
BRICS ministers meet in Brazil over Donald Trump trade policies
Senior diplomats from the BRICS grouping of nations gathered on Monday in Brazil to present a united front in the face of US President Donald Trump's aggressive trade policies.
The meeting comes at a critical moment for the world economy after the International Monetary Fund this week slashed growth forecasts over the impact of the American leader's sweeping new tariffs.
Foreign ministers from the ten-member trading bloc – which includes current-chair Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa – will hold two days of talks in Rio de Janeiro, as a precursor to a July leaders summit.
Ahead of the gathering, Brazil's BRICS representative Mauricio Lyrio said diplomats were negotiating a joint declaration on 'the centrality and importance of the multilateral trading system.'
The BRICS grouping has expanded significantly since its 2009 inception, and now includes Iran, Egypt, Indonesia, Ethiopia and the United Arab Emirates. It makes up nearly half of the global population and 39 percent of global GDP.
Trump, since returning to the White House in January, has hit dozens of countries with a blanket 10 percent tariff, but China faces levies of up to 145 percent on many products.
Beijing has responded with duties of 125 percent on US goods.
At a summit last year, BRICS members discussed boosting non-dollar transactions, eliciting a swift rebuke from Trump, who threatened them with 100 percent tariffs if they undercut the US currency.
Brazilian Foreign Minister Mauro Vieira will host this week's meeting that will be attended by Russia's Sergei Lavrov and China's Wang Yi among others.
Speaking to Brazil's O Globo newspaper, Lavrov said that BRICS nations planned to 'increase the share of national currencies in transactions' between member states but said the talk of transitioning towards a unified BRICS currency was 'premature.'
The group is also likely to discuss the war in Ukraine, as Trump seeks to push Moscow and Kyiv toward a peace agreement.
Russian President Vladimir Putin caused surprise on Monday by announcing a three-day ceasefire from May 8-10.
The White House suggested however that the pause was not satisfactory, saying that Trump had 'made it clear he wants to see a permanent ceasefire first.'
Trump appeared to turn against Putin at the weekend after a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at Pope Francis's funeral, saying he felt the Russian leader was 'just tapping me along.'
At the same time he has been pressuring Kyiv to give up hopes of reclaiming Russian-annexed Crimea.
Climate change is also expected to feature high on Brazil's agenda for the talks, which take place months before the major UN COP30 climate summit being hosted in the Amazon city of Belem.
The BRICS will be joined for discussions on Tuesday by nine other 'partner' countries, including several former Soviet states, as well as Cuba, Malaysia, Thailand, Uganda and Nigeria.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
By Garrin Lambley © Agence France-Presse
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Musk regrets some of his Trump criticisms, says they 'went too far'
Elon Musk says he regrets some of his recent criticisms of the US president, after the pair's public falling-out last week. Image: Allison Robbert / AFP Elon Musk, the world's richest person and Donald Trump's former advisor, said Wednesday he regretted some of his recent criticisms of the US president, after the pair's public falling-out last week. "I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far," Musk wrote on his social media platform X. Musk's expression of regret came just days after Trump threatened the tech billionaire with "serious consequences" if he sought to punish Republicans who vote for a controversial spending bill. Their blistering break-up -- largely carried out on social media before a riveted public since Thursday last week -- was ignited by Musk's harsh criticism of Trump's so-called "big, beautiful" spending bill, which is currently before Congress. Some lawmakers who were against the bill had called on Musk -- one of the Republican Party's biggest financial backers in last year's presidential election -- to fund primary challenges against Republicans who voted for the legislation. "He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that," Trump, who also branded Musk "disrespectful," told NBC News on Saturday, without specifying what those consequences would be. Trump also said he had "no" desire to repair his relationship with the South African-born Tesla and SpaceX chief, and that he has "no intention of speaking to him." In his post on Wednesday, Musk did not specify which of his criticisms of Trump had gone "too far." 'Wish him well' The former allies had seemed to have cut ties amicably about two weeks ago, with Trump giving Musk a glowing send-off as he left his cost-cutting role at the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). But their relationship cracked within days as Musk described the spending bill as an "abomination" that, if passed by Congress, could define Trump's second term in office. Trump hit back at Musk's comments in an Oval Office diatribe and from there the row detonated, leaving Washington stunned. "Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore. I was surprised," Trump told reporters. Musk, who was Trump's biggest donor to his 2024 campaign, also raised the issue of the Republican's election win. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate," he posted, adding: "Such ingratitude." Trump later said on his Truth Social platform that cutting billions of dollars in subsidies and contracts to Musk's companies would be the "easiest way" to save the US government money. US media have put the value of the contracts at $18 billion. With real political and economic risks to their falling out, both appeared to inch back from the brink on Friday, with Trump telling reporters "I just wish him well," and Musk responding on X: "Likewise." Trump had spoken to NBC on Saturday after Musk deleted one of the explosive allegations he had made during their fallout, linking the president with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein.


