'. 'But our study shows this is totally misleading. The most expensive t-shirt we tested cost £395 and ranked 28th out of 47, while a £4 t-shirt was placed 15th. 'The most durable t-shirt cost £28, but the one ranked second worst was £29. So, if you're judging on price alone – buyer beware.' PhD candidate at LITAC, Kate Baker, who presented the findings to the Product Lifetimes and the Environment Conference in Aalborg, Denmark, said: 'This research is another step forward in the road to developing a way of measuring how durable the clothes we wear are. 'Improved clothing durability is critical for the future of circularity and providing the opportunity for people to wear the clothes they love for longer.' The reports recommends that consumers wishing to ensure their t-shirts are as hard-wearing as possible choose heavier weight cotton options, while those with a blend of cotton and synthetic fibres also perform well.
The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
Lionesses party until 4am celebrating Euro 2025 win with champagne and a very special guest
England 's women's football team celebrated their Euro 2025 victory well into the early hours, with some players staying out until 4am. At their Zurich hotel, staff had prepared a festive champions' welcome. The Lionesses arrived cheering, with players raising glasses of champagne to the cameras. Wearing 'Champions 2025' T-shirts and their freshly won gold medals—secured after Chloe Kelly 's decisive penalty—the players embraced the celebrations with joy. Reggie, the Cavapoo who accompanied the squad throughout their campaign, also joined in, with the team chanting his name. The Lionesses now return to London for a parade and ceremony at Buckingham Palace on Tuesday.
