Why Filipinos should not fight over Duterte: A Good Friday reflection, a look at the bigger picture
Politics evolve: It's time for Filipinos to look forward, rather than fight over the past
Last updated:
In the often fiery world of Philippine politics, few names ignite as much passion and division as Rodrigo Duterte.
Loved by many, assailed by others, his six-year term as president (2016–2022) left a profound mark on the country.
On Good Friday, as we look at our collective lives this 2025 and beyond, as the political arena continues to evolve, it's time for Filipinos to look forward rather than fight over the past.
Here's why:
#1. The Constitution has spoken: 6-year term limit
The Philippine Constitution is clear: a president can only serve one six-year term. This provision was created to prevent the return of authoritarian rule and to ensure peaceful and democratic transitions of power.
Duterte stepped down in 2022 in accordance with this law. Whatever your opinion of his presidency, his time in office is constitutionally over — and that's how democracy works.
Prolonged political bickering over a past leader distracts from the pressing issues of today.
#2. Infrastructure got a serious upgrade
Under Duterte's 'Build, Build, Build' drive, the country witnessed a significant push in infrastructure. Hundreds of roads, bridges, airports, and seaports were built or modernized.
Projects like the Metro Manila Subway, Cebu-Cordova Link Expressway, airports, rail and the New Clark City were either completed or kicked into high gear.
This was a foundational boost that future administrations can — and should — build upon, rather than tearing each other down in political turf wars.
#3. Economic growth, GDP rise
Despite challenges like the pandemic, the Philippine economy under Duterte saw substantial growth, especially in the earlier years. The GDP grew by over 6% annually pre-COVID, and the country was on track to reach upper middle-income status. Recovery has since resumed post-pandemic.
Rather than dividing over political loyalties, Filipinos should focus on economic continuity and how to sustain this growth for the benefit of all.
#4. PPP rules improved for better investments
Under Duterte's watch, the administration updated and streamlined rules for Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) — a legacy of the Corazon Aquino Administration – a major win for both local development and foreign investment.
These changes have made it easier for private companies to collaborate with the government on infrastructure and services, from transport to digital networks. Instead of revisiting past rivalries, the national conversation should focus on how to maximize these tools for progress across regions.
#5. New laws with long-term impact
During Duterte's term, Congress passed numerous laws with long-lasting effects, such as:
The Universal Health Care Act
The Free College Tuition Law
The Ease of Doing Business Act
The Bangsamoro Organic Law
Public Service Act (amended Commonewealth Act No. 146)
EVIDA, Electric Vehicle Industry Development Act
These are not 'Duterte laws' or 'Dilawan laws' — they are Filipino laws designed to benefit current and future generations.
It's far more productive to evaluate and improve these laws than to fight over who gets credit.
#6. Focus on the present, and future
'Forget what lies behind, set your eyes on the prize.' The Philippines is a rich country, endowed resources (think nickel, gold, copper, hydropower, geothermal power, manganese, oil/gas). Freeflowing rivers and abundant marine resources.
Best of all: the country has a young population. Put those brains and muscles to productive work and you'll have an unbeatable generation. The energy spent defending or attacking a past president could be better used tackling today's challenges — like inflation, energy sustainability, education reform, climate change, and digital transformation.
Takeaways
Duterte had his chapter in Philippine history. He followed the constitutional rules, implemented major reforms, and handed the reins to the next administration.
Let history assess Duterte's legacy, but let Filipinos today decide what comes next. Unity doesn't mean forgetting the past — it means choosing not to be trapped by it.
We're all running the race to win: the real question isn't whether to praise or condemn Duterte — it's how to move forward as a nation, together.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
13 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Philippine Senate returns VP Sara Duterte's impeachment case to lower house
Philippine senators on Tuesday voted to return an impeachment case against Vice President Sara Duterte to the lower house to clarify its constitutionality, in a surprise move just hours after convening a trial that could end her political career. After heated debates among members that included efforts by a Duterte ally to dismiss the case, the senators agreed not to terminate the trial, but first send it back to the lower house to certify that its handling of the process had been lawful. The impeachment of the daughter of firebrand former President Rodrigo Duterte follows an acrimonious falling out last year with President Ferdinand Marcos Jr, with whom she ran on a joint ticket that won the 2022 election in a landslide. The Senate's late-night move could provide a lifebuoy for presidential contender Duterte in her make-or-break trial and impact the policy agenda and succession plans of former ally Marcos. . Marcos is limited to a single term in office and has created a powerful enemy in Duterte. He is expected to try to retain influence and protect his legacy by grooming a successor capable of fending off his rival in the next election should she be acquitted. "I think we have upheld our oath to be politically neutral," said Senator Alan Peter Cayetano, a Duterte loyalist who presented the motion to return the case to the House of Representatives. The lower house in February voted to impeach the vice president for high crimes and betrayal of the public trust, alleging budget irregularities, amassing of unusual wealth and a threat to the lives of Marcos, his wife, and the house speaker. She has denied all allegations. The unprecedented move by the Senate could add fuel to fierce public debate on what is already an emotionally charged issue in the Philippines, with the spectre of discord in the bicameral legislature and more legal action to try to dismiss the case against the popular Duterte. The trial will officially proceed, according to senators, who issued a summons to Duterte to respond to the charges, despite sending the case back to the lower house until a time when a Congress newly-formed after last month's midterm elections is "willing and ready" to pursue the impeachment complaint. Duterte will have 10 days to comply. A new Congress will convene at the end of July. Duterte's office late on Tuesday reiterated an earlier statement that said she was ready to "expose the baselessness of the accusations". "The impeachment process must never be weaponised to harass, silence, or eliminate political opponents," it said. Duterte is the fifth top official in the Philippines to be impeached, only one of whom, Renato Corona, a former Supreme Court chief justice, was convicted.