The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
Police make ‘mass arrests' in LA during nighttime curfew
Trump has ordered 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles, along with 700 active-duty Marines Police officers in riot gear stand near City Hall as a curfew is in effect in LA. Picture: Ringo Chiu/ AFP) Los Angeles police began arresting people in the city's downtown late Tuesday, as groups gathered in violation of an overnight curfew after a fifth day of protests against Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. Looting and vandalism in the second-biggest US city have marred the largely peaceful protests over ramped-up arrests by immigration authorities. The demonstrations, which began Friday, and isolated acts of violence prompted Trump to take the extraordinary step of sending in troops, over the objection of the state governor. Mass arrests The protests again turned ugly after dark Tuesday, but an hour into the overnight curfew, only a handful of protesters were left downtown, with police making several arrests as they warned stragglers to leave. 'Multiple groups continue to congregate on 1st St between Spring and Alameda' within the designated downtown curfew area, the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) wrote on X late Tuesday. 'Those groups are being addressed and mass arrests are being initiated.' Police arrested 25 people on suspicion of violating the curfew as of Tuesday evening, the Los Angeles Times reported, citing an LAPD spokesperson. The number of arrests was likely to rise as law enforcement worked to remove the remaining protesters from the area, the newspaper said. 'Stop the vandalism, stop the looting' Earlier, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said she had issued the curfew 'to stop the vandalism, to stop the looting.' One square mile (2.5 square kilometers) of the city's more-than-500 square mile area will be off-limits from 8 pm and 6 am for everyone apart from residents, journalists and emergency services, she added. One protester told AFP the arrest of migrants in a city with large immigrant and Latino populations was the root of the unrest. 'I think that obviously they're doing it for safety,' she said of the curfew. 'But I don't think that part of the problem is the peaceful protests. It's whatever else is happening on the other side that is inciting violence.' At their largest, the protests have included a few thousand people taking to the streets, but smaller mobs have used the cover of darkness to set fires, daub graffiti, and smash windows. Overnight, Monday 23 businesses were looted, police said, adding that more than 500 people had been arrested over recent days. Protests against immigration arrests by federal law enforcement have also sprung up in cities around the country, including New York, Atlanta, Chicago, San Francisco and Austin. 'Provide protection' Trump has ordered 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles, along with 700 active-duty Marines, in what he has claimed is a necessary escalation to take back control, despite the insistence of local law enforcement that they could handle matters. A military spokeswoman said the Marines were expected to be on the streets by Wednesday. Their mission will be to guard federal facilities and to accompany 'federal officers in immigration enforcement operations in order to provide protection.' Demonstrators told AFP the soldiers 'should be respected' because they had not chosen to be in Los Angeles, but Lisa Orman blasted it as 'ridiculous.' 'I was here for the Dodger parade,' she said, referring to the LA team's World Series victory. 'It was 100 times bigger,' she said, branding the idea that Marines were necessary as 'a big show' that Trump wanted. The Pentagon said the deployment would cost US taxpayers $134 million. Photographs issued by the Marine Corps showed men in combat fatigues using riot shields to practice crowd control techniques at the Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach. Late Tuesday, Texas Governor Greg Abbott said his state would deploy its National Guard 'to locations across the state to ensure peace & order' after solidarity protests. 