logo
NASA administrator nominee Jared Isaacman supports a return to the moon, argues for a parallel path to Mars

NASA administrator nominee Jared Isaacman supports a return to the moon, argues for a parallel path to Mars

CBS News09-04-2025
Billionaire entrepreneur and
space traveler
Jared Isaacman
, President Trump's nominee to serve as NASA's next administrator, told lawmakers Wednesday he supports sending astronauts back to the moon in the Artemis program but plans to "prioritize" eventual trips to Mars.
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) chaired Isaacman's confirmation hearing before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, directly asking the nominee if he would "maintain course with the Artemis program so that we can return American astronauts to the moon before President Trump leaves office?"
"I couldn't agree more with the president and his inspiring and ambitious goal to send American astronauts to plant the stars and stripes on Mars," Isaacman said. "He didn't say we shouldn't go to the moon.
"I suspect the president, as I feel and probably a lot of Americans (are), is wondering what's taking us so long to get back to the moon, and why does it cost so much money?"
Along with the president's call to eventually send astronauts to Mars, senior advisor Elon Musk, the founder of SpaceX, has called NASA's Artemis moon program a "distraction" and "jobs-maximizing program, not a results-maximizing program."
The Artemis program, with contractors spread across dozens of congressional districts, is behind schedule and billions of dollars over budget.
But it has strong bipartisan support in Washington and there has been pushback from lawmakers over Musk's comments and the possibility of major changes that could scale back Artemis, resulting in China beating the United States back to the moon.
Isaacman tried to ease those concerns.
"I absolutely want to see us return to the moon," he said. "As I mentioned in my prepared remarks, determine the economic, scientific, and national security value while we are also proceeding towards Mars.
"I don't think we have to make any tough trades here, Senator. I think if we can concentrate our resources at the world's greatest space agency, we don't have to make a binary decision of moon versus Mars or moon has to come first versus Mars."
Cruz asked if NASA, given current budget constraints, could realistically support both a return to the moon along with "a full mission to Mars simultaneously."
"Senator, as I mentioned my prepared remarks, I think we can absolutely do that," Isaacman said. "We can figure out the space economy in low-Earth orbit. We can run more scientific missions.
"This is the agency that went from sending Alan Shepard on a suborbital mission and eight years later we saw Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin on the surface of the moon. Do I think that we can get back to the moon, chart a course for Mars and do all the other things? Absolutely."
Sitting in the audience behind Isaacman were the
four NASA astronauts
scheduled for launch next year on an around-the-moon flight, the second mission in the Artemis program and the first carrying a crew. NASA says the third mission, tentatively planned for mid-2027, will carry two astronauts to the lunar surface, the first in a series of ever more ambitious Artemis flights.
A renaissance man of sorts, Isaacman, 42, dropped out of high school at age 16 to develop what became Shift4 Payments, a company that processes payments for more than 200,000 restaurants and other retail entities. He also is an accomplished aviator, with a degree in aeronautics, owning a fleet of fighter jets used in part to train military pilots.
He paid SpaceX hundreds of millions — the exact cost is not known — to charter two flights aboard SpaceX Crew Dragon spacecraft, the first purely commercial orbital spaceflights featuring non-government, all-civilian crews.
The first flight,
Inspiration4
, generated more than $250 million as part of a charity drive for St. Jude Children's Research hospital. During the second flight,
Polaris Dawn
, he and a SpaceX crewmate became the first private citizens to walk in space.
"Someday in the future, 50, 100 years from now, you're going to have a lunar base, you're going to probably have some sort of a Martian colony," he said before his first spaceflight in 2021. "But you have to start somewhere. And I think when this mission is complete, people are going to look at it and say it was the first time everyday people could go to space."
