Credit scores decline for millions as US student loan collections restart
NEW YORK — Millions of Americans are seeing their credit scores suffer now that the U.S. government has resumed referring missed student loan payments for debt collection.
After 90 days of non-payment, student loan servicers report delinquent, or past-due, accounts to major credit bureaus, which use the information to recalculate the borrower's score. Falling behind on loan payments therefore can affect an individual's credit rating as severely as filing for personal bankruptcy.
A lower credit score makes it harder or more expensive to obtain car loans, mortgages, credit cards, auto insurance and other financial services at a time when inflation, high interest rates, and layoffs have strained the resources of some consumers.
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York reported that in the first three months of 2025, 2.2 million student loan recipients saw their scores drop by 100 points, and an additional 1 million had drops of 150 points or more.
Declines that steep may mean the difference between a manageable credit card interest rate and an unmanageable one, or approval or rejection of an application to rent an apartment.
The U.S. Department of Education paused federal student loan payments in March 2020, offering borrowers relief during the economic chaos of the coronavirus pandemic.
Though payments technically resumed in 2023, the Biden administration provided a one-year grace period that ended in October 2024. Last month, the Trump administration restarted the collection process for outstanding student loans, with plans to seize wages and tax refunds if the loans continue to go unpaid.
According to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, about 1 in 4 people with student loan accounts were more than 90 days behind on payments at the end of March.
Kat Hanchon, 33, who works in marketing and higher education in Detroit, was one of them. Hanchon said her score dropped by 57 points as a result of her loans falling delinquent this year. That put her score below 600, or subprime.
When Hanchon received her statement from her loan servicer, her expected monthly payments were higher than before the pandemic-era pause, even though she had enrolled in a repayment plan that takes a borrower's full financial situation into account.
'They said I now have to pay $358 per month,' she said. 'I'm not going to be able to pay that. ... But I'm not unusual in the world we're living in right now.'
Hanchon said she's had to prioritize paying medical expenses — for a dental crown, a root canal, and an endoscopy — before she'll be able to consider putting money toward the loans. While her housing situation is secure for the moment, she worries about the annual percentage rate for her credit cards fluctuating.
Lenders, landlords, credit card companies, employers and utility companies all look to consumers' credit scores to gauge the likelihood of borrowers being able to make regular payments. A higher score typically results in lower interest rates and more favorable loan terms, while a lower score makes it harder to access credit.
The Education Department has said borrowers should receive bills from lenders three weeks before any payments are due, but some people have reported that they have not been notified.
Wait times for calls with loan servicers have been high, and layoffs at the Department of Education have also likely contributed to delayed service, consumer advocates say.
Dom Holmes, 28, who works for a nonprofit in Manheim, Pennsylvania, said he woke up in early May to find his credit score had dropped 60 or 70 points overnight.
'All of a sudden I was delinquent, even though I'd never received notice,' he said.
Holmes has begun the process of appealing the reduction of his credit score, he said. He's been considering a move for professional reasons, and added that he's concerned it could be tough to rent a place to live with his score as it stands.
'I'm at the ideal age where I should be starting a family and buying a home,' he said. 'When you destroy me financially, what are the chances I'm able to do that and that's viable for me?'
Holmes, who was the first person in his family to graduate from college, said he still has some outstanding Parent Plus loans, which he intends to keep paying down so that his parents' credit scores aren't affected.
He graduated in 2019, shortly before the pandemic, and said he can see how his generation might have difficulty paying off the debt.
'Right as I was entering the workforce, the world really stopped,' Holmes said. 'Things were really bad for a lot of people for a long time. We're still coming out of that. And all of a sudden, the switches got turned back on overnight.'
Kevin King, vice president of credit risk at data and analytics company LexisNexis, said he expects the effects of the resumed student loan collections to begin rippling through the U.S. economy in the coming months.
'There were a number of years where it was probably a bad financial strategy to be making student loan payments,' he said. 'A lot of consumers were confused as various government (policies of forgiveness) were passed and overruled.'
