South Africa's budget 3. 0 predictions: tough choices lie ahead
Frank Blackmore, Lead Economist at KPMG South Africa, has highlighted a key takeaway: the anticipated increase in Value Added Tax (VAT) will no longer materialise, forcing the government to recalibrate its revenue expectations.
Image: GCIS
As South Africa braces for the upcoming budget 3.0, industry experts are closely examining the fiscal landscape, drawing attention to the critical decisions poised to impact the nation's economic future. Frank Blackmore, Lead Economist at KPMG South Africa, has highlighted a key takeaway: the anticipated increase in Value Added Tax (VAT) will no longer materialise, forcing the government to recalibrate its revenue expectations.
Previously outlined in budget 2.0, the revenue anticipated from a VAT hike has now vanished. This development poses significant implications for the government's fiscal targets, particularly its commitment to achieving fiscal consolidation. Without the ability to increase public debt through borrowing to meet expenditure needs, the government finds itself cornered, necessitating cuts across various sectors.
The pressing question, as noted by Blackmore, is: 'Where will these expenditure cuts occur?'
With growth remaining a paramount objective for the budget—central to enhancing employment rates and boosting GDP—the government must tread cautiously. The infrastructure spending, fundamental to fostering long-term economic growth, cannot be sacrificed. Likewise, with a strong focus on the social wage, cuts to public services and grants are also off the table. This leaves limited avenues for budget slashing, underlining the complexity of the government's predicament.
'As we look forward, there are numerous opinions regarding potential cuts,' Blackmore stated. 'We anticipate scrutiny around the size and costs of the state, provoking essential debates on where reductions should take place.'
In the interim, the potential for policy adjustments remains in play. The proposals unveiled in budget 2.0 aimed at mitigating the impact of the now-derailed VAT hike, especially for lower-income households, are still on the table. This included considerations for tax adjustments on fuel, increases in zero-rated items, and only partial adjustments to personal income tax brackets.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
However, without the VAT increase, it's uncertain whether these provisions will proceed as planned. Blackmore predicts a rise in fuel prices and potential reductions in zero-rated items, as well as little to no change in tax brackets. This scenario presents a subtle yet impactful pathway for the government to bolster personal income tax revenues, thereby compensating for revenue shortfalls stemming from expenditure cuts.
As the nation awaits the unveiling of budget 3.0, the discussions surrounding these predictions highlight the intricate balance of maintaining economic growth while adhering to fiscal discipline. With various stakeholders eagerly watching, the pressure mounts on the government to deliver a budget that meets both its financial commitments and its societal responsibilities.
Frank Blackmore, Lead Economist at KPMG.
Image: Supplied.
BUSINESS REPORT
Visit: www.businessreport.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Political events happening in June expected to affect South African SMEs
'The fuel levy increases will compound existing cost pressures for SMEs, particularly those in logistics, manufacturing, and retail sectors that rely heavily on transportation.' June will provide some relief for Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) following the South African Reserve Bank's (SARB) Monetary Policy Committee's (MPC) decision to cut interest rates by 25 basis points. Another relief is that inflation is largely stable, and the exchange rate is trending favourably, giving the MPC some room for monetary easing. The economy needs every bit of help it can get, and this cut will no doubt be reflected in business confidence. Miguel da Silva, group executive for business banking at TymeBank noted how upcoming events will impact South Africa's position in a rapidly evolving global landscape and the effect of this reconfiguration on SMEs. ALSO READ: Reserve Bank cuts repo rate thanks to lower inflation, stronger rand Budget treads tricky course without cutting expenditure 'The national budget outlined a programme of continued expenditure propped up by less contentious funding mechanisms than previously tabled,' said Da Silva. After much debate, the Value Added Tax (VAT) rate will remain at 15%, providing certainty for SME pricing and cash flow planning following the proposed increase's withdrawal. To make up the shortfall, the general fuel levy has increased by 16 cents per litre for petrol and by 15 cents per litre for diesel. 