Reviewing a Netflix documentary about the Inspiration4 mission, The Guardian called Isaacman "that rarest of beasts - a genuinely personable billionaire."
Before his nomination to serve as NASA's next administrator, Isaacman was in the process of planning two additional flights, including the first crewed flight of SpaceX's gargantuan Super Heavy-Starship rocket. Those plans will be suspended upon confirmation as NASA administrator.
"I am not a typical nominee for this position," Isaacman said. "I've been relatively apolitical. I am not a scientist, I never worked at NASA. I do not think these are weaknesses, in fact I believe President Trump found them to be strengths.
"If confirmed, I will bring all my experience to the greatest adventure in human history, the quest to discover the secrets of the universe."
Trump
announced Isaacman's nomination
in December, saying on his Truth Social platform: "Jared will drive NASA's mission of discovery and inspiration, paving the way for groundbreaking achievements in Space science, technology and exploration."
Isaacman's "passion for space, astronaut experience and dedication to pushing the boundaries of exploration, unlocking the mysteries of the universe and advancing the new space economy, make him ideally suited to lead NASA into a bold new era," Trump wrote.
Isaacman's confirmation hearing came at a time of turmoil at NASA as the agency braces for widespread cuts across multiple programs expected from Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency.
The biggest question mark is the fate of NASA's Artemis moon program, its giant Space Launch System rocket and its Orion crew capsule.
Along with the ongoing International Space Station program, NASA's primary goal since the first Trump administration has been to send astronauts back to the moon, focusing on the lunar south pole where deposits of ice may be present in permanently shadowed craters.
If ice is present in extractable quantities, future astronauts may be able to process it into water, air and even rocket fuel, vastly lowering the cost of deep space exploration. The Chinese are pursuing their own moon program with plans to land their own "taikonauts" on the lunar surface by 2030.
Bill Nelson, the NASA administrator under President Joe Biden, couched the superpower competition as a new space race, arguing a U.S. presence on the moon was essential to national security and the nation's leadership on the world stage.
The Artemis program is built around the Boeing-managed SLS rocket, which will propel astronauts in Lockheed Martin-built Orion capsules to the moon. In the initial moon landing, they will descend to the lunar surface aboard a variant of the Starship upper stage.
Even though NASA is paying SpaceX nearly $4 billion to develop the Artemis lunar lander, Musk, in the wake of Trump's election, has suggested that NASA should bypass the moon and head for Mars.
"The Artemis architecture is extremely inefficient, as it is a jobs-maximizing program, not a results-maximizing program. Something entirely new is needed,"
Musk said on X
.
But Cruz does not agree. He repeatedly raised the prospect of China beating America back to the moon as a clear challenge to U.S. national security and global leadership.
"If China beats us to the moon, what consequences might America face?" Cruz asked.
"We certainly cannot lose," Isaacman replied. "If we do not lead the way and we're following, we may be following forever, the consequence of which could be extraordinary.
"Even if you're talking about things that have maybe even a low probability, let's say, for example, on the lunar surface helium-3 becomes a new source of fusion power. It could shift the balance of power here on Earth. I don't think we can afford to find that out the hard way. ... Space is the ultimate high ground. We cannot afford to cede that ground."
But when pressed, Isaacman would not commit to establishing a permanent presence on the moon, saying more research is needed to determine the scientific value and costs of such a program.
Asked about his past relationship with Musk and whether the SpaceX founder would enjoy any unusual access, Isaacman said "my loyalty is to this nation, the space agency and their world-changing mission."
"I have to imagine that in the 1960s, Administrator (James) Webb would have taken phone calls and welcomed the input from all the various contractors that were contributing to the endeavor," he said. "But NASA is the customer. They work for us, not the other way around."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China rushes to build out solar, emissions edge downward