King predicts that student loan payments will move higher in the so-called 'payment hierarchy,' or the order in which consumers make payments, since the government plans to use 'levers to compel' such as wage garnishment and the seizing of tax refunds.
'Which bill do you pay first, second, and not at all?' King said. 'Historically, student loans are really far down the list. But the government's being pretty aggressive here in pursuing payment activity in a way that may shift the hierarchy. Consumers might be more willing to go delinquent or default on something like a credit card or installment loan.'
The Federal Reserve of New York study also found that borrowers ages 40 and older were most likely to be delinquent on their loans.
Andrew McCall, 58, of Boise, Idaho, said he has about $30,000 remaining in outstanding loans from earning his computer science degrees. He said he can't afford his monthly payments, which are in the $250-300 range, and worries what a hit to his credit score might mean for all areas of his life.
'The fact that this economy is driven by debt to begin with causes my score to be paramount no matter what financial decisions I'm making, outside of going to the grocery store,' he said. 'My car, my house... Your credit rating becomes a social stratifier.'
Lewis writes for the Associated Press.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
7 minutes ago
- USA Today
Deeper Medicaid cuts, limited tax breaks for tips: What's in the Senate tax bill
Deeper Medicaid cuts, limited tax breaks for tips: What's in the Senate tax bill The bill text released June 16 sets up a potentially explosive confrontation with House Republicans. Show Caption Hide Caption Hakeem Jeffries backs Elon Musk's call to 'kill' Trump's tax bill House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries backed Elon Musk's call to "kill the bill", saying Trump's tax plan will harm Americans. WASHINGTON – Senate Republicans are proposing deeper cuts to Medicaid than the House of Representatives' recently passed budget bill, to help pay for President Donald Trump's major tax cuts under a budget plan released on June 16. The measure released by GOP leaders serving on a key panel responsible for writing the nation's tax laws also seeks a more limited tax cut for tips and overtime than the House, changing one of Trump's most recognizable 2024 campaign promises. Setting up a showdown with the Republican-led House, which adopted its own version of Trump's so-called "big beautiful bill" in late May, the Senate Finance Committee would not increase the federal deduction for state and local taxes from $10,000 to $40,000 for people earning less than $500,000 per year. Senate Republicans plan to continue to negotiate changes to the so-called SALT tax deduction. The proposal is the culmination of weeks of negotiations among Senate Republicans on the GOP bill that would be Trump's biggest legislative accomplishment in his second term thus far. Senators have been pushing to complete work on the package by July 4, before reconciling changes with the House and passing the bill before August. They have been walking a fine line since the House passed their version three weeks ago: Several senators have demanded deeper spending cuts to the bill, as the House's version is expected to add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next 10 years, while others are concerned that potential cuts to Medicaid and green energy tax credits go too far. Meanwhile, any changes they make could disrupt the delicate balance in the House, where Republicans have only a three-vote margin. The House-passed version of the bill would extend Trump's 2017 income tax cuts and implement new temporary tax breaks for tips and overtime. It would create new federally-seeded savings account for children and give seniors an additional tax credit. It would pour billions of dollars into the administration's deportation plans and on defense. And it would add new restrictions to benefit programs like Medicaid and food stamps in an effort to balance out the cost of the sweeping bill, including new Medicaid work requirements for able-bodied adults without children. The House's Medicaid changes are expected to save at least $625 billion and cause 7.6 million Americans to lose their health insurance over the next 10 years, according to initial estimates by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. A CBO estimate released on June 12 showed that the bill would decrease resources for low-income households while boosting resources for middle- and high-income households. Deeper Medicaid cuts As in the House, the Senate has fiscal conservatives who are concerned that the bill will add to the federal deficit and others who have problems with the potential impact on Medicaid health coverage. Appeasing one camp is difficult to do without inflaming the frustrations of the other, forcing Republican leaders to strike a balance to get the votes they need, as no Democrats are expected to support the proposal. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Missouri, and Sen. Jim Justice, R-West Virginia, have been critical of a provision in the bill that limits states from raising money to pay for their part of Medicaid spending through health-care-related taxes known as "provider taxes." But instead of rolling back the House's proposal, Senate lawmakers made deeper cuts to Medicaid through changes to the provider tax. They proposed gradually reducing the threshold by which states can guarantee providers will be paid back for contributing to the state's Medicaid funding, which boosts the amount the federal government matches. Right now, states can guarantee reimbursement if tax revenues make up 6% or less of revenues from treating patients. That limit would be gradually reduced to 3.5%. No taxes on tips, overtime A handful of Trump's key campaign promises would be scaled back under the Senate's version of the bill as opposed to the House's in order to rein in the cost of the package. The Senate's proposal would create a new tax deduction on overtime of up to $12,500 for an individual who makes $150,000 or less in a year. It would also create a tax deduction on tipped wages of up to $25,000 for people who make $150,000 or less. In the House's version, tax breaks for overtime and tips would have no limit and would apply to people who make $160,000 or less. SALT math The Senate had made it clear they planned to make some changes to a hotly-contested provision that would benefit people who live in high-tax states: State and local tax deductions, known as SALT. A handful of Republican lawmakers in the House who represent districts in Democratic-controlled states such as New York, New Jersey and California pushed to raise the $10,000 cap on SALT deductions to $40,000 for people earning less than $500,000 per year. But unlike in the House, there are no Republican senators who represent high-tax states that could benefit from the deduction. Adding a cap to the deduction, which Republicans approved during Trump's first presidency, "was one of the best reforms that we had in the bill," said Senate Majority Leader John Thune. The package, as released on June 16, would eliminate that deal and keep the existing $10,000 cap. Some of those GOP lawmakers in the House have already said they won't vote for the bill in the House if their deal on SALT is abandoned. Changing the deal "would be like digging up safely buried radioactive waste – reckless, destabilizing and sure to contaminate everything around it," Rep. Nick Lalota, R-New York, told reporters on June 4.


The Hill
14 minutes ago
- The Hill
60 percent disapprove of Trump handling of tariffs, trade: Survey
Sixty percent of Americans say they disapprove of the way President Trump is handling trade and tariffs, according to a new NBC News Decision Desk poll powered by SurveyMonkey. In the poll, conducted in early June, 45 percent of respondents said they strongly disapproved of Trump's handling of the issue, while 15 percent said they somewhat disapproved. Another 19 percent said they strongly approve of the way the president has handled the issue, while 21 percent said they somewhat approve. The latest poll is similar to a survey taken nearly two months earlier, in mid-April, which showed 61 percent of respondents disapproving of his handling of the issue and 39 percent approving. That April poll came after Trump made his April 2 'Liberation Day' tariff announcement, unveiling more than $600 billion in import taxes on goods from nearly all U.S. trading partners, including tariffs close to 100 percent on Chinese goods. Trump yielded to pressure from bond markets and congressional Republicans soon after by reducing his initial tariffs to 10 percent for 90 days, a deadline set to hit on July 8. Trump officials had touted plans to strike 90 deals in 90 days but so far has only announced a deal with the United Kingdom, while also reaching a tariff truce with China. In the survey, Trump's overall approval rating is 45 percent, with 55 percent disapproving. The 'trade and tariffs' category is among his worst issues. Only 'inflation and cost of living' scores worse, with 61 percent disapproving and 39 percent approving. Border security and immigration remains his top issue, with 51 percent approval and 49 percent disapproval. The poll was conducted from May 30 to June 10, 2025, and included 19,410 adults. The margin of error is 2.1 percentage points.