'The fuel levy increases will compound existing cost pressures for SMEs, particularly those in logistics, manufacturing, and retail sectors that rely heavily on transportation.' With many small businesses already operating on razor-thin margins, this 16-cent increase represents an additional burden that will likely be passed on to consumers, potentially dampening demand in an already constrained market. ALSO READ: GDP grew marginally in first quarter – agriculture helped keep economy afloat First quarter GDP figures 'The Minister also revised his predictions for our economic growth to 1.4% in 2025, down from 1.9%. With the official unemployment rate now at 32.9%, the disconnect between our economic ambitions and the harsh reality that only 16.8 million South Africans are in active employment highlights the urgent need for policy innovation,' he added. Da Silva said what seems clear is that under these constrained market conditions, there is no way for established businesses to incorporate the millions of South Africans seeking employment. There is far greater potential for entrepreneurs to create new jobs, and a focus on small business support and development must be prioritised. 'SME funding will remain an important area of discussion and entrepreneurs; funders and public-sector representatives will meet to discuss the state of small business funding in South Africa at the SME SA Funding Summit 2025 on 12 June – but even more important is the creation of an environment which is conducive to entrepreneurship: less red tape and dependable infrastructure.' ALSO READ: Tariffs and Agoa: How Parks Tau summarised US-SA trade talks Agoa forum in DRC The relationship between SA and the US remains fraught, but at least there is dialogue. 'Apart from the Presidential meeting in the Oval Office, trade, industry and competition minister Parks Tau and agriculture minister John Steenhuisen have submitted a new trade framework to US trade representative Jamieson Greer. 'There are key areas where US investment might help us unlock value at home, and which might appeal to the deal-centric nature of the US administration. Developing a domestic source of natural gas would bolster SA's regional competitiveness and energy security, and we remain a key source of scarce minerals,' he added. The annual conference on the African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa) between trade ministers of Agoa-eligible countries and the US is scheduled to take place in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) in June. This will be an important indicator of what the US will do when Agoa expires in September 2025, though it seems unlikely at this stage that SA's Agoa benefits will be extended. While the overall impact of losing Agoa would not be immense for SA, some sectors – particularly the automotive and agricultural sectors – would be significantly affected. Both sectors have extensive value chains, and SME suppliers are rapidly adjusting their operations. 'The potential loss of Agoa benefits creates particular uncertainty for SME suppliers in the automotive value chain, many of whom have built their business models around preferential access to US markets. 'These companies now face the complex challenge of either finding alternative markets or restructuring their operations to remain competitive under standard trade terms.' ALSO READ: Analysts say Trump's bid to weaken Brics will fail as US influence declines Brics summit in Brazil Da Silva added that the Brics Summit, scheduled to take place in Brazil in early July, will again put SA in the US crosshairs, as provocative issues (such as an alternative to the dollar as the world's reserve currency) will be raised and debated by Brics countries. 'The timing could not be more delicate. For SMEs, particularly those in export-oriented sectors, this diplomatic tightrope walk translates into very real business planning challenges. 'Where do allegiances lie in a rapidly shifting global order? This geopolitical balancing act requires SMEs to develop strategies that can withstand diplomatic volatility while capitalising on emerging opportunities within both Western and Brics markets.' NOW READ: Political uncertainties that will impact SMEs in the coming months
IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
Who does and who doesn't meet the 'Afrikaner' criteria for Trump's resettlement offer?