time25 minutes ago

China rushes to build out solar, emissions edge downward

TALATAN, China -- High on the Tibetan plateau, Chinese government officials last month showed off what they say will be the world's largest solar farm when completed — 610 square kilometers (235 square miles), the size of the American city of Chicago. China has been installing solar panels at a blistering pace, far faster than anywhere else in the world, and the investment is starting to pay off. A study released Thursday found that the country's carbon emissions edged down 1% in the first six months of the year compared to a year earlier, extending a trend that began in March 2024. The good news is China's carbon emissions may have peaked well ahead of a government target of doing so before 2030. But China, the world's biggest emitter of greenhouse gases, will need to bring them down much more sharply to play its part in slowing global climate change. For China to reach its declared goal of carbon neutrality by 2060, emissions would need to fall 3% on average over the next 35 years, said Lauri Myllyvirta, the Finland-based author of the study and lead analyst at the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air. 'China needs to get to that 3% territory as soon as possible,' he said. China's emissions have fallen before during economic slowdowns. What's different this time is electricity demand is growing — up 3.7% in the first half of this year — but the increase in power from solar, wind and nuclear has easily outpaced that, according to Myllyvirta, who analyzes the most recent data in a study published on the U.K.-based Carbon Brief website. 'We're talking really for the first time about a structural declining trend in China's emissions,' he said. China installed 212 gigawatts of solar capacity in the first six months of the year, more than America's entire capacity of 178 gigawatts as of the end of 2024, the study said. Electricity from solar has overtaken hydropower in China and is poised to surpass wind this year to become the country's largest source of clean energy. Some 51 gigawatts of wind power was added from January to June. Li Shuo, the director of the China Climate Hub at the Asia Society Policy Institute in Washington, described the plateauing of China's carbon emissions as a turning point in the effort to combat climate change. 'This is a moment of global significance, offering a rare glimmer of hope in an otherwise bleak climate landscape,' he wrote in an email response. It also shows that a country can cut emissions while still growing economically, he said. But Li cautioned that China's heavy reliance on coal remains a serious threat to progress on climate and said the economy needs to shift to less resource-intensive sectors. 'There's still a long road ahead,' he said. A seemingly endless expanse of solar panels stretches toward the horizon on the Tibetan plateau. White two-story buildings rise above them at regular intervals. Sheep graze on the scrubby vegetation that grows under them. Solar panels have been installed on about two-thirds of the land. When completed, it will have more than 7 million panels and be capable of generating enough power for 5 million households. Like many of China's solar and wind farms, it was built in the relatively sparsely populated west. A major challenge is getting electricity to the population centers and factories in China's east. 'The distribution of green energy resources is perfectly misaligned with the current industrial distribution of our country,' Zhang Jinming, the vice governor of Qinghai province, told journalists on a government-organized tour. Part of the solution is building transmission lines traversing the country. One connects Qinghai to Henan province. Two more are planned, including one to Guangdong province in the southeast, almost at the opposite corner of the country. Making full use of the power is hindered by the relatively inflexible way that China's electricity grid is managed, tailored to the steady output of coal plants rather than more variable and less predictable wind and solar, Myllyvirta said. 'This is an issue that the policymakers have recognized and are trying to manage, but it does require big changes to the way coal-fired power plants operate and big changes to the way the transmission network operates,' he said. 'So it's no small task.' ___

To understand Russians, try catching a ballet at the Bolshoi Theatre
To understand Russians, try catching a ballet at the Bolshoi Theatre

New York Post

time26 minutes ago

  • New York Post

To understand Russians, try catching a ballet at the Bolshoi Theatre

He's Putin on the ritz To try to understand a land which birthed a Putin, I went back to my old notes. I have been to Russia several times. A taxi, empty, cruised past, slowly, repeatedly, then grudgingly stopped. In English, the cabbie said: 'We must take foreign language in school. Still, we avoid anyone who looks American. They're trouble. They carry little conversation dictionaries but Americans we never understand. Talk too fast. 'Impatient. When you can't understand they bang you on the back — and you hit yourself against the wheel. Always they get mad. One threw hands around, pointed to where he wanted to go and his arm crossed my face. I couldn't see to drive. Dangerous. Americans are much trouble.' The Bolshoi Theatre got me into a personal cold war. They make you remove your coat before entering. I was freezing. It was chilly outside and inside. Also, my nose was running. Me walking to my seat, he then trotted out from his booth. This Gardes Des Robes tugged at my lapel. I tried sign language. He did physical language. As I headed for my seat he physically barred my way. A shivering lady comrade who'd doffed her wrap explained: 'People here are used to authority. You obey automatically.' Another said, 'We are on a cultural level. The sold-out Kremlin opera seats 6,000, Tchaikovsky Hall has nightly musical concerts. Also the Central Puppet Theatre, Operetta Theatre, Children's Theatre and 27 other Moscow theatres, including the Bolshoi, which was founded in 1776. And for three rubles [less than a dollar], I can sit in the seat which once held the czar.' She comes here how often? Her answer: 'This the first time.' On the outside, pleasant. Inside, something else. Crumple a Kleenex in your luggage. It's crumpled differently upon your return. Hotel elevators delist two floors. Reportedly, it's where the hotel held the building's wire tap equipment. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Showers without curtains. Sinks minus stoppers. Room service that doesn't answer. I myself brought in a chicken sandwich and cup of hot chocolate. Two days later a chicken sandwich and candy bar were on my bed. The manageress: 'Our new hotel will have 6,000 rooms. Equipped with every modern facility.' Me: 'Will it have a swimming pool?' She: 'Certainly not. But it will have a concert hall.' 'Hotels have reasonable rates. Wish entertainment — you pay extra.' I asked if she vacations with her husband. 'No. I go separately. To the Crimeas. Sochi in the Black Sea where many of the presidium go.' I also asked famed Russian circus clown Popov if he gets a percentage of all the Popov dolls sold. Answer? 'Nyet.' Does his contract guarantee special dressing room and dresser in attendance? 'Nyet.' How then can you tell you're a star? 'I have a car.' In the words of Commie Slamdamnhe, there are many nice things about that country. Like parking places. Only problem? They got nothing to park. Only in Putinville, kids, only in Putinville.