American Press
17 minutes ago
- American Press
Trump family's next venture, a mobile phone company
President-elect Donald Trump, center left, takes the oath of office during the 60th Presidential Inauguration in the Rotunda of the U.S. Capitol in Washington on Monday. (Associated Press) The Trump family is licensing its name to a new mobile phone service, the latest in a string of ventures announced while Donald Trump is in the White House despite ethical concerns that the U.S. president could mold public policy for personal gain. Eric Trump, the president's son running The Trump Organization in his absence, announced a new venture Monday called Trump Mobile. The plan is to sell phones that will be built in the U.S., and the phone service will maintain a call center in the country as well. The announcement of the new mobile phone and service, called T1 Mobile, follows several real estate deals for towers and resorts in the Middle East, including a golf development in Qatar announced in April. A $1.5 billion partnership to build golf courses, hotels and real estate projects in Vietnam was approved last month, though the deal was in the works before Trump was elected. Even oversight of such a company, with the Trump name attached, raises ethical concerns. Trump has already used the federal government to reward his allies and punish his enemies. The Federal Communications Commission, the primary regulatory body overseeing mobile phone companies, has already launched investigations of media outlets Trump dislikes and, in some cases, is personally suing. Eric Trump said Monday that consumers deserve a phone that aligns with their values. 'Hard-working Americans deserve a wireless service that's affordable, reflects their values, and delivers reliable quality they can count on,' he said in a statement. The company would also enter a highly competitive market that includes companies that have been directly attacked by Donald Trump. The president criticized Apple last month because it planned to make most of its U.S. iPhones in India, and threatened to slap a 25% tariff on the devices unless the tech giant starts building the phones domestically. The Trump phone deal comes as a mandatory financial disclosure report just filed with the government shows the president has moved fast in the last year to profit off his celebrity, taking in $3 million in revenue from selling 'Save America' coffee table books, $2.8 million from Trump watches and $2.5 million from Trump branded sneakers and fragrances. The Trump Organization on Monday said the new, gold-colored phone available for $499 in August, called the T1 Phone, won't be designed or made by Trump Mobile, but by another company. The Trump Organization did not respond immediately to a request for more details. In the first term, Trump was blasted by conservative and liberal government ethics experts alike for opening his Washington hotel to lobbyists and diplomats and violating his company's pledge to avoid even the appearance of a conflict between his private profit and the public interest. The company is feeling more emboldened now in the second term. The mobile service is partnering with existing cellular carriers with access to a 5G network, raising questions of how they will be treated by federal regulators now that they have partnered with his company. The Trump Organization said those companies are America's three biggest mobile network providers, an apparent reference to Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile, the latter with a trademarked name that is very similar to Trump's T1 Mobile. The name given to the monthly service offer, The 47 Plan, and the monthly fee of $47.45 make reference to Trump's two terms, the 45th and the 47th. The service will include unlimited calls, texts and data and free roadside assistance and telehealth services. A mock-up of the planned phone on the company's website shows Trump's slogan 'Make America Great' on the front and an etched American flag on the back. By sticking to licensing, the Trump family is limiting its risk. Still, the new service faces big challenges if it hopes to sell beyond the president's loyal MAGA fans. The Trump company tried to tap into support among the middle class in the first term with two mid-priced hotel chains. Called American Idea and Scion, and unveiled like the phone service Monday under a giant U.S. flag in the Trump Tower atrium, they flopped. Despite taking in millions of dollars each year in various licensing deals and a string of new ventures, the Trump brand has taken a series of hits to its brand over the years. During his first term, the Trump name was stripped off residential buildings and hotels in Toronto, Panama and Manhattan. The Trump International Hotel in Washington, since sold, lost money even though the family opened its doors to businesses and governments trying to shape U.S. policy. The average condo in 11 Trump-branded residential towers around the country underperformed the broader market during and immediately after Trump's first term. More recently, the value of Trump condos in New York City fell in the past two years as similar properties rise in value, according to brokerage CityRealty. The Trump Organization has had more success with some ventures launched in the first few months of his second term. Trump Media & Technology Group, a Florida company that operates the Truth Social media platform, filed plans with security regulators Monday to launch an exchange-traded fund tied to the prices of two popular cryptocurrencies. The ETF is part of the Trump family's rapidly growing crypto empire, which includes a new stablecoin and launching and promoting memecoins. The president's most recent financial disclosure report reveals he made more than $57 million last year from World Liberty Financial, a crypto company he and his sons helped launch in September.