The South African delegation led by President Cyril Ramaphosa with the US delegation and President Donald Trump at the White House. Image: GCIS With the second batch of white Afrikaners having quietly arrived in the United States last week, as part of President Donald Trump's offer to resettle them amidst false claims of white genocide and persecution in South Africa, a discussion has been raised around who exactly can meet the criteria. The second batch is part of a larger group that applied to be resettled within the US, according to the Head of Public Relations for trade union Solidarity, Jaco Kleynhans. Kleynhans further shared that there have been 70,000 enquiries and so far there have been about 8,000 formal applications. 'How many people will be resettled will be determined by many factors – how many people apply in future, (and) how many applications are successful?' Explaining their role in the process, Kleynhans said: 'We are not involved at all. We only help people with enquiries and refer them to the right people at the embassy.' A US Mission to South Africa spokesperson said: 'The U.S. Embassy in Pretoria continues to review inquiries from individuals who have expressed interest to the Embassy in resettling to the United States and is reaching out to eligible individuals for refugee interviews and processing.' 'Refugees continue to arrive in the United States from South Africa on commercial flights as part of the Afrikaner resettlement program's ongoing operations.' In their records, the spokesperson said they have received almost 50,000 inquiries regarding refugee resettlement to the United States from South Africa. Afrikaners waiting to be briefed by US government officials in a hangar at Dulles International Airport, Washington on May 12, 2025. Image: AFP According to the criteria, to be eligible for US resettlement consideration (USRAP), individuals must meet all of the following criteria: Must be of South African nationality; and Must be of Afrikaner ethnicity or be a member of a racial minority in South Africa; and Must be able to articulate a past experience of persecution or fear of future persecution. In his IOL opinion piece this week, Clyde N.S. Ramalaine argued that the criteria used, has opened an unexpected opportunity to examine how it could inadvertently apply to other historically marginalised South African groups, 'particularly the KhoeSan and Coloured communities'. 'The original purpose of the USRAP criteria appears to have been the protection of white South Africans fearing political and land displacement. However, its language is broad enough to permit reinterpretation. 'A literal application of its three criteria—nationality, minority status, and persecution—clearly allows for KhoeSan and Coloured inclusion,' Ramalaine said. Pan South African Language Board (PanSALB) CEO, Lance Schultz, explained that the word "Afrikaner" derives from the Dutch word Afrikaan, meaning "African," combined with the suffix -er, which denotes a person associated with a place or characteristic. 'Thus, 'Afrikaner' literally means 'one from Africa' or 'African' in Dutch.' Schultz explained that initially, "Afrikaner" was a broad term that could apply to anyone born in Africa, including people of mixed descent or even enslaved individuals, but over time, it became more narrowly associated with the white, Dutch-speaking settler population who developed a distinct cultural and linguistic identity separate from their European origins. 'Many views or schools of thought may exist regarding the historical origin of the word 'Afrikaner'; two of these can be explored. Firstly, the term 'Afrikaner' is regarded as having its roots in the Dutch colonial history of South Africa, and it refers to white Afrikaans-speaking persons. 'The term was initially used to describe people of European descent, primarily Dutch, who settled in southern Africa and identified with the continent as their home. This reflects the complex interplay of language, culture, and identity in the region,' Schultz said. He explained that the term "Afrikaner" has undergone significant changes in meaning, usage, and connotation since its emergence in the 17th century, reflecting shifts in historical, social, and political contexts in South Africa. 'After the end of apartheid in 1994, the term 'Afrikaner' became more contested. It remains primarily associated with white, Afrikaans-speaking South Africans, but is increasingly debated in terms of inclusivity. Some advocate for a broader definition that includes all Afrikaans speakers, regardless of race, such as Coloured and Black Afrikaans-speaking communities,' Schultz said. 