'Peaceful protest is legal. Harming a person or property is illegal & will lead to arrest,' Abbott wrote on X. The Texas National Guard 'will use every tool & strategy to help law enforcement maintain order.' Behaving like 'a tyrant' In sprawling Los Angeles on Tuesday, it was largely a typical day: tourists thronged Hollywood Boulevard, celebrities attended red carpet premieres, tens of thousands of children went to school, and commuter traffic choked the streets. But at a military base in North Carolina, Trump was painting a much darker picture. 'What you're witnessing in California is a full-blown assault on peace, on public order and national sovereignty,' the Republican told troops at Fort Bragg. 'This anarchy will not stand. We will not allow an American city to be invaded and conquered by a foreign enemy.' California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat who has clashed with the president before, said Trump's shock militarisation of the city was the behaviour of 'a tyrant, not a president.' In a filing to the US District Court in Northern California, Newsom asked for an injunction preventing the use of troops for policing. US law largely prevents the use of the military as a policing force — absent the declaration of an insurrection, which Trump has mused. Law professor Frank Bowman said the president 'is trying to use emergency declarations to justify bringing in first the National Guard and then mobilising Marines'. © Agence France-Presse

TimesLIVE
2 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Five nations and EU urge Trump not to impose new aircraft tariffs
Five nations and the EU, as well as airlines and aerospace firms worldwide, have urged the Trump administration not to impose new national security tariffs on imported commercial aircraft and parts, documents released on Tuesday showed. Airlines and aircraft manufacturers have been lobbying President Donald Trump to restore the tariff-free regime under the 1979 Civil Aircraft Agreement that has yielded an annual trade surplus of $75bn (R1.32-trillion) for the US industry. The documents made public by the US commerce department bared concerns about the fallout of possible new tariffs expressed by companies as well as Canada, China, Japan, Mexico and Switzerland, besides the EU. 'As reliable trading partners, the EU and US should strengthen their trade regarding aircraft and aircraft parts, rather than hinder it by imposing trade restrictions,' the EU wrote. It would consider its options 'to ensure a level playing field', it added. Trump has imposed tariffs of 10% on nearly all aircraft and parts imports. 'No country or region should attempt to support the development of its domestic aircraft manufacturing industry by suppressing foreign competitors,' the Chinese government wrote. Separately, US manufacturer Boeing cited a recent trade deal unveiled in May with Britain that ensures tariff-free treatment for aircraft and parts. 'The US should ensure duty-free treatment for commercial aircraft and their parts in any negotiated trade agreement, similar to its efforts with the UK,' Boeing told the commerce department in a filing. Mexico said in 2024 it exported $1.45bn (R25.7bn) in aircraft parts, a 10th of the total, to the US. The EU said it took US exports of aircraft worth about $12bn (R212.72bn), while exporting about $8bn (R141.82bn) of aircraft to the US. In early May, the commerce department launched a 'section 232" national security investigation into imports of commercial aircraft, jet engines and parts that could form the basis for higher tariffs on such imports. Last week, Delta Air Lines and major trade groups warned of tariffs' impact on ticket prices, aviation safety and supply chains. 'US tariffs on aviation are putting domestic production of commercial aircraft at risk,' Airbus Americas CEO Robin Hayes said in a filing. 'It is not realistic or sensible today to create a 100% domestic supply chain in any country.' Boeing said it had been increasing US content in its aircraft over the past decade and its newest models, the 737 MAX 10 and 777X, would have 'more than 88% domestically-sourced content'. The United Auto Workers union, which represents 10,000 aerospace workers, said it supports tariffs and domestic production quotas, adding US aerospace employment has fallen to 510,000 in 2024 from 850,000 in 1990. 'To safeguard the aerospace supply chain across the commercial and defence sectors, comprehensive tariffs and production quotas on several products are needed,' it said. JetBlue Airways opposed new tariffs, however, saying: 'Trade policy should reinforce, not destabilise, the proven systems that keep our aircraft flying safely and affordably.'