Khaleej Times
21 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
How will the impeachment trial of Philippine VP Sara Duterte be held?
Philippine Vice-President Sara Duterte, the popular daughter of the firebrand former leader Rodrigo Duterte, is facing a high-profile impeachment trial in the Senate that could determine her future in politics. WHAT IS DUTERTE CHARGED WITH? The impeachment complaint alleges Duterte is guilty of violating the constitution, graft and corruption, other high crimes, and betraying public trust. She is accused of misusing public funds while vice president and education minister, amassing unexplained wealth and threatening the lives of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr, the first lady and the lower house speaker. She denies all of the allegations. The impeachment, led by lower house allies of Marcos, followed a series of legislative enquiries into the finances of the vice-president's office, at a time when the relationship between Duterte and Marcos was rapidly deteriorating. Former ally Marcos has distanced himself from the impeachment and Duterte says the process has been weaponised and used as a political tool to sideline her. HOW WILL THE TRIAL BE CONDUCTED? The Senate will convene as an impeachment court, initially with 22 members as jurors and the speaker of the Senate presiding. The lower house has already appointed members to serve as prosecutors and Duterte has assembled a defence team to confront what she calls "baseless accusations". A new Senate is due to convene in July following May's midterm elections, with 12 new members joining to restore the chamber to its full complement of 24, meaning some of the jurors will change when the current Senate term expires. HOW MANY OFFICIALS HAVE BEEN IMPEACHED IN THE PHILIPPINES? Duterte is the fifth top official in the Philippines to be impeached, after former President Joseph Estrada, an ombudsman, former Supreme Court Chief Justice Renato Corona, and a former chairman of the election commission. Only Corona was convicted, with the former ombudsman and election commission chief resigning after they were impeached. Estrada's 2001 trial was aborted after some prosecutors walked out. WHAT IS REQUIRED TO CONVICT DUTERTE? A two-thirds majority vote in the Senate is needed to convict an impeached official. This means at least 16 out of 24 senators must vote in favour of conviction for it to pass. If convicted, Duterte would be removed from office and disqualified from holding any future government position, which would kill off any potential bid for the presidency. If a vice president is removed, the president will nominate a successor from among members of the Senate and House of Representatives and the nominee must be confirmed by a majority vote in both chambers, voting separately. WHAT IS THE LIKELY OUTCOME? The outcome of the trial is difficult to predict. While some senators have openly allied themselves with Marcos or Duterte, allegiances can easily shift in the Philippines depending on the political climate and public sentiment, with some hedging their bets ahead of elections in 2028. The introduction of 12 new senators next month is seen by analysts as a boon for Duterte, with her allies among the newcomers. The duration of an impeachment trial is not fixed and depends on a host of factors including the complexity of the case, number of witnesses and volume of evidence presented. For instance, the 2012 impeachment trial of the late Chief Justice Renato Corona lasted five months.
Dubai Eye
2 days ago
- Dubai Eye
Court delays South Korea President Lee's election law violation hearing
A Seoul court said on Monday it will indefinitely postpone a trial of President Lee Jae-myung on charges of violating election law in 2022. South Korea's Supreme Court ruled in May, before Lee was elected, that Lee had violated election law by publicly making "false statements" during his 2022 presidential bid, and sent the case back to an appeals court. The Seoul High Court, which had scheduled a hearing for the case on June 18, said on Monday that it will postpone the hearing "to be decided later" without a date, a court spokesperson confirmed. Lee's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The court said its decision to postpone the hearing was due to "Constitution Article 84", without elaborating. South Korea's Constitution, Article 84, says a sitting president is "not subject to criminal prosecution while in office" for most crimes. However, legal experts are divided on whether that applies to ongoing trials that were already prosecuted before a president was elected. The National Court Administration under the Supreme Court gave as its opinion that judges of each court where Lee's trials are being held will have to decide whether to stop or proceed, according to its statement to a lawmaker in May. "The court in charge of hearing the case will determine whether Article 84 of the Constitution should be applied to a criminal defendant who was elected in the presidential election," the statement said. Lee's ruling Democratic Party, which controls parliament, is planning to pass a bill this week which suspends ongoing trials for the incumbent president, local broadcaster KBS reported on Monday. The Constitutional Court may be asked to rule whether the bill is unconstitutional, legal experts have said.