'The legacy of apartheid has made 'Afrikaner' a polarising term for some, associated with historical oppression, while others view it as a cultural or linguistic identity divorced from political connotations. In modern South Africa, Afrikaner identity is diverse, with some embracing globalised or progressive values and others holding onto conservative or nationalist sentiments.' Head of Public Relations for trade union Solidarity, Jaco Kleynhans said that there have been 70,000 enquiries about US President Donald Trump's resettlement offer and so far there have been about 8,000 formal applications. Image: Graphic He explained that the categorising of who does and doesn't count as part of a specific ethnic group, such as "Afrikaner" in the context of Trump's 2025 executive order, involves navigating complex linguistic, cultural, and political terrain. 'This policy has spotlighted the term 'Afrikaner' and raised questions about its definition, revealing language pitfalls that can lead to exclusion, misrepresentation, or manipulation of ethnic identity.' He added that ethnic categories like "Afrikaner" often blend linguistic, cultural, ancestral, and racial elements, but vague or inconsistent definitions can lead to misinterpretation or exclusion. 'The executive order appears to define 'Afrikaner' narrowly as white, Afrikaans-speaking South Africans, aligning with historical apartheid-era usage that excluded non-white Afrikaans speakers, such as the Coloured community, who form a significant portion of Afrikaans speakers. This exclusionary framing ignores the linguistic diversity of Afrikaans speakers and reinforces a racialised interpretation of the term.' Director at the Centre for Education Rights and Transformation from the University of Johannesburg, Professor June Bam-Hutchison, added that the Trump administration is instrumentalising an apartheid white racist notion of 'Afrikaner' as 'embedded within Afrikaner nationalism which mutated into the ethnic foundations of the 'chosen people' (white Afrikaners)'. 'Of course, indigenous people and Africans have never been at the heart of Trump's interests. Since 1994, we have embraced a South African inclusivity, rejecting 'Colouredism' as it has a nasty Apartheid history of imposed dislocation from Africa. 'It would be foolish to believe that Trump's presidency, in this gesture from its embassy, includes indigenous people from anywhere in the world, although opportunistic ethnic nationalists would want to claim refugee status to further Apartheid ideals of divide and rule. Such claims are questionable within this context,' Bam-Hutchison said. Bam-Hutchison said Trump's actions are about entrenching global white supremacy, and the strategic positioning politically and economically on the continent. 'Should 'Coloureds' claim refugee status on the grounds stated, it would be merely opportunistic in a country which brutally dispossessed the Native American people and in which the Black Lives Matter movement has major unsettled business with the Trump administration. 'Definitely, a highly suspicious gesture peppered with significant and glaring contradictions for the world to see at a time of live genocide in Gaza,' Bam-Hutchison said. When asked if even people from the Cape Flats, who see themselves as 'Afrikaners', could also apply, Kleynhans said, 'Yes'. 'The entire process has been discredited by many in the mainstream media, as well as in the South African government. We find this despicable. The US government has the right to offer refugee status to anyone they wish. 'Furthermore, many Afrikaners experience serious discrimination and persecution. Many Afrikaners feel completely alienated from the country they love so much. This is a tragedy. Furthermore, our main focus as Solidarity has always been and is to ensure that Afrikaners can remain in South Africa,' Kleynhans said. 'We do not want Afrikaners to feel that they have lost all hope for a future in South Africa. We will therefore continue to fight for a future for Afrikaners in South Africa.' Head of Public Relations for trade union Solidarity, Jaco Kleynhans said that there have been 70,000 enquiries, so far there have been about 8,000 formal applications. Image: Graphic
IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
Sars launches Project AmaBillions: expect a surge in VAT audits
Discover how Sars' new initiative, Project AmaBillions, is set to increase VAT audits significantly, impacting businesses across South Africa. Learn what steps you can take to ensure compliance and avoid penalties Image: Ziphozonke Lushaba / Independent Newspapers According to recent media reports, Sars has launched a new initiative — Project AmaBillions — as part of its broader strategy to boost revenue collection by an additional R70 billion over the next three years. To support this objective, Sars has reportedly already recruited 500 new staff members, with an additional 1,000 to 1,500 appointments anticipated. While this expanded capacity will enhance Sars' ability to collect, across multiple tax types, Value-Added Tax (VAT) remains an easy target, with a notable increase in VAT-related audits, verifications, and additional assessments already being observed. In this evolving compliance landscape, businesses, particularly those operating in complex or high-risk sectors, are encouraged to revisit their VAT positions and ensure that both legal interpretation and supporting