Education Department quietly removes rules for teaching English learners
Education Department quietly removes rules for teaching English learners

Boston Globe

time26 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Education Department quietly removes rules for teaching English learners

Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Since March, the Education Department has also laid off nearly all workers in its Office of English Language Acquisition and has asked Congress to terminate funding for the federal program that helps pay for educating English-language learners. Last week, education advocates noticed that the guidance document related to English learning had a new label indicating it was rescinded and remains online 'for historical purposes only.' Advertisement On Tuesday, Education Department spokesperson Madi Biedermann said that the guidance for teaching English learners, which was originally set forth in 2015, was rescinded because it 'is not in line with administration policy.' Advertisement A Justice Department spokesperson responded to questions by sending a link to the July memorandum and said he had no comment when asked whether the guidance would be replaced. For decades, the federal government has held that failing to provide resources for people not proficient in English constitutes discrimination based on national origin under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. In rescinding the guidance, the Trump administration is signaling that it may stop enforcing the law under that long-standing interpretation. The Education and Justice departments have been responsible for enforcing the law. In the July memorandum, Attorney General Pam Bondi cited case law that says treating people, including students, who aren't proficient in English differently does not, on its face, amount to discrimination based on national origin. Other guidance related to language access for people using services across the federal government is also being suspended, according to the memo, and the Justice Department will create new guidance by mid-January to 'help agencies prioritize English while explaining precisely when and how multilingual assistance remains necessary.' The aim of the effort, Bondi said in a statement published alongside the memo, is to 'promote assimilation over division.' The consequences for school districts were not immediately clear, but advocates worry that rescinding the 2015 guidance could open the door for weaker instruction for English learners and upend decades of direction from the federal government to provide English-language services to students who need them. 'The Department of Education and the Department of Justice are walking away from 55 years of legal understanding and enforcement. I don't think we can understate how important that is,' said Michael Pillera, an attorney who worked at the Education Department's Office for Civil Rights for 10 years and now directs the Educational Opportunities Project at the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights. Advertisement Without pressure from the federal government to comply with the law, it is possible that some school districts will drop services, Pillera said, particularly as many districts struggle with financial pressures. 'It's going to ripple quickly,' he predicted. 'Schools were doing this because the Office for Civil Rights told them they had to.' Many districts will probably not change their services, but rescinding the guidance opens the door, said Leslie Villegas, an education policy analyst at New America, a think tank. Advocates may watch for changes in districts that previously had compliance problems or those that had open cases with the Office for Civil Rights related to English-language instruction, she noted. 'The rescission of this guidance may create the mentality that no one's watching,' Villegas said. In recent months, the Justice Department notified at least three school districts — in Boston; Newark; and Worcester, Massachusetts — that the government was releasing them from government monitoring that had been in place to ensure they offered services to English-language learners. 'Unfortunately, we're not at all surprised,' Anna Krieger, executive director of Massachusetts Advocates for Children, said of the Trump administration's latest move. 'It's a really devastating decision.'' In anticipation of such a shift, Krieger said in a phone interview Wednesday evening, state lawmakers recently took action to ensure ongoing protections for Massachusetts students who are learning English and those with disabilities. 'They will still have the same rights next year that they had in the last school year,' she said. Advertisement Supporters of immigration restrictions argued that relieving pressure on schools to provide these services might be helpful, especially given the costs to districts. 'If you devote all these resources to these kids coming in [to school] completely unprepared, inevitably it will diminish the quality of education others are getting,' said Ira Mehlman, spokesperson for the Federation for American Immigration Reform. Todd DuBois, communications director for U.S. English, a group that advocates for English as the official and common language, said some education is needed to help 'bridge the gap' for students who do not speak English, but the group is concerned that multilingualism 'gets in the way of teaching English literacy earlier in life.' Tonya Alanez of the Globe staff contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store