documentation are up to standard. VAT as an Easy Win for Sars The government's recent proposal to raise the VAT rate met significant public resistance and was ultimately shelved. However, the fiscal demands that prompted the proposal remain unchanged. In the absence of a rate increase, an easy target is the enhanced enforcement of existing VAT obligations as a more immediate mechanism to protect the tax base. Given the transactional nature and extensive reach of VAT, it remains one of the most active areas of Sars enforcement, and from a tax collection standpoint, is second only to Personal Income Tax, per Sars' Revenue Announcement for the 2024/25 Financial Year: Except from the 2024/25 Revenue Announcement presentation: Recent trends confirm an increase in audit activity, particularly where VAT positions rely on complex interpretation or are not fully substantiated by documentation. Certain areas are particularly at risk: Input tax deductions , where Sars may challenge the deductibility based on the nature of the underlying expense, its link to taxable supplies, or the quality of supporting invoices; Zero-rated supplies , especially exports, where documentary proof and timing requirements are closely examined; and Apportionment calculations , in cases where businesses make both taxable and exempt supplies, and Sars queries the method used to determine the deductible portion of input VAT. In addition to heightened audit activity, input tax deductions have become increasingly the subject of legal proceedings, with courts being asked to assess whether deductions meet the requirements of the VAT Act. Often, the success or failure of a claim rests both on the commercial reality of the transaction and on whether the taxpayer can demonstrate compliance with the relevant documentary and legal criteria. Discharging the burden of proof As a self-assessment system, VAT places the burden of proof squarely on the taxpayer. Sars does not need to prove a taxpayer is incorrect; rather, it is the taxpayer who must prove that the tax position adopted is correct. Documentary shortcomings that can result in adverse audit findings may include: Incomplete or non-compliant tax invoices; Missing or outdated export documentation; Contracts or agreements that do not support the VAT treatment applied; and A lack of internal policies governing apportionment or exempt supply treatment. Even businesses with reputable systems or historic Sars engagements should not assume automatic compliance. Audit readiness requires continuous alignment with Sars' current expectations and the evolving interpretation of the VAT Act. High-risk for high reward: which businesses are most scrutinised? While all VAT-registered vendors are subject to review, recent enforcement trends suggest that the following types of businesses may be more susceptible to VAT scrutiny, especially in light of the looming 'Project AmaBillions': Exporters of goods and services , particularly where zero-rating is applied; Foreign suppliers of electronic or remote services to South African recipients; Property developers and investors , due to the complexity of VAT on construction, disposals, and mixed-use properties; and Enterprises with substantial input tax deductions or recurring VAT refunds . In these cases, a proactive review of VAT compliance and risk report may assist in identifying and addressing potential exposure, before they are raised by Sars. A Coordinated Tax Debt Collection Strategy 'Project AmaBillions' is more than a revenue slogan — it reflects a deliberate shift by Sars toward coordinated and data-driven enforcement, leading to increased tax revenue collections. This includes the use of Artificial Intelligence tools, targeted audit selection based on risk modelling, and specialised teams focused on high-yield areas such as VAT, High-Net-Worth taxpayers, and Cryptocurrency. With the recruitment of up to 1,500 additional staff, Sars is positioned to expand its enforcement reach significantly over the coming months. Proactive compliance is key While increased audit activity may place pressure on internal finance and tax teams, early intervention and strategic review can help businesses avoid prolonged disputes or unintended liabilities. A targeted VAT review can assist in confirming that: Zero-rated supplies are supported by adequate and compliant documentation; Input tax deductions meet all legal and documentary requirements; Invoicing and contractual frameworks comply with SARS standards; and Internal VAT procedures, including apportionment and record-keeping, are robus t. Early action prevents future exposure Where there is uncertainty around VAT treatment, and businesses find themselves in a potentially precarious position of now facing Sars scrutiny, the best practice is to seek the assistance of a tax professional, ensuring the best compliance strategy is followed. Early assessment can help prevent future challenges, reduce the risk of penalties and interest, and ensure Sars readiness in an increasingly vigilant digitized environment.
